Arterial Thromboembolism in Japanese Patients With Cancer: Incidence, Predictors, and Survival Impact.

Background: Thromboembolism is a significant complication for patients with cancer, leading to treatment interruptions and poor outcomes. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of arterial thromboembolism (ATE) within cancer populations, identify the predictors of ATE, and determine its survival impact. Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was performed using data from the Osaka Cancer Registry linked with administrative data from 2010 to 2015. Patients were monitored for 5 years after cancer diagnosis, and ATE incidence was calculated with death as a competing risk. Fine and Gray competing risk regression models and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the predictors of ATE and the survival impact. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) was used to assess whether antithrombotic therapy after ATE contributed to improved survival. Results: The cohort comprised 97,448 patients with cancer (42.3% women, median age 70 years). ATE incidence displayed an annual increase, peaking 1 year after cancer diagnosis (1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year cumulative incidences were 1.29%, 1.77%, 2.05%, 2.22%, and 2.32%, respectively). Male sex, advanced age, advanced cancer stage, and hematologic malignancies correlated with a high risk for ATE. Patients with ATE had a 2-fold increased risk for mortality compared with those without ATE. The 90-day and 1-year RMST differences for those on antithrombotic therapy were 13.3 days (95% CI: 10.4-16.2 days; P < 0.001) and 57.8 days (95% CI: 43.1-72.5 days; P < 0.001), favoring the antithrombotic therapy group. The RMST differences varied by cancer stage. Conclusions: The risk for ATE varies according to sex, age, and cancer progression and type. Antithrombotic therapy after ATE is associated with improved survival among patients with cancer.

Trends in incidence and hormonal management of endometrial cancer during potentially reproductive age in Japan: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the trends in the incidence and treatment of endometrial cancer (EC) during potentially reproductive age in Japan, with a special focus on the relative oncologic safety of hormonal therapy (HT) over surgery. METHODS: This population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Osaka Cancer Registry from 2004 to 2018. Women with EC were first identified and then distributions of age, stage, histology, and initial treatment were examined. Then, the relative oncologic safety of HT over surgery in patients under the age of 50 years was evaluated. RESULTS: Among the 9417 patients with EC, 1937 were diagnosed during their potentially reproductive age (< 50 years). The incidence of EC during potentially reproductive age has increased from 18.5% in 2004-2011 to 21.9% in 2012-2018. ECs during potentially reproductive age more frequently displayed favorable characteristics, such as endometrioid histology, and lower histological grade than those in non-potentially reproductive age. Among the 1223 patients diagnosed with localized endometrioid EC, 74 cases (6.0%) received HT as an initial treatment, while 1100 cases (90.0%) underwent surgery as their initial treatment. When the two treatment groups were compared, there was no significant difference in overall survival (p = 0.3713). The estimated 5-year survival rates were 100 and 98.8% in the HT and surgery groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: EC is increasingly diagnosed during potentially reproductive age in Japan. The use of HT as an initial treatment is increasing, and achieved comparable survival outcomes to urgery against localized endometrioid EC during the potentially reproductive age.

Prevalence of survivors of childhood cancer based on a population-based cancer registry in Osaka, Japan.

Although the survival rate of patients with childhood cancer has greatly improved, long-term survivors face specific problems such as the late effects of cancer treatment. In this study, we estimated the number of people who had experienced childhood cancer to predict their needs for medical care and social resources. Using data from the population-based Osaka Cancer Registry, we identified children aged 0-14 years who were diagnosed with cancer between 1975 and 2019. We estimated the prevalence on December 31, 2019, and the 5- and 10-year prevalence (i.e., the number of survivors living up to 5 or 10 years after the diagnosis of cancer) over time. The prevalence proportion was age-standardized using a direct standardization method. The prevalence estimates for Osaka were applied to the national population to determine the national prevalence in Japan. Among 8186 patients diagnosed with childhood cancer in Osaka, 5252 (987 per million) survived until December 31, 2019. The 5-year prevalence per million increased from 194 in 1979 to 417 in 2019 (+116%), while the 10-year prevalence increased from 391 in 1984 to 715 in 2019 (+83%). Based on the long-term registry data, an estimated 73,182 childhood cancer survivors were living in Japan by the end of 2019. The increasing 5-year and 10-year prevalence proportions indicate the continued need for cancer survivorship support for children, adolescents, and young adults. These estimates of the prevalence of childhood cancer survivors, including long-term survivors, may be useful for policymakers and clinicians to plan and evaluate survivorship care.

Suicide risk among patients with cancer by sex in Japan: A population-based study.

BACKGROUND: In Japan, few studies have examined suicide risk for five-year relative survival rates for cancer sites. Since five-year relative survival rates differ by sex, we aim to examine suicide risk for patients with cancer separately for men and women. METHODS: We estimated the risk of suicide among patients with cancer by sex in Japan compared to the general population, using standardized mortality ratios (SMRs). Patients with cancer diagnosed between January 1, 1985-December 31, 2013 and registered in the Osaka Cancer Registry were followed-up with for up to 10 years. The outcome was suicide death. In addition, cancer sites were classified into three prognosis groups based on five-year relative survival rates: good (> 70%), moderate (40-70%), poor (< 40%). RESULTS: Among 623 995 patients with cancer observed for 2 349 432 person-years, 1210 patients died by suicide (867 men and 343 women). The SMRs were almost equal for men (1.66, 95% CI, 1.55-1.77) and women (1.65, 95% CI, 1.48-1.83). SMRs for cancer prognosis groups were 1.01 (95% CI, 0.84-1.22) for men and 1.47 (95% CI, 1.24-1.73) for women in the good group, 1.53 (95% CI, 1.39-1.68) for men and 1.74 (95% CI, 1.47-2.05) for women in the moderate group, and 2.54 (95% CI, 2.27-2.85) for men and 1.87 (95% CI, 1.43-2.46) for women in the poor group. CONCLUSIONS: In this population, both sexes had higher suicide risk with poor prognosis, but the difference in SMRs between the good and poor groups was smaller for women than men.

Alcohol consumption and 10-year mortality in oral and pharyngeal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies on the association of alcohol drinking with the prognosis of patients with oral and pharyngeal cancer are scarce and conflicting. Most previous studies are surveys from Europe, and examined up to 5 years of overall survival. We therefore evaluated the association between alcohol consumption and 10-year mortality among oral and pharyngeal cancer patients in Japan. METHODS: 2626 eligible cancer patients diagnosed between 1975 and 2010, identified through a hospital-based cancer registry in Japan, were followed up for up to 10 years. Alcohol consumption was used to divide subjects into five categories: non-drinker, ex-drinker, light (≤23 g/day of ethanol), moderate (23 < and ≤ 46 g/day of ethanol), and heavy drinker (> 46 g/day of ethanol), respectively. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was conducted to evaluate the association of alcohol consumption with 10-year all-cause mortality adjusting for sex, age, primary site, cancer stage, number of multiple cancers, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, smoking status and diagnosis year. RESULTS: Ex-drinker and heavy drinker cases had a significantly higher risk of death than non-drinkers (ex-drinker; HR=1.59; 95% CI,1.28-1.96, heavy drinker; HR=1.36; 95% CI,1.14-1.62). Heavy drinkers had a significantly higher risk of death than non-drinkers in both men and women (men; HR=1.35; 95% CI,1.10-1.65, women; HR=2.52; 95% CI,1.41-4.49). CONCLUSIONS: Among oral and pharyngeal cancer patients, an elevated risk of death was observed for heavy drinkers who consumed more than 46 g/day of ethanol compared with non-drinkers. In addition, this relationship was observed in both men and women.

Prognostic impact of coexisting cardiovascular disease in patients with cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Background: The incidence of malignancy and cardiovascular disease (CVD) is increasing worldwide. However, it is not entirely clear how the coexistence of CVD at the time of cancer diagnosis affects the overall survival of patients with cancer. Methods and results: We used the cancer registries and administrative claims data of patients diagnosed with cancer at 36 designated cancer care hospitals in Osaka, Japan, from 2010 to 2015. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to examine how coexisting CVD (heart failure [HF], ischemic heart disease, peripheral arterial disease, cerebrovascular accidents, and atrial fibrillation) affected overall survival and the impact of HF severity, as documented by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification. Of the 131,701 patients with cancer, 9704 had coexisting CVD. The 3-year survival rates for patients with and without coexisting CVD were 62.9 % and 77.6 %, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for all-cause mortality for coexisting CVD was 1.47 (95 % confidence interval, 1.41-1.52). Among the CVD subtype, patients with coexisting HF had the poorest prognosis. The aHRs in patients with HF by NYHA classification, using the patients without HF as a reference, were as follows: Class I: 1.33 (p = 0.217); II: 1.68 (p < 0.001); III: 1.54 (p = 0.011); IV: 2.47 (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Coexisting CVD and HF severity at cancer diagnosis is associated with survival in patients with cancer.

Faster surgery initiation in oral cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic in Osaka, Japan.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oral cancer (OC), comparing diagnosis and number of pre-operative days in the diagnosis of OC in 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and that in 2020 (during the COVID-19 pandemic). METHODS: Using data from a cancer registry-based study on the impact of COVID-19 on cancer care in Osaka (CanReCO), we collected details of sex, age, residential area, cancer site, date of diagnosis, clinical stage at first treatment and number of pre-operative days in OC patients. RESULTS: A total of 1470 OC cases were registered. Incidence of OC before and during COVID-19 was 814 and 656 cases, respectively. During the first wave of the pandemic (March to May 2020), incidence was about half that in the same period in 2019 (2019; n = 271, 2020; n = 145). Number of pre-operative days (median number of days between the first hospital visit and surgery date) was significantly shorter during the COVID-19 year (24.5 days) than in the pre-COVID-19 year (28 days, p = 0.0015). CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of OC during the COVID-19 pandemic was lower than in pre-COVID-19. Despite disruption in the healthcare system, the number of pre-operative days for OC cases was shorter during the pandemic.

Endoscopic Removal of Premalignant Lesions Reduces Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Risk: Results From the Japan Polyp Study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: To date, no regional evidence of long-term colorectal cancer (CRC) risk reduction after endoscopic premalignant lesion removal has been established. We aimed to analyze this over a long-term follow-up evaluation. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of participants from the Japan Polyp Study conducted at 11 Japanese institutions. Participants underwent scheduled follow-up colonoscopies after a 2-round baseline colonoscopy process. The primary outcome was CRC incidence after randomization. The observed/expected ratio of CRC was calculated using data from the population-based Osaka Cancer Registry. Secondary outcomes were the incidence and characteristics of advanced neoplasia (AN). RESULTS: A total of 1895 participants were analyzed. The mean number of follow-up colonoscopies and the median follow-up period were 2.8 years (range, 1-15 y) and 6.1 years (range, 0.8-11.9 y; 11,559.5 person-years), respectively. Overall, 4 patients (all males) developed CRCs during the study period. The observed/expected ratios for CRC in all participants, males, and females, were as follows: 0.14 (86% reduction), 0.18, and 0, respectively, and 77 ANs were detected in 71 patients (6.1 per 1000 person-years). Of the 77 ANs detected, 31 lesions (40.3%) were laterally spreading tumors, nongranular type. Nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms (NP-CRNs), including flat (<10 mm), depressed, and laterally spreading, accounted for 59.7% of all detected ANs. Furthermore, 2 of the 4 CRCs corresponded to T1 NP-CRNs. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic removal of premalignant lesions, including NP-CRNs, effectively reduced CRC risk. More than half of metachronous ANs removed by surveillance colonoscopy were NP-CRNs. The Japan Polyp Study: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry, C000000058; cohort study: UMIN000040731.

Validation of claims-based algorithms for rheumatoid arthritis in Japan: Results from the VALIDATE-J study.

AIM: Validity of Algorithms in Large Databases: Infectious Diseases, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Tumor Evaluation in Japan (VALIDATE-J) study examined algorithms for identifying rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Japanese claims data. METHODS: VALIDATE-J was a multicenter, cross-sectional retrospective study. Disease-identifying algorithms were used to detect RA diagnosed between January 2012 and December 2016 using claims data from two Japanese hospitals. An RA diagnosis was confirmed using one of four gold standard definitions. Positive predictive values (PPVs) were calculated for prevalent (regardless of baseline RA-free period) and incident (preceded by a 12-month RA-free period) cases. RESULTS: Of patients identified using claims-based algorithms, a random sample of 389 prevalent and 134 incident cases of RA were included. Cases identified by an RA diagnosis, no diagnosis of psoriasis, and treatment with any disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) resulted in the highest PPVs versus other claims-based treatment categories (29.0%-88.3% [prevalent] and 41.0%-78.2% [incident]); cases identified by an RA diagnosis, no diagnosis of psoriasis, and glucocorticoid-only treatment had the lowest PPVs. Across claims-based algorithms, PPVs were highest when a physician diagnosis or decision by adjudicators (confirmed and probable cases) was used as the gold standard and were lowest when American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology 2010 criteria were applied. PPVs of claims-based algorithms for RA in patients aged ≥66 years were slightly higher versus a USA Medicare population (maximum PPVs of 95.0% and 88.9%, respectively). CONCLUSION: VALIDATE-J demonstrated high PPVs for most claims-based algorithms for diagnosis of prevalent and incident RA using Japanese claims data. These findings will help inform appropriate RA definitions for future claims database research in Japan.

Risk of Parkinson's disease-related death in cancer survivors: A population-based study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The risk of Parkinson's disease (PD)-related death in patients with cancer largely unexplored. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Neoplasms ANd other causes of DEath (NANDE) study, which investigates the causes of death in patients with cancer in Japan. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated to compare the risk of PD-related deaths in patients with cancer to that of the general population. Poisson regression models were employed to estimate the relative risk of PD-related death in the subgroups. RESULTS: The cohort included 548,485 patients with cancer, yielding 2,047,398 person-years at risk from 1995 to 2013. During the study period, 242,250 patients died and 145 deaths were attributable to PD. The SMR for PD-related death was 2.34 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.99-2.75). Patients who were diagnosed with cancer before 70 years of age had a high SMR (>5) for PD-related deaths. The SMR of patients with mouth-to-stomach cancers (lip, oral cavity, pharynx, esophagus, and stomach cancers) was 3.72 (95% CI: 2.84-4.86), while that of those with other cancers was 1.93 (95% CI: 1.57-2.37). The multivariate Poisson regression model revealed that patients with mouth-to-stomach cancers were more likely to die of PD than those without (relative risk 2.07, 95 % CI; 1.46-2.93). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cancer are at a high risk of PD-related death; particularly, mouth-to-stomach cancers and potentially obstructing medication for PD are attributable to a high mortality risk. Careful management, including adequate PD treatment, would benefit cancer survivors with PD and reduce the risk of PD-related death.

Twenty-five-year mortality trends of four major histological subtypes of cervical cancer: a population-based study using the Osaka cancer registry data.

Objective: To assess the mortality trends of four major histological subtypes of cervical cancer diagnosed between 1994 and 2018. Methods: This population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Osaka Cancer Registry data from 1994 to 2018. A total of 12,003 patients with cervical cancer, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), adenocarcinoma (A), adenosquamous cell carcinoma (AS), or small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNEC) were identified. Patients were classified into groups according to the extent of disease (localized, regional, or distant), year of diagnosis (1994-2002, 2003-2010, or 2011-2018), and histological subtype (SCC, A/AS, or SCNEC). Then, their survival rates were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Overall, improved survival rates were observed according to the year of diagnosis in patients with local, regional, and distant cervical cancers. When examined according to the histological subtypes, improved survival rates according to the year of diagnosis were observed in patients with local, regional, and distant SCCs and in those with local and regional A/AS. In patients with distant A/AS, the survival rates did not improve since 2003. In patients with cervical cancer with SCNEC, the survival rates did not improve since 1994 irrespective of the extent of the disease. In the multivariate analysis, non-SCC histology was found to be an independent prognostic factor for OS. Conclusion: In contrast to SCC histology associated with improved survival between 1994 and 2018, SCNEC histology and advanced (stage IVB) A/AS remain to be the unmet medical needs for the management of cervical cancer.

Heart Disease Mortality in Cancer Survivors: A Population-Based Study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Data on the risk of cardiovascular-related mortality in patients with cancer are limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Osaka Cancer Registry and vital statistics in Japan between 1985 and 2013. The causes of death were investigated, and the risk of fatal heart disease was analyzed. Standardized mortality ratios were calculated to compare the risk of fatal heart disease between patients with cancer and the general population. Fine and Gray competing risk regression models were used to assess the risk of fatal heart disease among patients with cancer. In total, 682 886 patients with cancer were included in the analysis, and 335 635 patients died during the study period. Heart disease was the leading cause of noncancer deaths, with 10 686 deaths. Among the patients who died of heart disease, 5017 had ischemic heart disease, 3598 had heart failure, 356 had hypertensive disease, and 1715 had other heart diseases. The standardized mortality ratio for heart disease was 2.80 (95% CI, 2.74-2.85). The standardized mortality ratio for ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and hypertensive disease were 3.26 (95% CI, 3.17-3.35), 2.69 (95% CI, 2.60-2.78), and 5.97 (95% CI, 5.38-6.63), respectively. The risk of fatal heart disease increased over time after cancer diagnosis. Men were more likely to die of heart disease than women (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.02-1.16]). The risk of fatal heart disease among cancer survivors has decreased in recent years. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer survivors have a higher risk of fatal heart disease than the general population.

Population-Based Survival Analysis of Stage IVB Small-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma in Comparison to Major Histological Subtypes of Cervical Cancer.

The aim of the current study is to investigate the survival outcome of stage IVB SCNEC of the uterine cervix in comparison to major histological subtypes of cervical cancer. A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Osaka Cancer Registry data from 1994 to 2018. All FIGO 2009 stage IVB cervical cancer patients who displayed squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), adenocarcinoma (A), adenosquamous cell carcinoma (AS), or small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNEC) were first identified. The patients were classified into groups according to the types of primary treatment. Then, their survival rates were examined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Overall, in a total of 1158 patients, clearly differential survival rates were observed according to the histological subtypes, and SCNEC was associated with shortest survival. When examined according to the types of primary treatments, SCNEC was associated with significantly decreased survival when compared to SCC or A/AS, except for those treated with surgery. In patients with FIGO 2009 stage IVB cervical cancer, SCNEC was associated with decreased survival when compared to SCC or A/AS. Although current treatments with either surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy have some therapeutic efficacies, to improve the prognosis, novel effective treatments specifically targeting cervical SCNEC need to be developed.

An age-group analysis on the efficacy of chemotherapy in older adult patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer: a Japanese cancer registry cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of chemotherapy in older adult patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) remains to be established, despite the fact that the majority of patients diagnosed with BTC tend to be aged ≥ 70 years. In this study, we used three databases to examine the effectiveness of chemotherapy in a large patient population aged ≥ 70 years with metastatic BTC. METHODS: Using a large Japanese database that combined three data sources (Osaka Cancer Registry, Japan's Diagnosis Procedure Combination, the hospital-based cancer registry database), we extracted the data from patients pathologically diagnosed with metastatic BTC, between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015, in 30 designated cancer care hospitals (DCCHs). A cohort of patients with comparable backgrounds was identified using propensity score matching. The log-rank test was used to examine how chemotherapy affected overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Among 2,622 registered patients with BTC in 30 DCCHs, 207 older adult patients aged > 70 years with metastatic BTC were selected. Chemotherapy significantly improved the prognosis of older adult patients, according to propensity score matching (chemotherapy, 6.4 months vs. best supportive care, 1.8 months, P value < 0.001). The number of patients receiving chemotherapy tends to decrease with age. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) and gemcitabine plus S-1 (oral fluoropyrimidine) (GS) combination therapy were frequently performed in the chemotherapy group for patients under 80 years of age (70-74 years, 61.7%; 75-79 years, 62.8%). In contrast, monotherapy including GEM and S-1 was more frequently performed in age groups over 80 years (80-84 years, 56.2%; 85-89 years, 77.7%; ≥90 years, 100%). In the chemotherapy group among older adult patients aged < 85 years, the median OS was significantly longer according to age-group analysis of the 5-year age range following propensity score matching. CONCLUSIONS: In older adult patients with metastatic BTC who received chemotherapy, prolonged survival was observed. Chemotherapy may be a viable option for patients with metastatic BTC who are aged < 85 years.

Hospital volume and prognosis of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: A study using the Osaka Cancer Registry.

PURPOSE: Pancreatic cancer (PC) has one of the worst prognoses among all solid cancers. Hospital volume has been shown to be significantly associated with outcomes in patients with PC undergoing surgery. Nonetheless, the association between hospital volume and prognosis in patients with metastatic PC remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the association between hospital volume and prognosis in patients with metastatic PC using large-scale population-based cancer registry data. METHODS: This retrospective observational study was conducted using data from the Osaka Cancer Registry database. Data of patients with metastatic PC over 10 years (2009-2018) were obtained. Hospitals were categorized into high-volume hospitals (HVHs; ≥ 240 patients diagnosed with PC for 10 years), middle-volume hospitals (MVHs; 120-239 patients diagnosed with PC for 10 years), and low-volume hospitals (LVHs; < 120 patients diagnosed with PC for 10 years). Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The analysis included 8,929 patients with metastatic PC. Median OS was significantly more favorable in HVHs than in MVHs and LVHs. Multivariate analysis adjusted for hospital volume, age, primary tumor site, year of diagnosis, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy revealed that hospital volume was an independent factor associated with OS (HVHs vs. MVHs: hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.16; P = 0.003, HVHs vs. LVHs: HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.13-1.27; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Hospital volume is an independent prognostic factor in patients with metastatic PC, suggesting an association between hospital volume and treatment outcomes.

Prognostic impact of the presence or absence of prior cancer in patients with cancer using cure models: A population-based study.

Developing a subsequent cancer is one of the major concerns for cancer survivors; however, whether prior cancer could affect their prognosis is unknown. We therefore aimed to analyze how prognosis varies depending on prior cancer in patients with newly developed cancer, focusing on cancer that had been "cured." We used the record-linked database of the Osaka Cancer Registry and Vital Statistics to select 186,798 patients with stomach, colorectal, or lung cancer aged ≥40 years from 1995 to 2009 in Osaka, Japan. These cancers were defined as index cancers. We classified the patients into two groups according to whether they had a prior cancer diagnosis within 10 years before the index cancer diagnosis. The cured proportion was defined as the proportion of cancer patients with the same mortality as the general population and was estimated using the parametric mixture cure model. The cured proportion of patients with prior cancer by sex and age group was not significantly lower than those without prior cancer, except for patients with stomach cancer aged ≥65 years. According to the index cancer stage in the localized stomach or colorectal cancer, the cured proportion in patients with prior cancer was lower than in those without prior cancer. However, at any stage of lung cancer, the proportion of patients with prior cancer who had been cured was similar to patients without prior cancer, therefore prior cancer had a prognostic impact only in some patient groups based on the characteristics of their index cancer.

Evaluation of survival outcomes between minimally invasive and open surgery in the treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer: a population-based study in Osaka Japan.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the oncological outcomes between Japanese women who underwent minimally invasive surgery and those who underwent open surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer. METHODS: This population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Osaka Cancer Registry from 2011 to 2018. Surgically treated patients for localized (uterine-confined) endometrial cancer were identified. Patients were classified into two groups according to the type of surgery (minimally invasive surgery group and open-surgery group), pathological risk factors (low-risk and high-risk), and year of diagnosis (Group 1, 2011-14; Group 2, 2015-18). Overall survival was compared between the minimally invasive surgery and open-surgery groups. RESULTS: In the analyses including all patients, there was no difference in overall survival between the minimally invasive surgery and open-surgery groups (P = 0.0797). The 4-year overall survival rate was 97.1 and 95.7% in the minimally invasive surgery and open-surgery groups, respectively. When investigated according to pathological risks, there were no differences in overall survival between the minimally invasive surgery and open-surgery groups in both the low- and high-risk groups. In the low-risk group, the 4-year overall survival rates in the minimally invasive surgery and open-surgery groups were 97.7 and 96.5%, respectively. In the high-risk group, the 4-year overall survival rates in the minimally invasive surgery and open-surgery groups were 91.2 and 93.2%, respectively. Similarly, there were no differences in overall survival between the minimally invasive surgery and open-surgery groups in both Group 1 (P = 0.4479 in low-risk and P = 0.1826 in high-risk groups) and Group 2 (P = 0.1750 in low-risk and P = 0.0799 in high-risk groups). CONCLUSION: Our study provides epidemiological evidence that minimally invasive surgery is an effective alternative to open surgery in Japanese patients with early-stage endometrial cancer.

Comparison of the Survival Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery with Open Surgery in Patients with Uterine-Confined and Node-Negative Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

We aimed to compare the oncological outcomes between Japanese women with uterine-confined and node-negative cervical cancer who underwent open surgery and those who underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS). A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Osaka Cancer Registry that ranged from 2011 to 2018. A total of 2279 patients who underwent surgical treatment for uterine-confined and node-negative cervical cancer were identified. The patients were classified into groups according to surgery type (open and MIS groups) and year of diagnosis (group one, 2011-2014; group two, 2015-2018). The oncologic outcomes were compared between the MIS and open groups. When the MIS group (n = 225) was compared with open group (n = 2054), overall, there was no significant between-group difference in terms of overall survival. Based on Kaplan-Meier estimates, the probability of overall survival at four years was 99.5% in the MIS group and 97.2% in the open group (p = 0.1110). When examined according to the year of diagnosis, there were no significant between-group differences in the overall survival in both groups one and two. In this population-based cohort study, MIS did not compromise survival outcomes when compared with conventional open surgery in Japanese patients with uterine-confined and node-negative (FIGO 2018 stage I) cervical cancer.

Age-Dependent Causes of Death among Patients with Breast Cancer Based on Osaka Cancer Registry and Vital Statistics in Japan.

We aimed to clarify the differences in causes of death among patients with breast cancer according to age at diagnosis and years elapsed since diagnosis. Using data from the Osaka Cancer Registry and Vital Statistics databases, 40,690 female patients diagnosed with primary breast cancer between 1985 and 2006 were included in this study. The statistics on all deaths between 1985 to 2016 were collected, and the observation period was 10 years (2006-2016). Mortality hazards according to age at diagnosis and years elapsed since diagnosis were estimated using a flexible parametric estimation. Of the 40,690 patients, 13,676 (34%) died from all-cause death, and the 10-year survival rate was 65.74% (95% confidence interval: 65.28-66.21). The proportions of deaths were 10,531 (77%) from breast cancer, 1048 (8%) from other cancers, and 2097 (15%) from non-cancer causes. The mortality hazard for deaths from breast cancer was initially high and then declined, whereas that for deaths from other cancers and non-cancer causes was initially low and then increased. The more likely causes of death 5 years after breast cancer diagnosis were other cancers or non-cancer causes among patients aged ≥70 years.