Thromboelastography profiles in critically ill children with multisystem inflammatory syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: To describe critically ill children's coagulation profile with the multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C) related to coronavirus. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center, observational study at a tertiary, pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in children aged 1 month to 18 years. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sixteen children, with a median age of 5.4 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2.1, 11.75), 56% female, admission Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 (PELOD-2) score of 3.5 (IQR 2, 5), and median PICU length of stay 3 days (IQR 1.5, 4), met criteria of MIS-C. All patients received acetylsalicylic acid (80-100 mg/kg) and none received anticoagulation. Sixty-three percent (10/16) of children had out-of-normal range values on thromboelastography (TEG) (44% [7/16] with hypercoagulability and 19% [3/16] with hypocoagulability). Of those with hypercoagulability, 19% (3/16) had rapid clot formation, and 25% (4/16) had increased clot strength. In 69% (11/16) of children, there was impaired fibrinolysis (0% lysis at 30 minutes) on TEG. Seventy-five percent (12/16) of children had out-of-normal range value on standard coagulation assays (37.5% [6/16] with hypocoagulability and 37.5% [6/16] with hypercoagulability). TEG-G (clot strength as measured by TEG) value (ρ -.553, p = .033) and platelet count (ρ -.840, p < .0001) were correlated with admission PELOD-2 score. TEG-G value (ρ -.506, p = .04) and platelet count (ρ -.539, p = .03) were correlated with the duration of intensive care unit stay. CONCLUSIONS: Coagulation abnormalities are frequent in children with MIS-C. TEG parameter and platelet count are correlated with the severity of multiorgan dysfunction and the duration of intensive care stay. Multicenter studies are needed to confirm the clinical implications of these coagulation abnormalities.

Abdominal Imaging Findings in Critically Ill Children With Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome Associated With COVID-19.

We report findings on abdominal imaging in critically ill children admitted with MIS-C. On sonography, hepatomegaly, nephromegaly, gallbladder wall edema, ascites, intestinal inflammation and mesenteric lymphadenopathy were seen, while CT showed fluid-filled small bowel loops, mural thickening of the terminal ileum, diffuse lymphadenopathy, and moderate ascites.

Respiratory variation in peak aortic velocity accurately predicts fluid responsiveness in children undergoing neurosurgery under general anesthesia.

The determination of fluid responsiveness in the critically ill child is of vital importance, more so as fluid overload becomes increasingly associated with worse outcomes. Dynamic markers of volume responsiveness have shown some promise in the pediatric population, but more research is needed before they can be adopted for widespread use. Our aim was to investigate effectiveness of respiratory variation in peak aortic velocity and pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness, and determine their optimal cutoff values. We performed a prospective, observational study at a single tertiary care pediatric center. Twenty-one children with normal cardiorespiratory status undergoing general anesthesia for neurosurgery were enrolled. Respiratory variation in peak aortic velocity (ΔVpeak ao) was measured both before and after volume expansion using a bedside ultrasound device. Pulse pressure variation (PPV) value was obtained from the bedside monitor. All patients received a 10 ml/kg fluid bolus as volume expansion, and were qualified as responders if stroke volume increased >15% as a result. Utility of ΔVpeak ao and PPV and to predict responsiveness to volume expansion was investigated. A baseline ΔVpeak ao value of greater than or equal to 12.3% best predicted a positive response to volume expansion, with a sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 89% and area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90. PPV failed to demonstrate utility in this patient population. Respiratory variation in peak aortic velocity is a promising marker for optimization of perioperative fluid therapy in the pediatric population and can be accurately measured using bedside ultrasonography. More research is needed to evaluate the lack of effectiveness of pulse pressure variation for this purpose.

Futility: unilateral decision making is not the default for pediatric intensivists.

OBJECTIVE: Many hospitals have established medical futility policies allowing a physician to withdraw or withhold treatment considered futile against families' wishes, although little is known on how these policies are used. The goal of our study was to elucidate the perspective of pediatric critical care physicians on futility. METHODS: We sent an anonymous survey to all active members of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section of Critical Care, using Survey Monkey http://www.surveymonkey.com as the questionnaire tool. The survey included four clinical vignettes where families desired care that could be perceived as futile care. In each scenario, participants were asked if they would go against the families' wishes and how they would resolve the conflict. RESULTS: There were 266 of 618 (43%) respondents. For an infant with severe hypoxic ischemic injury and intestinal failure, the majority of physicians (83.7%) would not enact a unilateral do not attempt resuscitation order. For an oncology patient with multiorgan system failure and encephalopathy, the majority (90.4%) would not enact a unilateral donotattemptresuscitation. In the case where a child was declared brain dead, 54.3% of physicians would support unilateral donotattemptresuscitation, yet a third (33.1%) would continue mechanical ventilation. In the case of cardiac surgery for a patient with trisomy 13, the majority (67.1%) would not advocate for surgery. In most scenarios, intensivists cited consultation from the ethics committee (53.8%-76.6%) as the most appropriate way to resolve the conflict. Qualitative data revealed intensivists would prefer to honor families' wishes and utilize time with support from a multidisciplinary team rather than unilateral do not attempt resuscitation to resolve these conflicts. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of pediatric intensivists are not in support of unilateral do-not-attempt resuscitation or withholding care against families' wishes for a variety of reasons. Given this understandable reluctance on the part of the physicians for enforcing decisions, providing unqualified support to families at this difficult time is imperative. Further research is needed to facilitate decision making that respects the moral integrity of families and physicians.