Exploring the Feasibility of Utilizing Limited Gene Panel Circulating Tumor DNA Clearance as a Biomarker in Patients With Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Introduction: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing may identify patients at high risk for recurrence following chemoradiation (CRT) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). We evaluated the feasibility of ctDNA testing on a readily available commercial fixed-gene panel to predict outcomes in patients with LA-NSCLC. Methods: Plasma of 43 patients was collected at CRT initiation (pre-CRT), completion (post-CRT1), quarterly follow up for 12 months (post-CRT2, 3, 4, 5 respectively) after CRT, and at disease progression. ctDNA analysis was performed using InVisionFirst®-Lung to detect mutations in 36 cancer-related genes. ctDNA clearance was defined as absence of pre-CRT variants at post-CRT1. Patients without detectable pre-CRT variants or no post-CRT1 samples were excluded. Results: Twenty eight of 43 patients (65%) had detectable variants pre-CRT. Nineteen of 43 patients (44%) had detectable pre-CRT variants and post-CRT1 samples and were included in analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 65 years (43-82), and most patients had stage IIIB disease (10/19, 53%). Two patients died from non-cancer related causes before post-CRT2 and were excluded from further analysis. All three patients who did not clear ctDNA had tumor relapse with a median time to relapse of 74 days (30-238), while 50% (7/14) of those who cleared ctDNA have remained disease free. Progression free survival was longer in patients who cleared ctDNA compared to those who did not (median 567 vs 74 d, p = 0.01). Conclusions: Although it is feasible to use ctDNA testing on a limited gene panel to identify patients with LA-NSCLC who are at high risk for disease recurrence following CRT, further studies will be necessary to optimize these assays before they can be used to inform clinical care in patients with lung cancer.

Exploitation of treatment induced tumor lysis to enhance the sensitivity of ctDNA analysis: A first-in-human pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Blood-based liquid biopsies examining circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) have increasing applications in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Limitations in sensitivity remain a barrier to ctDNA replacing tissue-based testing. We hypothesized that testing immediately after starting treatment would yield an increased abundance of ctDNA in plasma because of tumor lysis, allowing for the detection of genetic alterations that were occult in baseline testing. METHODS: Three prospective cohorts of patients with stage III/IV NSCLC were enrolled. Cohort 1 (C1) contained patients starting platinum doublet chemoradiation (n = 10) and cohort 2 (C2) initiating platinum doublet cytotoxic chemotherapy ± immunotherapy (n = 10). Cohort 3 (C3) contained patients receiving palliative radiation. Two baseline samples were collected. In C1 and C2, subsequent samples were collected 3, 6, 24 and 48 h post initiation of chemotherapy. Patients in C3 had samples collected immediately prior to the next three radiotherapy fractions. Samples were analyzed for ctDNA using the 36-gene amplicon-based NGS Inivata InVisionFirst®-Lung assay. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were enrolled. Detectable ctDNA was present at baseline in 32 patients (80%), 4 additional patients (50%) had detectable ctDNA in post-treatment samples. Seven patients with detectable ctDNA at baseline (23%) had new genetic alterations detected in post-treatment samples. Mutant molecule numbers increased with treatment in 24 of 31 (77%) pts with detectable ctDNA. ctDNA levels peaked a median of 7 h (IQR:2-26 h) after the initiation of chemotherapy and a median of 2 days (IQR:1-3 days) after radiation was commenced. CONCLUSION: ctDNA levels increase in the hours to days after starting treatment. ctDNA testing in the acute post-treatment phase can yield results that were not evident in pre-treatment testing. Application of this principle could improve ctDNA utility as an alternate to tissue-based testing and improve sensitivity for the detection of treatment-resistant clones.(NCT03986463).

Longitudinal Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Blood and Saliva for Prediction of Response to Osimertinib and Disease Progression in EGFR-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Background: We assessed whether serial ctDNA monitoring of plasma and saliva predicts response and resistance to osimertinib in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. Three ctDNA technologies-blood-based droplet-digital PCR (ddPCR), next-generation sequencing (NGS), and saliva-based EFIRM liquid biopsy (eLB)-were employed to investigate their complementary roles. Methods: Plasma and saliva samples were collected from patients enrolled in a prospective clinical trial of osimertinib and local ablative therapy upon progression (NCT02759835). Plasma was analyzed by ddPCR and NGS. Saliva was analyzed by eLB. Results: A total of 25 patients were included. We analyzed 534 samples by ddPCR (n = 25), 256 samples by NGS (n = 24) and 371 samples by eLB (n = 22). Among 20 patients who progressed, ctDNA progression predated RECIST 1.1 progression by a median of 118 days (range: 61-272 days) in 11 (55%) patients. Of nine patients without ctDNA progression by ddPCR, two patients had an increase in mutant EGFR by eLB and two patients were found to have ctDNA progression by NGS. Levels of ctDNA measured by ddPCR and NGS at early time points, but not volumetric tumor burden, were associated with PFS. EGFR/ERBB2/MET/KRAS amplifications, EGFR C797S, PIK3CA E545K, PTEN V9del, and CTNNB1 S45P were key resistance mechanisms identified by NGS. Conclusion: Serial assessment of ctDNA in plasma and saliva predicts response and resistance to osimertinib, with each assay having supplementary roles.

Liquid biopsies for residual disease and recurrence.

Detection of minimal residual disease in patients with cancer, who are in complete remission with no cancer cells detectable, has the potential to improve recurrence-free survival through treatment selection. Studies analyzing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with solid tumors suggest the potential to accurately predict and detect relapse, enabling treatment strategies that may improve clinical outcomes. Over the past decade, assays for ctDNA detection in plasma samples have steadily increased in sensitivity and specificity. These are applied for the detection of residual disease after treatment and for earlier detection of recurrence. Novel clinical trials are now assessing how assays for "residual disease and recurrence" (RDR) may influence current treatment paradigms and potentially change the landscape of risk classification for cancer recurrence. In this review, we appraise the progress of RDR detection using ctDNA and consider the emerging role of liquid biopsy in the monitoring and management of solid tumors.

Clinical Relevance of an Amplicon-Based Liquid Biopsy for Detecting ALK and ROS1 Fusion and Resistance Mutations in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Liquid biopsy specimen genomic profiling is integrated in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) guidelines; however, data on the clinical relevance for ALK /ROS1 alterations are scarce. We evaluated the clinical utility of a targeted amplicon-based assay in a large prospective cohort of patients with ALK/ROS1-positive NSCLC and its impact on outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced ALK/ROS1-positive NSCLC were prospectively enrolled in the study by researchers at eight French institutions. Plasma samples were analyzed using InVisionFirst-Lung and correlated with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 128 patients included in the study, 101 were positive for ALK and 27 for ROS1 alterations. Blood samples (N = 405) were collected from 29 patients naïve for treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) or from 375 patients under treatment, including 105 samples collected at disease progression (PD). Sensitivity was 67% (n = 18 of 27) for ALK/ROS1 fusion detection. Higher detection was observed for ALK fusions at TKI failure (n = 33 of 74; 46%) versus in patients with therapeutic response (n = 12 of 109; 11%). ALK-resistance mutations were detected in 22% patients (n = 16 of 74) overall; 43% of the total ALK-resistance mutations identified occurred after next-generation TKI therapy. ALK G1202R was the most common mutation detected (n = 7 of 16). Heterogeneity of resistance was observed. ROS1 G2032R resistance was detected in 30% (n = 3 of 10). The absence of circulating tumor DNA mutations at TKI failure was associated with prolonged median overall survival (105.7 months). Complex ALK-resistance mutations correlated with poor overall survival (median, 26.9 months v NR for single mutation; P = .003) and progression-free survival to subsequent therapy (median 1.7 v 6.3 months; P = .003). CONCLUSION: Next-generation, targeted, amplicon-based sequencing for liquid biopsy specimen profiling provides clinically relevant detection of ALK/ROS1 fusions in TKI-naïve patients and allows for the identification of resistance mutations in patients treated with TKIs. Liquid biopsy specimens from patients treated with TKIs may affect clinical outcomes and capture heterogeneity of TKI resistance, supporting their role in selecting sequential therapy.

Circulating Tumor DNA Genomics Reveal Potential Mechanisms of Resistance to BRAF-Targeted Therapies in Patients with BRAF-Mutant Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: The limited knowledge on the molecular profile of patients with BRAF-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progress under BRAF-targeted therapies (BRAF-TT) has hampered the development of subsequent therapeutic strategies for these patients. Here, we evaluated the clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-targeted sequencing to identify canonical BRAF mutations and genomic alterations potentially related to resistance to BRAF-TT, in a large cohort of patients with BRAF-mutant NSCLC. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This was a prospective study of 78 patients with advanced BRAF-mutant NSCLC, enrolled in 27 centers across France. Blood samples (n = 208) were collected from BRAF-TT-naïve patients (n = 47), patients nonprogressive under treatment (n = 115), or patients at disease progression (PD) to BRAF-TT (24/46 on BRAF monotherapy and 22/46 on BRAF/MEK combination therapy). ctDNA sequencing was performed using InVisionFirst-Lung. In silico structural modeling was used to predict the potential functional effect of the alterations found in ctDNA. RESULTS: BRAFV600E ctDNA was detected in 74% of BRAF-TT-naïve patients, where alterations in genes related with the MAPK and PI3K pathways, signal transducers, and protein kinases were identified in 29% of the samples. ctDNA positivity at the first radiographic evaluation under treatment, as well as BRAF-mutant ctDNA positivity at PD were associated with poor survival. Potential drivers of resistance to either BRAF-TT monotherapy or BRAF/MEK combination were identified in 46% of patients and these included activating mutations in effectors of the MAPK and PI3K pathways, as well as alterations in U2AF1, IDH1, and CTNNB1. CONCLUSIONS: ctDNA sequencing is clinically relevant for the detection of BRAF-activating mutations and the identification of alterations potentially related to resistance to BRAF-TT in BRAF-mutant NSCLC.

Outcomes in oncogenic-addicted advanced NSCLC patients with actionable mutations identified by liquid biopsy genomic profiling using a tagged amplicon-based NGS assay.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based molecular profiling is rapidly gaining traction in clinical practice of advanced cancer patients with multi-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels. However, clinical outcomes remain poorly described and deserve further validation with personalized treatment of patients with genomic alterations detected in plasma ctDNA. Here, we describe the outcomes, disease control rate (DCR) at 3 months and progression-free survival (PFS) in oncogenic-addicted advanced NSCLC patients with actionable alterations identified in plasma by ctDNA liquid biopsy assay, InVisionFirst®-Lung. A pooled retrospective analysis was completed of 81 advanced NSCLC patients with all classes of alterations predicting response to current FDA approved drugs: sensitizing common EGFR mutations (78%, n = 63) with T790M (73%, 46/63), ALK / ROS1 gene fusions (17%, n = 14) and BRAF V600E mutations (5%, n = 4). Actionable driver alterations detected in liquid biopsy were confirmed by prior tissue genomic profiling in all patients, and all patients received personalized treatment. Of 82 patients treated with matched targeted therapies, 10% were at first-line, 41% at second-line, and 49% beyond second-line. Acquired T790M at TKI relapse was detected in 73% (46/63) of patients, and all prospective patients (34/46) initiated osimertinib treatment based on ctDNA results. The 3-month DCR was 86% in 81 evaluable patients. The median PFS was of 14.8 months (12.1-22.9m). Baseline ctDNA allelic fraction of genomic driver did not correlate with the response rate of personalized treatment (p = 0.29). ctDNA molecular profiling is an accurate and reliable tool for the detection of clinically relevant molecular alterations in advanced NSCLC patients. Clinical outcomes with targeted therapies endorse the use of liquid biopsy by amplicon-based NGS ctDNA analysis in first line and relapse testing for advanced NSCLC patients.

Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis for Patients with Oncogene-Addicted NSCLC With Isolated Central Nervous System Progression.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC and isolated central nervous system progression (iCNS), tissue biopsy is challenging, and the clinical utility of plasma liquid biopsy (i.e., circulating tumor DNA [ctDNA]) is unknown. METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC with known baseline genomic alteration (GA) (EGFR, ALK, BRAF, KRAS, HER2, ROS1, MET, PIK3CA, STK11, TP53) on tissue were divided into three groups on the basis of their disease progression pattern: iCNS, extra-CNS only (noCNS), or both (cCNS). All patients with available plasma ctDNA were included and were analyzed by next-generation sequencing InVisionFirst-Lung. ctDNA was considered positive if at least one GA was detected. Cell-free tumor DNA was analyzed in cerebrospinal fluid when available. RESULTS: Out of 517 patients screened, 247 were included: 54 had iCNS, 99 had noCNS, and 94 had cCNS progressive disease (64, 128, and 110 ctDNA samples, respectively). CtDNA was positive in 52% iCNS versus 84% in noCNS and 92% in cCNS (p < 0.00001), with lower detection of driver (37% versus 77% and 73%, respectively) and resistance alterations (6% versus 45% and 44%). Patients with iCNS and positive ctDNA were more at risk of extra-CNS progression (32% versus 7%, p = 0.026). In 12 patients with iCNS, ctDNA was positive in six (50%) plasma and in 10 (83%) paired cerebrospinal fluid (p = 0.193). CONCLUSIONS: Although tagged amplicon-based next-generation sequencing has high detection rates of GA in plasma ctDNA in patients with NSCLC with extra-CNS disease, detection rate of GAs (52%) is lower in the subset of patients with iCNS disease. Complementary tests such as cerebrospinal fluid cell-free DNA may be useful. Further evidence would be beneficial to understand the genomic landscape in patients with NSCLC and iCNS.

Targeted sequencing of plasma cell-free DNA to predict response to PD1 inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Tumor mutational burden is an emerging biomarker of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), whose clinical adoption is challenging. We hypothesized that targeting limited but relevant genetic alterations in plasma cell-free DNA along with early monitoring may non-invasively predict response to ICI in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Plasma samples from patients with progressive NSCLC collected before ICI initiation and at 1 month were profiled from responders (R: PFS > 6 months) and non-responders (NR: progressive disease at first evaluation) using amplicon sequencing of hotspots and coding regions from 36 genes. The molecular profile of ctDNA, and its early kinetics were analyzed. RESULTS: 97 patients were analyzed, of which 86 (39 R, 47 NR) were evaluable. Alterations in ctDNA were detectable in 67/86 baseline samples (78%). The detection of a targetable oncogenic driver was associated with a 2 months PFS. The presence of a PTEN or STK11 mutation was correlated with early progression (HR 8.9, p = 0.09 for PTEN, HR 4.7, p = 0.003 for STK11), while transversion mutations (Tv) in KRAS and TP53 predicted better outcomes (HR 0.36, p = 0.011 for TP53 Tv; HR 0.46, p = 0.11 for KRAS Tv). Patients with a low "immune score" (driver and/or PTEN or STK11 mutation and/or without KRAS or TP53 Tv) derived poor outcomes (median PFS 2 months), compared with patients with a high immune score (no driver, no PTEN or STK11 and with KRAS or TP53 Tv (median PFS 14 months, p = 0.0001, HR 2.96). Early changes in the ctDNA allele fraction (AF) of 65 specimens were correlated with clinical outcomes (14 months PFS if AF decreases vs. 2 months if AF increases, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Targeted sequencing of plasma ctDNA and monitoring its early variations can predict response to ICI.

Real-World Utility of an Amplicon-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Liquid Biopsy for Broad Molecular Profiling in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) by amplicon-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis in the daily clinical setting in a cohort of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as an alternative approach to tissue molecular profiling. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this single-center prospective study, treatment-naïve and previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled. Clinical validation of ctDNA using amplicon-based NGS analysis (with a 36-gene panel) was performed against standard-of-care tissue molecular analysis in treatment-naïve patients. The feasibility, utility, and prognostic value of ctDNA as a dynamic marker of treatment efficacy was evaluated. Results of tissue molecular profile were blinded during ctDNA analysis. RESULTS: Of 214 patients with advanced NSCLC who were recruited, 156 were treatment-naïve patients and 58 were pretreated patients with unknown tissue molecular profile. ctDNA screening was successfully performed for 91% (n = 194) of all patients, and mutations were detected in 77% of these patients. Tissue molecular analysis was available for 111 patients (52%), and tissue somatic mutations were found for 78% (n = 87) of patients. For clinically relevant variants, concordance agreement between ctDNA and tumor tissue analysis was 95% among 94 treatment-naïve patients who had concurrent liquid and tumor biopsy molecular profiles. Sensitivity and specificity were 81% and 97%, respectively. Of the 103 patients with no tissue available, ctDNA detected potential actionable mutations in 17% of patients; of these, 10% received personalized treatment. ctDNA kinetics correlated with response rate and progression-free survival in 31 patients treated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: These real-world data from a prospective study endorse ctDNA molecular profile by amplicon-based NGS as an accurate and reliable tool to detect and monitor clinically relevant molecular alterations in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Prospective Clinical Validation of the InVisionFirst-Lung Circulating Tumor DNA Assay for Molecular Profiling of Patients With Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Guidelines advocate molecular profiling in the evaluation of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and support the use of plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based profiling for patients with insufficient tissue. Thorough prospective clinical validation studies of next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based ctDNA assays are lacking. We report the multicentered prospective clinical validation of the InVision ctDNA assay in patients with advanced untreated NSCLC. METHODS: A total of 264 patients with untreated advanced NSCLC were prospectively recruited, and their plasma was analyzed using a ctDNA NGS assay for detection of genomic alterations in 36 commonly mutated genes. Tumor tissue was available in 178 patients for molecular profiling for comparison with plasma profiling. The remaining 86 patients were included to compare ctDNA profiles in patients with and without tissue for profiling. RESULTS: Concordance of InVisionFirst with matched tissue profiling was 97.8%, with 82.9% positive predictive value, 98.5% negative predictive value, 70.6% sensitivity, and 99.2% specificity. Considering specific alterations in eight genes that most influence patient management, the positive predictive value was 97.8%, with 97.1% negative predictive value, 73.9% sensitivity, and 99.8% specificity. Across the entire study, 48 patients with actionable alterations were identified by ctDNA testing compared with only 38 by tissue testing. ctDNA NGS reported either an actionable alteration or an alteration generally considered mutually exclusive for such actionable changes in 53% of patients. CONCLUSION: The liquid biopsy NGS assay demonstrated excellent concordance with tissue profiling in this multicenter, prospective, clinical validation study, with sensitivity and specificity equivalent to Food and Drug Administration-approved single-gene ctDNA assays. The use of plasma-based molecular profiling using NGS led to the detection of 26% more actionable alterations compared with standard-of-care tissue testing in this study.

Analytical validation of a next generation sequencing liquid biopsy assay for high sensitivity broad molecular profiling.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis is being incorporated into cancer care; notably in profiling patients to guide treatment decisions. Responses to targeted therapies have been observed in patients with actionable mutations detected in plasma DNA at variant allele fractions (VAFs) below 0.5%. Highly sensitive methods are therefore required for optimal clinical use. To enable objective assessment of assay performance, detailed analytical validation is required. We developed the InVisionFirst™ assay, an assay based on enhanced tagged amplicon sequencing (eTAm-Seq™) technology to profile 36 genes commonly mutated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and other cancer types for actionable genomic alterations in cell-free DNA. The assay has been developed to detect point mutations, indels, amplifications and gene fusions that commonly occur in NSCLC. For analytical validation, two 10mL blood tubes were collected from NSCLC patients and healthy volunteer donors. In addition, contrived samples were used to represent a wide spectrum of genetic aberrations and VAFs. Samples were analyzed by multiple operators, at different times and using different reagent Lots. Results were compared with digital PCR (dPCR). The InVisionFirst assay demonstrated an excellent limit of detection, with 99.48% sensitivity for SNVs present at VAF range 0.25%-0.33%, 92.46% sensitivity for indels at 0.25% VAF and a high rate of detection at lower frequencies while retaining high specificity (99.9997% per base). The assay also detected ALK and ROS1 gene fusions, and DNA amplifications in ERBB2, FGFR1, MET and EGFR with high sensitivity and specificity. Comparison between the InVisionFirst assay and dPCR in a series of cancer patients showed high concordance. This analytical validation demonstrated that the InVisionFirst assay is highly sensitive, specific and robust, and meets analytical requirements for clinical applications.

A Phase II, open-label, randomised study to assess the efficacy and safety of the MEK1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) versus capecitabine monotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer who have failed one or two prior chemotherapeutic regimens.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of the MEK1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had failed one or two previous chemotherapeutic regimens that included oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan. METHODS: This was a Phase II, multicentre, open-label, randomised, two-arm, parallel-group study comparing AZD6244 with capecitabine monotherapy. Patients received either 100 mg twice daily oral AZD6244 free-base suspension every day or 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily oral capecitabine, for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week rest period, in 3-weekly cycles. The primary endpoint was the number of patients experiencing disease progression events. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were randomised in the study (34 and 35 patients in the AZD6244 and capecitabine groups, respectively). Disease progression events were experienced by 28 patients (~80%) in both the AZD6244 and capecitabine treatment groups. Median progression-free survival was 81 days and 88 days in the AZD6244 and capecitabine groups, respectively. Ten patients in the AZD6244 treatment arm had a best response of stable disease. For capecitabine, best response was a partial response in one patient, with stable disease in a further 15 patients. The most frequently observed adverse events reported with AZD6244 were acneiform dermatitis, diarrhoea, asthenia and peripheral oedema, compared with hand-foot syndrome, diarrhoea, nausea and abdominal pain with capecitabine. CONCLUSIONS: AZD6244 showed similar efficacy to capecitabine in terms of the number of patients with a disease progression event and of progression-free survival. AZD6244 is currently undergoing evaluation in Phase II trials in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents.

A phase II, open-label, randomized study to assess the efficacy and safety of AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) versus pemetrexed in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have failed one or two prior chemotherapeutic regimens.

INTRODUCTION: AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) is a potent, selective MEK inhibitor. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AZD6244 versus pemetrexed as second- or third-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: In this randomized phase II study, patients received either 100 mg oral AZD6244 free-base suspension twice daily or 500 mg/m(2) intravenous pemetrexed once every 3 weeks after pretreatment with a corticosteroid, folic acid, and vitamin B12. The primary end point of the study was the disease progression event count. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were randomized. Disease progression events were experienced by 28 (70%) and 26 (59%) patients in the AZD6244 and pemetrexed groups, respectively. Median progression-free survival was not statistically significantly different between the AZD6244 and pemetrexed groups (67 versus 90 days, respectively; hazard ratio 1.08, two-sided 80% confidence interval = 0.75-1.54; p = 0.79). Two patients in the AZD6244 group had a best response to treatment of partial response. In the pemetrexed group, one patient achieved a complete response and one patient a partial response. Dermatitis acneiform, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting were the most frequently reported adverse events with AZD6244, compared with fatigue, anemia, nausea, anorexia, and dermatitis acneiform with pemetrexed. CONCLUSIONS: Oral AZD6244 showed clinical activity as second- or third-line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC. In an unselected NSCLC population, there is no suggestion that AZD6244 monotherapy offers any advantage over standard treatment with pemetrexed. Based on preclinical data and recent clinical observations, further development of AZD6244 in NSCLC should focus on BRAF or RAS mutation-positive patients and/or AZD6244-based combination regimens.

The first-in-human study of the hydrogen sulfate (Hyd-sulfate) capsule of the MEK1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY-142886): a phase I open-label multicenter trial in patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: In part A, the aim was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the hydrogen sulfate (Hyd-Sulfate) oral capsule formulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY-142886). In part B, the aim was to compare the pharmacokinetic profile of the new Hyd-Sulfate capsule with the initial AZD6244 free-base suspension and further characterize the pharmacodynamic profile and efficacy of the new formulation. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In part A, 30 patients received escalating doses of AZD6244 Hyd-Sulfate twice daily. In part B, 29 patients were randomized to a single dose of the Hyd-Sulfate capsule or free-base suspension, followed by a washout, then a single dose of the alternative formulation. Patients received the Hyd-Sulfate capsule twice daily at MTD of part A thereafter. RESULTS: The MTD of the Hyd-Sulfate capsule was 75 mg twice daily. Dose limiting toxicities were Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 acneiform rash and pleural effusion. Fatigue (65.7%) and acneiform dermatitis (60.0%) were the most frequent adverse events at the MTD. Based on area under curve(0-24), exposure of the 75 mg Hyd-Sulfate capsule relative to the 100 mg free-base suspension was 197% (90% confidence interval, 161-242%). Pharmacodynamic analysis showed that inhibition of 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-induced extracellular signal-regulated kinase phosphorylation in peripheral blood lymphocytes was related to plasma concentrations of AZD6244, with an estimated IC(50) of 352 ng/mL and maximum inhibition (E(max)) of approximately 91%, showing target inhibition. A patient with metastatic melanoma bearing a V600E BRAF mutation achieved a complete response persisting after 15 months of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The AZD6244 Hyd-Sulfate capsule formulation has shown a favorable toxicity, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic profile, and is being taken forward in ongoing clinical trials.

A survey of the potential impact of the European Union Physical Agents Directive (EU PAD) on electromagnetic fields (EMF) on MRI research practice in the United Kingdom.

PURPOSE: To assess concerns that the European Union Physical Agents Directive (EU PAD) on Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) could seriously restrict the use of MRI for research, diagnosis, and treatment, this study was conducted to examine the impact of the EU PAD on research practice, following a previous survey that assessed its impact on clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected through an online survey. E-mail invitations were sent to every UK grant-holder funded by Cancer Research UK, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Medical Research Council (MRC), and the Wellcome Trust in the last three years, who use MRI technology. RESULTS: A total of 70% of researchers responding to the survey reported that some of their MR research is conducted with at least one researcher in the scanner room during operation. Of those researchers in the scanner room, more than three-quarters are within 1 m of the scanner, for any scanner strength, and would therefore exceed the limits set in the Directive. Over half of these researchers also reach into the magnet bore, while at least one in five researchers spend over an hour in the scanner room during operation. CONCLUSION: The results suggest the EU PAD could have a very prohibitive impact on research practice. The current exposure limits would prohibit interventional MRI, limit the provision of patient care, and restrict researchers from reaching into the magnet bore to position and check equipment or to provide technical support. The use of new, more powerful high-field scanners will be particularly restricted.

Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the oral, small-molecule mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) in patients with advanced cancers.

PURPOSE: To assess the tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) 1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) in patients with advanced cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In part A, patients received escalating doses to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). In both parts, blood samples were collected to assess PK and PD parameters. In part B, patients were stratified by cancer type (melanoma v other) and randomly assigned to receive the MTD or 50% MTD. Biopsies were collected to determine inhibition of ERK phosphorylation, Ki-67 expression, and BRAF, KRAS, and NRAS mutations. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were enrolled. MTD in part A was 200 mg bid, but this dose was discontinued in part B because of toxicity. The 50% MTD (100 mg bid) was well tolerated. Rash was the most frequent and dose-limiting toxicity. Most other adverse events were grade 1 or 2. The PKs were less than dose proportional, with a median half-life of approximately 8 hours and inhibition of ERK phosphorylation in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells at all dose levels. Paired tumor biopsies demonstrated reduced ERK phosphorylation (geometric mean, 79%). Five of 20 patients demonstrated >or= 50% inhibition of Ki-67 expression, and RAF or RAS mutations were detected in 10 of 26 assessable tumor samples. Nine patients had stable disease (SD) for >or= 5 months, including two patients with SD for 19 (thyroid cancer) and 22 (uveal melanoma plus renal cancer) 28-day cycles. CONCLUSION: AZD6244 was well tolerated with target inhibition demonstrated at the recommended phase II dose. PK analyses supported twice-daily dosing. Prolonged SD was seen in a variety of advanced cancers. Phase II studies are ongoing.

The bicalutamide 150 mg early prostate cancer program: findings of the North American trial at 7.7-year median followup.

PURPOSE: We describe the results of North American Trial 23 of the bicalutamide (Casodex) early prostate cancer program in the context of the overall early prostate cancer program findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In Trial 23, 3,292 men with T1b-4, N0-Nx (N+ not allowed) M0 prostate cancer who had undergone radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy at 96 specialist referral centers in the United States (2,974) and Canada (318) were randomized 1:1 to 150 mg bicalutamide daily or placebo in addition to standard care for 2 years. RESULTS: In Trial 23 at a 7.7-year median followup there were few clinical events in the bicalutamide or standard care groups and the rates of objective progression were 15.4% and 15.3%, respectively. Mortality rates were 12.9% in the treatment group and 12.3% in the standard care group, including 11.2% and 11.0% for nonprostate cancer deaths in the absence of objective progression and 1.6% and 0.9%, respectively, for mortality due to prostate cancer. No differences in the primary end points (objective progression-free and overall survival) were seen between patients treated with bicalutamide and those treated with standard care alone. Bicalutamide (150 mg) significantly improved time to PSA progression (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.90, p <0.001). The tolerability profile of bicalutamide was similar to that previously described. CONCLUSIONS: In Trial 23 the current data suggest that early or adjuvant therapy may not benefit patients at low risk for recurrence, such as those with localized disease. The findings of Trial 23 contrast with the results in the overall early prostate cancer program and in other published literature, in which bicalutamide has been shown to provide significant clinical benefit for locally advanced disease.

Bicalutamide ('Casodex') 150 mg as adjuvant to radiotherapy in patients with localised or locally advanced prostate cancer: results from the randomised Early Prostate Cancer Programme.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The ongoing Early Prostate Cancer (EPC) programme is assessing bicalutamide ('Casodex') 150 mg, either alone or as adjuvant to treatment of curative intent, in patients with localised or locally advanced prostate cancer (n=8113). This paper presents an exploratory analysis of the subgroup of the EPC programme who received radiotherapy with curative intent (n=1370) in order to determine the efficacy (in terms of progression-free survival [PFS]) and tolerability of bicalutamide 150 mg in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 1370 patients with T1-4, MO, any N prostate cancer received bicalutamide 150 mg or placebo adjuvant to radiotherapy of curative intent. This analysis was undertaken at median 5.3 years' follow-up. RESULTS: In patients with locally advanced disease (n=305), bicalutamide adjuvant to radiotherapy significantly increased PFS by 53% (event-time ratio 1.53; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.16, 2.02) compared with placebo and reduced the risk of disease progression by 42% (hazard ration [HR] 0.58; 95% CI 0.41, 0.84; P=0.00348). In these patients, objective progression was experienced by 33.5% of those randomised to bicalutamide versus 48.6% for those randomised to placebo. The between-group difference in patients with localised disease (n=1065) failed to reach statistical significance (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.62, 1.03; P=0.088). The most common adverse events were breast pain (74.8%) and gynaecomastia (66.6%), which were mild to moderate in >90% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Bicalutamide 150 mg/day given as adjuvant to radiotherapy significantly improved PFS in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. For patients with localised disease, the results at this stage from the radiotherapy subgroup and the overall EPC programme suggest that adjuvant hormonal therapy is currently not appropriate. There were no unexpected tolerability findings.