Race has no impact on prostate cancer-specific mortality, when comparing patients with similar risk of other-cause mortality: An analysis of a population-based cohort.

BACKGROUND: Other-cause mortality (OCM) can serve as a surrogate for access-to-care. The authors sought to compare prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) in Black versus White men matched based on their calculated OCM risk. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was queried for Black and White men diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2004 to 2009, to collect long-term follow-up. A Cox regression was used to calculate the OCM risk using all available covariates. This calculated OCM risk was used to construct a 1:1 propensity score matched (PSM) cohort. Then, a competing-risks multivariable tested the impact of race on PCSM. RESULTS: A total of 94,363 patients were identified, with 19,398 Black men and 74,965 White men. The median (IQR) follow-up was 11.3 years (9.8-12.8). In the unmatched-cohort at 10-years, PCSM and OCM were 5.5% versus 3.5% and 13.8% versus 8.4% in non-Hispanic Black (NHB) versus non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients (all p < .0001). The standardized mean difference was <0.15 for all covariates, indicating a good match. In the matched cohort at 10-years, OCM was 13.6% and 10.0% in NHB versus NHW (p < .0001), whereas the PCSM was 5.3% versus 4.7% (p < .01). On competing-risks multivariable analysis on PCSM, Black men had a hazard ratio of 1.08 (95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.20) compared to White men with a p = .13. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed similar PCSM in Black and White patients, when matched with their calculated OCM risk. This report is the first to indicate at a population-based level that race has no impact on PCSM. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Prostate cancer is a very common cancer among men and it is associated with health disparities that disproportionately impact Black men compared to White men. There is an on-going discussion of whether disparities between these two groups stem from genetic or environmental factors. This study sought to examine if matching based on overall health status, a proxy for the impact of social determinants of health, mitigated significant differences in outcomes. When matched using risk of death from any cause other than prostate cancer, Black and White men had no significant differences in prostate cancer death.

Testing the external validity of the POUT III trial (adjuvant platnium-based chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma) in a North American cohort.

OBJECTIVE: The European POUT III randomized controlled trial provided level-one evidence that adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard of care following nephroureterectomy (RNU) for locally invasive or node-positive upper tract urothelial carcinoma. We aim to assess this European randomized controlled trial's generalizability (external validity) to a North American cohort, using a nationwide database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To compare trial patients with those seen in real-world practice, we simulated the trial inclusion criteria using data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). We identified patients with histologically confirmed transitional cell carcinoma who underwent RNU. The available demographic characteristics of the NCDB cohort were compared with the POUT III trial cohort using Chi-squared test. RESULTS: The NCDB cohort (n = 3,380) had a significantly higher proportion of older patients (age ≥ 80: 23.5% vs. 5%), and more males (68% vs. 56.2%) than the POUT cohort (Table 1, both p < 0.001). Additionally, the rate of advanced nodal disease was higher in the NCDB (N1 9.6%, N2 9.3%) than in the POUT (N1 6%, N2 3%) cohort (p < 0.001). A more extensive lymph node dissection was performed in NCDB vs. POUT patients (node≥10 10.9% vs. 3%, p < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis removing all subjects with a Charlson Comorbidity Index > 0 did not change the significance of any results. CONCLUSIONS: While the primary disease stage was similar, the rate of advanced nodal disease was significantly higher in NCDB, which might be explained partially by the more extensive lymph node dissection performed in the latter. These differences warrant caution when applying the POUT III findings to North American patients.

Dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma metastasis to axillary lymph node: a case report.

BACKGROUND: We present an unusual case of a left axillary lymph node metastasis from a primary dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma. This pattern of metastasis is likely the result of circulating tumor cells reaching the node through its arterial blood supply. CASE PRESENTATION: In this report, a 68-year-old white woman with a dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma underwent a hysterectomy. She later developed an enlarged axillary lymph node due to metastatic dedifferentiated endometrial carcinoma, treated with chemotherapy and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 immunotherapy resulting in a complete clinical and radiological response. CONCLUSION: A review of the literature reveals the rarity of blood-borne lymph node metastasis, especially with uterine carcinoma. Immunotherapy has shown promising results in the treatment of some subtypes of metastatic uterine carcinoma.

Trends in Prostate Cancer Screening in the Pre- and Peri-COVID-19 Pandemic Period.

INTRODUCTION: This study sought to examine PSA testing rates before, early in, and later in the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Our cohort included test results from men >45 years who received PSA testing at least once at our institution from November 2018 to September 2021 and were alive at the end of that period. Monthly trends were evaluated for 3 periods: pre-COVID (November 2018-February 2020), early-COVID (March-May 2020), and late-COVID (June 2020-September 2021). Univariable and multivariable analysis tested the impact of these periods on PSA testing rate, after accounting for available confounders. All analyses were stratified by prostate cancer diagnosis status. RESULTS: A total of 141,777 PSA tests met inclusion criteria. The monthly number of tests in men without prostate cancer declined from 3,669 pre-COVID to 1,760 early-COVID (52% decrease; P = .0086) before increasing to 4,171 (14% increase from pre-COVID; P < .0001) late-COVID. The monthly average of first-time tests declined from 805 pre-COVID to 315 early-COVID (61% decrease; P = .008) before rebounding to 795 (1% decrease from pre-COVID; P = .7) late-COVID. The monthly number of tests in prostate cancer patients declined from 343 pre-COVID to 195 early-COVID (43% decrease; P = .008) before partially rebounding to 313 (9% decrease; P = .03) late-COVID. These differences remained within multivariable models. CONCLUSIONS: A number of men have forgone first-time PSA testing opportunities following the COVID-19 outbreak; thus, early cancer diagnoses in some individuals might have been missed. Likewise, many prostate cancer patients have forgone follow-up in the late-COVID period, which might compromise their oncologic outcomes.