Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 29
Filtrar
1.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 170(4): 1051-1058, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38018504

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the readability of patient-facing educational information about the most common otolaryngology diagnoses on popular social media platforms. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Social media platforms. METHODS: The top 5 otolaryngologic diagnoses were identified from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Database. Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, and Instagram were searched using these terms, and the top 25 patient-facing posts from unique accounts for each search term and poster type (otolaryngologist, other medical professional, layperson) were identified. Captions, text, and audio from images and video, and linked articles were extracted. The readability of each post element was calculated with multiple readability formulae. Readability was summarized and was compared between poster types, platforms, and search terms via Kruskal-Wallis testing. RESULTS: Median readability, by grade level, by grade level, was greater than 10 for captions, 5 for image-associated text, and 9 for linked articles. Captions and images in posts by laypeople were significantly more readable than captions by otolaryngologists or other medical professionals, but there was no difference for linked articles. All post components were more readable in posts about cerumen than those about other search terms. CONCLUSIONS: When examining the readability of posts on social media regarding the most common otolaryngology diagnoses, we found that many posts are less readable than recommended for patients, and found that posts by laypeople were significantly more readable than those by medical professionals. Medical professionals should work to make educational social media posts more readable to facilitate patient comprehension.


Assuntos
Otolaringologia , Mídias Sociais , Humanos , Compreensão , Estudos Transversais , Cabeça
2.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 170(3): 788-794, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37890071

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the nature and impact surgical ergonomic challenges experienced by female otolaryngologists. STUDY DESIGN: National survey study. SETTING: Female otolaryngology residents, fellows and attendings recruited via social media posting and email distribution. METHODS: We distributed a survey study to female otolaryngologists throughout the United States. The height and glove size of participants reporting difficulties with equipment and instruments were compared to those not reporting difficulties. RESULTS: Ninety-six female otolaryngologists participated in our study, comprised of 43% residents, 10% fellows, and 47% attendings. Ninety percent of participants reported difficulties using equipment and 77% of participants reported difficulty with instruments, the most common being nasal endoscopic instruments (28%). The vast majority of participants reported pain during and (or) after the operation (92%). Head and neck (53%) and rhinology (44%) were identified as particularly challenging specialities, but only 25% of participants reported that ergonomics affected their career plans. Participants felt that adjustable equipment (60%), a variety of sizes of instruments (43%), and more discussion around ergonomics (47%) would help. Respondents reported adjusting the operating room to accommodate their size took extra time (44%) and was a mental burden (39%). Participants reporting difficulties with operating room equipment were significantly shorter than those without difficulties (64 inches vs 67 inches, P = .037), and those reporting difficulties with instruments had a smaller median glove size (6 vs 6.5, P = .018). CONCLUSION: Surgical ergonomics represent a challenge for female otolaryngologists, particularly those with smaller hands and shorter height. Partnering with industry, we must address the needs of an increasingly diverse workforce to ensure that all surgeons can operate effectively and comfortably.


Assuntos
Otolaringologia , Humanos , Feminino , Estados Unidos , Otorrinolaringologistas , Ergonomia , Endoscopia , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
Laryngoscope ; 133(11): 3034-3041, 2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37096670

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To explore the surgical ergonomic challenges experienced by women in otolaryngology, identify specific equipment that is ergonomically challenging, and assess the impact of suboptimal ergonomics on female otolaryngologists. METHODS: We performed a qualitative study using an interpretive framework rooted in grounded theory. We performed semi-structured qualitative interviews of 14 female otolaryngologists from nine institutions at various stages in training and across subspecialties. Interviews were independently analyzed by thematic content analysis by two researchers and inter-rater reliability was assessed via Cohen's kappa. Differing opinions were reconciled via discussion. RESULTS: Participants noted difficulties with equipment including microscopes, chairs, step stools, and tables as well as difficulty using larger surgical instruments, preference for smaller instruments, frustration with lack of smaller instruments, and a desire for a larger spectrum of instrument sizes. Participants reported neck, hand, and back pain associated with operating. Participants suggested modifications to the operative environment, including a wider variety of instrument sizes, adjustable instruments, and more focus and attention on ergonomic issues and the range of surgeon physiques. Participants felt that optimizing their operating room set-up was an additional burden on them, and that lack of inclusive instrumentation affected their sense of belonging. Participants emphasized positive stories of mentorship and empowerment from peers and superiors of all genders. CONCLUSION: Female otolaryngologists face unique ergonomic challenges. As the otolaryngology workforce becomes increasingly diverse, it is important to address the needs of a diverse set of physiques to avoid inadvertently disadvantaging certain individuals. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A Laryngoscope, 133:3034-3041, 2023.


Assuntos
Doenças Musculoesqueléticas , Doenças Profissionais , Otolaringologia , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Ergonomia
4.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 168: 111558, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37075592

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the clinical characteristics of infants with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), define the resolution rate of infant OSA, and identify factors associated with OSA resolution. METHODS: We identified infants diagnosed with OSA via retrospective chart review at less than one year of age at a tertiary care center. We identified patient comorbidities, flexible or rigid airway evaluations, surgical procedures, and oxygen/other respiratory support administration. We identified infants as having resolved OSA based on clinical or polysomnogram resolution. We compared the frequency of comorbid diagnoses and receipt of interventions in infants with resolved versus non-resolved OSA by χ2 analysis. RESULTS: 83 patients were included. Prematurity was found in 35/83 (42%), hypotonia-related diagnoses in 31/83 (37%), and craniofacial abnormalities in 34/83 (41%). Resolution was observed in 61/83 (74%), either clinically or by polysomnogram, during follow up. On χ2 analysis, surgical intervention was not associated with likelihood of resolution (73% versus 74% in those without surgical intervention, p = 0.98). Patients with airway abnormalities on flexible or rigid evaluation were less likely to have OSA resolution than those without (63% versus 100%, p = 0.010), as were patients with hypotonia-related diagnoses (58% versus 83%, p = 0.014). In patients with laryngomalacia, there was no association of supraglottoplasty with increased resolution (88% with supraglottoplasty versus 80% without, p = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: We identified a group of infants with OSA with diverse comorbidities. There was a high rate of resolution. This data can assist with treatment planning and family counselling for infants with OSA. A prospective clinical trial is needed to better assess consequences of OSA in this age.


Assuntos
Laringomalácia , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono , Lactente , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Hipotonia Muscular/epidemiologia , Hipotonia Muscular/complicações , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/diagnóstico , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/epidemiologia , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/terapia , Laringomalácia/cirurgia
5.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 169(2): 406-411, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36939570

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel lateral approach for hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HNS) implantation in women and provide evidence for its safety and efficacy. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Single academic medical center. METHODS: We identified patients implanted with HNS by a single surgeon from January 2017 to December 2021. Patient characteristics, postoperative complications, surgical duration, response to therapy, and need for revision surgery were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred four patients were included, including 93 males and 11 females. The lateral approach for HNS implantation involves placing the chest incision for the implantable pulse generator and respiratory sensor lead vertically in the anterior axillary line instead of horizontally in the infraclavicular area. No changes are made to the stimulator lead placement. All female patients were implanted using a lateral approach and all male patients were implanted via the standard anterior approach. Half of the patients were implanted via a 2-incision technique. The median surgical time duration was equivalent in male and female patients (119 [interquartile range (IQR): 105-138] vs 126 [IQR: 115-141], respectively). Revision was required in 2 (18%) females versus 6 (6%) males (p = .17). There were equivalent rates of therapy response as well as postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: A more cosmetic lateral approach is feasible for HNS in female patients and has a similar rate of adverse events and therapy responsiveness. Additional considerations in female patients include the ability to tolerate mammography as well as HNS implantation in the setting of existing breast implants.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/cirurgia , Nervo Hipoglosso/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias
6.
Laryngoscope ; 132(3): 706-710, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34559404

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HGNS) implantation is highly effective in treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in select patient populations that are intolerant of continuous positive airway pressure. Implantation surgery is traditionally performed in hospital outpatient departments (HOPD) due to concern about anesthetic effects and airway manipulation in an OSA population. In this study, we examined complications and efficiency of HGNS implantation in an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) versus HOPD. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Patients with HGNS implantation performed between May 2015-January 2021 at our HOPD or ACS were included. Patient-related characteristics, surgical times, and postoperative complications were obtained via chart review. Reimbursement data on a national level for Medicare patients were calculated based on publicly available data from the Center for Medicare Services. Patient characteristics, surgical times, and complications were summarized as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) and proportions in each surgical setting group as appropriate. These were compared between surgical setting groups via Wilcoxon rank-sum testing and χ2 testing. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients were included. Patients in the HOPD group had significantly higher median apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (42.0 [IQR 27.9-51.0]) compared to the ASC group (31.0 [IQR 21.0-44.2], P = .005). The intervals between in-room and case start, case finish and out-of-room, and time in the postoperative area were significantly shorter in the ASC group compared to the HOPD group. Reimbursement on a national level was estimated at 18% lower for patients with surgery performed at the ASC. There was no significant difference in postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: HGNS implantation in an ASC is safe and more efficient than in a HOPD, and may also be more cost-effective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:706-710, 2022.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Nervo Hipoglosso , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/cirurgia , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Implantação de Prótese/métodos , Implantação de Prótese/estatística & dados numéricos
7.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 48(1): 27-31, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34610861

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Impact on blood flow by double vein anastomosis in head and neck free flaps is unclear. We aimed to assess venous doppler loss of signal (LOS) rates of double vein system compared with a single vein system. METHODS: Consecutive free flaps with implanted venous flow couplers between 2015-2017 were included. LOS rates were compared between groups and with regard to flap type, defect site and recipient vein within double vein group. RESULTS: 92 double-vein (184 veins) and 48 single-vein flaps were included. LOS was similar in single- and double-vein flaps (11/48 (25%) versus 46/184 (25%), p = 0.765). Double veins had fewer flap takebacks compared with single vein (4.3% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.075). Common facial vein (CFV) anastomosis showed superior LOS rates compared with external jugular and CFV branches (p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Double vein anastomosis does not impact LOS rates, results in fewer flap takebacks, yet LOS rates depend on selected recipient vein.


Assuntos
Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/irrigação sanguínea , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Veias Jugulares/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Ultrassonografia Doppler , Veias/cirurgia
8.
J Surg Oncol ; 124(8): 1272-1283, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34390494

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The impact of travel distance on stage at presentation and management strategies of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is unknown. We investigated this relationship. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with laryngeal SCC in the National Cancer Data Base from 2004 to 2016. Multivariate analysis determined relationships between travel distance, sociodemographic, geographic, and hospital factors. Logistic regression determined the influence of travel distance on T-stage and overall stage at presentation, and receipt of total laryngectomy. RESULTS: Sixty thousand four hundred and thirty-nine patients were divided into groups based on distance to treatment: short (<12.5 miles); intermediate (12.5-49.9 miles); and long (>50 miles). Increased travel was associated with T4-stage (intermediate vs. short OR 1.11, CI 1.04-1.18, p = 0.001; long vs. short OR 1.5, CI 1.36-1.65, p < 0.001), and total laryngectomy (intermediate vs. short OR 1.40, CI 1.3-1.5, p ≤ 0.001; long vs. short OR 2.52, CI 2.28-2.79, p ≤ 0.001). In T4 disease, total laryngectomy was associated with improved survival compared to nonsurgical treatment (HR 0.75, CI 0.70-0.80, p < 0.001) regardless of travel distance. CONCLUSION: Longer travel distance to care is associated with increased stage at presentation, rate of laryngectomy, and improved survival in advanced laryngeal SCC. Health policy efforts should be directed towards improving early access to diagnosis and care.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/patologia , Laringectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Viagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia
10.
Laryngoscope ; 130(5): 1195-1201, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31233223

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To characterize patients undergoing laryngeal transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and compare to open partial surgery and transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) in achieving negative margins, requiring adjuvant radiation, and overall survival. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. METHODS: Early-stage (T1/2) laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients from the National Cancer Database. Univariable and multivariable logistic and Cox regressions were used to identify predictors. RESULTS: There were 1,780 patients included in the study (186 [10.4%] = TORS; 523 [29.4%] = open surgery; 1,071 [60.2%] = TLM). TORS was more commonly treated at academic centers (68.8% = open surgery, 53.9% = TLM, 71.0% = TORS; P < .001) and had more T2 (52.7% = TORS, 46.7% = open surgery, 20.5% = TLM; P < .001) and N-positive disease (26.9% = TORS, 19.5% = open surgery, 5.5% = TLM; P < .001). Surgical approach was significantly associated with margin status (positive margin rates: TORS = 17.4%, TLM = 20.0%, open surgery = 13.8%) between open surgery and TLM in multivariable analysis (compared to open surgery, TLM: 1.63 [1.12-2.38], TORS: 1.18 [0.72-1.94]; P = .04). Surgical approach was not associated with receipt of adjuvant radiation (compared to open surgery, TLM: 1.52 [1.04-2.24], TORS: 1.56 [0.97-2.49]; P = .05). It was not associated with margins or adjuvant radiation in supraglottic patients. TORS had the highest 5-year overall survival, although the survival for TLM was similar (68.7% and 64.8%, respectively), and both were higher than that of open surgery (59.1%; P = .01). In multivariable Cox regression for supraglottic patients, there was no observed difference between TORS and open surgery (compared to TORS, open surgery: 1.44 [0.93-2.24]; P = .25). CONCLUSIONS: On multivariable analysis, there was no observed difference in margin status in TORS patients compared to TLM and open surgery (in both the total cohort and supraglottic subgroup). Similarly there was no observed difference in necessitating adjuvant radiation. In Cox regression, there was no observed difference between TORS and open surgery in overall survival for supraglottic patients. This study suggests that TORS may be a viable treatment option for early-stage laryngeal cancer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:1195-1201, 2020.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Laríngeas/patologia , Neoplasias Laríngeas/cirurgia , Terapia a Laser , Microcirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Laríngeas/radioterapia , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Masculino , Margens de Excisão , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Laryngoscope ; 130(6): 1450-1458, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31411749

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Determine rate of preoperative biopsy in parotid malignancies, identify factors associated with its use, and its association with surgical margins. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Commission on Cancer-Accredited Institutions. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We included 5533 patients treated surgically for a parotid malignancy 2004-2014 in the National Cancer Database. Chi-squared tests, univariable, and multivariable logistic regressions were used to evaluate predictors of preoperative biopsy (defined as needle, aspiration, or incisional), and associate biopsy with surgical margins. RESULTS: Preoperative biopsy was utilized in 26.0% of patients. Biopsy was more likely in patients >60 years (odds ratio [OR]: 1.19, P = .035), advanced clinical T stage (vs. T1,T2 OR: 1.23, P = .009; T3 OR: 1.26, P = .026; T4A OR: 2.05, P < .001), advanced clinical N stage (vs. N0, N1: OR: 1.39, P = .013; N2/3: OR: 1.63, P < .001), in academic centers (OR: 1.18, P < .024), and in higher volume centers (vs. low, medium OR: 1.28, P = .002; high OR: 2.16, P < .001). Biopsy use increased over time (vs. 2004-2006, 2007-2010 OR: 1.20, P = .047; 2011-2014 OR: 1.39, P < .001). Biopsy was associated with a reduced risk of positive margins in patients with clinical T1 stage (OR: 0.70, P = .012), and younger than 61 (OR: 0.79, P = .036). CONCLUSION: The national rate of preoperative biopsy in parotid malignancy is low at 26.0%, but has increased over time. Preoperative biopsy is associated with a reduced risk of positive margins in younger patients and those with early clinical stage, suggesting its increased use may improve surgical outcomes and decrease reoperation or adjuvant therapy in these subgroups of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 130:1450-1458, 2020.


Assuntos
Margens de Excisão , Neoplasias Parotídeas/patologia , Neoplasias Parotídeas/cirurgia , Biópsia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pré-Operatório , Utilização de Procedimentos e Técnicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos
12.
Laryngoscope ; 130(6): E388-E396, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31755988

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with positive margins following surgical management of sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC), especially with regard to endoscopic treatment. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of adult patients with clinically staged tumor (T)1 to T4a SNSCC within the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2014, factors were associated with positive margins using multivariable binary logistic regression. Cases from 2010 to 2014 had surgical approach (open vs. endoscopic) available and were analyzed in a subgroup to assess the association of surgical approach with margin status. The association of margin status with overall survival (OS) and additional therapy administration was also assessed. RESULTS: We identified 2,968 cases, of which 807 (27.2%) had positive margins. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with positive margins included higher T stage (T4a vs. T1: odds ratio [OR] 2.768 [95% CI 2.143-3.577]), less differentiated tumors (poorly differentiated vs. well differentiated: OR 1.403 [95% CI 1.060-1.856]), and tumors in the ethmoid sinus (vs. nasal cavity; OR 1.889 [95% CI 1.305-2.734]). Cases treated at higher volume facilities (HVFs) were associated with a lower likelihood of positive margins (OR 0.716 [95% CI 0.582-0.881]). Positive margins were associated with decreased OS (hazard ratio 1.672 [95% CI 1.464-1.908]) and an increased rate of additional therapy (OR 1.966 [95% confidence interval 1.597-2.421]). An endoscopic approach was not associated with an increased likelihood of obtaining positive margins (vs. open; OR 1.151 [0.903-1.651]). CONCLUSION: Positive margins were less likely when performed at HVFs and more likely in the ethmoid sinus than other subsites. Importantly, there was no association between positive margins and surgical approach. Endoscopic surgery may offer a safe, less invasive alternative to open surgery for select patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 130:E388-E396, 2020.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Endoscopia/mortalidade , Neoplasias dos Seios Paranasais/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Endoscopia/métodos , Seio Etmoidal/patologia , Seio Etmoidal/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Margens de Excisão , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cavidade Nasal/patologia , Cavidade Nasal/cirurgia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Razão de Chances , Neoplasias dos Seios Paranasais/patologia , Neoplasias dos Seios Paranasais/cirurgia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 161(4): 605-612, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31547772

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To associate pharmaceutical industry payments to brand-name prescriptions by otolaryngologists. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: Open Payments Database and the Medicare Part D Participant User File 2013-2016. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We identified otolaryngologists receiving nonresearch industry payments and prescribing to Medicare Part D recipients. Records were linked by physician name and state. The value of industry payments and the percentage of brand-name drugs prescribed per hospital referral region (HRR) were characterized as medians. Industry payments were correlated to the rate of brand-name prescription by Kendall's τ correlation. This was repeated at the individual physician level and stratified by payment type. RESULTS: In total, 8167 otolaryngologists received a median of $434 (interquartile range, $138-$1278) in industry compensation over 11 (3-26) payments. Brand-name drugs made up a median of 12.9% (8.6%-18-4%) of each physician's drug claims. The number (τ = 0.05, P < .001) and dollar amount (τ = 0.04, P < .001) of industry payments were correlated with the rate of brand-name drug prescription at the individual physician level. The number of industry payments was also associated with the rate of brand-name prescription by HRR (τ = 0.14, P < .001), but the dollar amount was not. By HRR, food and beverage payments received by physicians were associated with the rate of brand-name drug prescription (τ = 0.04, P < .001), but travel and lodging payments were not. CONCLUSIONS: Industry financial transactions are associated with brand-name drug prescriptions in otolaryngologists, and these associations are stronger at the regional level than at the individual physician level. These correlations are of modest strength and should be interpreted cautiously by readers.


Assuntos
Indústria Farmacêutica/economia , Doações , Medicare Part D , Otorrinolaringologistas/economia , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Conflito de Interesses , Estudos Transversais , Custos de Medicamentos , Humanos , Otorrinolaringologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
14.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 161(6): 986-992, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31476984

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine national positive margin rates in transoral laser microsurgery, to compare patients with positive and negative margins, and to identify factors associated with positive margins. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of the National Cancer Database. SETTING: Population based. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Patients included those with TIS-T3 laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (2004-2014). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify predictors. RESULTS: A total of 1959 patients met inclusion criteria. The national positive margin rate was 22.3%. Sixty-five percent of patients had T1 disease; 94.3% were N-negative; and 74.0% had glottic tumors. Fifty-eight percent of patients were treated at academic centers, and 60.6% were treated at facilities performing <2 cases per year. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with margin status included facility volume (odds ratio [95% CI]; in cases per year: 0.93 [0.89-0.97], P = .001), academic status (vs nonacademic; academic: 0.70 [0.54-0.90], P = .008), T-stage (vs T1; T2: 2.74 [2.05-3.65], T3: 5.53 [3.55-8.63], TIS: 0.59 [0.38-0.92], P < .001), and N-stage (vs N0; N1: 3.42 [1.79-6.54], N2: 2.01 [1.09-3.69], P < .001). Tumor subsite was not associated with margin status. CONCLUSION: The national positive margin rate for laryngeal laser surgery is 22%, which is concerning given the equivalent survival benefit offered by surgery and primary radiation and the increased likelihood of bimodal therapy in the situation of positive margins. Cases treated at nonacademic centers and those with lower caseloads had a higher likelihood of positive margins. There was a linear association between T-stage and likelihood of positive margins, with T3 tumors being 5 times as likely as T1 to yield positive margins. This study highlights the importance of proper patient selection for transoral laser microsurgery resections.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Laríngeas/cirurgia , Terapia a Laser , Margens de Excisão , Microcirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
15.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 161(4): 620-628, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31159649

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Identify positive margin rate in a national cohort of patients with submandibular carcinoma, identify predictors of positive margins, and associate margins with overall survival. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Commission on Cancer-accredited hospitals. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We included patients in the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2014 who were diagnosed with submandibular carcinoma and underwent primary surgical resection. We determined the rate of positive surgical margins and associated patient, tumor, and treatment factors with positive margins via univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis. We associated margin status with overall survival by Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: We identified 1150 patients with submandibular malignancy undergoing surgical resection. Positive margin rate was 41.0%. Increased odds of positive margins were seen in patients with advanced T stage (vs T1, T3: odds ratio [OR] = 3.04, P < .001; T4a: OR = 2.89, P < .001), adenoid cystic carcinoma histology (OR = 1.54, P = .020), and those treated at nonacademic facilities (OR = 1.41, P = .008). Patients who underwent a preoperative diagnostic biopsy had decreased odds of positive margins (OR = 0.72, P = .014). Positive margins were associated with reduced overall survival (58% vs 69% 5-year overall survival, P < .001; hazard ratio = 1.49, P = .001) when controlling for patient, tumor, and management factors. CONCLUSIONS: The national positive margin rate of submandibular carcinoma is 41.0%. Preoperative biopsy and treatment at academic institutions independently decreased the risk of positive margins, and positive margins were independently associated with diminished overall survival. Positive margin rate for submandibular carcinoma may be considered a benchmark for quality of care.


Assuntos
Margens de Excisão , Neoplasias da Glândula Submandibular/cirurgia , Adulto , Biópsia , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias da Glândula Submandibular/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Glândula Submandibular/patologia , Análise de Sobrevida
16.
Head Neck ; 41(9): 3064-3072, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31058417

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Purpose of the study is to assess nationwide margin performance in oropharynx transoral robotic surgery (TORS). METHODS: Retrospective review of the National Cancer Database. RESULTS: Two thousand six hundred sixty-one patients were included. The national positive margin rate (PMR) was 16.9%. High-volume facilities had a lower PMR than low-volume facilities (12.7% vs 21.9%; P < .001). Patients with disease of the tonsil had a lower PMR (15.7%) than base-of-the-tongue (18.2%; P = .14). PMR increased with T classification (T1 = 13.0%, T2 = 17.1%, T3 = 28.2%, T4a = 45.9%, T4b = 58.3%; P < .001). On multivariable regression, factors associated with margin status included only lymph-vascular invasion (1.63[1.13-2.36]; P = .01), high volume (0.57[0.36-0.92]; P = .005), and T classification (as compared to T1, T2: 1.50[1.03-2.18], T3: 3.11[1.77-5.46], T4a: 7.03[2.95-16.75], T4b: 6.72[1.26-35.93]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: National PMR is 16.9%, substantially higher than reported in high-volume TORS centers. There is a linear association between positive margins and T classification, with T3 and T4 PMRs exceeding 28%. High-volume facilities are half as likely to yield positive margins compared to low-volume facilities. There was no association between human papilloma virus status, tumor subsite, or academic facility status and positive margins.


Assuntos
Margens de Excisão , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
17.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 161(2): 265-270, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30909808

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To characterize drug and device industry payments to otolaryngologists in 2017 and compare them with payments from 2014 to 2016. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: 2017 Open Payments Database. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We identified otolaryngologists in the Open Payments Database receiving nonresearch industry payments in 2017. We determined the total number and value of payments and the mean and median payments per compensated otolaryngologist. We characterized payments by census region, nature of payment, and sponsor subspecialty. RESULTS: A total of 8131 otolaryngologists received 66,414 payments totaling to $11.2 million in industry compensation in 2017. This is decreased from $14.5 million in 2016. The mean and median payment per compensated otolaryngologist was $1383 ($10,459) and $159 ($64-$420), respectively. Of the total compensation, 85% was received by the top 10th percentile of otolaryngologists. Speaking fees accounted for $3.1 million (28% of total payments), and food and beverage was the most common payment type (57,691 payments; 87%). Consulting fees decreased by $1 million from 2016 to 2017, and ownership interests decreased by $1.2 million from 2016 to 2017. The south had the highest total compensation value ($4.2 million), while the west had the highest mean payment value ($1561). Rhinology accounted for the highest proportion of payments of all otolaryngology subspecialties at $3.9 million (34%). CONCLUSION: Industry payments to otolaryngologists decreased to $11.2 million in 2017 from $14.5 million in 2016. Much of the decrease can be attributed to decreases in consulting fees and ownership payments. It is important that otolaryngologists remain aware of changes in industry funding with each release of the Open Payments Database.


Assuntos
Indústrias/economia , Otorrinolaringologistas/economia , Otolaringologia/economia , Estudos Transversais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
18.
Laryngoscope ; 129(1): 129-137, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30194762

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To establish benchmarks for positive margin incidence in parotid cancers, associate positive margin status with patient, tumor, and institutional factors and overall survival, and characterize institutional variation in positive margin incidence. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. METHODS: We identified patients surgically treated for a parotid malignancy 2004 to 2013 in the National Cancer Database. We associated positive margins with patient, tumor, and treatment factors by multivariable logistic regression and with overall survival by Cox proportional hazards regression. We characterized institutional variation in positive margin rates by facility type and volume. RESULTS: A total of 5,639 patients were identified. The overall positive margin rate was 31%. By institution, positive margin rates varied from 0% to 100%, with a median rate of 31% (interquartile range = 18%-43%). Adenoid cystic carcinoma was associated with increased, and low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma with decreased, odds of positive margins, (odds ratio [OR] = 1.91 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.54-2.38], P < .001 and OR = 0.68 [95% CI: 0.53-0.87], P = .002, respectively). Treatment at academic or high-volume facilities was associated with decreased odds of positive margins (OR = 0.79 [95% CI: 0.68-0.91], P = .001 and OR = 0.76 [95% CI: 0.63-0.91], P = .004). Positive surgical margins were associated with decreased overall survival (62% vs. 79% 5-year overall survival, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.34 [95% CI: 1.20-1.49], P < .001). Upon stratification by histology, this association was maintained for high-grade, but not low-grade, mucoepidermoid carcinoma (52% vs. 74%, HR = 1.56 [95% CI: 1.31-1.86], P < .001 and 89% versus 91%, HR = 1.05 [95% CI: 0.60-1.83], P = .874, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor and institutional factors are associated with positive surgical margins. Positive margin rates vary substantially between facilities and are less likely at academic and high-volume facilities. Positive surgical margins are associated with decreased overall survival and could be considered quality indicators in parotid malignancies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c Laryngoscope, 129:129-137, 2019.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Margens de Excisão , Neoplasias Parotídeas/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adulto , Carcinoma de Células Acinares/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Acinares/cirurgia , Carcinoma Adenoide Cístico/patologia , Carcinoma Adenoide Cístico/cirurgia , Carcinoma Mucoepidermoide/patologia , Carcinoma Mucoepidermoide/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Neoplasias Parotídeas/patologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida
19.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 160(5): 783-790, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30060705

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To design and implement a postoperative clinical care pathway designed to reduce intensive care usage on length of stay, readmission rates, and surgical complications in head and neck free flap patients. METHODS: A postoperative clinical care pathway detailing timelines for patient care was developed by a multispecialty team. In total, 108 matched patients receiving free tissue transfer for reconstruction of head and neck defects in the year before (prepathway), year after (early pathway), and second year after (late pathway) pathway implementation were compared based on postoperative length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and rates of medical/surgical complications. RESULTS: Median length of stay decreased from 10 to 7.5 and 7 days in the pre-, early, and late-pathway groups, respectively ( P = .012). Readmission rate decreased from 16% in the prepathway group to 0% and 3% in the early and late-pathway groups. The number of patients admitted to the ICU postoperatively decreased from 100% to 36% and 6% in the pre-, early, and late-pathway groups, respectively ( P = .025). The rates of surgical and medical complications were equivalent. DISCUSSION: This pathway effectively reduced ICU admission, length of stay, and readmission rates, without increasing postoperative complications. These outcomes were sustainable over 2 years. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Free flap patients may not require routine ICU admission and may be taken off ventilatory support in the operating room. This effectively reduces costly resource use in this patient population. Similar pathways could be introduced at other institutions.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/organização & administração , Procedimentos Clínicos/organização & administração , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços , Feminino , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos
20.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 160(2): 267-276, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30324861

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To characterize treatment delays in hypopharyngeal cancer, identify factors associated with delays, and associate delays with overall survival. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Commission on Cancer hospitals nationwide. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We included patients in the National Cancer Database who were treated for hypopharyngeal cancer with primary radiation, concurrent chemoradiation, or induction chemotherapy and radiation. We identified median durations of diagnosis to treatment initiation (DTI), radiation treatment duration (RTD), and diagnosis to treatment end (DTE). We associated delays with patient, tumor, and treatment factors and overall survival via multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 3850 patients treated with primary radiation or concurrent chemoradiation were included. Median durations of DTI, RTD, and DTE were 37, 52, and 92 days, respectively. Nonwhite race was associated with delays in DTI (odds ratio [OR] = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51-0.80; P < .001) and DTE (OR = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.49-0.75; P < .001). Medicaid insurance was associated with delays in DTI (OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.07-1.90; P = .015), RTD (OR = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.06-1.83; P = .018), and DTE (OR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.12-1.97; P = .007). Delays in RTD (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.11-1.37; P < .001), not DTI (HR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.82-1.03; P = .150) or DTE (HR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.90-1.15; P = .825), were associated with impaired overall survival. We identified 922 patients who received induction chemotherapy. Delays in DTI, RTD, and DTE were not associated with overall survival in this cohort (HR = 1.10; 95% CI, 0.87-1.39; P = 0.435; HR = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.83-1.32; P = 0.686; HR = 1.11; 95% CI, 0.88-1.41; P = 0.377, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The median durations identified can serve as national benchmarks. Delays during radiation are associated with impaired overall survival among patients treated with primary radiation or chemoradiation but not patients treated with induction chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Hipofaríngeas/mortalidade , Tempo para o Tratamento , Adulto , Idoso , Benchmarking , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Quimiorradioterapia/mortalidade , Estudos de Coortes , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hipofaríngeas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hipofaríngeas/radioterapia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Radioterapia Conformacional/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA