Respiratory gating techniques for optimization of lung cancer radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of the STIC 2003 project was to compare the clinical and economic aspects of respiratory-gated conformal radiotherapy (RGRT), an innovative technique proposed to limit the impact of respiratory movements during irradiation, versus conventional conformal radiotherapy, the reference radiation therapy for lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A comparative, nonrandomized, multicenter, and prospective cost toxicity analysis was performed in the context of this project between April 2004 and June 2008 in 20 French centers. Only the results of the clinical study are presented here, as the results of the economic assessment have been published previously. RESULTS: The final results based on 401 evaluable patients confirm the feasibility and good reproducibility of the various RGRT systems. The results of this study demonstrated a marked reduction of dosimetric parameters predictive of pulmonary, cardiac and esophageal toxicity as a result of the various respiratory gating techniques. These dosimetric benefits were mainly observed with deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) techniques (ABC and SDX systems), which markedly increased the total lung volume compared with the inspiration-synchronized system based on tidal volume (Real-time Position Management). These theoretical dosimetric benefits were correlated clinically with a significant reduction of pulmonary acute toxicity, and the pulmonary, cardiac, and esophageal late toxicities, especially with DIBH techniques. Pulmonary function parameters, although more heterogeneous, especially DLCO, showed a tendency to reduction of pulmonary toxicity in the RGRT group. CONCLUSIONS: RGRT seems to be essential to reduce toxicities, especially the pulmonary, cardiac, and esophageal late toxicities with the DIBH methods.

Can we decrease the skin reaction in breast cancer patients using hyaluronic acid during radiation therapy? Results of phase III randomised trial.

PURPOSE: Radio-induced early skin reactions still remain a clinical challenge. Preliminary results with Hyaluronic acid, one of the most recent topical products used in this indication are proving interesting. To evaluate the efficacy of Hyaluronic acid compared to placebo. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Breast cancer patients with grade 1-2 radio-induced dermatitis during postoperative radiotherapy were eligible. They were randomised to receive either hyaluronic acid (A) or a simple emollient (B). The primary endpoint was the clinical evaluation of the erythema (success versus failure). Secondary endpoints were the evaluation of skin colorimetry, pain, and quality of life. RESULTS: Two-hundred patients were enrolled (A=99, B=101). Ninety-five patients per treatment arm could be evaluated. Failures occurred in 23 patients (24%) in the hyaluronic acid arm, and 32 (34%) in the emollient arm (p=0.15). Seventy-three patients (36.5%) prematurely stopped the treatment without any ensuing difference between the two arms. Body mass index and the size of the epithelitis were both independently associated with the failure of the local treatment. The relative reduction of colorimetric levels was 20% in the hyaluronic acid group, and 13% in the emollient group (p=0.46). Concerning the quality of life assessment, there was a trend towards a lower level of pain in patients receiving hyaluronic acid (p=0.053). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed no significant difference between hyaluronic acid and simple emollient in the treatment of acute radio-induced dermatitis. There was however a trend towards an improvement in both pain level and skin colorimetry.