Retrograde cerebral perfusion reduces embolic and watershed lesions after acute type a aortic dissection repair with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.

BACKGROUND: To assess whether retrograde cerebral perfusion reduces neurological injury and mortality in patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective, observational study including all patients undergoing acute type A aortic dissection repair with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest between January 1998 and December 2022 with or without the adjunct of retrograde cerebral perfusion. 515 patients were included: 257 patients with hypothermic circulatory arrest only and 258 patients with hypothermic circulatory arrest and retrograde cerebral perfusion. The primary endpoints were clinical neurological injury, embolic lesions, and watershed lesions. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of the primary outcomes. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS: Clinical neurological injury and embolic lesions were less frequent in patients with retrograde cerebral perfusion (20.2% vs. 28.4%, p = 0.041 and 13.7% vs. 23.4%, p = 0.010, respectively), but there was no significant difference in the occurrence of watershed lesions (3.0% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.156). However, after multivariable logistic regression, retrograde cerebral perfusion was associated with a significant reduction of clinical neurological injury (OR: 0.60; 95% CI 0.36-0.995, p = 0.049), embolic lesions (OR: 0.55; 95% CI 0.31-0.97, p = 0.041), and watershed lesions (OR: 0.25; 95%CI 0.07-0.80, p = 0.027). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality (12.8% vs. 11.7%, p = ns) or long-term survival between groups. CONCLUSION: In this study, we showed that the addition of retrograde cerebral perfusion during hypothermic circulatory arrest in the setting of acute type A aortic dissection repair reduced the risk of clinical neurological injury, embolic lesions, and watershed lesions.

The predictive value of highly malignant EEG patterns after cardiac arrest: evaluation of the ERC-ESICM recommendations.

PURPOSE: The 2021 guidelines endorsed by the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) recommend using highly malignant electroencephalogram (EEG) patterns (HMEP; suppression or burst-suppression) at > 24 h after cardiac arrest (CA) in combination with at least one other concordant predictor to prognosticate poor neurological outcome. We evaluated the prognostic accuracy of HMEP in a large multicentre cohort and investigated the added value of absent EEG reactivity. METHODS: This is a pre-planned prognostic substudy of the Targeted Temperature Management trial 2. The presence of HMEP and background reactivity to external stimuli on EEG recorded > 24 h after CA was prospectively reported. Poor outcome was measured at 6 months and defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 4-6. Prognostication was multimodal, and withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST) was not allowed before 96 h after CA. RESULTS: 845 patients at 59 sites were included. Of these, 579 (69%) had poor outcome, including 304 (36%) with WLST due to poor neurological prognosis. EEG was recorded at a median of 71 h (interquartile range [IQR] 52-93) after CA. HMEP at > 24 h from CA had 50% [95% confidence interval [CI] 46-54] sensitivity and 93% [90-96] specificity to predict poor outcome. Specificity was similar (93%) in 541 patients without WLST. When HMEP were unreactive, specificity improved to 97% [94-99] (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: The specificity of the ERC-ESICM-recommended EEG patterns for predicting poor outcome after CA exceeds 90% but is lower than in previous studies, suggesting that large-scale implementation may reduce their accuracy. Combining HMEP with an unreactive EEG background significantly improved specificity. As in other prognostication studies, a self-fulfilling prophecy bias may have contributed to observed results.

Radiological properties of neurological injury following acute type A aortic dissection repair.

Objective: The study objective was to assess the radiological properties of acute type A aortic dissection-related neurological injuries and identify predictors of neurological injury. Methods: Our single-center, retrospective, observational study included all patients who underwent acute type A aortic dissection repair between January 1998 and December 2021. Multivariable analyses and Cox regression were performed to identify predictors of embolic lesions, watershed lesions, neurological injury, 30-day mortality, and late mortality. Results: A total of 538 patients were included. Of these, 120 patients (22.3%) experienced postoperative neurological injury; 74 patients (13.8%) had postoperative stroke, and 36 patients (6.8%) had postoperative coma. The 30-day mortality was 22.7% in the neurological injury group versus 5.8% in the no neurological injury group (P < .001). We identified several independent predictors of neurological injury. Cerebral malperfusion (odds ratio, 2.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-5.00), systemic hypotensive shock (odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-3.43), and aortic arch replacement (odds ratio, 3.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-8.08) predicted embolic lesions. Diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 5.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.85-15.42), previous cardiac surgery (odds ratio, 8.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-50.43), duration of hypothermic circulatory arrest (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.08), cardiopulmonary bypass time (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.01), ascending aortic/arch cannulation (odds ratio, 5.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.88-17.12), and left ventricular cannulation (odds ratio, 17.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.69-188.01) predicted watershed lesions. Retrograde cerebral perfusion (odds ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.84) had a protective effect against watershed lesions. Conclusions: In this study, we demonstrated that the radiological features of neurological injury may be as important as clinical characteristics in understanding the pathophysiology and causality behind neurological injury related to acute type A aortic dissection repair.

Carbon dioxide flooding to reduce postoperative neurological injury following surgery for acute type A aortic dissection: a prospective, randomised, blinded, controlled clinical trial, CARTA study protocol - objectives and design.

INTRODUCTION: Neurological complications after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) increase patient morbidity and mortality. Carbon dioxide flooding is commonly used in open-heart surgery to reduce the risk of air embolism and neurological impairment, but it has not been evaluated in the setting of ATAAD surgery. This report describes the objectives and design of the CARTA trial, investigating whether carbon dioxide flooding reduces neurological injury following surgery for ATAAD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The CARTA trial is a single-centre, prospective, randomised, blinded, controlled clinical trial of ATAAD surgery with carbon dioxide flooding of the surgical field. Eighty consecutive patients undergoing repair of ATAAD, and who do not have previous neurological injuries or ongoing neurological symptoms, will be randomised (1:1) to either receive carbon dioxide flooding of the surgical field or not. Routine repair will be performed regardless of the intervention. The primary endpoints are size and number of ischaemic lesions on brain MRI performed after surgery. Secondary endpoints are clinical neurological deficit according to the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, level of consciousness using the Glasgow Coma Scale motor score, brain injury markers in blood after surgery, neurological function according to the modified Rankin Scale and postoperative recovery 3 months after surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted by Swedish Ethical Review Agency for this study. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04962646.

S100B predicts neurological injury and 30-day mortality following surgery for acute type A aortic dissection: an observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Neurological injuries are frequent following Acute Type A Aortic Dissection (ATAAD) repair occurring in 4-30% of all patients. Our objective was to study whether S100B can predict neurological injury following ATAAD repair. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. The study included all patients that underwent ATAAD repair at our institution between Jan 1998 and Dec 2021 and had recorded S100B-values. The primary outcome measure was neurological injury, defined as focal neurological deficit or coma diagnosed by clinical assessment with or without radiological confirmation and with a symptom duration of more than 24 h. Secondary outcome measure was 30-day mortality. RESULTS: 538 patients underwent surgery during the study period and 393 patients, had recorded S100B-values. The patients had a mean age of 64.4 ± 11.1 years and 34% were female. Receiver operating characteristic curve for S100B 24 h postoperatively yielded area under the curve 0.687 (95% CI 0.615-0.759) and best Youden's index corresponded to S100B 0.225 which gave a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 75%. Multivariable logistic regression identified S100B ≥ 0.23 µg/l at 24 h as an independent predictor for neurological injury (OR 4.71, 95% CI 2.59-8.57; p < 0.01) along with preoperative cerebral malperfusion (OR 4.23, 95% CI 2.03-8.84; p < 0.01) as well as an independent predictor for 30-day mortality (OR 4.57, 95% CI 1.18-11.70; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that S100B, 24 h after surgery is a strong independent predictor for neurological injury and 30-day mortality after ATAAD repair. TRIAL REGISTRATION: As this was a retrospective observational study it was not registered.

Association Between EEG Patterns and Serum Neurofilament Light After Cardiac Arrest: A Post Hoc Analysis of the TTM Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: EEG is widely used for prediction of neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. To better understand the relationship between EEG and neuronal injury, we explored the association between EEG and neurofilament light (NfL) as a marker of neuroaxonal injury, evaluated whether highly malignant EEG patterns are reflected by high NfL levels, and explored the association of EEG backgrounds and EEG discharges with NfL. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of the Target Temperature Management After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest trial. Routine EEGs were prospectively performed after the temperature intervention ≥36 hours postarrest. Patients who awoke or died prior to 36 hours postarrest were excluded. EEG experts blinded to clinical information classified EEG background, amount of discharges, and highly malignant EEG patterns according to the standardized American Clinical Neurophysiology Society terminology. Prospectively collected serum samples were analyzed for NfL after trial completion. The highest available concentration at 48 or 72 hours postarrest was used. RESULTS: A total of 262/939 patients with EEG and NfL data were included. Patients with highly malignant EEG patterns had 2.9 times higher NfL levels than patients with malignant patterns and NfL levels were 13 times higher in patients with malignant patterns than those with benign patterns (95% CI 1.4-6.1 and 6.5-26.2, respectively; effect size 0.47; p < 0.001). Both background and the amount of discharges were independently strongly associated with NfL levels (p < 0.001). The EEG background had a stronger association with NfL levels than EEG discharges (R2 = 0.30 and R2 = 0.10, respectively). NfL levels in patients with a continuous background were lower than for any other background (95% CI for discontinuous, burst-suppression, and suppression, respectively: 2.26-18.06, 3.91-41.71, and 5.74-41.74; effect size 0.30; p < 0.001 for all). NfL levels did not differ between suppression and burst suppression. Superimposed discharges were only associated with higher NfL levels if the EEG background was continuous. DISCUSSION: Benign, malignant, and highly malignant EEG patterns reflect the extent of brain injury as measured by NfL in serum. The extent of brain injury is more strongly related to the EEG background than superimposed discharges. Combining EEG and NfL may be useful to better identify patients misclassified by single methods. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01020916.