Outcomes of pediatric oncology and hematopoietic cell transplant patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: There is controversy regarding the utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in pediatric patients with an underlying oncologic diagnosis or who have undergone hematopoietic cell transplant. We hypothesized that these patients have higher mortality, more bleeding complications, more blood product utilization, and a higher rate of new infections than the general pediatric intensive care unit population supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. DESIGN/METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review at a single center quaternary care pediatric hospital including all pediatric intensive care unit extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients from 2011 to 2016. Patients were categorized as either oncology/hematopoietic cell transplant or general pediatric intensive care unit. Patients from the cardiovascular intensive care unit or the neonatal intensive care unit were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients met inclusion criteria of which 7 were oncology/hematopoietic cell transplant patients. The oncology/hematopoietic cell transplant group had lower platelets at the start of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (p = 0.02) but other pre-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation characteristics were similar. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation survival was lower in the oncology/hematopoietic cell transplant group (29% vs 77%, p = 0.02). The incidence of bleeding complications and new infections did not differ. The oncology/hematopoietic cell transplant group received more platelets (median of 15.9 mL/kg/day (interquartile range 8.4, 36.6) vs 7.9 mL/kg/day (3.3, 21.9), p = 0.04) and fresh frozen plasma (14.0 mL/kg/day (3, 15.7) vs 1.8 mL/kg/day (0.5, 5.9), p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Oncology and hematopoietic cell transplant patients had a higher mortality and received more blood products while on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation than the general pediatric intensive care unit patients despite similar pre-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation characteristics. Physicians should use caution when deciding whether or not to utilize extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in this population.

High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Use and Severe Pediatric ARDS in the Pediatric Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipient.

INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in the pediatric hematopoietic cell transplant patient has not been established. We sought to identify current practice patterns of HFOV, investigate parameters during HFOV and their association with mortality, and compare the use of HFOV to conventional mechanical ventilation in severe pediatric ARDS. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a multi-center database of pediatric and young adult allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant subjects requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for critical illness from 2009 through 2014. Twelve United States pediatric centers contributed data. Continuous variables were compared using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test or a Kruskal-Wallis analysis. For categorical variables, univariate analysis with logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: The database contains 222 patients, of which 85 subjects were managed with HFOV. Of this HFOV cohort, the overall pediatric ICU survival was 23.5% (n = 20). HFOV survivors were transitioned to HFOV at a lower oxygenation index than nonsurvivors (25.6, interquartile range 21.1-36.8, vs 37.2, interquartile range 26.5-52.2, P = .046). Survivors were transitioned to HFOV earlier in the course of mechanical ventilation, (day 0 vs day 2, P = .002). No subject survived who was transitioned to HFOV after 1 week of invasive mechanical ventilation. We compared subjects with severe pediatric ARDS treated only with conventional mechanical ventilation versus early HFOV (within 2 d of invasive mechanical ventilation) versus late HFOV. There was a trend toward difference in survival (conventional mechanical ventilation 24%, early HFOV 30%, and late HFOV 9%, P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: In this large database of pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant subjects who had acute respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for critical illness with severe pediatric ARDS, early use of HFOV was associated with improved survival compared to late implementation of HFOV, and the subjects had outcomes similar to those treated only with conventional mechanical ventilation.