Determining breast volume preference among patients, plastic surgeons, and laypeople: Is there a perfect breast size?

BACKGROUND: The female breast comes in many different shapes and sizes. The literature remains inconclusive on the ideal breast size. This study aims to investigate and compare breast size preferences among three cohorts (patients, plastic surgeons, and laypeople) to provide a better understanding of Western European ideals. METHODS: Patients, plastic surgeons, and laypeople were interviewed using a survey containing three-dimensional simulations of nine females, each depicted using five simulations with increasing breast size (1 = natural breast without breast implants, 2 = moderate, 3 = moderate plus, 4 = high, and 5 = ultra-high). Linear regression models were performed to define statistically significant associations between preferred breast size and predictor variables. RESULTS: In total, 28 patients, 45 plastic surgeons, and 100 laypeople (50 males and 50 females) participated in this study. On average, patients (3.5 ± 0.7) preferred larger breast sizes compared to surgeons (3.0 ± 0.7) and laypeople (3.1 ± 0.8). The difference between patients and surgeons was statistically significant. Overall, males preferred larger breast sizes than women. Patients of older age and with a higher BMI preferred larger breast sizes, while higher educational level was significantly associated with smaller breast size preference. Female plastic surgeons would undergo breast augmentation, while male plastic surgeons and female lay participants seem more skeptical. CONCLUSIONS: Significant preferential differences exist between patients and surgeons. It is important for professionals to be aware of societal ideals and preferential differences to adequately consult patients and achieve more satisfactory results.

Long-term recurrence rates of whole specimen intraoperative frozen section analysis in basal cell carcinomas of the face with WIFSA.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recent studies show that whole specimen intraoperative frozen section analysis (WIFSA) is a reliable method for margin analysis in basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and has low recurrence rates after five-years follow-up. There are no studies with longer follow-up. Our aim is to present long-term recurrence rates after WIFSA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with a facial BCC receiving excision with WIFSA between 1992 and 2007 were evaluated. Recurrence rates were examined for primary BCC (pBCC), recurrent BCCs (rBCC), and the different histological subtypes. The accuracy of WIFSA was assessed by comparing with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded section analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1140 patients with 1265 BCCs underwent excision with WIFSA, with a median and maximum follow-up of 10 and 25.3 years, respectively. Of all tumors, 90.0% were primary. Excisions were radical after an average of 1.4 excision rounds;5, 10, and 15-year recurrence rates for pBCCs are 3.3%, 5.1%, and 7.3%, respectively. An aggressive growth pattern and rBCCs are associated with more recurrences. The accuracy of WIFSA is 98.4%. CONCLUSIONS: WIFSA provides a highly accurate analysis and has a low recurrence rate for primary BCCs. The increasing recurrence rates over time imply 5 years of follow-up may be insufficient.

A Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Exposure Between the Mini C-Arm and the Standard C-Arm.

Background: The use of intraoperative fluoroscopy has become mandatory in osseous hand surgery. Due to its overall practicality, the mini C-arm has gained popularity among hand surgeons over the standard C-arm. This study compares image quality and radiation exposure for patient and staff between the mini C-arm and the standard C-arm, both with flat panel technology. Methods: An observer-based subjective image quality study was performed using a contrast detail (CD) phantom. Five independent observers were asked to determine the smallest circles discernable to them. The results were plotted in a graph, forming a CD curve. From each curve, an image quality figure (IQF) was derived. A lower IQF equates to a better image quality. The patients' entrance skin dose was measured, and to obtain more information about the staff exposure dose, a perspex hand phantom was used. The scatter radiation was measured at various distances and angles relative to a central point on the detector. Results: The IQF was significantly lower for the mini C-arm resulting in a better image quality. The patients' entrance dose was 10 times higher for the mini C-arm as compared with the standard C-arm, and the scatter radiation threefold. Conclusions: Due to its improved image quality and overall practicality, the mini C-arm is recommended for hand surgical procedures. To ensure that the surgeons' radiation exposure is not exceeding the safety limits, monitoring radiation exposure using mini C-arms with flat panel technology during surgery should be done in a future clinical study.

Radiation Exposure to Surgeon and Assistant During Flat Panel Mini C-Arm Fluoroscopy in Hand and Wrist Surgical Procedures.

PURPOSE: During mini C-arm fluoroscopy, both the patient and surgical team are exposed to scatter radiation. The objective of this study was to quantify body, thyroid, and hand radiation exposure to surgeon and assistant during intraoperative use of flat panel mini C-arm fluoroscopy in hand and wrist surgical procedures. METHODS: Over 5 months, the surgeon's and assistant's radiation exposure was recorded during all osseous hand and wrist surgical procedures. Whole-body and thyroid radiation exposure were measured with 2 types of dosimeters: a photon thermoluminescence detector and a RaySafe i2 real-time dosimeter. Ring dosimeters were used to quantify hand radiation exposure. RESULTS: Mini C-arm fluoroscopy was used in 94 surgical procedures. Total fluoroscopy time was 1,996 seconds and varied between surgical procedures (range, 1-152 seconds; median, 11 seconds). No thermoluminescence detector photon dosimeter exceeded the threshold limit of 0.1 mSv. The RaySafe i2 real-time dosimeters recorded a cumulated dose of 0.029 mSv for the body and 0.012 mSv for the thyroid position of the surgeon. The assistant received a cumulated dose of 0.011 mSv for the body and 0.011 mSv for the thyroid position. The ring dosimeters showed a cumulated dosage of 1.28 mSv for the surgeon and 0.20 mSv for the assistant. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the surgeon's and assistant's body, thyroid, and hands were exposed to acceptable levels of scatter radiation during intraoperative use of the flat panel mini C-arm. The surgeon received the highest radiation exposure: 2.9% of the yearly radiation limits for the body, 0.05% for the thyroid position, and 2.56% for the hands. The assistant was exposed to less scatter radiation: 1.1% for the body, 0.04% for the thyroid, and 0.4% for the hands. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study quantified radiation levels to which surgeon and assistant are exposed during mini C-arm fluoroscopy in hand and wrist surgical procedures.

Comparison of Cartilage-Scoring and Cartilage-Sparing Otoplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of Complications and Aesthetic Outcome of 1060 Ears.

BACKGROUND: Various techniques are used to correct prominent ears. The authors describe their experience with four different otoplasty techniques in 565 patients with congenital deformities of the ears (1060 ears) that were performed in their hospital during an 11-year period (2002 to 2012). METHODS: The authors divided the techniques into two groups: group I, cartilage-sparing techniques (i.e., IA, Mustardé; and IB, Furnas); and group II, cartilage-cutting techniques (i.e., IIA, Chongchet; and IIB, concha shell reduction). The authors compared early and late and minor and major complications, recurrence rates, and revision surgery. Furthermore, aesthetic outcome was scored by three different groups (consultant plastic surgeons, plastic surgery residents, and laymen) on a visual analogue scale using a blinded random selection of preoperative and postoperative photographs. RESULTS: The percentage of complications without the need for reoperation was 20 percent and 21 percent in the cartilage-sparing and cartilage-cutting groups, respectively (p = 0.44). In 6 percent of all cases, a reoperation of the otoplasty was required (7 percent and 6 percent in the cartilage-sparing and cartilage-cutting groups, respectively). Aesthetic postoperative results showed that the cartilage-cutting group scored significantly lower on postoperative shape (p = 0.04), result (p = 0.03), and satisfaction (p = 0.04) compared with the cartilage-sparing group. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that patients who have undergone operations with cartilage-sparing or cartilage-cutting techniques have a similar rate of complications and need for reoperation. However, the cartilage-sparing techniques have a better aesthetic outcome, as judged by the different groups. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Custom-Made Palatal Shield Use in Cleft Palate and Fistula Repair: A Potential Benefit for Fast Postoperative Recovery.

OBJECTIVE: To review our experience with a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) protective shield used as an adjunct to protect the newly restored palate in wide bilateral cleft and complex fistula closure without diet restrictions. DESIGN: Clinical cohort study. SETTING: Division of Plastic Surgery and Maxillary Surgery. PATIENTS: A selection of 22 cleft palate children undergoing (tertiary) palatal fistula repair (n = 16) or closure of a complex wide primary palatal defect (n = 6). INTERVENTIONS: One month prior to surgery, a plaster model of the palate was made adding a 5- to 8-mm-thick layer of dental putty to the level of the dental arch. On top of the putty, a 1.5-mm-thick PMMA shield was created to cover the postoperative elevated and restored palate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fistula recurrence rate, postoperative complications, days of hospitalization. RESULTS: All patients maintained durable and safe palatal closure without fistula recurrence within the follow-up period, varying from 1 until 4 years. Recovery was fast, with a mean duration of hospitalization of 1.5 days. All patients could directly resume their normal diet. CONCLUSIONS: A PMMA shield has been shown to be a safe and helpful adjunct in complex fistula repair and late anterior palate repair.

Complications after Hypospadias Correction: Prognostic Factors and Impact on Final Clinical Outcome.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of patient and treatment characteristics on the occurrence of complications after hypospadias correction and the impact of complications on final clinical outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 205 hypospadias patients who had surgery in the Medical Centre Leeuwarden (1996-2011). Patient and treatment characteristics were hypospadias severity (preoperative meatal location and chordee), number of planned surgeries, reconstruction technique, operation year, and patient's age at the time of surgery. The final clinical outcome was measured with the Hypospadias Objective Scoring Evaluation (HOSE) (maximum score = 16) and compared between patients with and without complications. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients (31%) had complications, most of which were fistulas (n = 40). An increased complication risk was seen in patients with severe hypospadias (preoperative proximal meatus or chordee), multistage reconstruction, reconstruction techniques other than Mathieu, and surgeries performed before 2005. Uncomplicated treatment resulted only in a marginally higher HOSE (15.7) compared with complicated treatment (15.4). Fistulas and multiple complications reduced clinical outcome more (15.3 and 14.9, respectively), while urinary tract infections, wound dehiscence, or prepuce related complications did not (16.0, 16.0, and 15.8, respectively). CONCLUSION: The complication risk after hypospadias correction is influenced by hypospadias severity and type and year of reconstruction. Certain, but not all complications diminish final clinical outcome.

Effective excision of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the face using analysis of intra-operative frozen sections from the whole specimen.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We excised cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) of the face while using intra-operative frozen section analysis of the margins in an optimized bread-loafing fashion (WIFSA). METHODS: Medical records were reviewed of 160 cSCCs of the face that were treated by surgical excision with WIFSA between April 2007 and January 2013. The accuracy of WIFSA was verified by comparing results with postoperative formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections. Also, recurrence and metastasis during follow-up were studied and duration of treatment and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: The 160 cSCCs affected 152 patients. In 131 cSCCs (mean follow-up: 41.0 months, SD: ±26.3, range: 3.0-110.7) occurred 6 (4.6%) recurrences and 2 (1.5%) metastases. Of the WIFSA results, 98.8% corresponded with postoperative FFPE sections. Mean duration of treatment was 77 min (SD: ±25, range: 34-159) and complication rate was 8.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical excision with WIFSA is an excellent treatment modality for cSCC of the face because of its accurate method for assessment of complete tumor removal, low recurrence and metastasis rate, short average duration of treatment, and low complication rate.

Whole specimen intraoperative frozen section analysis. Experience with 1082 basal cell carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: Basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) excised leaving positive tumour margins, are at a higher risk of recurrence. Accordingly, complete tumour removal with preservation of healthy tissue, aiming for low recurrence rates, is the main goal in treating BCCs. OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to identify the reliability of the Whole Specimen Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis (WIFSA) technique by comparing intraoperative WIFSA and postoperative Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded section analysis (FFPE) results in 1082 basal cell carcinomas and by assessing the recurrence rates during a follow-up period up to 10 years. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective cohort of all patients with BCC of the face receiving surgical excision with the WIFSA method between January 2007 and December 2013 was evaluated. We compared the intraoperative frozen section results with postoperative FFPE in order to assess accuracy of the WIFSA. Recurrence rates were assessed among all BCCs with a tumour-free margin at final excision that had a minimum follow-up of 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 996 patients with 1082 BCCs were treated with the WIFSA. Overall agreement of WIFSA with conventional postoperative FFPE was 98·8%, sensitivity and specificity being 99·0% and 98·7% respectively. We excluded 23 BCCs that still had positive tumour margins at the end of the procedure and another 67 for the analysis of recurrence rate because follow-up was shorter than 6 months. A total of 992 BCCs with a tumour-free margin at final excision had a mean follow-up of 5·6 years (mean 67 ± 27·7 months (range 6-117 months)). The total recurrence rate was 2·1% (21 out of 992 BCCs). The recurrence rate among the primary tumours was 1·6% (13 out of 828 cases) and 4·9% among the recurring tumours (8 out of 164 cases). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that, in patients with primary or recurring BCCs, WIFSA provides a high accuracy for intraoperative specimen analysis and has a low recurrence rate after a mean follow-up of 5·6 years. FUNDING: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Gastric perforation due to the ingestion of a hollow toothpick: report of a case.

A perforation due to the ingestion of a toothpick is a condition seldom seen in the stomach. We herein describe an 80-year-old woman with a perforation of the stomach due to an ingested hollow toothpick. The toothpick was easily removed during a mini-laparotomy. The site of perforation was closed with absorbable sutures and omentum was used to function as an overlying patch. The postoperative course was uncomplicated. The hollow toothpick functioned as a fistula between the contents of the stomach and the peritoneal cavity. This resulted in a very different clinical picture from that observed in "classical wooden" toothpick injury, where the toothpick is not able to function as a fistula. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of a hollow toothpick perforating the stomach. A hollow toothpick perforation must be considered in any patient with symptoms of intestinal perforation, even when there is no history of swallowing toothpicks. Removal of a toothpick and subsequent suturing of the puncture site is a simple and relatively minor surgical procedure, which may have a lower morbidity and mortality as compared to other causes of gastric perforation. A precaution to observe, is the potential danger that one of the members of the operating team might perforate a finger.