Olfactory Dysfunction Predicts Frailty and Poor Postoperative Outcome in Older Patients Scheduled for Elective Non-Cardiac Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Frailty has been suggested to take part in the recently demonstrated link between olfactory dysfunction and overall mortality risk. Preoperative assessment of frailty is essential to detect the most vulnerable patients scheduled for surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether olfactory dysfunction is a reliable predictor of preoperative frailty and postoperative outcome. DESIGN: This was a single-center prospective observational study conducted between July and October 2020 in Brussels, Belgium. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 155 preoperative patients aged from 65 years old and scheduled for elective non-cardiac surgery. MEASUREMENTS: Olfactory function was examined using the Sniffin' Sticks 12-item identification test. Frailty was assessed using the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) and handgrip strength. The clock drawing test (CDT) from the EFS was also analyzed separately to evaluate cognitive function. Patients were followed for postoperative complications and mortality over one year. RESULTS: Olfactory dysfunction was significantly associated with the EFS score, anosmic patients having a higher median EFS score than normosmic patients (6[4-7] vs 4[2-5], p = .025). Anosmic patients had an increased odds of being frail after adjusting for possible confounding factors (OR: 6.19, 95% CI: 1.65-23.20, p = .007) and were more at risk of poor postoperative outcome (including complications and death) (OR: 4.33, 95% CI: 1.28-14.67, p = .018). CONCLUSIONS: Olfactory dysfunction is associated with preoperative frailty determined by the EFS and with poor post-surgical outcome at one-year.

Development of a new psychophysical method to assess intranasal trigeminal chemosensory function.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop a new psychophysical test to assess intranasal trigeminal chemosensory function. METHODOLOGY: The test is similar to the Sniffin’ Sticks test, but using pens impregnated with substances preferentially activating trigeminal afferents. Our test comprises detection threshold, discrimination, identification and lateralization tasks. In a first study, we evaluated healthy controls. In a second study, we evaluated the potential usefulness of this test in patients with rhinological conditions. RESULTS: Study 1: 86 controls were included. Threshold, identification and lateralization performance decreased with age. Test-retest reliability was similar to that of olfactory tests. Study 2: results of the controls group were compared to those of 59 patients (14 allergic rhinitis, 11 chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), 9 without nasal polyps (CRSsNP), and 25 with an olfactory disorder (OD)). Controls had 1) lower detection thresholds compared to CRSwNP, CRSsNP and OD, 2) better discrimination and identification scores compared to OD, and 3) better lateralization scores compared to CRSwNP and CRSsNP. CONCLUSIONS: Our test allows to identify age-related changes in trigeminal chemosensory function. Trigeminal function seems to be differently affected in different pathologies. Further studies are necessary to validate our results and evaluate the impact of olfactory co-activation on the observed results.

Estimation of intraepidermal fiber density by the detection rate of nociceptive laser stimuli in normal and pathological conditions.

The variability of warm and heat pain sensitivity between body regions is usually ascribed to differences in intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density. However, although crucial to assess the function of the thermo-nociceptive system, especially in the context of small fiber neuropathies, the relationship between psychophysical performance and IENF density is poorly understood. Here, we examine the hypothesis according to which the nociceptive system must receive a critical amount of afferent information to generate a conscious percept and/or a behavioral response. The amount of nociceptive information is defined by the stimulus, but also by the state of the nervous system encoding, transmitting and processing the afferent input. Furthermore, this amount may be expected to depend on the number of activated IENF, itself dependent on the size of the stimulated surface area as well as the density of IENF. By characterizing the relationship between psychophysical responses to nociceptive stimuli, size of the stimulated surface area and IENF density estimated using skin biopsies in healthy subjects as well as experimental and pathological conditions of reduced IENF density, we were able to estimate the number of nociceptive afferents required to elicit a conscious percept. Convergent results were obtained across the different experiments, indicating that the detection rate to brief small-diameter CO(2) laser pulses could be used to estimate IENF density and, hence, to diagnose and quantify denervation in small fiber neuropathies.

From the neuromatrix to the pain matrix (and back).

Pain is a conscious experience, crucial for survival. To investigate the neural basis of pain perception in humans, a large number of investigators apply noxious stimuli to the body of volunteers while sampling brain activity using different functional neuroimaging techniques. These responses have been shown to originate from an extensive network of brain regions, which has been christened the Pain Matrix and is often considered to represent a unique cerebral signature for pain perception. As a consequence, the Pain Matrix is often used to understand the neural mechanisms of pain in health and disease. Because the interpretation of a great number of experimental studies relies on the assumption that the brain responses elicited by nociceptive stimuli reflect the activity of a cortical network that is at least partially specific for pain, it appears crucial to ascertain whether this notion is supported by unequivocal experimental evidence. Here, we will review the original concept of the "Neuromatrix" as it was initially proposed by Melzack and its subsequent transformation into a pain-specific matrix. Through a critical discussion of the evidence in favor and against this concept of pain specificity, we show that the fraction of the neuronal activity measured using currently available macroscopic functional neuroimaging techniques (e.g., EEG, MEG, fMRI, PET) in response to transient nociceptive stimulation is likely to be largely unspecific for nociception.