Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery Outcomes: A Comparison Between Patients Who Underwent the Procedure During the COVID-19 Pandemic and a Cohort Treated Prior to the Pandemic.

Background and objective During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, many elective orthopedic surgeries, including anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), were temporarily postponed. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of ACLR in patients who underwent surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic with those in a cohort treated before the pandemic. Materials and methods This retrospective review compared patients who underwent primary ACLR during two periods: March to June 2020 (the pandemic group) and January to December 2018 (the pre-pandemic group). Matched cohorts (1:1) were created using propensity matching. Time from injury-to-first visit, injury-to-surgery, and first visit-to-surgery were calculated. Subjective and objective outcomes, minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement, and complication rates were recorded for up to two years postoperatively. Statistical analysis included 𝛘2 or Fisher's exact tests for categorical data, and t- or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for continuous data with significance set at P < 0.05. Results The pandemic and pre-pandemic groups consisted of 33 and 217 patients, respectively. Matched cohorts consisted of 33 patients each. The time from injury-to-surgery and the first visit-to-surgery was prolonged in the pandemic group. When unmatched, visual analog scale (VAS) scores at three months postoperatively and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-pain interference (PI) at six months postoperatively and at the final follow-up were higher in the pandemic group. When matched, PROMIS-PI at six months postoperatively was higher in the pandemic group, and VAS scores at one year postoperatively were higher in the pre-pandemic group. MCID achievement and complication rates did not significantly differ between the groups. Conclusions ACLR procedures were significantly delayed in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. While patients treated before and during the pandemic experienced varying pain levels during recovery, their functional outcomes, MCID achievement, and complication rates did not differ significantly.

When Do Patients Achieve PROMIS Milestones After Rotator Cuff Repair?

Background: Given the variability of the questions asked, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity (UE) computer adaptive test (CAT) Version 2.0 item bank aids in the evaluation of rotator cuff repair (RCR) rehabilitation by determining when recovery milestones are possible based on the quality of patient responses at certain time points. Purpose: To assess the time point at which patients with RCR were able to achieve specific functional milestones, determined as positive responses to the 5 most frequently asked items on the PROMIS UE CAT Version 2.0. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The postoperative PROMIS UE CAT Version 2.0 scores of patients who underwent RCR between February 16, 2017, and July 30, 2019, were reviewed with respect to individual PROMIS item, response, and timing of response. A functional milestone was considered achieved if the patient response was "without any difficulty" or "with a little difficulty" to any of the 5 most frequently asked PROMIS items. The percentage of patients in each monthlong postoperative interval who answered with either response was recorded. The logit generalized estimating equations method was used to analyze the association between milestone achievement for each PROMIS item and predictor variables (age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, race, ethnicity, and employment status). Results: A total of 1131 responses from 371 patients were included. The majority of patients attained milestone achievement on 4 of the 5 most frequently asked PROMIS items at time points ranging from 1 to 5 months postoperatively: "Are you able to carry a shopping bag or briefcase?" (by 1 month), "Are you able to put on and take off a coat or jacket?" (by 3 months), "Are you able to pour liquid from a bottle into a glass?" (by 3 months), and "Are you able to carry a heavy object (over 10 pounds/5 kg)?" (by 5 months). For the item "Are you able to put on a shirt or blouse?", the majority of patients did not achieve the milestone by 1 year. Conclusion: These findings support the application of PROMIS UE CAT Version 2.0 milestone achievement in the shared decision-making process and postoperative monitoring, as patients can use this information to determine when they can return to certain activities and providers can apply these standards to identify patients needing additional clinical support.

What Do Patients Encounter When Searching Online About Meniscal Surgery? An Analysis of Internet Trends.

Background: Many patients use the internet to learn about their orthopaedic conditions and find answers to their common questions. However, the sources and quality of information available to patients regarding meniscal surgery have not been fully evaluated. Purpose: To determine the most frequently searched questions associated with meniscal surgery based on question type and topic, as well as to assess the website source type and quality. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: The following search terms were entered into a web search (www.google.com) using a clean-install browser: "meniscal tear,""meniscus repair,""meniscectomy,""knee scope,""meniscus surgery," and "knee arthroscopy." The Rothwell classification system was used to categorize questions and sort them into 1 of 13 topics relevant to meniscal surgery. Websites were also categorized by source into groups. The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria (medians and interquartile ranges [IQRs]) were used to measure website quality. Results: A total of 337 unique questions associated with 234 websites were extracted and categorized. The most popular questions were "What is the fastest way to recover from meniscus surgery?" and "What happens if a meniscus tear is left untreated?" Academic websites were associated more commonly with diagnosis questions (41.9%, P < .01). Commercial websites were associated more commonly with cost (71.4%, P = .03) and management (47.6%, P = .02). Government websites addressed a higher proportion of questions regarding timeline of recovery (22.2%, P < .01). Websites associated with medical practices were associated more commonly with risks/complications (43.8%, P = .01) while websites associated with single surgeons were associated more commonly with pain (19.4%, P = .03). Commercial and academic websites had the highest median JAMA benchmark scores (4 [IQR, 3-4] and 3 [IQR, 2-4], respectively) while websites associated with a single surgeon or categorized as "other" had the lowest scores (1 [IQR 1-2] and 1 [IQR 1-1.5], respectively). Conclusion: Our study found that the most common questions regarding meniscal surgery were associated with diagnosis of meniscal injury, followed by activities and restrictions after meniscal surgery. Academic websites were associated significantly with diagnosis questions. The highest quality websites were commercial and academic websites.

Indications for Surgery, Activities After Surgery, and Pain Are the Most Commonly Asked Questions in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Reconstruction.

Purpose: To leverage Google's search algorithms to summarize the most commonly asked questions regarding anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and surgery. Methods: Six terms related to ACL tear and/or surgery were searched on a clean-installed Google Chrome browser. The list of questions and their associated websites on the Google search page were extracted after multiple search iterations performed in January of 2022. Questions and websites were categorized according to Rothwell's criteria. The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark criteria were used to grade website quality and transparency. Descriptive statistics were provided. χ2 and Student t-tests identified for categorical differences and differences in JAMA score, respectively (significance set at P < .05). Results: A total of 273 unique questions associated with 204 websites were identified. The most frequently asked questions involved Indications/Management (20.2%), Specific Activities (15.8%), and Pain (10.3%). The most common websites were Medical Practice (27.9%), Academic (23.5%), and Commercial (19.5%). In Academic websites, questions regarding Specific Activities were seldom included (4.7%) whereas questions regarding Pain were frequently addressed (39.3%, P = .027). Although average JAMA score was relatively high for Academic websites, the average combined score for medical and governmental websites was lower (P < .001) than nonmedical websites. Conclusions: The most searched questions on Google regarding ACL tears or surgery related to indications for surgery, pain, and activities postoperatively. Health information resources stemmed from Medical Practice (27.9%) followed by Academic (23.5%) and Commercial (19.5%) websites. Medical websites had lower JAMA quality scores compared with nonmedical websites. Clinical Relevance: These findings presented may assist physicians in addressing the most frequently searched questions while also guiding their patients to greater-quality resources regarding ACL injuries and surgery.

High Return to Play Rate and Diminished Career Longevity are Seen Following Arthroscopic Shoulder Labral Repair in Major League Baseball Players.

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of arthroscopic shoulder labral repair, not related to instability, on return to play (RTP), return to prior performance (RTPP), game utilization, and performance in Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers and positional players. Methods: A retrospective review of all MLB athletes who underwent arthroscopic shoulder labrum repair from 2002 to 2020 was performed. Players with a history of instability events were excluded. A 2:1 control cohort of healthy MLB players were matched to the operative cohort by age, years of experience, position, height, and body mass index (BMI). Player demographics, game utilization, and performance metrics were collected for all players. Results: Twenty-six of 39 MLB pitchers (66%) and 18 of 25 (72%) positional players, who underwent arthroscopic shoulder labral repair RTP, with 46.2% of pitchers and 72% of positional players successfully RTP. At one season postsurgery, pitchers and positional players experienced a significant reduction in games played compared to their one season preinjury (44.7 ± 29.3 vs 109.5 ± 73.2 games; P < .001 and 75.7 ± 47.1 vs 98.0 ± 50.7 games; P = .04). When compared with matched controls at one season postinjury, pitchers had significantly fewer runs allowed per 9 innings (5.8 ± 2.0 vs 4.3 ± 1.4; P = .0061) and walk and hits per inning pitched (WHIP) (1.5 ± 0.3 vs 1.3 ± 0.2; P = .0035), while positional players had worse on-base percentage (0.3 ± 0.1 vs 0.3 ± 0.1; P = .0116). Both pitchers and positional players experienced significantly shorter career lengths after surgery (P = .002) when compared to controls. Conclusions: Following arthroscopic shoulder labral surgery, most MLB pitchers and positional players were able to RTP successfully but experienced shorter careers thereafter. These players also experienced declines in game utilization and performance one season after surgery but were able to return to baseline at 3 seasons after surgery. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective case control.

Patient factors influencing the choice of opioid versus non-opioid postoperative analgesia following common sports procedures: a prospective survey study.

Purpose: Despite established opioid-free protocols for postoperative analgesia after common orthopaedic sports procedures, many patients continue to request opioids postoperatively. The purpose of this study was to elucidate patient factors influencing preferences for opioid versus nonopioid postoperative analgesia. Methods: Patients (age >/ = 15) without a history of a documented chronic pain disorder who were scheduled for one of ten sports procedure types from August 2020 to May 2021 were eligible for inclusion. Patients were excluded if undergoing revision surgery, had concomitant injuries, had opioids use >3 months preoperatively, or unable to read English. Recruitment ended after 100 patients enrolled. At the patients' preoperative visit, patients were administered a written survey assessing pain medication preferences. Participants completed the Opioid Risk Tool survey, as well as Visual Analog Scale and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System surveys. Results: One hundred patients participated in the study. Forty-two patients preferred opioids versus 58 patients preferring nonopioid postoperative analgesia. Patients preferring opiates were more likely to have had previous surgery (90.2% vs. 69.6%, p = 0.023) with post-operative pain managed with opiates (87.5% vs 55.4%, p = 0.003), higher preoperative Visual Analog Scale score (6±3.5 vs. 3±2, p < 0.001), reported post-operative pain as a reason for opioids preference (88.1% vs 20.0%, p < 0.001), and were less concerned about addiction (4.8% vs. 45.5%, p < 0.001) and side effects (11.9% vs. 52.7%, p < 0.001). For every unit increase in Visual Analog Scale score, the odds of preferring opioid pain control increased 1.41 times. Conclusions: Patients with a history of prior surgery utilizing opioid pain control, higher Visual Analog Scale scores preoperatively, and concern for inadequately managed postoperative pain were more likely to prefer opioid pain control following common orthopaedic sports procedures. Patients may benefit from increased preoperative education about opioid risks and the role of multimodal pain management regimens.

Blood Flow Restriction Therapy for 2 Weeks Prior to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Did Not Impact Quadriceps Strength Compared to Standard Therapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of a 2-week home-based blood flow restriction (BFR) prehabiliation program on quadriceps strength and patient-reported outcomes prior to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: Patients presenting with an ACL tear were randomized into two groups, BFR and control, at their initial clinic visit. Quadriceps strength was measured using a handheld dynamometer in order to calculate peak force, average force, and time to peak force during seated leg extension at the initial clinic visit and repeated on the day of surgery. All patients were provided education on standardized exercises to be performed 5 days per week for 2 weeks between the initial clinic visit and date of surgery. The BFR group was instructed to perform these exercises with a pneumatic cuff set to 80% of limb occlusion pressure placed over the proximal thigh. Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), knee range of motion, and quadriceps circumference were gathered at the initial clinic visit and day of surgery, and patients were monitored for adverse effects. RESULTS: A total 45 patients met inclusion criteria and elected to participate. There were 23 patients randomized to the BFR group and 22 patients randomized into the control group. No significant differences were noted between the BFR and control groups in any demographic characteristics (48% vs 64% male [P = .271] and average age 26.5 ± 12.0 vs 27.0 ± 11.0 [P = .879] in BFR and control, respectively). During the initial clinic visit, there were no significant differences in quadriceps circumference, peak quadriceps force generation, time to peak force, average force, pain, and PROMIS scales (P > .05 for all). Following completion of a 2-week home prehabilitation protocol, all patients indeterminant of cohort demonstrated decreased strength loss in the operative leg compared to the nonoperative leg (P < .05 for both) However, there were no significant differences in any strength or outcome measures between the BFR and control groups (P > .05 for all). There were no complications experienced in either group, and both were compliant with the home-based prehabilitation program. CONCLUSIONS: A 2-week standardized prehabilitation protocol preceding ACL reconstruction resulted in a significant improvement in personal quadriceps peak force measurements, both with and without the use of BFR. No difference in quadriceps circumference, strength, or patient reported outcomes were found between the BFR and the control group. The home-based BFR prehabiliation protocol was found to be feasible, accessible, and well tolerated by patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, randomized controlled trial with small effect size.

Reduced Career Longevity but Return to Baseline Performance After Arthroscopic Shoulder Labral Repair in National Hockey League Players.

Purpose: To investigate the impact of arthroscopic shoulder labral repair without shoulder instability on career longevity, game use, and performance in National Hockey League (NHL) athletes. Methods: A retrospective review of all NHL players who underwent arthroscopic shoulder labral repair from 2004 to 2020 was performed. A 2:1 matched control group was used for comparison. Controls were matched by age, body mass index, position, and experience prior to the index year. Demographic characteristics, game use, and performance metrics were collected for all athletes. Statistical analysis examined game use and performance both at 1-year and 3-year follow-up compared with one season before injury. Results: Twenty-nine players who underwent arthroscopic shoulder labral surgery returned to play (100%) and were matched with 55 control players. The operative cohort experienced shorter careers compared with controls (4.4 ± 3.1 vs 6.0 ± 3.6 seasons, P < .05). After one season, injured players experienced significant reductions in goals per 60 (0.6 ± 0.4 vs 0.8 ± 0.5, P = .013), points per 60 (1.5 ± 0.9 vs 2.0 ± 0.9, P = .001), and shooting percentage, (8.5 ± 5.8 vs 10.5 ± 5.2, P = .02) compared with the year prior. The reduction in goals (0.6 ± 0.4 vs 0.8 ± 0.5, P = .01) and shooting % (8.5 ± 4.7 vs 10.5 ± 5.2, P = .04) persisted at 3 years. Compared with controls, the surgical group experienced significant reductions at one season postindex in percentage of goals, assists, points per 60, and shooting percentage. Only the reduction in goals per 60 persisted at 3 seasons postindex. Conclusions: Following return to play after arthroscopic shoulder labral repair, NHL players demonstrated reduced career longevity compared with healthy controls. Players exhibited significant reductions in game use and performance at one season after injury but returned closer to baseline after 3 seasons. Level of Evidence: Level III; retrospective case control.

In Vivo Static Retraction and Dynamic Elongation of Rotator Cuff Repair Tissue After Surgical Repair: A Preliminary Analysis at 3 Months.

Background: Rotator cuff repair is a common orthopaedic procedure that provides pain relief for many patients, but unfortunately, an estimated 20% to 70% of repair procedures will fail. Previous research has shown that elongation (ie, retraction) of a repaired tendon is common even in patients with a repair construct that appears intact on magnetic resonance imaging. However, it is unknown how this repair tissue functions under dynamic conditions. Purpose: To quantify static retraction and maximum dynamic elongation of repair tissue after rotator cuff repair. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Data from 9 patients were analyzed for this study. During surgery, a 3.1-mm tantalum bead was sutured to the supraspinatus tendon, medial to the repair site. Glenohumeral kinematics were assessed at 1 week (static) and 3 months (static and during scapular-plane abduction) after surgery using a biplanar videoradiographic system. The 3-dimensional position of the bead was calculated relative to the tendon's insertion on the humerus (ie, bead-to-insertion distance). Static retraction was calculated as the change in the bead-to-insertion distance under static conditions between 1 week and 3 months after surgery, and maximum dynamic elongation was calculated as the maximal positive change in the bead-to-insertion distance during dynamic motion relative to the start of motion. The magnitudes of static retraction and maximum dynamic elongation were assessed with 1-sample t tests. Results: At 3 months after surgery, static retraction occurred in all patients by a mean of 10.0 ± 9.1 mm (P = .01 compared with no elongation). During scapular-plane abduction, maximum dynamic elongation averaged 1.4 ± 1.0 mm (P < .01 compared with no elongation). Descriptively, dynamic elongation consistently took 1 of 2 forms: an initial increase in the bead-to-insertion distance (mean, 2.0 ± 0.6 mm) before decreasing until the end of motion or an immediate and substantial decrease in the bead-to-insertion distance at the onset of motion. Conclusion: Repair tissue elongation (static retraction and maximum dynamic elongation) appeared to be a common and significant finding at 3 months after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Dynamic elongation of repair tissue during scapular-plane abduction exhibited 1 of 2 distinct patterns, which may suggest different patterns of supraspinatus mechanical and neuromuscular function.

Preoperative Opioid Use Is Associated With Inferior Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Scores Following Rotator Cuff Repair.

PURPOSE: To determine the influence of preoperative opioid use on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores pre- and postoperatively in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). METHODS: A retrospective review of all RCR patients aged >18 years old was performed. PROMIS pain interference ("PROMIS PI"), upper extremity function ("PROMIS UE"), and depression ("PROMIS D") scores, were reviewed. These measures were collected at preoperative, 6-month, and 1-year postoperative time points. A prescription drug-monitoring program was queried to track opioid prescriptions. Patients were categorized as chronic users, acute users, and nonusers based on prescriptions filled. Comparison of means were carried out using analysis of variance and least squares means. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: In total, 184 patients who underwent RCR were included. Preoperatively, nonusers (n = 92) had superior PROMIS UE (30.6 vs 28.9 vs 26.1; P < .05) and PI scores (61.5 vs 64.9 vs 65.3; P < .001) compared with acute users (n = 65) and chronic users (n = 27), respectively. At 6 months postoperatively; nonusers demonstrated significantly greater PROMIS UE (41.7 vs 35.6 vs. 33.5; P < .001), lower PROMIS D (41.6 vs 45.8 vs 51.1; P < .001), and lower PROMIS PI scores (50.7 vs 56.3 vs 58.1; P < .01) when compared with acute and chronic users, respectively. Nonusers had lower PROMIS PI (47.9 vs 54.3 vs 57.4; P < .0001) and PROMIS D (41.6 vs 48.3 vs 49.2; P = .0002) scores compared with acute and chronic users at 1-year postoperatively. Nonusers experienced a significantly greater magnitude of improvement in PROMIS D 6 months postoperatively compared with chronic opioid users (-5.9 vs 0.0; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing RCR demonstrated superior PROMIS scores pre- and postoperatively if they did not use opioids within 3 months before surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative trial.

Trends in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Scores Exist Between Day of Surgical Scheduling and Day of Surgery.

PURPOSE: To examine trends in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores among orthopedic sports medicine patients undergoing surgery who completed PROMIS forms both in the ambulatory (preoperative) setting at the time of surgical scheduling, as well as on the day of surgery (perioperative) prior to their procedure. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing various sports medicine-related surgeries were recruited. Patients were included if they were scheduled for surgery and completed preoperative PROMIS on the day of surgical scheduling and on the day of surgery. Patients were excluded if they refused the questionnaire or had been administered perioperative anesthesia, which would interfere with questionnaire completion. Paired samples t-tests were run between preoperative and perioperative PROMIS scores to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: 153 patients were included with an average age of 46.5 years. The average (SD) time between completion of PROMIS questionnaires was 46.5 (44.4) days. The absolute value change in scores between preoperative and perioperative visits was 4.09 for PROMIS UE, 3.59 for PROMIS PF, 3.67 for PROMIS PI, and 4.13 for PROMIS D. The overall net change of scores between preoperative and perioperative visits were -.57 for PROMIS UE CAT, .16 points for PROMIS PF CAT, -.85 points for PROMIS PI CAT, and -2.14 points for PROMIS D CAT. Statistically significant differences in preoperative and perioperative PROMIS PI (P =.042) and PROMIS D (P =.004) scores were found. CONCLUSIONS: Health states-as measured by PROMIS CAT forms completed among patients undergoing orthopedic surgery-can either improve or worsen preoperatively between the time of administration in both the ambulatory and perioperative setting. Despite the existence of these preoperative trends, it is important to consider patient and surgery-specific causes, such as the anatomic region, type of surgical intervention, and timing of preoperative PROMIS administration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, prognostic.

Extensor Mechanism Ruptures and Reruptures: Perioperative Opioid Management.

The purpose of this study was to determine (1) the correlation between preoperative and postoperative opioid use and (2) risk factors associated with rerupture in patients undergoing open extensor mechanism repair. A retrospective review of patients who underwent operative repair of quadriceps or patellar tendon rupture was performed. Patients were classified as opioid nonusers if they had not received any opioid medications in the 3 months before surgery, or as acute users or chronic users if they received at least one opioid prescription within 1 month or 3 months preceding surgery. Clinical records were reviewed for postoperative opioid use within a year after surgery as well as rerupture rates. A total of 144 quadriceps tendon and 15 patellar tendon repairs were performed at a mean age of 56.8 ± 15.1 years and body mass index of 33.2 ± 7.1. The overall rerupture rate was 6%. Diabetes was a significant risk factor for rerupture (56 vs. 19%, p = 0.023). Chronic preoperative opioid users were more likely to continue to use opioids beyond 1 month postoperatively (p < 0.001) as compared with acute or nonopioid users. Chronic preoperative opioid users (relative risk [RR]: 3.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.11-5.90) and patients with longer anesthesia time (RR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.00-1.93) required more monthly opioid refills, whereas tourniquet use required fewer opioid refills each month (RR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.37-0.88). Compared with patients without a rerupture, each additional prescription refill after the initial repair in the rerupture group was associated with a 22% higher risk of tendon rerupture (RR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.07-1.39). The chronicity of preoperative opioid intake was found to have a significant effect on postoperative opioid use. This study suggests that there is a higher prevalence of rerupture in patients with prolonged opioid use postoperatively and among diabetics.

Multimodal Nonopioid Pain Protocol Provides Better or Equivalent Pain Control Compared to Opioid Analgesia Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of a multimodal nonopioid analgesic protocol in controlling postoperative pain compared to opioids following a primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: Seventy consecutive patients undergoing a primary rotator cuff repair were assessed for eligibility. An observer-blinded prospective randomized controlled trial was designed in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 (CONSORT) statement. The two arms of the study included a multimodal nonopioid pain regimen for the experimental group, and a standard of care narcotics for the control group. The primary outcome was visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores for the first 10 postoperative days. Secondary outcomes included PROMIS-PI (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Pain Interference) scale, patient satisfaction, and adverse drug events. RESULTS: Thirty patients declined to participate or were excluded, and 40 patients were included in the final analysis. A total of 23 patients were in the traditional group, and 17 patients were in the nonopioid group. Control patients on opioid pain management reported a significantly higher VAS pain score on postoperative day 1 (opioid: 5.7 ± 2, nonopioid: 3.7 ± 2.2; P = .011) and postoperative day 4 (opioid: 4.4 ± 2.7, nonopioid: 2.4 ± 2.2; P = .023). No significant difference was seen on any other postoperative day. When mixed measured models were used to control for confounding factors, the nonopioid group demonstrated significantly lower VAS and PROMIS-PI scores (P < .01) at every time point. Patients in the traditional analgesia group reported significantly more days with constipation (P = .003) and days with upset stomach (P = .020) than those in the nonopioid group. CONCUSSION: The present study found that a multimodal nonopioid pain protocol provided equivalent or better pain control compared to traditional opioid analgesics in patients undergoing primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Minimal side effects were noted with some improvement in the multimodal nonopioid pain cohort. All patients reported satisfaction with their pain management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, prospective randomized controlled trial.

Multimodal nonopioid pain protocol provides equivalent pain control versus opioids following arthroscopic shoulder labral surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare postoperative pain and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing primary arthroscopic labral surgery managed with either a nonopioid alternative pain regimen or a traditional opioid pain regimen. METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients undergoing primary arthroscopic shoulder labral surgery were assessed for participation. In accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 statement, a prospective randomized controlled trial was performed. The 2 arms of the study were a multimodal nonopioid analgesic protocol as the experimental group and a standard opioid regimen as the control group. The primary outcome was postoperative pain scores (on a visual analog scale [VAS]) for the first 10 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction, patient-reported outcomes, and complications. Randomization was performed with a random number generator, and all data were collected by blinded observers. Patients were not blinded. RESULTS: Twelve patients did not meet the inclusion criteria or declined to participate. Thus, 48 patients were included in the final analysis: 24 in the nonopioid group and 24 in the opioid group. There was no significant difference in VAS or PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) scores between patients in the 2 cohorts on any postoperative day (P > .05). When we controlled for confounding factors with repeated-measures mixed models, the nonopioid cohort reported significantly lower VAS and PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Pain Interference scores (P < .01) at all time points. No difference was found in reported adverse events (constipation, diarrhea, drowsiness, nausea, and upset stomach) between cohorts at any time point (P > .05). CONCLUSION: This study found that a multimodal nonopioid pain regimen provided, at the minimum, equivalent pain control, an equivalent adverse reaction profile, and equivalent patient satisfaction when compared with a standard opioid-based regimen following arthroscopic shoulder labral surgery.

Patients With Preoperative Clinical Depression Symptomology Experience Significant Improvements in Postoperative Pain, Function, and Depressive Symptoms Following Rotator Cuff Repair.

PURPOSE: To determine the impact of clinical depression on outcomes after rotator cuff repair (RCR), as measured by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) health domains. METHODS: RCR patients were given PROMIS CAT assessments for physical function (PROMIS UE), pain interference (PROMIS PI), and depression (PROMIS D) during preoperative and postoperative clinic visits. PROMIS D scores ≥55 correlate with mild clinical depression; thus patients with PROMIS D scores ≥ 55 were placed in the clinical depression (CD) group, whereas patients with scores <55 were placed in the "no clinical depression" (NCD) group. Categorical variables were compared at preoperative and postoperative (6 months and ≥1 year) timepoints using χ2 tests. Continuous variables were compared using Student's t-tests. RESULTS: Of the 340 RCR patients included in this study, 65 (19.1%) were found to have mild clinical depression preoperatively, with that number being reduced to 23 (6.8%) at 6 months and 19 (5.6%) at ≥1 year after surgery. Compared with preoperative PROMIS scores, CD patients had significant postoperative improvements at 6 months and ≥1 year in mean PROMIS UE (26.7 vs 35.5 vs 38.9; P < .001) and PROMIS PI (67.6 vs 56.7 vs 56.4; P < .001). NCD patients had similar postoperative improvements at 6 months and ≥1 year in mean PROMIS UE (30.8 vs 38.6 vs 46.9; P < .001) and PROMIS PI (61.7 vs 53.0 vs 47.6; P < .001). The improvement in PROMIS scores was similar for the CD and NCD groups in both PROMIS UE (12.2 vs 16.1, respectively) and PROMIS PI (-11.2 vs -14.1, respectively). CONCLUSION: Despite starting with worse PROMIS UE and PROMIS PI scores, patients undergoing RCR with symptoms of CD experienced significant improvement in function, pain, and depressive symptoms. Preoperative depression should not be a contraindication to arthroscopic RCR in patients who are otherwise appropriate operative candidates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative trial.

Multimodal Nonopioid Pain Protocol Provides Equivalent Pain Versus Opioid Control Following Meniscus Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness of a nonopioid pain regimen in controlling postoperative pain as compared with a traditional opioid pain control following primary meniscectomy or meniscal repair. METHODS: Ninety-nine patients undergoing primary meniscectomy or meniscal repair were assessed for participation. A prospective randomized control trial was performed in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 statement. The 2 arms of the study included a multimodal nonopioid analgesic protocol and a standard opioid regimen with a primary outcome of postoperative pain level (visual analog scale) for the first 10 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction. Randomization was achieved using a random-number generator. Patients were not blinded. Data collection was done by a blinded observer. RESULTS: Eleven patients did not meet the inclusion criteria, and 27 declined participation. A total of 61 patients were analyzed with 30 randomized to the opioid regimen and 31 randomized to the nonopioid regimen. Patients receiving the nonopioid regimen demonstrated noninferior visual analog scale scores compared with patients who received opioid pain medication (P > .05). No significant differences were found in preoperative (opioid: 58.9 ± 7.0; nonopioid: 58.2 ± 5.5, P = .724) or postoperative (opioid: 59.8 ± 6.5; nonopioid: 54.9 ± 7.1, P = .064) Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement and Information System Pain Interference Short Form scores. No difference was found in recorded side effects between both groups at any given time point: constipation, nausea, diarrhea, upset stomach, and drowsiness (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that a multimodal nonopioid pain protocol provided equivalent pain control and patient outcomes following primary meniscus surgery while having an equivalent side effect profile. All patients reported satisfaction with their pain management without requiring emergency opioid analgesia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, prospective randomized controlled trial.

Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computerized Adaptive Testing (PROMIS CAT) Scores Predict Achievement of Minimum Clinically Important Difference Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an Anchor-Based Methodology.

PURPOSE: To determine the change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computerized Adaptive Testing (PROMIS CAT) scores for physical function, pain interference, and depression that constitute minimum clinically important difference (MCID) using an anchor-based technique and to identify pre-operative clinical thresholds in anchor-based MCID that predict likelihood of achieving MCID following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: Adult patients aged 18 years or older undergoing ACL reconstruction that completed both preoperative and postoperative PROMIS CAT assessments and an anchor-based questionnaire were identified over a 23-month period. Anchor-based MCID was determined for PROMIS CAT forms for physical function (PROMIS PF CAT), pain interference (PROMIS PI CAT), and depression (PROMIS D CAT). RESULTS: A total of 137 patients were included for statistical analysis, with pre-operative PROMIS CAT forms completed 27.9 ± 31.2 days before surgery and 492.5 ± 219.9 days postoperatively on average. Statistically significant improvements were observed for all PROMIS CAT domains. PROMIS PF CAT improved from 39.5 ± 8.2 to 55.0 ± 9.7 (P < .0005), PROMIS PI CAT from 59.8 ± 7.2 to 48.2 ± 8.3 (P < .0005), and PROMIS D CAT from 47.9 ± 8.8 to 41.5 ± 8.6 (P < .0005). Anchor-based MCID for each PROMIS CAT form was calculated to be +4.5, -5.4, and -4.1 for PROMIS PF CAT, PROMIS PI CAT, and PROMIS D CAT, respectively. Mean difference between preoperative and postoperative PROMIS CAT scores exceeded MCID for all domains. The percentage of patients achieving MCID for PROMIS PF CAT, PROMIS PI CAT, and PROMIS D CAT was 85%, 72%, and 55%, respectively. After introduction of 95% specificity cutoffs, the percentage of patients achieving MCID for PROMIS PF CAT, PROMIS PI CAT, and PROMIS D CAT increased to 100% (<35.6 cutoff score), 92% (>65.7 cutoff score), and 83% (>57.5 cutoff score), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: According to anchor-based analysis of PROMIS CAT MCID, ACL reconstruction is effective in improving physical function, pain interference, and depression symptoms. In addition, preoperative PROMIS CAT scores can predict the likelihood of achieving MCID postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prognostic case series.

The relationship between shoulder range of motion and elbow stress in college pitchers.

HYPOTHESIS: College pitchers with increased external rotation gain (ERG) produce increased medial elbow torque (elbow stress) whereas those with reduced total rotational range of motion (ROM) have reduced medial elbow torque during pitching. METHODS: Pitchers were recruited from 3 college baseball teams. Players with prior injury or on pitching restrictions because of pain were excluded. Players were evaluated within 2 weeks before their first game of the season. Pitchers completed an intake survey, and shoulder and arm measurements were taken. Pitchers were fitted with a baseball sleeve that included a sensor at the medial elbow. The sensor calculated elbow torque, arm speed, arm slot, and shoulder rotation for each pitch, while a radar gun measured peak ball velocity. After adequate warm-up, pitchers threw 5 fastballs in a standardized manner off the mound at game-speed effort. The primary outcome evaluated the relationship between shoulder ROM and medial elbow torque. Additional outcomes evaluated pitcher characteristics and demographic characteristics in the context of shoulder ROM. RESULTS: Twenty-eight pitchers were included in the preseason analysis. The average age and playing experience were 20.1 years (standard deviation [SD], 1.3 years) and 15.3 years (SD, 1.8 years), respectively, with 2.5 years (SD, 1.2 years) playing at collegiate level. The dominant shoulder showed decreased internal rotation and increased external rotation (ER) relative to the nondominant side (P < .001). The average glenohumeral internal rotation deficit and ERG were 11.3° (SD, 9.87°) and 5.71° (SD, 8.8°), respectively. ERG ≥ 5° was a significant predictor of elbow stress during pitching (47.4 Nm [SD, 0.7 Nm] vs. 45.1 Nm [SD, 0.6 Nm], P = .014). Univariate associations showed that each additional degree of ER resulted in increased elbow torque (ß estimate, 0.35 ± 0.06 Nm; P = .003). Conversely, decreased medial elbow torque was found in pitchers with reduced shoulder ROM (glenohumeral internal rotation deficit ≥ 20°: 43.5 Nm [SD, 1.1 Nm] vs. 46.6 Nm [SD, 0.5 Nm], P = .011; loss of total rotational ROM ≥ 5°: 43.6 Nm [SD, 1.1 Nm] vs. 46.6 Nm [SD, 0.5 Nm], P = .013) and in those with greater arm length (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: College pitchers with increased ER produce greater medial elbow torque during the pitching movement. Each degree of increased ER was found to correlate with increased elbow torque and ball velocity. On the contrary, arm length and reduced shoulder ROM were associated with reduced medial elbow torque. This study suggests that increased ER in pitchers is associated with greater elbow stress during pitching.

Preoperative Patient-Centric Predictors of Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Meniscectomy.

PURPOSE: To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) using Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer-adaptive testing assessments in patients undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. The secondary purpose was to identify which preoperative patient factors are associated with MCID achievement. METHODS: Three PROMIS computer-adaptive testing assessments (Physical Function [PF], Pain Interference [PI], and Depression [D]) were administered to all patients presenting to 1 of 2 board-certified, sports medicine orthopaedic surgeons. Patients with Current Procedural Terminology codes of 29880 or 29881 were chart reviewed for a host clinical and demographic factors. PROMIS scores were assessed for improvement and patient characteristics were assessed for influence on any improvement. MCID was calculated according to the distribution methodology and receiver operating characteristics were used to assess preoperative scores predictive ability. RESULTS: In total, 166 patients met inclusion criteria (58 exclusions). Postoperative PROMIS-PF (45.6), PROMIS-PI (54.6), and PROMIS-D (44.1) significantly improved at least 3 months after surgery when compared with baseline (P = .002). MCID values for PROMIS-PF, PROMIS-PI, and PROMIS-D were 3.5, 3.3, and 4.4, respectively. Individuals with PROMIS-PF scores below 34.9 yielded an 82% probability of achieving MCID, while PROMIS-PI scores above 67.5 yielded an 86% probability of achieving MCID and a cutoff of 58.9 for PROMIS-D yielded a 60% probability of achieving MCID, with 90% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: PROMIS scores, obtained preoperatively, were shown to be valid predictors of postoperative clinical improvement in patients undergoing meniscectomy. Our findings suggest that patients with physical function scores of 34.9 or less have an increased probability of reaching a minimal clinically important difference. Similarly, patients with pain interference scores of 67.5 and above have increased probability of reaching MCID for pain interference. These cutoffs may be used by physicians to aid in the counseling of patients considering arthroscopic meniscectomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Case Series.

Elbow Torque Is Reduced in Asymptomatic College Pitchers With Elbow Laxity: A Dynamic Ultrasound Study.

PURPOSE: To determine the relation between medial elbow torque, as measured by wearable sensor technology, and adaptations of the medial elbow structures on dynamic ultrasound imaging in asymptomatic collegiate pitchers. METHODS: Thirty-four pitchers from National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II universities were eligible for preseason testing. The exclusion criteria included age younger than 18 years, history of surgery, non-pitcher, or current restrictions. Pitchers were fitted with a wearable sensor sleeve that recorded elbow torque, arm slot, arm speed, and arm rotation. Pitchers threw 5 fastballs in a standardized manner off the mound at game-speed effort. They also underwent dynamic ultrasound imaging of the elbow by a musculoskeletal sonographer, with standardized valgus loading. Images were deidentified, and measurements of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) and ulnohumeral joint space (UHJS), to assess elbow laxity, were performed by a musculoskeletal radiologist. RESULTS: The final analysis included 28 pitchers with an average age of 20.1 years (standard deviation, 1.3 years; range, 18-23 years) and playing experience of 15.3 years (standard deviation, 1.8 years; range, 11-19 years). The dominant UCL thickness (P < .001), loaded UHJS (P = .039), and delta UHJS (P < .001) were significantly greater than the nondominant measurements. An inverse correlation was found between loaded UHJS and medial elbow torque (r = -0.4, P < .001). Additionally, every 1-mm increase in UHJS significantly reduced medial elbow torque by 2.27 Nm (P = .032) and arm slot by 8.8° (P = .019) and increased arm rotation by 5.3° (P = .043). Pitchers with a loaded UHJS of 4.4 mm or greater and delta UHJS of 1.25 mm or greater had significantly reduced medial elbow torque (P < .001). Pitchers with a UCL thickness of 1.65 mm or greater had significantly increased medial elbow torque (47.4 Nm vs 44.8 Nm, P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Pitchers with increased dynamic elbow laxity were found to experience reduced medial elbow torque while pitching. Additionally, pitchers with greater UCL thickness on ultrasound were found to experience increased medial elbow torque while pitching. This study's findings suggest a relation between anatomic adaptations found on ultrasound of the pitching elbow and medial elbow torque. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective cohort study.