Demographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcome data from 2 global, phase 3 trials of chronic cough.

BACKGROUND: The current characterization of patients with refractory or unexplained chronic cough (RCC and UCC, respectively) primarily stems from relatively small clinical studies. OBJECTIVE: To report the baseline medical history and clinical characteristics of individuals with RCC or UCC who were enrolled in COUGH-1 and COUGH-2, 2 large, global, phase 3 trials of gefapixant, a P2 × 3-receptor antagonist. METHODS: Adults with a chronic cough lasting for more than 1 year, diagnosis of RCC or UCC, and score greater than 40 mm on a 100-mm cough severity visual analog scale at both screening and baseline were eligible for enrollment. Demographics, medical history, and cough characteristics were collected at baseline. Cough-related measures included objective cough frequency, cough severity visual analog scale, Leicester Cough Questionnaire, and Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire. The data were summarized using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of 2044 participants, 75% were women; mean age was 58 years, and mean cough duration was approximately 11 years. Among all participants, 73% were previously diagnosed with asthma, gastroesophageal reflux disease, or upper airway cough syndrome. The mean Leicester Cough Questionnaire total score was 10.4, with domain scores reflecting impaired cough-specific quality of life across physical, psychological, and social domains. The mean Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire score was 39.6, with some of the most burdensome reported items being consistent with features of cough-reflex hypersensitivity. Participant characteristics and cough burden were comparable across geographic regions. CONCLUSION: Participants with RCC or UCC had characteristics consistent with published demographics associated with chronic cough. These data reflect a global population with burdensome cough of long duration and substantial impairment to quality of life. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: COUGH-1, NCT03449134 (https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT03449134); COUGH-2, NCT03449147 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03449147).

Validation and Meaningful Change Thresholds for an Objective Cough Frequency Measurement in Chronic Cough.

PURPOSE: Objective cough frequency is used to assess efficacy of chronic cough (CC) treatments. The objective of this study was to explore the relationship between objective cough frequency and cough-specific patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and estimate a clinically meaningful change threshold (MCT) for objective cough frequency. METHODS: Data collected in a phase 2b study in participants with refractory or unexplained CC were used to investigate the relationship between 24-h cough frequency (measured using an ambulatory cough monitor) and cough-specific PROs (i.e., cough severity visual analog scale, cough severity diary, Leicester Cough Questionnaire). Convergent validity was assessed using Spearman ρ. An MCT for 24-h cough frequency was estimated using the patient global impression of change (PGIC) scale as an anchor. RESULTS: Correlations between 24-h cough frequency and cough-specific PROs at baseline, Week 4, and Week 12 were significant (P < 0.0001) but low to moderate in strength (ρ = 0.30-0.58). Participants categorized as very much improved/much improved (i.e., PGIC of 1 or 2) or minimally improved (i.e., PGIC of 3) had mean 24-h cough frequency reductions of 55% and 30%, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis suggested that a 24-h cough frequency reduction of 38% optimizes sensitivity and specificity for predicting a PGIC score of 1-3. CONCLUSION: Objective 24-h cough frequency is significantly associated with cough-specific PROs, but cough frequency and PROs most likely capture distinct aspects of CC. A ≥ 30% reduction in 24-h cough frequency is a reasonable MCT to define treatment response in CC clinical trials.

Improvements in Objective and Subjective Measures of Chronic Cough with Gefapixant: A Pooled Phase 3 Efficacy Analysis of Predefined Subgroups.

INTRODUCTION: In phase 3 trials (COUGH-1/COUGH-2), gefapixant 45 mg twice daily significantly reduced 24-h cough frequency vs placebo in refractory or unexplained chronic cough (RCC or UCC). METHODS: Here, the efficacy of gefapixant 45 mg vs placebo was evaluated across COUGH-1/COUGH-2 in predefined subgroups based on sex, region, age, cough duration, cough severity, cough frequency, and diagnosis (RCC, UCC). Awake cough frequency reductions at Week 12 and LCQ response rates (i.e., ≥ 1.3-point improvement) at Week 24 were assessed. RESULTS: Among 1360 participants analyzed, gefapixant 45 mg resulted in consistent awake cough frequency reductions overall and across predefined subgroups at Week 12. Gefapixant also resulted in improved LCQ scores across subgroups at Week 24; ≥ 70% of participants in each subgroup treated with gefapixant 45 mg had an LCQ response. CONCLUSION: These data suggest gefapixant 45 mg provides consistent objective and subjective efficacy across subgroups of individuals with RCC or UCC.

A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, clinical study to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of gefapixant in Japanese adult participants with refractory or unexplained chronic cough.

BACKGROUND: In two phase 3, global clinical trials (COUGH-1 and COUGH-2), the P2X3-receptor antagonist gefapixant significantly reduced objective 24-h cough frequency in participants with refractory or unexplained chronic cough (RCC or UCC) at a dosage of 45 mg twice daily (BID), with an acceptable safety profile. The primary objective of this phase 3, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study was to assess the safety and tolerability of gefapixant in Japanese participants with RCC or UCC (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03696108; JAPIC-CTI, 184154). METHODS: Participants aged ≥20 years with chronic cough lasting ≥4 months and a diagnosis of RCC or UCC despite treatment in accordance with Japanese Respiratory Society guidelines were randomized 1:1 to receive gefapixant 15 or 45 mg BID for 52 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of gefapixant, including adverse events (AEs) and discontinuations due to AEs. Cough-specific quality of life was assessed using the Leicester Cough Questionnaire as a secondary objective. RESULTS: Of 169 randomized and treated participants, 63% were female and mean age was 58 years. Adverse events were reported by 79 (94%) and 82 (96%) participants in the 15- and 45-mg BID groups, respectively. Most treatment-related AEs were taste related. Discontinuations due to AEs occurred in 6 (7%) and 17 (20%) participants receiving gefapixant 15 or 45 mg BID, respectively. There were no serious treatment-related AEs or deaths. Leicester Cough Questionnaire total scores improved from baseline through Week 52. CONCLUSIONS: Gefapixant had an acceptable safety profile, with no serious treatment-related AEs in Japanese participants.

Leicester Cough Questionnaire validation and clinically important thresholds for change in refractory or unexplained chronic cough.

INTRODUCTION: The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), a cough-specific quality-of-life measure, evaluates the impact of cough across physical, psychological, and social domains in patients with chronic cough (CC). This study assessed the psychometric properties of the LCQ. METHODS: Data from a phase IIb, randomized controlled trial of the P2X3-receptor antagonist gefapixant were analyzed (NCT02612610). Subjective [Cough Severity Diary, cough severity visual analogue scale, and patient global impression of change (PGIC)] and objective (awake and 24-h cough frequency) data were used to validate the LCQ for use in patients with refractory or unexplained CC (RCC and UCC, respectively). Psychometric analyses included confirmatory factor analyses, internal consistency and test-retest reliability, validity, responsiveness, and estimated within-patient thresholds for clinically meaningful change. RESULTS: Model-fit values for the proposed three-factor LCQ domains and most individual items were acceptable. Analyses suggest that a mean improvement ranging from 1.3 to 2.3 points for the LCQ total and ⩾0.8, ⩾0.9, and ⩾0.8 points for physical, psychological, and social domain scores, respectively, had the best sensitivity and/or specificity for predicting patient ratings of improvement on the PGIC. CONCLUSIONS: The LCQ is a valid and reliable measure to evaluate cough-specific quality of life and is a fit-for-purpose measure for use in patients with RCC or UCC. Although a single threshold for defining clinically meaningful change depends on the context of use, the results can help guide both treatment decisions and drug development. Therefore, clinicians may consider a ⩾1.3-point increase in the LCQ total score as clinically meaningful.

Update on the clinical development of gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist for the treatment of refractory chronic cough.

Chronic cough, or cough lasting >8 weeks, is often associated with underlying medical conditions (ie, asthma, gastroesophageal reflux disease, nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis, and upper-airway cough syndrome). In some patients with chronic cough, treatment of these underlying conditions does not resolve the cough (refractory chronic cough [RCC]), or none of these conditions are present (unexplained chronic cough [UCC]). Despite appropriate medical evaluation, patients with RCC or UCC frequently experience cough persisting for many years, as there are currently no targeted pharmacological approaches approved for the treatment of these conditions. However, the adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-gated P2X3 receptor, a key modulator of the activation of sensory neurons central to the cough reflex, has recently garnered attention as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of chronic cough. Gefapixant, a first-in-class, non-narcotic, selective antagonist of the P2X3 receptor, recently demonstrated efficacy and was generally well tolerated in phase 2 clinical trials in patients with RCC, validating the utility of targeting this receptor in patients with chronic cough. On the basis of these data, 2 global phase 3 trials, with combined anticipated enrolment exceeding 2000 patients and with treatment durations of up to 1 year, have been initiated. Together, these trials will further evaluate efficacy and safety of gefapixant in the control of cough in patients with RCC or UCC.