Influence of hemodialysis on regadenoson clearance in an in vitro hemodialysis model.

BACKGROUND: Regadenoson is a novel pharmacological stress agent whose disposition during hemodialysis is not known. The purpose of this study was to determine the clearance of regadenoson under varying dialytic conditions using an in vitro hemodialysis model. METHODS AND RESULTS: Whole human blood was used to analyze the effect of hemodialysis on the clearance of regadenoson. Regadenoson transmembrane clearance (CLD) was assessed for both a standard permeability and a high permeability polysulfone hemodialyzer with blood/dialysate flow rates of 300/600 and 400/800 mL/min. A two-tailed, paired Student's t test was used to compare regadenoson CLD between hemodialyzer types and flow rates. The mean ± SD regadenoson CLD values ranged between 62.5 ± 11.8 and 89.1 ± 24.0 mL/min for all dialytic conditions. There was no significant difference in regadenoson CLD between hemodialyzer types and flow rates (p > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Hemodialysis enhances the clearance of regadenoson independent of hemodialyzer permeability and blood/dialysate flow rate. This clearance is modest relative to total body clearance and is unlikely to produce a clinically significant outcome.

Antibiotic Dosing in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

Appropriate antibiotic dosing is critical to improve outcomes in critically ill patients with sepsis. The addition of continuous renal replacement therapy makes achieving appropriate antibiotic dosing more difficult. The lack of continuous renal replacement therapy standardization results in treatment variability between patients and may influence whether appropriate antibiotic exposure is achieved. The aim of this study was to determine if continuous renal replacement therapy effluent flow rate impacts attaining appropriate antibiotic concentrations when conventional continuous renal replacement therapy antibiotic doses were used. This study used Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the effect of effluent flow rate variance on pharmacodynamic target attainment for cefepime, ceftazidime, levofloxacin, meropenem, piperacillin, and tazobactam. Published demographic and pharmacokinetic parameters for each antibiotic were used to develop a pharmacokinetic model. Monte Carlo simulations of 5000 patients were evaluated for each antibiotic dosing regimen at the extremes of Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines recommended effluent flow rates (20 and 35 mL/kg/h). The probability of target attainment was calculated using antibiotic-specific pharmacodynamic targets assessed over the first 72 hours of therapy. Most conventional published antibiotic dosing recommendations, except for levofloxacin, reach acceptable probability of target attainment rates when effluent rates of 20 or 35 mL/kg/h are used.

Antibiotic Dosing in Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: "Enough But Not Too Much".

Increasing evidence suggests that antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) often does not achieve pharmacodynamic goals, and the continued high mortality rate due to infectious causes appears to confirm these findings. Although there are compelling reasons why clinicians should use more aggressive antibiotic dosing, particularly in patients receiving aggressive renal replacement therapies, concerns for toxicity associated with higher doses are real. The presence of multisystem organ failure and polypharmacy predispose these patients to drug toxicity. This article examines the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic consequences of critical illness, AKI, and renal replacement therapy and describes potential solutions to help clinicians give "enough but not too much" in these very complicated patients.

Pharmacokinetics of oseltamivir and oseltamivir carboxylate in critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous hemodialysis and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate oseltamivir and oseltamivir carboxylate pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients who were receiving continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD) and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). DESIGN: Prospective, open-label, pharmacokinetic study. SETTING: Intensive care units of an academic medical center. PATIENTS: Thirteen critically ill patients aged 13 years or older with suspected or confirmed H1N1 influenza who had a prescription for oseltamivir and were concurrently receiving CVVHD and/or ECMO between October 2009 and January 2010. INTERVENTION: Oseltamivir 150 mg was administered nasogastrically or nasoenterically every 12 hours. Blood samples were collected at baseline and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after administration of the fourth oseltamivir dose or subsequent doses. In patients receiving CVVHD, effluent also was collected at the same time points. Urine was collected throughout the 12-hour dosing interval. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Eight patients received CVVHD only, four patients received both CVVHD and ECMO, and one patient received ECMO only. Pharmacokinetic parameters for the patient who received only ECMO were not reported. The median maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve for the 12-hour dosing interval (AUC(0-12) ) for the remaining 12 patients were 83.4 ng/ml and 216 ng•hour/ml, respectively, for oseltamivir and 2000 ng/ml and 21,500 ng•hour/ml, respectively, for oseltamivir carboxylate. Mean clearance due to CVVHD was 33.8 ml/minute for oseltamivir and 50.2 ml/minute for oseltamivir carboxylate. For patients who received ECMO, no substantial differences between pre- and post-ECMO oxygenator plasma concentrations were found for oseltamivir or oseltamivir carboxylate. CONCLUSION: Although the optimal pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic targets for oseltamivir carboxylate remain unclear, in the patients receiving CVVHD with or without ECMO, a regimen of oseltamivir 150 mg every 12 hours yielded a median oseltamivir carboxylate AUC(0-12) considerably higher than would be expected in non-critically ill patients receiving the same dosage regimen.

Treatment of methotrexate intoxication with various modalities of continuous extracorporeal therapy and glucarpidase.

Methotrexate, administered for treatment of pediatric and adult malignancies, is a direct renal toxin, which can lead to renal dysfunction, decreased methotrexate clearance, elevated methotrexate concentrations, and systemic toxicity. Although plasma methotrexate concentrations have been shown to decline precipitously after a single dose of glucarpidase, this drug is investigational and available only through compassionate use. Therefore, alternative treatments for methotrexate removal may be required. We describe a 13-year-old girl (body surface area 1.2 m(2)) with osteosarcoma who was treated with high-dose methotrexate 12 g/m(2) infused over 4 hours. Forty-eight hours after the infusion, her plasma methotrexate concentrations were elevated at 446 micromol/L. She exhibited severe signs of methotrexate toxicity, including encephalopathy, liver failure, and acute kidney injury, and could not tolerate conventional hemodialysis. Over the next 12 days, the patient was treated with continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD), single-pass albumin dialysis (SPAD), continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF), and glucarpidase to enhance methotrexate elimination. Compared with standard CVVHD, SPAD did not significantly increase methotrexate removal as measured by elimination half-life and methotrexate saturation coefficient. The highest clearance rate among extracorporeal therapies was achieved by CVVHDF, with an effluent rate of 4950 ml/hour. The patient's clinical condition steadily improved, and all extracorporeal therapies were stopped 168 hours after methotrexate administration. The patient was discharged home and continued with chemotherapy, including methotrexate, which was dosed based on iothalamate glomerular filtration rates on the day before infusion. Although extracorporeal treatments appeared to enhance methotrexate clearance, the administration of glucarpidase resulted in the most rapid percentage decline (86%) in methotrexate concentration. Until glucarpidase is readily available, intermittent hemodialysis should be used to enhance methotrexate clearance. If the patient is unable to tolerate hemodialysis, use of CVVHDF with maximum effluent rates will enhance methotrexate clearance.

Etanercept clearance during an in vitro model of continuous venovenous hemofiltration.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Etanercept is a tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonist used in inflammation-mediated conditions. Continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) has also been used in patients with inflammatory conditions. This study evaluated etanercept clearance using an in vitro CVVH model. METHODS: Etanercept clearance was assessed in vitro in bovine blood at 1-3 mg/l final serum concentration, and urea control at 750 mg/l. CVVH was performed using polyacrylonitrile, polysulfone, and polymethylmethacrylate filters at 3 l/h ultrafiltrate and 200 ml/min blood flow rates. Transmembrane clearance was estimated using sieving coefficient calculations, and adsorptive removal rate was approximated using a mass balance calculation. RESULTS: Urea sieving coefficient remained constant (1.04 +/- 0.01). Ultrafiltrate etanercept concentrations were undetectable (sieving coefficient < 0.02) and transmembrane and adsorptive clearances were negligible. CONCLUSION: Etanercept is not cleared appreciably by transmembrane or adsorptive mechanisms in CVVH using polyacrylonitrile, polysulfone, or polymethylmethacrylate hemofilters.

Optimizing anemia management in hospitalized patients with end-stage renal disease.

OBJECTIVE: To review available literature on the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who require hospitalization and to provide recommendations for ESA use in this setting. DATA SOURCES: Primary articles were identified by English-language MEDLINE search (1966-October 2008) using the MeSH headings: kidney failure (chronic), anemia, erythropoietin, darbepoetin, hospitalization, and hematinics. Relevant data presented at recent nephrology scientific meetings (2004-October 2008) were also identified. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Identified studies were reviewed and information regarding hospitalization, ESA use, and patient outcomes was evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS: Studies demonstrate that hospitalized patients with ESRD usually experience a decline in hemoglobin values. Contributing factors include infection, inflammation, and untreated iron deficiency. ESAs are used inconsistently during hospitalization, with less than 50% of hospitalized patients with ESRD receiving ESA therapy in some reports. Some controversy exists regarding optimal hemoglobin targets for ESA therapy in nonhospitalized patients with ESRD, and no targets are defined for hospitalized patients. Clinical trials examining in-hospital ESA use have primarily involved the intensive care population and excluded ESRD patients. Following the patient's hospitalization, lower hemoglobin values may persist for 6 months, despite increased ESA dosing. Variability exists in frequency of hemoglobin monitoring and ESA dose changes. To date, no clinical trials have evaluated different approaches to anemia management in hospitalized patients with ESRD, and there are no published guidelines in this area. Based on published observations and clinical experience, we offer recommendations for anemia management around the time of hospitalization in an attempt to define a more rational approach to ESA therapy in this population. CONCLUSIONS: Trials are needed to define optimal ESA dosing strategies and hemoglobin targets in hospitalized patients with ESRD.