Epithelial calcium-sensing receptor activation by eosinophil granule protein analog stimulates collagen matrix contraction.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophils reside in normal gastrointestinal tracts and increase during disease states. Receptors for eosinophil-derived granule proteins (EDGPs) have not been identified, but highly cationic molecules, similar to eosinophil proteins, bind extracellular calcium-sensing receptors (CaSRs). We hypothesized that stimulation of CaSRs by eosinophil proteins activates epithelial cells. METHODS: Caco2 intestinal epithelial cells, AML14.3D10 eosinophils, wild-type (WT) human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells not expressing CaSRs (HEK-WT), and CaSR-transfected HEK293 cells (HEK-CaSR) were stimulated with an eosinophil protein analog poly-L-arginine (PA) and phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (pERK)1 and pERK2 were measured. Functional activation was measured with collagen lattice contraction assays. RESULTS: Coculture of Caco2 cells with AML14.3D10 eosinophils augmented lattice contraction as compared with lattices containing Caco2 cells alone. PA stimulation of Caco2 lattices augmented contraction. HEK-CaSR stimulation with PA or Ca(2+) resulted in greater pERK activation than that of stimulated HEK-WT cells. PA stimulated greater HEK-CaSR lattice contraction than unstimulated lattices. Contraction of PA-stimulated and PA-unstimulated HEK-WT lattices did not differ. CONCLUSION: Exposure of intestinal epithelia to the EDGP analog PA stimulates CaSR-dependent ERK phosphorylation and epithelial-mediated collagen lattice contraction. We speculate that EDGP release within the epithelial layers activates the CaSR receptor, leading to matrix contraction and tissue fibrosis.

The oesophageal string test: a novel, minimally invasive method measures mucosal inflammation in eosinophilic oesophagitis.

OBJECTIVE: Eosinophil predominant inflammation characterises histological features of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE). Endoscopy with biopsy is currently the only method to assess oesophageal mucosal inflammation in EoE. We hypothesised that measurements of luminal eosinophil-derived proteins would correlate with oesophageal mucosal inflammation in children with EoE. DESIGN: The Enterotest diagnostic device was used to develop an oesophageal string test (EST) as a minimally invasive clinical device. EST samples and oesophageal mucosal biopsies were obtained from children undergoing upper endoscopy for clinically defined indications. Eosinophil-derived proteins including eosinophil secondary granule proteins (major basic protein-1, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin, eosinophil cationic protein, eosinophil peroxidase) and Charcot-Leyden crystal protein/galectin-10 were measured by ELISA in luminal effluents eluted from ESTs and extracts of mucosal biopsies. RESULTS: ESTs were performed in 41 children with active EoE (n=14), EoE in remission (n=8), gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (n=4) and controls with normal oesophagus (n=15). EST measurement of eosinophil-derived protein biomarkers significantly distinguished between children with active EoE, treated EoE in remission, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and normal oesophagus. Levels of luminal eosinophil-derived proteins in EST samples significantly correlated with peak and mean oesophageal eosinophils/high power field (HPF), eosinophil peroxidase indices and levels of the same eosinophil-derived proteins in extracts of oesophageal biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of eosinophil-derived proteins in luminal secretions is reflective of mucosal inflammation in children with EoE. The EST is a novel, minimally invasive device for measuring oesophageal eosinophilic inflammation in children with EoE.

A novel histologic scoring system to evaluate mucosal biopsies from patients with eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is characterized by medically/surgically-resistant gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and dense squamous eosinophilia. Studies suggest that histologic assessment of esophageal eosinophilia alone cannot reliably separate patients with EoE from those with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Our goal was to develop an assay to identify EoE patients and perhaps differentiate EoE from other causes of esophageal eosinophilia. METHODS: A monoclonal antibody specific for an eosinophil secondary granule protein (eosinophil peroxidase [EPX]) was developed and shown to specifically identify intact eosinophils and detect eosinophil degranulation in formalin-fixed specimens. A histopathologic scoring algorithm was developed to analyze data from patient evaluations; the utility of this algorithm was assessed by using archived esophageal tissues from patients with known diagnoses of EoE and GERD as well as controls from 2 tertiary care centers. RESULTS: Intraobserver/interobserver blinded evaluations demonstrated a significant difference (P < .001) between scores of samples taken from control subjects, from patients with esophageal eosinophilia who had a diagnosis of EoE, and from patients with GERD (P < .001). This algorithm also was able to identify patients whose clinical course was suggestive of a diagnosis of EoE, but that nonetheless failed to reach the critical threshold number of > or =15 eosinophils in a high-power (40x) microscopy field. CONCLUSIONS: A novel immunohistochemical scoring system was developed to address an unmet medical need to differentiate histologic specimens from patients with EoE relative to those with GERD. The availability of a unique anti-EPX-specific monoclonal antibody, combined with the ease/rapidity of this staining method and scoring system, will provide a valuable strategy for the assessment of esophageal eosinophilia.