The G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor, a gene co-expressed with ERα in breast tumors, is regulated by estrogen-ERα signalling in ERα positive breast cancer cells.

GPER is a seven transmembrane G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor that mediates rapid estrogen actions. Large volumes of data have revealed its association with clinicopathological variables in breast tumors, role in epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like effects of estrogen, potential as a therapeutic target or a prognostic marker, and involvement in endocrine resistance in the face of tamoxifen agonism. GPER cross-talks with estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) in cell culture models implicating its role in the physiology of normal or transformed mammary epithelial cells. However, discrepancies in the literature have obfuscated the nature of their relationship, its significance, and the underlying mechanism. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between GPER, and ERα in breast tumors, to understand the mechanistic basis, and to gauge its clinical significance. We mined The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-BRCA data to examine the relationship between GPER and ERα expression. GPER mRNA, and protein expression were analyzed in ERα-positive or -negative breast tumors from two independent cohorts using immunohistochemistry, western blotting, or RT-qPCR. The Kaplan-Meier Plotter (KM) was employed for survival analysis. The influence of estrogen in vivo was studied by examining GPER expression levels in estrus or diestrus mouse mammary tissues, and the impact of 17ß-estradiol (E2) administration in juvenile or adult mice. The effect of E2, or propylpyrazoletriol (PPT, an ERα agonist) stimulation on GPER expression was studied in MCF-7 and T47D cells, with or without tamoxifen or ERα knockdown. ERα-binding to the GPER locus was explored by analysing ChIP-seq data (ERP000380), in silico prediction of estrogen response elements, and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay. Clinical data revealed significant positive association between GPER and ERα expression in breast tumors. The median GPER expression in ERα-positive tumors was significantly higher than ERα-negative tumors. High GPER expression was significantly associated with longer overall survival (OS) of patients with ERα-positive tumors. In vivo experiments showed a positive effect of E2 on GPER expression. E2 induced GPER expression in MCF-7 and T47D cells; an effect mimicked by PPT. Tamoxifen or ERα-knockdown blocked the induction of GPER. Estrogen-mediated induction was associated with increased ERα occupancy in the upstream region of GPER. Furthermore, treatment with 17ß-estradiol or PPT significantly reduced the IC50 of the GPER agonist (G1)-mediated loss of MCF-7 or T47D cell viability. In conclusion, GPER is positively associated with ERα in breast tumors, and induced by estrogen-ERα signalling axis. Estrogen-mediated induction of GPER makes the cells more responsive to GPER ligands. More in-depth studies are warranted to establish the significance of GPER-ERα co-expression, and their interplay in breast tumor development, progression, and treatment.

Global transcriptome analysis reveals partial estrogen-like effects of karanjin in MCF-7 breast cancer cells.

Karanjin, an abundantly occurring furanoflavonoid in edible and non-edible legumes, exerts diverse biological effects in vivo, and in vitro. Its potential as an anticancer agent is gaining traction following recent demonstrations of its anti-proliferative, cell cycle inhibitory, and pro-apoptotic effects. However, the genomic correlates of these activities are not known. In the present study we delineated the transcriptomic footprint of 10 µM karanjin in MCF-7 breast cancer cells, using next generation sequencing technology (RNA-seq). We show that karanjin-modulated gene-expression repertoire is enriched in several hallmark gene sets, which include early estrogen-response, and G2/M checkpoint genes. Genes modulated by karanjin overlapped with those modulated by 1 nM 17ß-estradiol (E2), or 1 µM tamoxifen. The results suggest partial estrogen-like activity of karanjin, thereby presenting a caveat to its anticancer potential. Further investigations into its mechanisms of action are warranted to ascertain the true potential of karanjin in anticancer, or endocrine therapy.