Pack Years of Tobacco Cigarette Smoking as a Predictor of Bony Fusion after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: Smoking tobacco cigarettes negatively impacts bone healing after spinal fusion. Smoking history is often assessed based on current smoker and nonsmoker status. However, in current research, smoking history has not been quantified in terms of pack years to estimate lifetime exposure and assess its effects. Our goal was to investigate the influence of smoking history, quantified in pack years, on bony fusion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of consecutive patients who underwent ACDF for cervical disc degeneration between September 21, 2017 and October 17, 2018 was conducted. Patient demographics, procedural variables, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for bony fusion following ACDF. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the optimal discrimination threshold for smoking history pack years in association with nonfusion. RESULTS: Among 97 patients identified, 90 (93%) demonstrated bony fusion on postoperative imaging. Mean number of smoking history pack years was 6.1 ± 13 for the fusion group and 16 ± 21 for the nonfusion group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that increased pack years of tobacco cigarette smoking was a significant predictor of nonfusion (95% confidence interval, [1.0,1.1], P = 0.045). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that 6.1 pack years best stratified the risk for nonfusion (area under the curve, 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a history of tobacco cigarette smoking ≥6.1 pack years may have an increased risk of nonfusion after ACDF.

Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap for Treatment of Cervical Wound Defects and Persistent Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks: A Technical Note and Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue defects and persistent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks can create complications after cervical spinal surgery. The supraclavicular artery island (SAI) flap is useful in closing tissue defects, particularly in these complex surgeries and multiple reinterventions. However, technical reports in this context are scarce. We describe application of the SAI flap technique to control persistent CSF leak in the first documented instance (to our knowledge) of a low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma (LGFMS) in the cervical epidural space. Additionally, we conducted a comprehensive review of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar from their earliest records through December 17, 2023 using combined terms, "supraclavicular artery island flap AND spine" and "supraclavicular AND flap AND spine". TECHNICAL NOTE: A 56-year-old woman with arm pain and weakness presented with a cervical epidural mass extending from C4-C6 and associated spinal cord compression. She underwent a 3-level corpectomy and tumor resection. Primary dural closure was impossible due to the dural invasion, and reintervention with an SAI flap and definitive lumboperitoneal shunting were required to control and seal the CSF leak. SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW: Seven case reports describing SAI flap for spinal surgery complications were identified. The indications in those cases were correcting esophageal and hypopharyngeal perforations after cervical fusion and discectomy and persistent soft tissue coverage after cervical instrumentation. CONCLUSIONS: The SAI flap technique provided wound defect coverage in this case and is suitable for addressing issues such as persistent CSF leaks or soft tissue coverage after cervical spine surgery.

The Effect of Diabetes on Complications after Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal fusion procedures are used to treat a wide variety of spinal pathologies. Diabetes mellitus (DM) has been shown to be a significant risk factor for several complications following these procedures in previous studies. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis elucidating the relationship between DM and complications occurring after spinal fusion procedures. METHODS: Systematic literature searches of PubMed and EMBASE were performed from their inception to October 1, 2022, to identify studies that directly compared postfusion complications in patients with and without DM. Studies met the prespecified inclusion criteria if they reported the following data for patients with and without DM: (1) demographics; (2) postspinal fusion complication rates; and (3) postoperative clinical outcomes. The included studies were then pooled and analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies, with a cumulative total of 18,853 patients (2695 diabetic patients), were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Analysis showed that diabetic patients had significantly higher rates of total number of postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR] = 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.12-1.58; P = 0.001), postoperative pulmonary complications (OR=2.01; 95%CI=1.31-3.08; P = 0.001), postoperative renal complications (OR=2.20; 95%CI=1.27-3.80; P = 0.005), surgical site infection (OR=2.65; 95%CI=2.19-3.20; P < 0.001), and prolonged hospital stay (OR=1.67; 95%CI=1.47-1.90; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with DM had a significantly higher risk of developing complications after spinal fusion, particularly pulmonary and renal complications, in addition to surgical site infections and had a longer length of stay. These findings are important for informed discussions of surgical risks with patients and families before surgery.

Analysis of tranexamic acid usage in adult spinal deformity patients with relative contraindications: does it increase the risk of complications?

OBJECTIVE: Complex spinal deformity surgeries may involve significant blood loss. The use of antifibrinolytic agents such as tranexamic acid (TXA) has been proven to reduce perioperative blood loss. However, for patients with a history of thromboembolic events, there is concern of increased risk when TXA is used during these surgeries. This study aimed to assess whether TXA use in patients undergoing complex spinal deformity correction surgeries increases the risk of thromboembolic complications based on preexisting thromboembolic risk factors. METHODS: Data were analyzed for adult patients who received TXA during surgical correction for spinal deformity at 21 North American centers between August 2018 and October 2022. Patients with preexisting thromboembolic events and other risk factors (history of deep venous thrombosis [DVT], pulmonary embolism [PE], myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, peripheral vascular disease, or cancer) were identified. Thromboembolic complication rates were assessed during the postoperative 90 days. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess thromboembolic outcomes in high-risk and low-risk patients who received intravenous TXA. RESULTS: Among 411 consecutive patients who underwent complex spinal deformity surgery and received TXA intraoperatively, 130 (31.6%) were considered high-risk patients. There was no significant difference in thromboembolic complications between patients with and those without preexisting thromboembolic risk factors in univariate analysis (high-risk group vs low-risk group: 8.5% vs 2.8%, p = 0.45). Specifically, there were no significant differences between groups regarding the 90-day postoperative rates of DVT (high-risk group vs low-risk group: 1.5% vs 1.4%, p = 0.98), PE (2.3% vs 1.8%, p = 0.71), acute MI (1.5% vs 0%, p = 0.19), or stroke (0.8% vs 1.1%, p > 0.99). On multivariate analysis, high-risk status was not a significant independent predictor for any of the thromboembolic complications. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of intravenous TXA during the correction procedure did not change rates of thromboembolic events, acute MI, or stroke in this cohort of adult spinal deformity surgery patients.

Factors Associated with the Maintenance of Cost-Effectiveness at 5 Years in Adult Spinal Deformity Corrective Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate factors associated with the long-term durability of cost-effectiveness (CE) in ASD patients. BACKGROUND: A substantial increase in costs associated with the surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity (ASD) has given precedence to scrutinize the value and utility it provides. METHODS: We included 327 operative ASD patients with 5-year (5 Y) follow-up. Published methods were used to determine costs based on CMS.gov definitions and were based on the average DRG reimbursement rates. Utility was calculated using quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) utilizing the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) converted to Short-Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D), with a 3% discount applied for its decline with life expectancy. The CE threshold of $150,000 was used for primary analysis. RESULTS: Major and minor complication rates were 11% and 47% respectively, with 26% undergoing reoperation by 5 Y. The mean cost associated with surgery was $91,095±$47,003, with a utility gain of 0.091±0.086 at 1Y, QALY gained at 2 Y of 0.171±0.183, and at 5 Y of 0.42±0.43. The cost per QALY at 2 Y was $414,885, which decreased to $142,058 at 5 Y.With the threshold of $150,000 for CE, 19% met CE at 2 Y and 56% at 5 Y. In those in which revision was avoided, 87% met cumulative CE till life expectancy. Controlling analysis depicted higher baseline CCI and pelvic tilt (PT) to be the strongest predictors for not maintaining durable CE to 5 Y (CCI OR: 1.821 [1.159-2.862], P=0.009) (PT OR: 1.079 [1.007-1.155], P=0.030). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients achieved cost-effectiveness after four years postoperatively, with 56% meeting at five years postoperatively. When revision was avoided, 87% of patients met cumulative cost-effectiveness till life expectancy. Mechanical complications were predictive of failure to achieve cost-effectiveness at 2 Y, while comorbidity burden and medical complications were at 5 Y.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusions (ALIFs) Using a Titanium Cage with a Biomimetic Surface.

OBJECTIVE We analyzed clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusions (ALIFs) using a new biomimetic titanium fusion cage (Titan nanoLOCK interbody, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota). This specialized cage employs precise nanotechnology to stimulate inherent biochemical and cellular osteogenic reactions to the implant, aiming to amplify the rate of fusion. To our knowledge, this is the only study to assess early clinical and radiographic results in ALIFs. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of data for patients who underwent single or multilevel ALIF using this implant between October 2016 and April 2021. Indications for treatment were spondylolisthesis, post-laminectomy syndrome, or spinal deformity. Clinical and radiographic outcome data for these patients were collected and assessed. RESULTS A total of 84 patients were included. The mean clinical follow-up was 36.6±14 months. At 6 months, solid fusion was seen in 97.6% of patients. At 12 months, solid fusion was seen in 98.8% of patients. Significant improvements were seen in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index) at 6 and 12 months compared to the preoperative scores (P<0.001). One patient required reoperation for broken pedicle screws 2 days after the ALIF. None of the patients required readmission within 90 days of surgery. No patients experienced an infection. CONCLUSIONS ALIF using a new titanium interbody fusion implant with a biomimetic surface technology demonstrated high fusion rates (97.6%) as early as 6 months. There was significant improvement in PROMs at 6 and 12 months.

Predictors of pelvic tilt normalization: a multicenter study on the impact of regional and lower-extremity compensation on pelvic alignment after complex adult spinal deformity surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the degree of regional decompensation to pelvic tilt (PT) normalization after complex adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. METHODS: Operative ASD patients with 1 year of PT measurements were included. Patients with normalized PT at baseline were excluded. Predicted PT was compared to actual PT, tested for change from baseline, and then compared against age-adjusted, Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab, and global alignment and proportion (GAP) scores. Lower-extremity (LE) parameters included the cranial-hip-sacrum angle, cranial-knee-sacrum angle, and cranial-ankle-sacrum angle. LE compensation was set as the 1-year upper tertile compared with intraoperative baseline. Univariate analyses were used to compare normalized and nonnormalized data against alignment outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to develop a model consisting of significant predictors for normalization related to regional compensation. RESULTS: In total, 156 patients met the inclusion criteria (mean ± SD age 64.6 ± 9.1 years, BMI 27.9 ± 5.6 kg/m2, Charlson Comorbidity Index 1.9 ± 1.6). Patients with normalized PT were more likely to have overcorrected pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis and sagittal vertical axis at 6 weeks (p < 0.05). GAP score at 6 weeks was greater for patients with nonnormalized PT (0.6 vs 1.3, p = 0.08). At baseline, 58.5% of patients had compensation in the thoracic and cervical regions. Postoperatively, compensation was maintained by 42% with no change after matching in age-adjusted or GAP score. The patients with nonnormalized PT had increased rates of thoracic and cervical compensation (p < 0.05). Compensation in thoracic kyphosis differed between patients with normalized PT at 6 weeks and those with normalized PT at 1 year (69% vs 35%, p < 0.05). Those who compensated had increased rates of implant complications by 1 year (OR [95% CI] 2.08 [1.32-6.56], p < 0.05). Cervical compensation was maintained at 6 weeks and 1 year (56% vs 43%, p = 0.12), with no difference in implant complications (OR 1.31 [95% CI -2.34 to 1.03], p = 0.09). For the lower extremities at baseline, 61% were compensating. Matching age-adjusted alignment did not eliminate compensation at any joint (all p > 0.05). Patients with nonnormalized PT had higher rates of LE compensation across joints (all p < 0.01). Overall, patients with normalized PT at 1 year had the greatest odds of resolving LE compensation (OR 9.6, p < 0.001). Patients with normalized PT at 1 year had lower rates of implant failure (8.9% vs 19.5%, p < 0.05), rod breakage (1.3% vs 13.8%, p < 0.05), and pseudarthrosis (0% vs 4.6%, p < 0.05) compared with patients with nonnormalized PT. The complication rate was significantly lower for patients with normalized PT at 1 year (56.7% vs 66.1%, p = 0.02), despite comparable health-related quality of life scores. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PT normalization had greater rates of resolution in thoracic and LE compensation, leading to lower rates of complications by 1 year. Thus, consideration of both the lower extremities and thoracic regions in surgical planning is vital to preventing adverse outcomes and maintaining pelvic alignment.

The Case for Operative Efficiency in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Impact of Operative Time on Complications, Length of Stay, Alignment, Fusion Rates, and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of operative room (OR) time in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery on patient outcomes. BACKGROUND: It is currently unknown if OR time in ASD patients matched for deformity severity and surgical invasiveness is associated with patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ASD patients with baseline and two-year postoperative radiographic and patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) data, undergoing a posterior-only approach for long fusion (>L1-Ilium) were included. Patients were grouped into short OR time (<40th percentile: <359 min) and long OR time (>60th percentile: >421 min). Groups were matched by age, baseline deformity severity, and surgical invasiveness. Demographics, radiographic, PROM data, fusion rate, and complications were compared between groups at baseline and two years follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 270 patients were included for analysis: the mean OR time was 286 minutes in the short OR group versus 510 minutes in the long OR group ( P <0.001). Age, gender, percent of revision cases, surgical invasiveness, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis, and pelvic tilt were comparable between groups ( P >0.05). Short OR had a slightly lower body mass index than the short OR group ( P <0.001) and decompression was more prevalent in the long OR time ( P =0.042). Patients in the long group had greater hospital length of stay ( P =0.02); blood loss ( P <0.001); proportion requiring intensive care unit ( P =0.003); higher minor complication rate ( P =0.001); with no significant differences for major complications or revision procedures ( P >0.5). Both groups had comparable radiographic fusion rates ( P =0.152) and achieved improvement in sagittal alignment measures, Oswestry disability index, and Short Form-36 ( P <0.001). CONCLUSION: Shorter OR time for ASD correction is associated with a lower minor complication rate, a lower estimated blood loss, fewer intensive care unit admissions, and a shorter hospital length of stay without sacrificing alignment correction or PROMs. Maximizing operative efficiency by minimizing OR time in ASD surgery has the potential to benefit patients, surgeons, and hospital systems.

Cervical Vertebral Bone Quality Score Independently Predicts Distal Junctional Kyphosis After Posterior Cervical Fusion.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Posterior cervical fusion is the surgery of choice when fusing long segments of the cervical spine. However, because of the limited presence of this pathology, there is a paucity of data in the literature about the postoperative complications of distal junctional kyphosis (DJK). We aimed to identify and report potential associations between the preoperative cervical vertebral bone quality (C-VBQ) score and the occurrence of DJK after posterior cervical fusion. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed records of patients who underwent posterior cervical fusion at a single hospital between June 1, 2010, and May 31, 2020. Patient data were screened to include patients who were >18 years old, had baseline MRI, had baseline standing cervical X-ray, had immediate postoperative standing cervical X-ray, and had clinical and radiographic follow-ups of >1 year, including a standing cervical X-ray at least 1 year postoperatively. Univariate analysis was completed between DJK and non-DJK groups, with multivariate regression completed for relevant clinical variables. Simple linear regression was completed to analyze correlation between the C-VBQ score and total degrees of kyphosis angle change. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients were identified, of whom 19 (20.4%) had DJK and 74 (79.6%) did not. The DJK group had a significantly higher C-VBQ score than the non-DJK group (2.97 ± 0.40 vs 2.26 ± 0.46; P < .001). A significant, positive correlation was found between the C-VBQ score and the total degrees of kyphosis angle change (r 2 = 0.26; P < .001). On multivariate analysis, the C-VBQ score independently predicted DJK (odds ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.27-1.67; P < .001). CONCLUSION: We found that the C-VBQ score was an independent predictive factor of DJK after posterior cervical fusion.

Comparative Analysis of the 3 Cervical Vertebral Bone Quality (C-VBQ) Score Methodologies and Their Correlations to the Lumbar Vertebral Bone Quality (VBQ) Score.

OBJECTIVE: Common complications after spinal fusion, such as pseudoarthrosis, cage subsidence, or instrumentation failure, are affected by patients' bone quality. The cervical-vertebral bone quality (C-VBQ) score, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based adaption of the lumbar vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score, was developed by 3 separate research groups simultaneously to evaluate bone quality in cervical spinal fusion patients. We present the first analysis comparing these scoring methods to the well-validated VBQ score. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data for consecutive patients who underwent spine surgery at a single institution was completed. The VBQ score was calculated using the Ehresman et al. METHOD: The C-VBQ scores, named according to placement of the region of interest within the cerebral spinal fluid, were calculated separately using the methods of Soliman et al. (C2-VBQ), Razzouk et al. (C5-VBQ), and Huang et al. (T1-VBQ). Linear regression models were utilized to evaluate correlations to the VBQ score. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients were identified (mean age, 57.0 ± 11.9 years; women, 50.5%). Mean scores were C2-VBQ, 2.37 ± 0.55; C5-VBQ, 2.36 ± 0.61; and T1-VBQ, 2.64 ± 0.68. The C-VBQ scores for the C2 level were significantly higher than those for the C3-C6 levels (3.18 ± 0.96 vs. 2.63 ± 0.77, P < 0.001), whereas the C7 level was found to have significantly lower C-VBQ scores (2.42 ± 0.78 vs. 2.63 ± 0.77, P = 0.04). The C2-VBQ (r = 0.63) score had the strongest correlation to the VBQ score, compared to C5-VBQ (r = 0.41) and T1-VBQ (r = 0.43) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the C2-VBQ had the strongest correlation to the lumbar VBQ score among all C-VBQ scores.

Adult Cervical Deformity Patients Have Higher Baseline Frailty, Disability, and Comorbidities Compared With Complex Adult Thoracolumbar Deformity Patients: A Comparative Cohort Study of 616 Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter comparative cohort. OBJECTIVE: Studies have shown markedly higher rates of complications and all-cause mortality following surgery for adult cervical deformity (ACD) compared with adult thoracolumbar deformity (ATLD), though the reasons for these differences remain unclear. Our objectives were to compare baseline frailty, disability, and comorbidities between ACD and complex ATLD patients undergoing surgery. METHODS: Two multicenter prospective adult spinal deformity registries were queried, one ATLD and one ACD. Baseline clinical and frailty measures were compared between the cohorts. RESULTS: 616 patients were identified (107 ACD and 509 ATLD). These groups had similar mean age (64.6 vs 60.8 years, respectively, P = .07). ACD patients were less likely to be women (51.9% vs 69.5%, P < .001) and had greater Charlson Comorbidity Index (1.5 vs .9, P < .001) and ASA grade (2.7 vs 2.4, P < .001). ACD patients had worse VR-12 Physical Component Score (PCS, 25.7 vs 29.9, P < .001) and PROMIS Physical Function Score (33.3 vs 35.3, P = .031). All frailty measures were significantly worse for ACD patients, including hand dynamometer (44.6 vs 55.6 lbs, P < .001), CSHA Clinical Frailty Score (CFS, 4.0 vs 3.2, P < .001), and Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS, 5.15 vs 3.21, P < .001). Greater proportions of ACD patients were frail (22.9% vs 5.7%) or vulnerable (15.6% vs 10.9%) based on EFS (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with ATLD patients, ACD patients had worse baseline characteristics on all measures assessed (comorbidities/disability/frailty). These differences may help account for greater risk of complications and all-cause mortality previously observed in ACD patients and facilitate strategies for better preoperative optimization.

Standalone versus Anterior Cervical Plating for One-To-Two Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) can be performed with and without supportive anterior cervical plating. Fusion rates, incidence of dysphagia, and repeat surgery are concerns when performing ACDF with or without plating. We aimed to compare procedural success and outcomes between patients treated with and without cervical plating for 1-2 level ACDF. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively searched for patients who underwent 1-2 level ACDF surgery. Patients were divided into cohorts treated with plating and without (standalone). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to eliminate selection bias and control for baseline comorbidities and disease severity. Patient demographics (including age, body mass index, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis), disease presentation (cervical stenosis, degenerative disc disease), and operative details (number of operative levels, cage type used, intraoperative, and postoperative complications) were recorded. Outcomes assessed were fusion observed at 3, 6, and 12 months, patient-reported postoperative pain, and any repeat surgeries. Univariate analysis was performed according to data normality and variables for PSM cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 365 patients were identified (plating=289, standalone=76). After PSM, 130 patients (65 in each group) were included for final analysis. Similar mean operative times (101.3 ± 26.5-standalone; 104.8 ± 32.2-plating; P = 0.5) and mean hospital stays (1.2 ± 1.8-standalone; 0.7 ± 0.7-plating; P = 0.1) were noted. Twelve-month fusion rates were also similar (84.6%-standalone; 89.2%-plating; P = 0.6). Repeat surgery rates were equivalent (13.8%-standalone; 12.3%-plating; P = 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: In this propensity score-matched case-control study, we report comparable effectiveness and outcomes of performing 1-2 level ACDF with and without cervical plating.

Milestones for neurosurgery sub-interns: a novel evaluation tool to quantitatively differentiate residency applicants.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to create a novel milestones evaluation form for neurosurgery sub-interns and assess its potential as a quantitative and standardized performance assessment to compare potential residency applicants. In this pilot study, the authors aimed to determine the form's interrater reliability, relationship to percentile assignments in the neurosurgery standardized letter of recommendation (SLOR), ability to quantitatively differentiate tiers of students, and ease of use. METHODS: Medical student milestones were either adapted from the resident Neurological Surgery Milestones or created de novo to evaluate a student's medical knowledge, procedural aptitude, professionalism, interpersonal and communication skills, and evidence-based practice and improvement. Four milestone levels were defined, corresponding to estimated 3rd-year medical student through 2nd-year resident levels. Faculty and resident evaluations as well as student self-evaluations were completed for 35 sub-interns across 8 programs. A cumulative milestone score (CMS) was computed for each student. Student CMSs were compared both within and between programs. Interrater reliability was determined with Kendall's coefficient of concordance (Kendall's W). Student CMSs were compared against their percentile assignments in the SLOR using analysis of variance with post hoc testing. CMS-derived percentile rankings were assigned to quantitatively distinguish tiers of students. Students and faculty were surveyed on the form's usefulness. RESULTS: The average faculty rating overall was 3.20, similar to the estimated competency level of an intern. Student and faculty ratings were similar, whereas resident ratings were lower (p < 0.001). Students were rated most highly in coachability and feedback (3.49 and 3.67, respectively) and lowest in bedside procedural aptitude (2.90 and 2.85, respectively) in both faculty and self-evaluations. The median CMS was 26.5 (IQR 21.75-29.75, range 14-32) with only 2 students (5.7%) achieving the highest rating of 32. Programs that evaluated the most students differentiated the highest-performing students from the lowest by at least 13 points. A program with 3 faculty raters demonstrated scoring agreement across 5 students (p = 0.024). The CMS differed significantly between SLOR percentile assignments, despite 25% of students being assigned to the top fifth percentile. CMS-driven percentile assignment significantly differentiated the bottom, middle, and top third of students (p < 0.001). Faculty and students strongly endorsed the milestones form. CONCLUSIONS: The medical student milestones form was well received and differentiated neurosurgery sub-interns both within and across programs. This form has potential as a replacement for numerical Step 1 scoring as a standardized, quantitative performance assessment for neurosurgery residency applicants.

Strong Correlation Between the Vertebral Bone Quality Score and the Cervical-Vertebral Bone Quality Score in Spine Surgery Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Osteoporosis is a burgeoning public health problem for over 44 million people in the United States. The magnetic resonance imaging-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score and cervical VBQ (C-VBQ) score are two novel approaches that use data routinely gathered during preoperative evaluation to assess bone quality. The goal of this study was to investigate the relationship between the VBQ and C-VBQ scores. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of chart data for patients who underwent spine surgery for degenerative conditions between 2015 and 2022. Patients eligible for study inclusion had preoperative T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar and cervical spine available for review. Demographics of each patient were collected. The VBQ score was determined by dividing the median signal intensity (SI) of the L1-L4 vertebral bodies by the SI of the cerebrospinal fluid at L3. The C-VBQ score was calculated by dividing the median SI of the C3-C6 vertebral bodies by the SI of the C2 cerebrospinal fluid space. Pearson's correlation test was utilized to evaluate the association between the scores. RESULTS: We identified 171 patients, with a mean age of 57.44 ± 11.79 years. The interrater reliability of the VBQ and C-VBQ measurements was excellent (intraclass correlation-coefficients were 0.89 and 0.84, respectively). A statistically significant, positive correlation was found between the VBQ score and the C-VBQ score (r = 0.757,P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study, to our knowledge, to assess the degree to which the newly developed C-VBQ score correlates with the VBQ score. We found a strong positive correlation between the scores.

Predictive Factors of Intraoperative and Early Postoperative Outcome Measures After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusions Based on American Society of Anesthesiologists Score.

OBJECTIVE: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a surgical treatment that requires a close operative plane to the great vessels, which increases the risk of perioperative complications. To our knowledge, no previous study has investigated the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System as a predictive factor for unfavorable perioperative outcomes in ALIF procedures. We aimed to analyze the ASA score as a predictive factor of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing ALIFs. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed at each center to identify a consecutive set of patients who underwent an ALIF. Univariate and multivariate analyses between patients with preoperative ASA scores of ≤2 and >2 were performed to identify predictive factors that may contribute to adverse intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Among 210 patients identified, 59 (28.1%) had an ASA score >2 and 151 (71.9%) had an ASA score ≤2. On multivariate analysis, an ASA score >2 was predictive of increased 90-day reoperations (P = 0.02), estimated blood loss (EBL) (P = 0.02), and operative time (P = 0.02). Previous lumbar surgery was predictive of increased length of stay (P = 0.005), EBL (P < 0.001), 90-day readmission (P = 0.02), and operative time (P < 0.001). Posterior supplemental fixation was predictive of increased length of stay (P = 0.04). Increased number of operative levels was predictive of increased EBL (P < 0.001) and operative time (P < 0.001). Perioperative anticoagulation use was predictive of increased EBL (P < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: Increased ASA scores were associated with unfavorable outcomes after ALIF and also can be used as a predictive tool for the risk of reoperations.

Complications associated with subaxial placement of pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws in the cervical spine (C2-T1): systematic review and meta-analysis comprising 4,165 patients and 16,669 screws.

Lateral mass screw (LMS) and cervical pedicle screw (CPS) fixation are among the most popular techniques for posterior fusion of the cervical spine. Early research prioritized the LMS approach as the trajectory resulted in fewer neurovascular complications; however, with the incorporation of navigation assistance, the CPS approach should be re-evaluated. Our objective was to report the findings of a meta-analysis focused on comparing the LMS and CPS techniques in terms of rate of various complications with inclusion of all levels from C2 to T1. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE databases with final inclusion criteria focused on identifying studies that reported outcomes and complications for either the CPS or LMS technique. These studies were then pooled, and statistical analyses were performed from the cumulative data. A total of 60 studies comprising 4165 participants and 16,669 screws placed within the C2-T1 levels were identified. Within these studies, the LMS group had a significantly increased odds for lateral mass fractures (odds ratio [OR] = 43.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.62-711.42), additional cervical surgeries (OR = 5.56, 95%CI = 2.95-10.48), and surgical site infections (SSI) (OR = 5.47, 95%CI = 1.65-18.16). No other significant differences between groups in terms of complications were identified. Within the subgroup analysis of navigation versus non-navigation-guided CPS placement, no significant differences were identified for individual complications, although collectively significantly fewer complications occurred with navigation (OR = 5.29, 95%CI = 2.03-13.78). The CPS group had significantly fewer lateral mass fractures, cervical revision surgeries, and SSIs. Furthermore, navigation-assisted CPS placement was associated with a significant reduction in complications overall.

Risk factors of early complications after thoracic and lumbar spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine risk factors increasing susceptibility to early complications (intraoperative and postoperative within 6 weeks) associated with surgery to correct thoracic and lumbar spinal deformity. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases for studies published between January 1990 and September 2021. Observational studies evaluating predictors of early complications of thoracic and lumbar spinal deformity surgery were included. Pooled odds ratio (OR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated via the random effects model. RESULTS: Fifty-two studies representing 102,432 patients met the inclusion criteria. Statistically significant patient-related risk factors for early complications included neurological comorbidity (OR = 3.45, 95% CI 1.83-6.50), non-ambulatory status (OR = 3.37, 95% CI 1.96-5.77), kidney disease (OR = 2.80, 95% CI 1.80-4.36), American Society of Anesthesiologists score > 2 (OR = 2.23, 95% CI 1.76-2.84), previous spine surgery (OR = 1.98, 95% CI 1.41-2.77), pulmonary comorbidity (OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.21-3.09), osteoporosis (OR = 1.60, 95% CI 1.17-2.20), cardiovascular diseases (OR = 1.46, 95% CI 1.20-1.78), hypertension (OR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.23-1.52), diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.84, 95% CI 1.30-2.60), preoperative Cobb angle (SMD = 0.43, 95% CI 0.29, 0.57), number of comorbidities (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI 0.12, 0.70), and preoperative lumbar lordotic angle (SMD = - 0.20, 95% CI - 0.35, - 0.06). Statistically significant procedure-related factors were fusion extending to the sacrum or pelvis (OR = 2.53, 95% CI 1.53-4.16), use of osteotomy (OR = 1.60, 95% CI 1.12-2.29), longer operation duration (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI 0.05, 1.40), estimated blood loss (SMD = 0.46, 95% CI 0.07, 0.85), and number of levels fused (SMD = 0.37, 95% CI 0.03, 0.70). CONCLUSION: These data may contribute to development of a systematic approach aimed at improving quality-of-life and reducing complications in high-risk patients.

Vertebral Bone Quality Score Independently Predicts Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and/or Failure After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF) can be catastrophic complications associated with adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. These complications are markedly influenced by osteoporosis, leading to additional vertebral fracture and pedicle screw loosening. The MRI-based vertebral bone quality score (VBQ) is a newly developed tool that can be used to assess bone quality. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the utility of the VBQ score in predicting PJK and/or PJF (PJF/PJK) after ASD correction. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review to identify patients age ≥50 years who had received ASD surgery of 5 or more thoracolumbar levels. Demographic, spinopelvic parameters, and procedure-related variables were collected. Each patient's VBQ score was calculated using preoperative T1-weighted MRI. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed to determine potential risk factors of PJK/PJF. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and area-under-the-curve values were generated for prediction of PJK/PJF. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were included (mean age, 64.1 ± 6.8 years). Among them, 34 patients (29.3%) developed PJK/PJF. Mean VBQ scores were 3.13 ± 0.46 for patients with PJK/PJF and 2.46 ± 0.49 for patients without, which was significantly different between the 2 groups ( P < .001). On multivariate analysis, VBQ score was the only significant predictor of PJK/PJF (odds ratio = 1.745, 95% CI = 1.558-1.953, P < .001), with a predictive accuracy of 94.3%. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing ASD correction, higher VBQ was independently associated with PJK/PJF occurrence. Measurement of VBQ score on preoperative MRI may be a useful adjunct to ASD surgery planning.

Prolonged Opioid Use After Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Prevalence and Risk Factors.

BACKGROUND: Persistent opioid utilization after spine surgery is a rising complication among both preoperatively opioid-naïve and opioid-tolerant patients. To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to determine the prevalence and characterize the risk factors that predispose patients to prolonged opioid use (≥3 months) after lumbar fusion. METHODS: Studies were identified through searches in PubMed and EMBASE from each database's earliest records to February 1, 2022. We included observational studies examining the risk factors and rates of prolonged opioid use following lumbar fusion. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) or standardized mean differences with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using inverse-variance methods. RESULTS: In this meta-analysis of 12 studies encompassing 80,935 patients, 40.2% of patients continued to fill opioid prescriptions ≥3 months after lumbar fusion. Significant sociodemographic predictors included Medicare or Medicaid insurance (OR=1.60, 95% CI 1.36-1.88), African-American ethnicity (OR=1.29, 95% CI 1.18-1.41), being from the Southern United States (OR=1.18, 95% CI 1.11-1.25), or women (OR=1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.20). Being from the Midwestern United States (OR=0.80, 95% CI 0.75-0.85) was found to be a protective factor. Comorbidities associated with increased risk of prolonged opioid use were preoperative opioid use (OR=5.76, 95% CI 3.52-9.41), drug abuse (OR=3.11, 95% CI 2.37-4.08), alcohol abuse (OR=2.37, 95% CI 2.14-2.64), psychiatric disorders (OR=2.29, 95% CI 1.94-2.70), smoking history (OR=1.81, 95% CI 1.23-2.66), arthritis (OR=1.35, 95% CI 1.29-1.40), and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score (standardized mean difference=0.72, 95% CI 0.61-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of prolonged opioid use after lumbar fusion underscores the importance of screening patients for comorbidities and implementing targeted strategies to minimize opioid misuse.