Hyaluronic Acid Therapy in Hip OA Does Not Perform Equally in Osteoarthritis Secondary to Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis When Compared to Primary Osteoarthritis: A 2-Year Preliminary Evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: Hip involvement in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is one of most important causes of pain and disability. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is considered the standard when medical approaches fail to relieve pain. However, THA is problematic for many reasons. As current literature lacks studies valuating medical management of osteoarthritis (OA) secondary to JIA, we assessed the long-term pain relief effect of US-guided intra-articular viscosupplementation in hip osteoarthritis secondary to JIA versus primary OA under different etiological conditions. METHODS: Patients in both groups received intra-articular Hylan G-F 20 2 ml once a month for 3 consecutive months and every 6 months for 2 years as maintenance. Effectiveness (VAS and WOMAC), NSAID/analgesic consumption, tolerability, withdrawals and reason for discontinuation were collected at each time point. An inverse probability weighting was used to balance the two groups. RESULTS: We retrospectively retrieved data of 14 JIA patients and 26 primary OA. Weighting successfully accounted for differences between the disease groups supporting the results. Viscosupplementation led to an early and significant improvement of pain and function and concomitant decrease in NSAIDs consumption, while the response diverged over 1 year with loss of benefits in JIA. The worst outcome was observed in active JIA. CONCLUSIONS: Duration of symptom relief after intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid depends on the nature of arthritis. Multiple courses of viscosupplementation are required to maintain low-dose NSAIDs consumption in patients responsive to treatment while shortening the time between consecutive injections might provide persistent positive results in patients suffering from JIA.

Personalized medicine in rheumatoid arthritis: How immunogenicity impacts use of TNF inhibitors.

Up to 40% of patients treated with tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (TNFi) do not respond to therapy. Testing drug bioavailability and/or anti-drug antibody (ADAb) levels may justify dosage adjustment or switch to different drugs, enabling a personalized medicine approach. We report a multicenter cross-sectional study on different methods [ELISA and a cell based functional assay (reporter gene assay - RGA)] for drug/ADAb detection, and on the relationship between drug bioavailability and ADAb. 163 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with infliximab (IFX; n = 67), adalimumab (ADL; n = 49) or etanercept (ETA; n = 47) were tested for drug and ADAb levels. Furthermore, we report prospective data from additional 70 patients (59 RA and 11 juvenile idiopathic arthritis - JIA) tested for drug and ADAb levels at baseline (T0) and after 3 (T3) and 6 months (T6) of treatment with ADL or ETA only. IFX-treated patients were not included because of the increasing use of IFX biosimilars. Stringent inclusion criteria were used in order to avoid unwanted variables in both studies; none of the patients used TNFi before the study, and TNFi was used only in combination with methotrexate. Clinical response was defined according to EULAR response criteria. The two assays performed comparably in the comparison study. Accordingly, ELISA was selected for the prospective study because of its feasibility in the clinical setting. The cross-sectional study found ADAb in IFX and ADL treated groups only, that were associated with a decrease in pharmacological drug availability in the blood. Comparable results were found for the ADL-treated group in the prospective study which also showed a relationship between drug/ADAb levels and the loss of clinical response. Altogether our findings support drug and anti-drug Ab monitoring in the real-world clinical setting thus enabling individualized treatment and reducing disability in chronic inflammatory arthritis.