Multicenter Quantification of Radiation Exposure and Associated Risks for Prostatic Artery Embolization in 1476 Patients.

Background Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) is a safe, minimally invasive angiographic procedure that effectively treats benign prostatic hyperplasia; however, PAE-related patient radiation exposure and associated risks are not completely understood. Purpose To quantify radiation dose and assess radiation-related adverse events in patients who underwent PAE at multiple centers. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients undergoing PAE for any indication performed by experienced operators at 10 high-volume international centers from January 2014 to May 2021. Patient characteristics, procedural and radiation dose data, and radiation-related adverse events were collected. Procedural radiation effective doses were calculated by multiplying kerma-area product values by an established conversion factor for abdominopelvic fluoroscopy-guided procedures. Relationships between cumulative air kerma (CAK) or effective dose and patient body mass index (BMI), fluoroscopy time, or radiation field area were assessed with linear regression. Differences in radiation dose stemming from radiopaque prostheses or fluoroscopy unit type were assessed using two-sample t tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Results A total of 1476 patients (mean age, 69.9 years ± 9.0 [SD]) were included, of whom 1345 (91.1%) and 131 (8.9%) underwent the procedure with fixed interventional or mobile fluoroscopy units, respectively. Median procedure effective dose was 17.8 mSv for fixed interventional units and 12.3 mSv for mobile units. CAK and effective dose both correlated positively with BMI (R2 = 0.15 and 0.17; P < .001) and fluoroscopy time (R2 = 0.16 and 0.08; P < .001). No radiation-related 90-day adverse events were reported. Patients with radiopaque implants versus those without implants had higher median CAK (1452 mGy [range, 900-2685 mGy] vs 1177 mGy [range, 700-1959 mGy], respectively; P = .01). Median effective dose was lower for mobile than for fixed interventional systems (12.3 mSv [range, 8.5-22.0 mSv] vs 20.4 mSv [range, 13.8-30.6 mSv], respectively; P < .001). Conclusion Patients who underwent PAE performed with fixed interventional or mobile fluoroscopy units were exposed to a median effective radiation dose of 17.8 mSv or 12.3 mSv, respectively. No radiation-related adverse events at 90 days were reported. © RSNA, 2024 See also the editorial by Mahesh in this issue.

Cumulative diagnostic imaging radiation exposure in premature neonates.

BACKGROUND: To date, there has been limited work evaluating the total cumulative effective radiation dose received by infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. Most previous publications report that the total radiation dose received falls within the safe limits but does not include all types of ionizing radiation studies typically performed on this vulnerable patient population. We aimed to provide an estimate of the cumulative effective ionizing radiation dose (cED) in microSieverts (µSv) received by premature infants ≤32 weeks from diagnostic studies performed throughout their NICU stay, and predictors of exposures. METHODS: Retrospective chart review from 2004-2011. Data included demographics, gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW), length of stay (LOS), clinical diagnosis, and radiological studies. RESULTS: 1045 charts were reviewed. Median GA = 30.0 weeks (SD 2.7, range 22.0-32.6). Median BW = 1340.0 grams (SD 445.4, range 420-2470). Median number of radiographic studies = 9 (SD 28.5, range 0-210). Median cED = 162µSv (range 0-9248). The cED was positively associated with LOS (p < 0.001) and inversely correlated with GA (p < 0.001) and BW (p < 0.001). Infants with intestinal perforation had the highest median cED 1661µSv compared to 162µSv for others (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results provide an estimate of the cumulative effective radiation dose received by premature infants in a level 4 neonatal intensive care unit from all radiological studies involving ionizing radiation and identifies risk factors and predictors of such exposure. Radiation exposure in NICU is highest among the most premature and among infants who suffer from intestinal perforation.

Pediatric CT radiation exposure: where we were, and where we are now.

Since the turn of the last millennium, the pediatric radiology community has blazed a patient-quality and safety trail in helping to effectively address the public and the news media's concerns about the implications of ionizing radiation from CT scanners in children. As such, this article (1) reviews the potential deleterious effects of ionizing radiation, (2) discusses why limiting radiation exposure in children is so important, (3) tells the history of pediatric CT radiation exposure concerns, (4) explains the interventions that took place to address these concerns and (5) touches on the current school of thought on pediatric CT dose reduction.

Risk of Radiation-Induced Cancer From Computed Tomography Angiography Use in Imaging Surveillance for Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms.

Background and Purpose- Although computed tomography angiography (CTA) is an excellent, noninvasive imaging modality for surveillance of intracranial aneurysms, radiation concerns have been cited to restrict its use in surveillance imaging. The goal of this study was to estimate distributions of radiation-induced central nervous system cancer incidence from CTA surveillance for intracranial aneurysms, and the impact of frequency and duration of surveillance imaging using follow-up CTAs. Methods- Simulation-modeling approach was performed using data on CTA associated radiation risk. We used the Radiation Risk Assessment Tool, based on the data using the BEIR VII report (BEIR VII). Each CTA was assigned as a separate exposure event. Men and women, respectively, starting surveillance imaging at 30, 40, and 50 years and receiving annual CTAs were considered as separate subgroups. As a comparison, we also calculated the radiation-induced cancer risk in the same groups of patients but receiving CTAs every 2 and 5 years, respectively. Results- CTA-associated excess cancer risk per exposure increases relatively more rapidly with the first 10 exposures and plateaus after the 44th exposure. On average, per CTA incurs ≈0.0026% in excess lifetime cancer risk. Receiving CTA follow-up at a younger age, more frequent follow-up, longer surveillance period, and men are the major factors contributing to an elevated excess lifetime risk. In the highest risk group, male patient receiving annual CTA follow-ups from the age of 30 years, the excess lifetime risk is 0.115% at the age of 81 years. Conclusions- Radiation-induced brain cancer incidence associated with unruptured intracranial aneurysm surveillance strategies using CTA is low relative to the risk for aneurysmal rupture. Further cost-effectiveness/utility analyses might help assess this risk in the context of aneurysmal ruptures prevented by surveillance imaging.

Evaluation of Kidney Stones with Reduced-Radiation Dose CT: Progress from 2011-2012 to 2015-2016-Not There Yet.

Purpose To determine if the use of reduced-dose computed tomography (CT) for evaluation of kidney stones increased in 2015-2016 compared with that in 2011-2012, to determine variability in radiation exposure according to facility for this indication, and to establish a current average radiation dose for CT evaluation for kidney stones by querying a national dose registry. Materials and Methods This cross-sectional study was exempt from institutional review board approval. Data were obtained from the American College of Radiology dose registry for CT examinations submitted from July 2015 to June 2016. Study descriptors consistent with single-phase unenhanced CT for evaluation of kidney stones and associated RadLex® Playbook identifiers (RPIDs) were retrospectively identified. Facilities actively submitting data on kidney stone-specific CT examinations were included. Dose metrics including volumetric CT dose index, dose-length product, and size-specific dose estimate, when available, were reported, and a random effects model was run to account for clustering of CT examinations at facilities. A z-ratio was calculated to test for a significant difference between the proportion of reduced-radiation dose CT examinations (defined as those with a dose-length product of 200 mGy · cm or less) performed in 2015-2016 and the proportion performed in 2011-2012. Results Three hundred four study descriptors for kidney stone CT corresponding to data from 328 facilities that submitted 105 334 kidney stone CT examinations were identified. Reduced-dose CT examinations accounted for 8040 of 105 334 (7.6%) CT examinations, a 5.6% increase from the 1010 of 49 903 (2%) examinations in 2011-2012 (P < .001). Mean overall dose-length product was 689 mGy · cm (95% confidence interval: 667, 712), decreased from the mean of 746 mGy · cm observed in 2011-2012. Median facility dose-length product varied up to sevenfold, from less than 200 mGy · cm to greater than 1600 mGy · cm. Conclusion Use of reduced-radiation dose CT for evaluation of kidney stones has increased since 2011-2012, but remains low; variability of radiation dose according to facility continues to be wide. National mean CT radiation exposure for evaluation of renal colic during 2015-2016 decreased relative to 2011-2012 values, but remained well above what is reasonably achievable. © RSNA, 2017.

Organización, desarrollo, garantía de calidad y radioprotección en los servicios de radiología: Imaginología y radioterapia / Organization, development, guarantee of quality and radioprotección in the radiology services: Imaginología and radiotherapy

Se presentan las pautas para la planificación, organización y operación de los servicios de imaginología y radioterapia en la estrategia de desarrollo de los sistemas locales de salud (SILOS), tomando en cuenta las características de su nuevo contexto tecnológico, político, financiero y organizacional. Además se revisan y reexaminan definiciones, conceptos y principios en los cuales se ha basado la organización general de los servicios. Esta publicación esta dirigida a profesionales en ciencias de la salud, especialmente en el área de radiológia y también el físico médico, profesional relativamente nuevo en el área de la salud, al sector político involucrado en el proceso, además de administradores y planificadores