Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Hosp Infect ; 111: 189-199, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33600892

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic not only had an impact on public life and healthcare facilities in general, but also affected established surgical workflows for elective procedures. The strategy to protect patients and healthcare workers from infection by SARS-CoV-2 in surgical departments has needed step-by-step development. Based on the evaluation of international recommendations and guidelines, as well as personal experiences in a clinical 'hot spot' and in a 450-bed surgical clinic, an adapted surgical site infection (SSI) prevention checklist was needed to develop concise instructions, which described roles and responsibilities of healthcare professionals that could be used for wider guidance in pandemic conditions. METHOD: Publications of COVID-19-related recommendations and guidelines, produced by health authorities and organizations, such as WHO, US-CDC, ECDC, the American College of Surgery and the Robert Koch Institute, were retrieved, assessed and referenced up to 31st January 2020. Additionally, clinical personal experiences in Germany were evaluated and considered. RESULTS: Part 1 of this guidance summarizes the experience of a tertiary care, surgical centre which utilized redundant hospital buildings for immediate spatial separation in a 'hot spot' COVID-19 area. Part 2 outlines the successful screening and isolation strategy in a surgical clinic in a region of Germany with outbreaks in surrounding medical centres. Part 3 provides the synopsis of personal experiences and international recommendations suggested for implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: Understanding of COVID-19, and SARS-CoV-2-related epidemiology, is constantly and rapidly changing, requiring continuous adaptation and re-evaluation of recommendations. Established national and local guidelines for continuation of surgical services and prevention of SSI require ongoing scrutiny and focused implementation. This manuscript presents a core facility checklist to support medical institutions to continue their clinical and surgical work during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/normas , Controle de Infecções/normas , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Alemanha , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 26(6): 780.e1-780.e8, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31654794

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Conjugative gene transfer has been considered as one of the driving factors in the transmission and dissemination of multidrug resistance in bacteria. The abundance of antimicrobial resistance genes and bacteria in the gut microbiome may provide the ideal platform for plasmid exchange. Systematic data on in vivo horizontal gene transfer (HGT) and its frequency are scarce. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and ninety-six carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli (CRGNBs) from 179 patients (158 inpatients and 21 outpatients) between January 2016 and April 2017 were analysed retrospectively. Alignment of plasmid content for 32 isolates from 16 patients with multiple CRGNB species was performed from whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data. RESULTS: Sixteen of the 179 patients (8.9%) were colonized and/or infected with more than one CRGNB species; 11/179 (6.1%) were colonized by multiple carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CREs) and 5/179 (2.8%) by carbapenem-resistant non-fermenters (CRNFs) and CREs. WGS suggested interspecies transfer as the predominant mechanism rather than independent acquisition in 8/10 patients (80%, one non-recoverable isolate) with multiple CREs but not in CRNF-CRE combinations; 30/158 inpatients (20%) had underlying haematological malignancies, and they are more likely to exhibit multiple CRGNB strains (OR 3.0, 95%CI 0.98-8.89, p 0.05) and CRE strains (OR 3.9, 95%CI 1.02-14.58, p 0.04) during hospital stay compared to other patient groups. CONCLUSION: Our data give insight into the occurrence of natural in vivo HGT in a clinical setting. Better understanding of HGT will help optimize containment measures and may guide antibiotic stewardship programmes.


Assuntos
Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/genética , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/isolamento & purificação , Transferência Genética Horizontal , Neoplasias Hematológicas/microbiologia , Plasmídeos/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/transmissão , Feminino , Genômica , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Hosp Infect ; 93(2): 191-6, 2016 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27112045

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are an economic burden, and infection control (IC) measures are cost- and labour-intensive. A two-tier IC management strategy was developed, including active screening, in order to achieve effective use of limited resources. Briefly, high-risk patients were differentiated from other patients, distinguished according to type of MDRO, and IC measures were implemented accordingly. AIM: To evaluate costs and benefits of this IC management strategy. METHODS: The study period comprised 2.5 years. All high-risk patients underwent microbiological screening. Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) were classified as multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR). Expenses consisted of costs for staff, materials, laboratory, increased workload and occupational costs. FINDINGS: In total, 39,551 patients were screened, accounting for 24.5% of all admissions. Of all screened patients, 7.8% (N=3,104) were MDRO positive; these patients were mainly colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (37.3%), followed by meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (30.3%) and MDR-GNB (28.3%). The median length of stay (LOS) for all patients was 10 days (interquartile range 3-20); LOS was twice as long in colonized patients (P<0.001). Screening costs totalled 255,093.82€, IC measures cost 97,701.36€, and opportunity costs were 599,225.52€. The savings of this IC management strategy totalled 500,941.84€. Possible transmissions by undetected carriers would have caused additional costs of 613,648.90-4,974,939.26€ (i.e. approximately 600,000-5 million €). CONCLUSION: Although the costs of a two-tier IC management strategy including active microbiological screening are not trivial, these data indicate that the approach is cost-effective when prevented transmissions are included in the cost estimate.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Controle de Infecções/economia , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Infecções Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Infecção Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA