Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Cancer ; 113(5): 706-15, 2015 Sep 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26291057

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics of two dosing schedules of oral topotecan in combination with pazopanib in patients with advanced solid tumours. METHODS: Stage I of this study was to determine whether there was an impact of pazopanib on topotecan exposure. In stage II, the MTD and safety profile of oral topotecan given weekly on days 1, 8 and 15 in a 28-day cycle; or daily-times-five on days 1-5 in a 21-day cycle, both in combination with daily pazopanib, were explored. RESULTS: In total, 67 patients were enroled. Pazopanib co-administration caused a substantial increase in exposure to total topotecan (1.7-fold) compared with topotecan alone, which is considered clinically relevant. Topotecan had no effect on pazopanib concentrations. Safety findings were consistent with the known profile of both agents. There were three drug-related deaths, liver failure, tumour haemorrhage and myelosuppression. Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; hand-foot syndrome, myelosuppression and diarrhoea) on the weekly topotecan schedule and four patients experienced DLTs (myelosuppression) on the daily-times-five topotecan schedule. When combined with pazopanib, 800 mg daily, the recommended doses for oral topotecan are: 8 mg weekly and 2.5 mg daily-times-five. Seven of eight patients with partial response had platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. In addition, 54% of patients had stable disease with 22% stable for 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Total topotecan exposure is 1.7-fold higher when co-administered with pazopanib. Both schedules of administration were tolerated and would permit further evaluation, especially the weekly schedule.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/toxicidade , Feminino , Humanos , Indazóis , Masculino , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Pirimidinas/administração & dosagem , Sulfonamidas/administração & dosagem , Topotecan/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Ann Oncol ; 24(12): 3061-5, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24146220

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Current data suggest that chemotherapy combinations may be superior to single agents in biliary tract cancer. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway appears to be associated with tumor stage, prognosis and response to therapy. This trial was designed to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of the combination of panitumumab, a monoclonal anti-EGFR antibody, with gemcitabine and irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced (unresectable or metastatic) cholangiocarcinoma, ECOG PS 0-2, and adequate organ function were treated with panitumumab (9 mg/kg) on day 1, and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) and irinotecan (100 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The primary objective was to evaluate the 5-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives included overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Mutational analyses of EGFR, KRAS and BRAF were carried out when feasible. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients received a median of 7 (0-30) cycles. The most common grade 3/4 toxic effects were neutropenia (10 patients, 29%), thrombocytopenia (10 patients, 29%), skin rash (13 patients, 37%) and dehydration (9 patients, 26%). Two patients had CR, 9 had partial response (PR), and 15 had SD for a disease-control rate of 74% (by RECIST) in 28 assessable patients. Two patients went on to have surgical resection. The 5-month PFS was 69%. The median PFS was 9.7 months and the median OS was 12.9 months. In 17 testable samples, no EGFR or BRAF mutations were identified; there were 7 KRAS mutations, with no difference in OS by KRAS status. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed encouraging efficacy of this regimen with good tolerability. Further study in this area is warranted. Clinical Trials Number: The trial was registered with the National Cancer Institute (www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00948935).


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/tratamento farmacológico , Colangiocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/genética , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/mortalidade , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/patologia , Camptotecina/administração & dosagem , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Colangiocarcinoma/genética , Colangiocarcinoma/mortalidade , Colangiocarcinoma/patologia , Análise Mutacional de DNA , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Irinotecano , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Panitumumabe , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras) , Resultado do Tratamento , Proteínas ras/genética , Gencitabina
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA