Preoperative and Postoperative Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio Is a Prognostic Marker for Patients With Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treated With Curative Resection.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Systemic inflammation has been implicated in the development and progression of cancer. Inflammatory markers have been identified as prognostic indicators in numerous malignancies. This study explored the prognostic relevance of the initial and postoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) on relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) who underwent curative resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 89 patients with STS who underwent extensive and radical resection at the Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital between 2004 and 2018. Kaplan-Meier curves for RFS and OS were calculated using multivariate Cox proportional models. RESULTS: A total of 67 (75.3%) patients demonstrated a high initial NLR (≥4.1) and 65 (75.3%) showed a high initial PLR (≥231). In the univariate and multivariate analyses, an elevated initial PLR ratio was significantly associated with a decreased RFS (p=0.017) and OS (p=0.003). Patients with a high PLR (PLR >231) had a median RFS of 24 months, whereas those with a low PLR (PLR ≤231) had a median RFS of 96 months. The median OS was 50 and 298 months for the high PLR and low PLR groups, respectively. Furthermore, a high postoperative PLR ratio was associated with a decreased RFS (p=0.001) and OS (p=0.038). CONCLUSION: Preoperative and postoperative PLR ratio can be used as a cost-effective prognostic marker for oncologic outcomes in patients with STS who undergo surgery.

Is intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation mandatory for curing Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia in young patients in the era of multitarget agents?

INTRODUCTION: The treatment outcomes for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) have improved with various tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and bispecific T-cell engagers. Although allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the standard treatment for young patients with Ph+ALL, its role remains debatable in the era of TKIs and blinatumomab. AREAS COVERED: There are some issues regarding Ph+ALL. First, do young patients require intensive chemotherapy (IC) in the era of multitarget agents? Second, which TKI is preferred for frontline therapy? Third, should allo-SCT be performed in patients achieving complete remission with ponatinib and IC? Fourth, can chemo-free treatment lead to a cure without allo-SCT? We searched relevant literature from the last 30 years on PubMed; reviewed the role of chemo-free therapies and combinations of ponatinib and IC; and assessed the necessity of allo-SCT in young patients with Ph+ALL. EXPERT OPINION: Allo-SCT may not be needed, even in young patients with Ph+ALL treated with ponatinib-based IC or combined ponatinib and blinatumomab as frontline therapy. When adopting a ponatinib-based chemo-minimized regimen for induction, allo-SCT is needed with posttransplant ponatinib maintenance. Continuous exposure to ponatinib at pre- or post-transplant is regarded as one of the most important factor for the success of treatment.