Current treatment of symptomatic aortic stenosis in elderly patients: Do risk scores really matter after 80 years of age?

BACKGROUND: According to the guidelines, surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is recommended in patients at low surgical risk (EuroSCORE II<4%), whereas for other patients, the decision between transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and surgery should be made by the Heart Team, with TAVI being favoured in elderly patients. AIM: The RAC prospective multicentre survey assessed the respective contributions of age and surgical risk scores in therapeutic decision making in elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. METHODS: In September and October 2016, 1049 consecutive patients aged ≥ 75 years were included in 32 centres with on-site TAVI and surgical facilities. The primary endpoint was the decision between medical management, TAVI or SAVR. RESULTS: Mean age was 84±5 years and 53% of patients were female. The surgical risk was classified as high (EuroSCORE II>8%) in 18% of patients, intermediate (EuroSCORE II 4-8%) in 34% and low (EuroSCORE II≤4%) in 48%. TAVI was preferred in 71% of patients, SAVR in 19% and medical treatment in 10%. The choice of TAVI over SAVR was associated with older age (P<0.0001) and a higher EuroSCORE II (P=0.008). However, the weight of EuroSCORE II in therapeutic decision making markedly decreased after the age of 80 years. Indeed, 77% of patients aged ≥ 80 years were referred for TAVI, despite a low estimated surgical risk. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of risk scores depends strongly on age, and decreases considerably after 80 years, most patients being referred for TAVI, independent of their estimated surgical risk. Despite medical advancements, 10% of patients were still denied any intervention.

Magnesium and Ketamine Reduce Early Morphine Consumption After Open Bariatric Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Study.

BACKGROUNDS: Optimal pain management in bariatric patients is crucial for early recovery. This study aims to evaluate the effects of magnesium and ketamine combination on morphine consumption after open bariatric surgery (primary outcome), as well as on postoperative pain scores and occurrence of side effects. METHOD: A total of 60 patients undergoing elective open gastric bypass were randomized into 3 groups. All patients received the same general anaesthesia protocol. The magnesium and ketamine group (Mg + K) received an IV bolus of magnesium 50 mg/kg and ketamine 0.2 mg/kg followed by continuous infusion of magnesium (8 mg/kg/h) and ketamine (0.15 mg/kg/h) until extubation. The ketamine group (K) received the same bolus and infusion of ketamine, together with a bolus and continuous infusion of normal saline. The placebo group (P) received normal saline. All patients received 48 h of paracetamol 1 g IV q6h and morphine sulphate 0.1 mg/kg subcutaneous q6h PRN. Morphine consumption, VAS pain scores and occurrence of side effects were recorded for 48 h postoperatively. RESULTS: Patients in group (Mg + K) (2.4 ± 2.62 mg) and in group (K) (2.8 ± 2.66 mg) had significantly lower morphine consumption in the PACU compared with the patients in group (P) (4.85 ± 4.51 mg) (p = 0.045). Patients in group (Mg + K) consumed significantly less morphine the first 24 postoperative hours, with a relative reduction of 87% and 21% compared with group (K) and group (P) respectively (p = 0.028). However, this difference was not observed at 48 h. No significant difference was shown between the three groups in terms of nausea and vomiting, time to extubation or excessive sedation. CONCLUSION: The association of magnesium and ketamine bolus followed by infusion in open bariatric surgery appears to be safe and decreases morphine requirements in the first 24 h compared with both ketamine alone and placebo.

Safety and Efficacy of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) Used for Analgesia After Bariatric Surgery: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are cornerstone in multimodal analgesia protocols. This point is of great value in morbidly obese patients due to the high prevalence of restrictive pulmonary disease and obstructive sleep apnea. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that NSAIDs do not increase acute bariatric surgery complications while optimizing postoperative analgesia. METHODS: Databases of two medical centers were retrospectively reviewed to find all patients who underwent bariatric surgery between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2017. Inclusion criteria were BMI greater than 30 kg/m2 and age of 16-75 years old. Patients who suffered from severe organ failure or coagulation disorders were excluded. Patient's demographics, obesity-related diseases (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia), postoperative pain scores, and morphine consumption in PACU, as well as early and late surgical complications, were collected. Patients included from the first institution (where NSAIDs analgesia was prohibited: control group) were compared to patients from the second institution (where NSAIDs analgesia was mandatory: case group). RESULTS: The study population included 270 patients, 134 in the control group, and 136 in the case group. NSAIDs usage produced better analgesia with significant reduction in morphine consumption and PACU length of stay. Also, incidence of surgical complications was the same in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: NSAIDs administration do not increase postoperative complication rate after bariatric surgery. Although NSAID administration provided better analgesia and shorter PACU stay, future prospective studies are needed to confirm these encouraging results and to evaluate their impact on postoperative rehabilitation.

Genotyping test with clinical factors: better management of acute postoperative pain?

Individualization of acute postoperative pain treatment on an evidence-based decision process is a major health concern. The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of genetic and non-genetic factors on the variability of response to morphine in acute postoperative pain. A group of nighty-five patients undergoing major surgery were included prospectively. At 24 h, a logistic regression model was carried out to determine the factors associated with morphine doses given by a Patient Controlled Analgesia device. The dose of morphine was associated with age (p = 0.011), patient weight (p = 0.025) and the duration of operation (p = 0.030). This dose decreased with patient's age and duration of operation and increased with patient's weight. OPRM1 and ABCB1 polymorphisms were significantly associated with administered dose of morphine (p = 0.038 and 0.012 respectively). Patients with at least one G allele for c.118A>G OPRM1 polymorphism (AG/GG) needed 4 times the dose of morphine of AA patients. Additionally, patients with ABCB1 CT and CC genotypes for c.3435C>T polymorphism were 5.6 to 7.1 times more prone to receive higher dose of morphine than TT patients. Our preliminary results support the evidence that OPRM1/ABCB1 genotypes along with age, weight and duration of operation have an impact on morphine consumption for acute postoperative pain treatment.

Opioid drugs: what is next for Lebanon?

Opioids remain essential drugs for the treatment of severe cancerous pain. However, many countries have developed new regulations and policies for a better availability and accessibility of these drugs. Lebanon is not too far from these advanced strategies. The Ministry of Health and specifically the Narcotic Department have adjusted regulations related to opioid prescriptions and have registered many new opioid drugs in 2012 for a better pain-free life for our patients. However, there is still a lot to do in this field.

Multilevel nerve stimulator-guided paravertebral block as a sole anesthetic technique for breast cancer surgery in morbidly obese patients.

In this case series, we present the effectiveness of multilevel nerve stimulator-guided paravertebral block (PVB) technique in obese women of body mass index ≥30 kg/m(2) undergoing breast cancer surgery with or without axillary dissection. Twenty-six obese women were included in this case series. Block classification, hemodynamics and complication rate, postoperative nausea and vomiting, postoperative analgesic consumption, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay, and hospital stay were recorded. All patients were hemodynamically stable during the operation, and no complications were noted. Patients stayed 69 min on average in the PACU and were discharged within 2 days. Confirmation of the landmark was established from the initial attempt in 61.5%. Surgical PVB was achieved in 76.9% of the patients; the failure rate of the technique was 11.5%. This case series suggested that the multilevel nerve stimulator-guided PVB may be an effective technique for obese patients undergoing breast cancer surgery, although further studies are needed to compare PVB and general anesthesia.

General anaesthesia combined with bilateral paravertebral blockade (T11-T12-L1) vs general anaesthesia for bilateral varicocelectomy. A randomized double-blind clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Varicocelectomy is a common operation in urology associated with considerable postoperative pain. The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to investigate whether a combination of general anesthesia and bilateral nerve stimulator guided paravertebral nerve blocks could provide better postoperative pain relief compared to general anesthesia in combination with placebo paravertebral nerve block. METHODS: Sixty patients scheduled for varicocelectomy were randomized prospectively. Thirty patients each in either the active group (general anaesthesia combined with nerve stimulator guided bilateral paravertebral block) or the control group (general anaesthesia combined with normal saline nerve stimulator guided bilateral paravertebral block). Postoperative pain was assessed by visual analogue scale scores at predetermined time intervals. RESULTS: The active group was found to have better postoperative pain-relief (p < 0.005), reduced need for analgesics (p < 0.05), and also a more rapid return to normal activities (p < 0.001) compared to control group. Higher surgeon and patient satisfaction (p < 0.001) were noted in the active group compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: Preoperative paravertebral blockade combined with general anesthesia showed significantly reduced postoperative pain scores and analgesic consumption, earlier return to normal activity and was associated with better patient and surgeon satisfaction during varicocelectomy surgery.

Regional analgesia and breast cancer surgery.

Breast cancer surgery is frequently associated with postoperative nausea, vomiting, pain and painful restricted movement. It is well established that thoracic paravertebral block with or without general anesthesia provides better postoperative analgesia and reduces the risk of nausea and vomiting after breast surgery as well as the incidence of chronic pain. Paravertebral block improves the quality of recovery after breast cancer surgery and provides the patient with the option of ambulatory discharge.

Combined regional and general anesthesia for ambulatory peripheral orthopedic surgery in children.

Pediatric orthopedic surgery is rarely done in an outpatient setting because of the postoperative pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the children's comfort and parents' satisfaction after ambulatory peripheral pediatric orthopedic surgery performed under general anesthesia combined with regional anesthesia (RA). Sixty consecutive children were enrolled in this prospective study. All children fulfilled inclusion criteria for outpatient and for RA and parents received proper information regarding their child postoperative care. Postoperative pain control was sustained for 48 h using routine paracetamol, ibuprofen, and oral tramadol if needed. A telephone survey was conducted on day 1 and day 2 to evaluate pain scores, limb motor function, occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and feeding, sleep or play disturbance. The parents were also asked about their overall satisfaction rate and the choice of ambulatory mode versus inpatient admission in case of future orthopedic procedure. A total of 34 soft tissue procedures and 26 bony procedures were performed. 63.3% recovered motor function before discharge from the postanesthesia care unit. Low pain scores and good postoperative comfort were observed. Parents' satisfaction was greater than eight out of 10 in 88.3% of the cases, and 85% of the parents would choose ambulatory surgery in case of a second procedure. RA used with level I or II analgesics is compatible with ambulatory peripheral pediatric orthopedic surgery. Resulting good analgesia and postoperative comfort render the ambulatory mode to be favored by the parents.

Undergraduate medical education in palliative medicine: the first step in promoting palliative care in Lebanon.

Effective delivery of high-quality palliative care requires effective interprofessional team working by skilled healthcare professionals. Palliative care is therefore highly suitable for sowing the seeds of interprofessional team working in early professional undergraduate medical education. Integrating palliative medicine in undergraduate medical education curricula seems to be a must. In this review, we present as an example the Palliative and End-of-Life Care Curriculum (PEOLC) used in Canada for undergraduate medical education and underline the need for such a national curriculum in Lebanon. One must keep in mind that medical education does not stop at the end of the medical school, ongoing learning needs exist. Continuous medical education in palliative care should also be emphasized; the overall goal is promoting palliative medicine. Respecting and protecting human dignity is the right of every patient.

Pain management and health care policy.

Opioid analgesics are essential for the management of moderate to severe pain. In spite of their documented effectiveness, opioids are often underutilized, a factor which has contributed significantly to the undertreatment of pain. Many countries have developed true national policies on cancer pain and palliative care, and in others only guidelines for care have been developed. Ideally, national policies facilitate and legislate not only a patient's right to care, but also the necessary components of education and drug availability which are so critical for the appropriate achievement of public health programs.

[Regional anesthesia for lumbar microdiscectomy]. / Anesthésie locorégionale pour cure microchirurgicale des hernies discales lombaires.

GOAL OF THE STUDY: Lumbar microdiscectomy surgery is already performed under spinal anesthesia (SA) in many institutions. The aim of this study is to compare the quality of analgesia and recovery after SA when compared to general anesthesia (GA) after lumbar microdiscectomy surgery. METHODS: Following light sedation, SA is performed with the patient in the left lateral decubitus position, one to two levels above the herniated disc level. Isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine 3-3.5 ml was injected intrathecally followed by wound infiltration with 15 ml of bupivacaine with 1/200 000 epinephrine prior to surgical incision. RESULTS: Despite randomization, we found significantly more females in the GA group. Pain scores at 4 and 8 h postoperatively were lower in SA group as well as total analgesic consumption during the first 24 h. Postoperative recovery including time to drinking, eating and walking were more rapid after SA when compared to GA. During the postoperative period, the incidence of urinary retention was comparable between groups but the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was significantly higher in the GA group. Moreover, the overall patient's and surgeon's satisfaction were significantly better in the SA group. CONCLUSION: SA associated to wound infiltration using bupivacaine is an interesting alternative to general anesthesia for outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy surgery.