Screening for Type 1 Diabetes Risk in Newborns: The Freder1k Pilot Study in Saxony.

An increased risk for type 1 diabetes can be identified using genetic and immune markers. The Freder1k study introduces genetic testing for type 1 diabetes risk within the context of the newborn screening in order to identify newborns with a high risk to develop type 1 diabetes for follow-up testing of early stage type 1 diabetes and for primary prevention trials. Consent for research-based genetic testing of type 1 diabetes risk is obtained with newborn screening. Increased risk is assessed using three single nucleotide polymorphisms for HLA DRB1*03 (DR3), HLA DRB1*04 (DR4), HLA DQB1*0302 (DQ8) alleles, and defined as 1. an HLA DR3/DR4-DQ8 or DR4-DQ8/DR4-DQ8 genotype or 2. an HLA DR4-DQ8 haplotype and a first-degree family history of type 1 diabetes. Families of infants with increased risk are asked to participate in follow-up visits at infant age 6 months, 2 years, and 4 years for autoantibody testing and early diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. After 8 months, the screening rate has reached 181 per week, with 63% coverage of newborns within Freder1k-clinics and 24% of all registered births in Saxony. Of 4178 screened, 2.6% were identified to have an increased risk, and around 80% of eligible infants were recruited to follow-up. Psychological assessment of eligible families is ongoing with none of 31 families demonstrating signs of excessive burden associated with knowledge of type 1 diabetes risk. This pilot study has shown that it is feasible to perform genetic risk testing for childhood disease within the context of newborn screening programs.

Why is insulin pump treatment rarely used in adolescents and young adults with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes?

BACKGROUND: In type 1 diabetes (T1D), the use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) has increased steadily in the last years. Compared with conventional insulin injection regimes, major advantages might be a nearly physiological insulin secretion, lower rates of hypoglycemia, higher flexibility in daily life, and increased quality of life. Data on CSII in cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To analyze current use of insulin pumps in CFRD and compare demographics of pump-treated patients between CFRD and T1D. METHODS: Data from the prospective German/Austrian diabetes patient registry on insulin-treated patients with either CFRD (n = 515) or T1D (n = 43 165) aged >10 yr at manifestation of diabetes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 4.1% (n = 21) of CFRD and 17.7% (n = 7647) of T1D patients received insulin pump treatment within the recent year of care (p < 0.001). Pump-treated patients with CFRD had a significantly shorter duration of diabetes [median (Q1 ; Q3 ): 5.8 (2.9; 9.5) vs. 7.8 (4.3; 20.4) yr, p = 0.026] and tended to be younger [22.0 (18.2; 30.1) vs. 24.9 (17.3; 45.9) yr] than pump-treated T1D patients. Age at initiation of CSII seemed to be lower in CFRD [19.2 (16.5; 29.2) vs. 23.3 (14.8; 43.5) yr]. Insulin pump therapy was used slightly more often in male CFRD patients than females (4.7 vs. 3.6%), whereas in T1D the opposite was observed (14.9 vs. 21.2%, p < 0.001). Discontinuation rate of CSII was higher in CFRD than T1D (30.0 vs. 12.7%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Despite potential advantages, insulin pump therapy was rarely used among adolescent and young adult CFRD patients.

Smoking and metabolic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To relate self-reported smoking frequency to metabolic control and other cardiovascular risk factors in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. STUDY DESIGN: In the multicenter Diabetes Patienten Verlaufsdokumentationssystem database from Germany and Austria, anonymized records on 27 561 patients < 20 years of age with documented smoking status were available for analysis. RESULTS: Self-reported smoking was negligible in patients younger than 11 years (0.1%), increasing to 5% in 11- to 15-year-old patients, and 28.4% in the 15- to 20-year-old age group. Multivariate analysis with adjustment for age, diabetes duration, sex, insulin therapy, and center differences, revealed that smokers had higher HbA1c-levels compared with non-smokers (9.1% vs 8.0%, P < .0001). Diastolic blood pressure was higher (68.2 vs 67.6 mm Hg, P < .0001), and the lipid profile was unfavorable in patients who smoke: Triglycerides and total cholesterol were higher and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol was lower (all P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Smokers display significantly worse metabolic control and a higher cardiovascular risk profile. Although not attested in trials, we state that education about smoking, smoking prevention, and psychological help for smoking cessation should be an integral part of comprehensive pediatric care for adolescent patients with type 1 diabetes.