Comparative cardioprotective effects of carvedilol versus atenolol in a rat model of cardiorenal syndrome type 4.

The incidence of chronic kidney disease is escalating; cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) type 4 is gaining a major health concern causing significant morbidity and mortality, putting major burdens on the healthcare system. This study was designed to compare the cardioprotective effects of carvedilol versus atenolol against CRS type 4 induced by subtotal 5/6 nephrectomy in rats and to explore the underlying mechanisms. Immediately after surgery, carvedilol (20 mg/kg/day) or atenolol (20 mg/kg/day) was added to drinking water for 10 weeks. Carvedilol was more effective than atenolol in improving kidney functions, decreasing elevated blood pressures, attenuating cardiac hypertrophy, reducing serum brain natriuretic peptide, and diminished cardiac fibrous tissue deposition. However, carvedilol was equivalent to atenolol in modulating ß1-adrenergic receptors (ß1ARs) and cardiac diacylglycerol (DAG) signaling, but carvedilol was superior in modulating ß-arrestin2, phosphatidyl inositol 4,5 bisphosphates (PIP2), and caspase 3 levels. Carvedilol has superior cardioprotective effects than atenolol in a rat model of CRS type 4. These protective effects are mediated through modulating cardiac ß1ARs/ß-arrestin2/PIP2/DAG as well as abating cardiac apoptotic signaling pathways (caspase3/pS473 protein kinase B (Akt)).

Silymarin in combination with chlorogenic acid protects against hepatotoxicity induced by doxorubicin in rats: possible role of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase pathway.

Many xenobiotics are known to cause hepatic damage with subsequent significant morbidity and mortality. Doxorubicin (DOX) is a broad-spectrum antineoplastic agent. DOX is reported to cause hepatocellular damage. Previous studies verified the promising role of many natural antioxidant products against various models of hepatic dysfunction. We conducted this study to evaluate the possible hepatoprotective effect of silymarin (SILY) and/or chlorogenic acid (CGA) in a rat model of DOX-induced hepatotoxicity. For this purpose, we randomly divided 30 adult male rats into five equal groups as control, DOX, co-treated DOX with SILY, co-treated DOX with GCA and co-treated DOX with SILY and CGA groups. All treatments were administered every second day for 4 weeks. Our results showed that simultaneous SILY and CGA administration caused a significant decrease in hepatic apoptosis biomarkers (hepatic caspase-3 and nuclear factor-κB levels), a significant improvement in hepatic oxidant/antioxidant status (malondialdehyde and superoxide dismutase) and significant decrease in hepatic pro-inflammatory biomarkers (tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interlukin-1ß) compared with DOX treatment. We concluded that adding CGA to SILY acts as a hepatoprotective agent against DOX-induced liver injury through inhibiting apoptosis biomarkers, maintaining antioxidant enzyme levels, decreasing pro-inflammatory cytokines as well as regulating liver adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase signaling.

Comparative effectiveness of methylene blue versus intravenous lipid emulsion in a rodent model of amlodipine toxicity.

Context: Calcium channel blocker (CCB) poisonings are the leading cause of death from cardiovascular medication-related overdoses. Current treatments (calcium salts, vasopressors, inotropes) are often insufficient. Intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) and methylene blue (MB) show promise in treating CCB overdoses unresponsive to conventional therapy. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of MB versus ILE in a rodent model of amlodipine (AML) poisoning with survival as the primary outcome and hemodynamic parameters as secondary outcomes. Materials and methods: Sixty-four adult male albino rats were anesthetized and cannulated for non-invasive hemodynamic measurement. Rats received amlodipine intraperitoneally (42 mg/kg). We then divided the rats into four groups: AML only without antidote, AML followed by ILE (24.8 mL/kg over 10 min), AML followed by normal saline (an equivalent volume of ILE), and AML followed by IV MB (2 mg/kg over 5 min). They received study treatments at 5, 30, and 60 minutes from the start of the protocol and with observation for 2 hours. Results: Survival time in ILE group was greater than in the control and NS groups. Differences between ILE and MB and between MB and NS were not significant. Hemodynamic parameters significantly increased in ILE group compared to the MB group at the 30, 60 and 120 min assessments but not after induction of AML poisoning and at 5 min assessment. Conclusions: Survival was greatest in rats treated with ILE. Both MB and NS had little effect on survival when compared to control animals. Both ILE and MB improved hemodynamics.