Differential effects of continuous exposure to the investigational metastin/kisspeptin analog TAK-683 on pulsatile and surge mode secretion of luteinizing hormone in ovariectomized goats.

The aim of the present study was to determine if the estradiol-induced luteinizing hormone (LH) surge is influenced by the constant exposure to TAK-683, an investigational metastin/kisspeptin analog, that had been established to depress the pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and LH secretion in goats. Ovariectomized goats subcutaneously received TAK-683 (TAK-683 group, n=6) or vehicle (control group, n=6) constantly via subcutaneous implantation of an osmotic pump. Five days after the start of the treatment, estradiol was infused intravenously in both groups to evaluate the effects on the LH surge. Blood samples were collected at 6-min intervals for 4 h prior to the initiation of either the TAK-683 treatment or the estradiol infusion, to determine the profiles of pulsatile LH secretion. They were also collected at 2-h intervals from -4 h to 32 h after the start of estradiol infusion for analysis of LH surges. The frequency and mean concentrations of LH pulses in the TAK-683 group were remarkably suppressed 5 days after the start of TAK-683 treatment compared with those of the control group (P<0.05). On the other hand, a clear LH surge was observed in all animals of both groups. There were no significant differences in the LH concentrations for surge peak and the peak time of the LH surge between the TAK-683 and control groups. These findings suggest that the effects of continuous exposure to kisspeptin or its analog on the mechanism(s) that regulates the pulsatile and surge mode secretion of GnRH/LH are different in goats.

Progesterone profiles in the caudal vena cava and jugular vein in response to pulsatile luteinizing hormone stimulation induced by GnRH treatment during the mid-luteal phase in lactating dairy cows.

The aim of this study was to examine whether increased frequency of luteinizing hormone (LH) pulses influences luteal progesterone (P4) secretion by measuring progesterone concentrations at the secreted (caudal vena cava) and circulating levels (jugular vein) in lactating dairy cows. Cows received six intravenous administrations of 2.5 µg of GnRH (gonadorelin acetate, n=4) or 2 ml saline (n=3) at 1-h intervals on 12.4 ± 0.4 (mean ± SE) days after ovulation. Blood samples were collected from the caudal vena cava and jugular vein every 12 min for 12 h (6 h before and after treatment). During the 6 h after treatment, frequency of LH pulses (5.3 ± 0.3 and 3.0 ± 0.0 pulses/6 h) and mean LH concentration (0.50 ± 0.06 and 0.38 ± 0.05 ng/ml) were greater (P<0.05) in GnRH-treated cows than in saline-treated cows. Mean P4 concentration and amplitude of P4 pulses in the caudal vena cava during the 6 h after treatment were greater (P<0.05) in GnRH-treated cows than in saline-treated cows, but the frequency of P4 pulses was not different between the groups. Mean P4 concentration in the jugular vein during the 6 h after treatment was also higher (P<0.05) in GnRH-treated cows than in saline-treated cows (7.0 ± 1.3 and 5.4 ± 0.9 ng/ml). These results indicate that the increased frequency of LH pulses stimulates progesterone secretion from the functional corpus luteum and brings about higher P4 concentrations in the circulating blood in lactating dairy cows.

Changes in plasma progesterone levels in the caudal vena cava and the jugular vein and luteinizing hormone secretion pattern after feeding in lactating and non-lactating dairy cows.

The present study was designed to assess progesterone profiles at the secreted (caudal vena cava) and circulating levels (jugular vein) and luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion pattern in lactating and non-lactating cows with reference to feeding. Four lactating and four non-lactating cycling Holstein cows were examined. Blood samples were collected simultaneously from the caudal vena cava (via a catheter inserted from the coccygeal vein) and the jugular vein every 15 min for 12 h (0500-1700 h) during the functional luteal phase. Cows were fed 50% of the daily diet 6 h after the start of blood sampling. During the 12-h sampling period, mean progesterone concentrations in the caudal vena cava did not differ between lactating and non-lactating cows (49.0 ± 2.9 and 53.3 ± 3.7 ng/ml; mean ± SE), whereas mean progesterone concentrations in the jugular vein in lactating cows were higher than those in non-lactating cows (6.4 ± 0.1 and 5.6 ± 0.1 ng/ml, P < 0.001). Lactating cows had a higher frequency of LH pulses than non-lactating cows (7.0 ± 0.7 and 4.3 ± 0.9 pulses/12 h, P<0.05). The influence of feeding was not observed on LH profiles but was observed on progesterone profiles in both veins. Progesterone concentrations in the caudal vena cava increased after feeding in both groups. Progesterone concentrations in the jugular vein decreased after feeding in lactating cows but not in non-lactating cows. These results indicate the difference in feeding-related changes in progesterone dynamics between lactating and non-lactating cows.

Exposure to estrogen mimicking the level of late pregnancy suppresses estrus subsequently induced by estrogen at the level of the follicular phase in ovariectomized shiba goats.

A high-estrogen environment during late pregnancy is suspected to cause postpartum silent ovulation, and progesterone (P4) is suggested to recover estrus. However, few attempts have been undertaken to elucidate the influence of these steroids on estrus by analyzing hormonal profiles. We investigated estrus and luteinizing hormone (LH) surges in ovariectomized goats (n=6) assigned to three treatments in a cross-over design. In groups 1 and 2, 200 µg/kg body weight/day estradiol benzoate (Dose-200 E2B) was administered for 14 days concurrent with P4 for 11 days, while in the control, saline solution and P4 were administered likewise. Ten days after the final administration of Dose-200 E2B, group 2 was treated with P4 for 8 days, and all groups were treated with 2 µg/kg body weight E2B (Dose-2 E2B) 20 days after the final administration of Dose-200 E2B (or saline solution). The proportion of cases expressing estrus after the administration of Dose-2 E2B was smaller (P<0.01) in group 1 than in the control (1/6, 3/6 and 6/6; groups 1 and 2 and the control, respectively). The proportions of cases generating LH surges did not differ (P>0.1) among the groups (5/6, 5/6 and 6/6; groups 1 and 2 and the control, respectively), but the peak concentrations in groups 1 and 2 (26.2 ± 14.7 and 11.3 ± 6.7 ng/ml) were lower (P<0.01) than those in the control (67.8 ± 19.4 ng/ml). These results demonstrated that elevation of plasma estrogen mimicking late pregnancy inhibits the subsequent estrus induced by estrogen simulating the follicular phase.

Comparison between lactating and non-lactating dairy cows on follicular growth and corpus luteum development, and endocrine patterns of ovarian steroids and luteinizing hormone in the estrous cycles.

The dynamics of ovarian follicle, corpus luteum (CL), and peripheral plasma ovarian steroids were compared between lactating and non-lactating cows, and a possible association of pulsatile luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion with the dynamics was examined. Lactating (n=5) and non-lactating (n=5) cows were monitored daily for follicle and CL throughout two consecutive estrous cycles (Day 0: day of ovulation). Blood samples were collected daily and at 15 min intervals for 8h on Days 2, 4, 6, 8, and 14 of the second cycle. Lactating cows had larger CL (25.4 ± 1.8mm vs. 23.5 ± 1.5mm, P<0.01) and greater progesterone concentrations (4.6 ± 1.0ng/ml vs. 3.9 ± 0.9 ng/ml, P<0.01) during mid-luteal phase compared with non-lactating cows. Maximal diameters of the first wave dominant follicle (17.2 ± 1.8mm vs. 15.5 ± 0.8mm) and the ovulatory follicle (17.9 ± 1.2mm vs. 15.2 ± 0.8mm) were greater (P<0.05) in lactating cows than in non-lactating cows during the estrous cycles with two follicular waves, but no significant differences were detected between the groups during the estrous cycles with three follicular waves. Plasma estradiol concentrations did not differ between the groups throughout the experiment. Lactating cows had more LH pulses from Days 2 to 14 than non-lactating cows. These results imply that differences in ovarian dynamics may exist between lactating and non-lactating cows, for which the increased number of LH pulses observed in lactating cows may have responsibility.

Profiles of ovarian steroids, luteinizing hormone and estrous signs from luteolysis to ovulation in lactating and non-lactating dairy cows.

The aims of the present study were to investigate the profiles of ovarian steroids and luteinizing hormone (LH) and the appearance of estrous signs in relation to luteolysis and ovulation in lactating and non-lactating cows and to examine the influence of lactation on those observations. Five lactating (daily milk yield of 28.4 ± 3.2 kg; mean ± SD) and five non-lactating cycling Holstein cows were examined. Their ovaries were monitored by ultrasonography daily during one estrous cycle. Blood samples were collected daily and then at 3-h intervals after luteolysis until ovulation. Estrous signs in terms of behavior, the vulva and the vagina were checked at 8-h intervals after luteolysis until ovulation. Profiles of progesterone, estradiol-17ß and LH did not differ between the groups. There were no differences in the interval from luteolysis to ovulation (4.6 ± 0.5 and 4.2 ± 0.8 days) and the interval from the estradiol-17ß peak to ovulation (34.2 ± 4.5 and 30.6 ± 3.9 h) between lactating and non-lactating cows. The interval from the peak of the LH surge to ovulation was 27 h in all cows examined. Appearance of estrous signs did not differ between the groups. The vaginal estrous signs were observed conspicuously in all cows examined, but the behavioral signs were not observed in 20.0% of the cows. The duration of behavioral signs (41.3 ± 23.6 h) was shorter (P<0.05) than that of the vagina (68.9 ± 25.4 h). These results imply that lactation might not interfere with the hormonal profiles from luteolysis to ovulation.