Evaluating optimal quality assurance and quality control conditions of activation measurements at the accelerator-based boron neutron capture therapy system employing a lithium target.

Evaluating neutron output is important to ensure proper dose delivery for patients in boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT). It requires efficient quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) while maintaining measurement accuracy. This study investigated the optimal measurement conditions for QA/QC of activation measurements using a high-purity germanium (HP-Ge) detector in an accelerator-based boron neutron capture therapy (AB-BNCT) system employing a lithium target. The QA/QC uncertainty of the activation measurement was evaluated based on counts, reproducibility, and standard radiation source uncertainties. Measurements in a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) cylindrical phantom using aluminum-manganese (Al-Mn) foils and aluminum-gold (Al-Au) foils and measurements in a water phantom using gold wire with and without cadmium cover were performed to determine the optimal measurement conditions. The QA/QC uncertainties of the activation measurements were 4.5% for Au and 4.6% for Mn. The optimum irradiation proton charge and measurement time were determined to be 36 C and 900 s for measurements in a PMMA cylindrical phantom, 7.0 C and 900 s for gold wire measurements in a water phantom, and 54 C and 900 s at 0-2.2 cm depth and 3,600 s at deeper depths for gold wire measurements with cadmium cover. Our results serve as a reference for determining measurement conditions when performing QA/QC of activation measurements using HP-Ge detectors at an AB-BNCT employing a lithium target.

Comparing Efficacy Between Robust and PTV Margin-based Optimizations for Interfractional Anatomical Variations in Prostate Tomotherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Interfractional anatomical variations cause considerable differences between planned and actual radiotherapy doses. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of robust and planning target volume (PTV) margin-based optimizations for the anatomical variations in helical tomotherapy for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten patients underwent treatment-planning kilovolt computed tomography (kVCT) and daily megavolt computed tomography (MVCT). Two types of nominal plans, with a prescription of 60 Gy/20 fractions, were created using robust and PTV margin-based optimizations on kVCT for each patient. Subsequently, the daily estimated doses were recalculated using nominal plans, and all available MVCTs modified the daily patient-setup errors. Due to the difference in dose calculation accuracy between kVCT and MVCT, three scenarios with dose corrections of 1, 2, and 3% were considered in the recalculation process. The dosimetric metrics, including target coverage with the prescription dose, Paddick's conformity index, homogeneity index, and mean dose to the rectum, were analyzed. RESULTS: A dosimetric comparison of the nominal plans demonstrated that the robust plans had better dose conformity, lower target coverage, and dose homogeneity than the PTV plans. In the daily estimated doses of any dose-corrected scenario, the target coverage and dose sparing to the rectum in the robust plans were significantly higher than those in the PTV plans, whereas dose conformity and homogeneity were identical to those of the nominal case. CONCLUSION: Robust optimization is recommended as it accounts for anatomical variations during treatment regarding target coverage in helical tomotherapy plans for prostate cancer.

Impact of delivery time factor on treatment time and plan quality in tomotherapy.

Delivery time factor (DTF) is a new parameter introduced by the RayStation treatment planning system for tomotherapy treatment planning. This study investigated the effects of this factor on various tomotherapy plans. Twenty-five patients with cancer (head and neck, 6; lung, 9; prostate, 10) were enrolled in this study. Helical tomotherapy plans with a field width of 2.5 cm, pitch of 0.287, and DTF of 2.0 were created. All the initial plans were recalculated by changing the DTF parameter from 1.0 to 3.0 in increments of 0.1. Then, DTF's impact on delivery efficiency and plan quality was evaluated. Treatment time and modulation factor increased monotonically with increasing DTF. Increasing the DTF by 0.1 increased the treatment time and modulation factor by almost 10%. This relationship was similar for all treatment sites. Conformity index (CI), homogeneity index, and organ at risk doses were improved compared to plans with a DTF of 1.0, except for the CI in the lung cancer case. However, the improvement in most indices ceased at a certain DTF; nevertheless, treatment time continued to increase following an increase in DTF. DTF is a critical parameter for improving the quality of tomotherapy plans.

Initial evaluation of accelerator-based neutron source system at the Shonan Kamakura General Hospital.

An accelerator-based boron neutron capture therapy (AB-BNCT) system was installed at the Shonan Kamakura General Hospital (SKGH). We confirmed that a stable operation was possible for 1 h at a current of 30 mA. The evaluated thermal neutron flux was 2.8 × 109 cm-2 s-1 and in good agreement (±5%) with the calculated values. The daily variation was within ±2%. The ambient dose rate due to residual radioactivity after irradiation was approximately 5 µSv/h using a lead shutter.

Effectiveness of robust optimization against geometric uncertainties in TomoHelical planning for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Geometrical uncertainties in patients can severely affect the quality of radiotherapy. PURPOSE: We evaluated the dosimetric efficacy of robust optimization for helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) planning in the presence of patient setup uncertainty and anatomical changes. METHODS: Two helical IMRT plans for 10 patients with localized prostate cancer were created using either minimax robust optimization (robust plan) or a conventional planning target volume (PTV) margin approach (PTV plan). Plan robustness was evaluated by creating perturbed dose plans with setup uncertainty from isocenter shifts and anatomical changes due to organ variation. The magnitudes of the geometrical uncertainties were based on the patient setup uncertainty considered during robust optimization, which was identical to the PTV margin. The homogeneity index, and target coverage (TC, defined as the V100% of the clinical target volume), and organs at risk (OAR; rectum and bladder) doses were analyzed for all nominal and perturbed plans. A statistical t-test was performed to evaluate the differences between the robust and PTV plans. RESULTS: Comparison of the nominal plans showed that the robust plans had lower OAR doses and a worse homogeneity index and TC than the PTV plans. The evaluations of robustness that considered setup errors more than the PTV margin demonstrated that the worst-case perturbed scenarios for robust plans had significantly higher TC while maintaining lower OAR doses. However, when anatomical changes were considered, improvement in TC from robust optimization was not observed in the worst-case perturbed plans. CONCLUSIONS: For helical IMRT planning in localized prostate cancer, robust optimization provides benefits over PTV margin-based planning, including better OAR sparing, and increased robustness against systematic patient-setup errors.

Designation Products: Boron Neutron Capture Therapy for Head and Neck Carcinoma.

The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare approved a drug called borofalan (10 B), a treatment system, and a dose calculation program for boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) in March 2020. The application pertaining to the products submitted to the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency was supported by a Japanese, open-label, uncontrolled trial (Study 002) in patients with unresectable, locally recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy, or in those with unresectable locally advanced or locally recurrent (LA/LR) head and neck nonsquamous cell carcinoma. The drug was administered as a single intravenous dose using infusion rates of 200 mg/kg per hour for the first 2 hours after the start of administration and 100 mg/kg per hour during irradiation. Neutron irradiation was performed using the devices at a single dose of 12 Gy-equivalent for oral, pharyngeal, or laryngeal mucosa for up to 60 minutes from 2 hours after the start of drug administration. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). The results of Study 002 showed that the ORR based on an assessment of the Independent Central Review Committee per RECIST version 1.1 was 71.4% (90% confidence interval [CI], 51.3%-86.8%). The lower limit of the 90% CI exceeded the prespecified threshold for ORR. When BNCT is applied to patients with unresectable LA/LR head and neck cancer, precautions should be taken, and patients should be monitored for possible onset of dysphagia, brain abscess, skin disorder, crystal urine, cataract, and/or carotid hemorrhage. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Borofalan (10 B), a treatment system and a dose calculation program for boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT), demonstrated significant efficacy in an open-label, uncontrolled trial in which overall response rate was the primary endpoint for patients with unresectable locally advanced or locally recurrent head and neck cancer. Although no information about survival benefits was obtained, BNCT will become an effective treatment option that is expected to manage local lesions that are intractable with any standard therapy. In addition, BNCT is expected to maintain quality of life of the intended patient population, on account of its high tumor selectivity and low invasiveness.

Treatment Outcome of the Combination Therapy of High-dose rate Intracavitary Brachytherapy and Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy With Central-shielding for Cervical Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT) in uterine cervical cancer (UCC). IMRT consisted of whole-pelvic radiation therapy (WPRT) and sequential WPRT with central-shielding (WPRT-CS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty UCC patients treated with IMRT using TomoTherapy, were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The median dose of WPRT and WPRT-CS was 36 and 14.4 Gy and the median total dose of these was 50 Gy in 25 fractions (Fr). Median HDR-ICBT dose/Fr to Point A was 25 Gy/5 Fr. Median 2 Gy per fraction-equivalent dose (EQD2) of combined WPRT and HDR-ICBT to Point A (α/ß=10) was 71.0 Gy. The 3-year local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 89.9%, 83.3%, and 86.3%. CONCLUSION: IMRT of WPRT and WPRT-CS given in combination with HDR-ICBT was a feasible therapy resulting in good disease control and tolerance in patients with UCC.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy using TomoDirect for postoperative radiation of left-sided breast cancer including lymph node area: comparison with TomoHelical and three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivers an excellent dose distribution compared with conventional three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for postoperative radiation including the lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. The TomoTherapy system, developed exclusively for IMRT, has two treatment modes: TomoDirect (TD) with a fixed gantry angle for beam delivery, and TomoHelical (TH) with rotational beam delivery. We compared the characteristics of TD with TH and 3D-CRT plans in the breast cancer patients. Ten consecutive women with left breast cancer received postoperative radiation therapy using TD including the chest wall/residual breast tissue and level II-III axial and supraclavicular lymph node area. Fifty percent of the planning target volume (PTV) was covered with at least 50 Gy in 25 fractions. TD, TH and 3D-CRT plans were created for each patient, with the same dosimetric constraints. TD and TH showed better dose distribution to the PTV than 3D-CRT. TD and 3D-CRT markedly suppressed low-dose spread to the lung compared with TH. Total lung V5 and V10 were significantly lower, while V20 was significantly higher in the TD and 3D-CRT plans. The mean total lung, heart and contralateral breast doses were significantly lower using TD compared with the other plans. Compared with 3D-CRT and TH, TD can provide better target dose distribution with optimal normal-organ sparing for postoperative radiation therapy including the chest wall/residual breast tissue and lymph node area in breast cancer patients. TD is thus a useful treatment modality in these patients.

Patient organ doses from megavoltage computed tomography delivery with a helical tomotherapy unit using a general treatment planning system.

The purpose of this study was to quantify actual patient organ doses from megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) using an MVCT beam model of a helical tomotherapy unit in a general treatment planning system (TPS). Dosimetric parameters (percentage depth dose, lateral beam profile, and longitudinal beam profile) of the MVCT beam were measured using Gafchromic EBT3 films (ISP Corporation, Wayne, NJ, USA) and used for beam modeling in a Pinnacle3 TPS (Philips, Amsterdam, Netherlands); this TPS is widely used with linear accelerators. The created beam model was adjusted and validated by assessing point doses in a cylindrical phantom in static and helical beam plans with fine, normal and coarse pitches. Maximum doses delivered to important organs from MVCT delivery for five clinical cases were calculated using the created beam model. The difference (average ± one standard deviation for all evaluation points) between calculated and measured doses was -0.69 ± 1.20% in the static beam plan. In the helical beam plan, the differences were 1.83 ± 2.65%, 1.35 ± 5.94% and -0.66 ± 8.48% for fine, normal and coarse pitches, respectively. The average maximum additional dose to important organs from MVCT in clinical cases was 0.82% of the prescribed dose. In conclusion, we investigated a method for quantifying patient organ dose from MVCT delivery on helical tomotherapy using an MVCT beam model in a general TPS. This technique enables estimation of the patient-specific organ dose from MVCT delivery, without the need for additional equipment.

Multi-institutional comparison of secondary check of treatment planning using computer-based independent dose calculation for non-C-arm linear accelerators.

PURPOSE: This report covers the first multi-institutional study of independent monitor unit (MU)/dose calculation verification for the CyberKnife, Vero4DRT, and TomoTherapy radiotherapy delivery systems. METHODS: A total of 973 clinical treatment plans were collected from 12 institutions. Commercial software employing the Clarkson algorithm was used for verification after a measurement validation study, and the doses from the treatment planning systems (TPSs) and verification programs were compared on the basis of the mean value ±â€¯two standard deviations. The impact of heterogeneous conditions was assessed in two types of sites: non-lung and lung. RESULTS: The dose difference for all locations was 0.5 ±â€¯7.2%. There was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.01) in dose difference between non-lung (-0.3 ±â€¯4.4%) and lung sites (3.5 ±â€¯6.7%). Inter-institutional comparisons showed that various systematic differences were associated with the proportion of different treatment sites and heterogeneity correction. CONCLUSIONS: This multi-institutional comparison should help to determine the departmental action levels for CyberKnife, Vero4DRT, and TomoTherapy, as patient populations and treatment sites may vary between the modalities. An action level of ±5% could be considered for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), non-IMRT, and volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy using these modalities in homogenous and heterogeneous conditions with a large treatment field applied to a large region of homogeneous media. There were larger systematic differences in heterogeneous conditions with a small treatment field because of differences in heterogeneity correction with the different dose calculation algorithms of the primary TPS and verification program.

Clinical and dosimetric predictors of late rectal bleeding of prostate cancer after TomoTherapy intensity modulated radiation therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Rectal bleeding after radiotherapy impacts the quality of life of long-term surviving prostate cancer patients. We sought to identify factors associated with late rectal bleeding following intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using TomoTherapy for prostate cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 82 patients with localised prostate cancer treated with TomoTherapy. Most patients (95.1%) received neoadjuvant and concurrent hormone therapy. Forty-two patients (51.2%) graded as high risk using D'Amico's classification underwent radiotherapy involving the pelvic nodal area. Late bleeding complications were quantified using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. Multiple clinical and dosimetric factors were considered with reference to rectal bleeding. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 538 (range, 128-904) days. Grades 1, 2 and 3 rectal bleeding were observed in 14 (17.1%), four (4.9%) and one (1.2%) patient respectively. In multivariate analysis, the following factors were significantly associated with Grade ≥1 late rectal bleeding: volume, mean dose (P = 0.012) and rectal V30 (P = 0.025), V40 (P = 0.011), V50 (P = 0.017) and V60 (P = 0.036). When exclusively considering Grade 2-3 rectal bleeding, significant associations were observed with the use of anticoagulants or antiaggregates (P = 0.007), rectal V30 (P = 0.021) and V40 (P = 0.041) in univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that the intermediate rectal dose-volume (V30-V60) was a significant predictor for mild to severe late rectal bleeding (Grade ≥1). Rectal dose-volumes >V70, which represented the volume of the highest doses, were not predictive in this study.

[Effect of prostate matching on dose distribution by on board imager kV-CBCT image].

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of prostate matching on dose distribution using kilovolt cone beam computed tomography (kV-CBCT) with image guided radiation therapy for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Sixteen prostate cancer patients were treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy to 76 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction in 38 fractions. Daily target localization was performed using "bone matching" and "prostate matching" based on planning CT and kV-CBCT. Prostate dose coverage was assessed by the proportion of the CTV fully encompassed by 95%, 98% isodose lines, and mean dose lines. As for rectal and bladder, dose coverage was assessed by volumes which received 40 Gy, 60 Gy, 70 Gy, 75 Gy and mean dose at treatment. And we calculated the tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), accordingly. They were compared to the bone and prostate matching image. RESULT: Our study found an improvement in dose usage in CTV and bladder which enabled us to compare the bone matching image and the prostate matching image. However, it did not improve dose usage in the rectal. Then we chose patients who were a large shift from bone matching image to prostate matching image. As a result, rectal dose and NTCP were reduced. DISCUSSION: Prostate matching is useful and safe when compared to bone matching because of improving CTV dose usage and reducing dose rectal and bladder.

[Development of a new position-recognition system for robotic radiosurgery systems using machine vision].

CyberKnife(®) provides continuous guidance through radiography, allowing instantaneous X-ray images to be obtained; it is also equipped with 6D adjustment for patient setup. Its disadvantage is that registration is carried out just before irradiation, making it impossible to perform stereo-radiography during irradiation. In addition, patient movement cannot be detected during irradiation. In this study, we describe a new registration system that we term "Machine Vision," which subjects the patient to no additional radiation exposure for registration purposes, can be set up promptly, and allows real-time registration during irradiation. Our technique offers distinct advantages over CyberKnife by enabling a safer and more precise mode of treatment. "Machine Vision," which we have designed and fabricated, is an automatic registration system that employs three charge coupled device cameras oriented in different directions that allow us to obtain a characteristic depiction of the shape of both sides of the fetal fissure and external ears in a human head phantom. We examined the degree of precision of this registration system and concluded it to be suitable as an alternative method of registration without radiation exposure when displacement is less than 1.0 mm in radiotherapy. It has potential for application to CyberKnife in clinical treatment.