Two traction methods that can facilitate esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Different traction devices that can provide a visual field and attain appropriate tension at the dissection plane during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) have been developed. Clip-with-line (CWL) is a classic traction device that can offer per-oral traction toward the direction where the line is drawn. A multicenter randomized controlled trial (CONNECT-E trial) comparing the conventional ESD and CWL-assisted ESD (CWL-ESD) for large esophageal tumors was conducted in Japan. This study showed that CWL-ESD was associated with a shorter procedure time (defined as the time from initiating submucosal injection to completing tumor removal) without increasing the risk of adverse events. Multivariate analysis revealed that whole-circumferential lesion and abdominal esophageal lesion were independent risk factors for technical difficulties, which were defined as a procedure time of > 120 min, perforation, piecemeal resection, inadvertent incision (any accidental incision caused by the electrosurgical knife within the marked area), or handover to another operator. Therefore, techniques other than CWL should be considered for these lesions. Several studies have shown the usefulness of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD) for such lesions. A randomized controlled trial conducted at five Chinese institutions showed that compared with the conventional ESD, ESTD had a significantly reduced median procedure time for lesions covering ≥ 1/2 of the esophageal circumference. In addition, a propensity score matching analysis conducted at a single Chinese institution showed that compared with the conventional ESD, ESTD had a shorter mean resection time for lesions at the esophagogastric junction. With the appropriate use of CWL-ESD and ESTD, esophageal ESD can be performed more efficiently and safely. Moreover, the combination of these two methods may be effective.

Device-assisted traction methods in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection and options for difficult cases.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedure has a longer procedure time and higher perforation rate than endoscopic mucosal resection owing to technical complications, including a poor field of vision and inadequate tension for the submucosal dissection plane. Various traction devices were developed to secure the visual field and provide adequate tension for the dissection plane. Two randomized controlled trials demonstrated that traction devices reduce colorectal ESD procedure time compared with conventional ESD (C-ESD), but they had limitations, including a single-center fashion. The CONNECT-C trial was the first multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the C-ESD and traction device-assisted ESD (T-ESD) for colorectal tumors. In the T-ESD, one of the device-assisted traction methods (S-O clip, clip-with-line, and clip pulley) was chosen according to the operator's discretion. The median ESD procedure time (primary endpoint) was not significantly different between C-ESD and T-ESD. For lesions ≥ 30 mm in diameter or in cases treated by nonexpert operators, the median ESD procedure time tended to be shorter in T-ESD than in C-ESD. Although T-ESD did not reduce ESD procedure time, the CONNECT-C trial results suggest that T-ESD is effective for larger lesions and nonexpert operators in colorectal ESD. Compared with esophageal and gastric ESD, colorectal ESD has some difficulties, including poor endoscope maneuverability, which may be associated with prolonged ESD procedure time. T-ESD may not effectively improve these issues, but a balloon-assisted endoscope and underwater ESD may be promising options and these methods can be combined with T-ESD.

Impact of Traction Direction in Traction-Assisted Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (with Videos).

BACKGROUND: The impact of traction direction in traction-assisted gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has not been adequately investigated. A clip with line (CWL) is a classical single-directional traction device. In contrast, a spring and loop with clip (SLC; S-O clip) is a newly developed multidirectional traction device. AIMS: To investigate the impact of traction direction in gastric ESD by comparing the procedure-related outcomes of CWL-assisted ESD (CWL-ESD) and SLC-assisted ESD (SLC-ESD). METHODS: We retrospectively examined 140 patients with superficial gastric neoplasms who underwent SLC-ESD or CWL-ESD by a single ESD expert during November 2017-September 2020. The traction direction was classified based on the endoscopic finding in the following five categories: proximal, diagonally proximal, vertical, diagonally distal, and distal. In SLC-ESD, we set vertical traction, using the multidirectional traction function. Propensity score matching was conducted to compensate for the differences in lesion size, injection function of electrosurgical knife, ulcerative lesion, lesion location, and lesion position. The primary outcome was gastric ESD procedure time. RESULTS: Propensity score matching created 42 pairs. The median gastric ESD procedure time in the SLC-ESD group was significantly shorter than that in the CWL-ESD group (28.3 min vs. 51.0 min, P = 0.022). All traction direction in the SLC-ESD group was vertical, while only 16.7% in the CWL-ESD group. En bloc resection was attained without perforation in all the patients in both groups. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that SLC can provide vertical traction, which reduces the gastric ESD procedure time. Multidirectional traction devices can provide vertical traction in most cases of gastric ESD, unlike single-directional traction devices. Vertical traction may reduce the gastric ESD procedure time.

Optimal traction direction in traction-assisted gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Various traction devices have been developed to secure a visual field and sufficient tension at the dissection plane during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, few large-scale studies have investigated the effectiveness of traction devices in gastric ESD. Clip-with-line (CWL) is one such traction device that is widely used in cases of gastric ESD. The CONNECT-G trial was the first multicenter randomized controlled trial to compare conventional ESD with CWL-assisted ESD (CWL-ESD) for superficial gastric neoplasms. Overall, no significant intergroup difference was observed in terms of the gastric ESD procedure time. However, subgroup analysis according to lesion location revealed a significant reduction in the procedure time of gastric ESD for the lesion located at the greater curvature of the middle and upper third of the stomach in the CWL-ESD group. In this subgroup analysis, lesion location was categorized as follows: anterior wall, posterior wall, lesser curvature, and greater curvature of the upper, middle, and lower thirds of the stomach. However, the gastric ESD procedure time showed no significant difference, except for lesions located at the greater curvature of the upper and middle thirds of the stomach. The traction direction of CWL in the stomach was limited to the cardia and changed depending on the lesion location. Therefore, outcomes of the CONNECT-G trail suggest that the effectiveness of CWL was influenced by lesion location, i.e., traction direction. Further studies are warranted to investigate the optimal traction direction in gastric ESD.

Advances in traction methods for endoscopic submucosal dissection: What is the best traction method and traction direction?

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been developed as a treatment for superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms, which can achieve en bloc resection regardless of the lesion size. However, ESD is technically difficult because endoscopists cannot bring their hand into the gastrointestinal tract, unlike surgeons in regular surgery. It is difficult to obtain sufficient tension in the dissection plane and a good field of vision. Therefore, ESD is associated with a long procedure time and a high risk of adverse events in comparison with endoscopic mucosal resection. Traction methods have been developed to provide sufficient tension for the dissection plane and a good field of vision during the ESD procedure. However, traction direction is limited in most traction methods, resulting in insufficient effect in some cases. Although traction direction is considered important, there have been few investigations of its effect. In the first half of this review, important traction methods are discussed, including traction direction. In second half, appropriate traction methods for each organ are considered. Other important considerations for traction method, such as ability to adjust traction strength, interference between traction device and endoscope, and the need for specialized devices are also discussed.

Comparing a conventional and a spring-and-loop with clip traction method of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastric neoplasms: a randomized controlled trial (with videos).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Several traction methods have sought to overcome the technical difficulties of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, traction direction has remained limited in most of these methods, with lack of clarity about the optimal method and traction direction for gastric ESD. A spring-and-loop with clip (SLC) has been developed as a multidirectional traction device. Here, we investigated whether SLC traction-assisted ESD (SLC-ESD) improved procedure-related outcomes compared with conventional ESD (C-ESD) among patients with superficial gastric neoplasms. METHODS: This single-center randomized controlled trial included patients with superficial gastric neoplasms undergoing SLC-ESD or C-ESD between October 2018 and December 2019. Using the multidirectional traction function, we set traction vertical to the gastric wall for SLC-ESD. The primary outcome was the median procedure time for gastric ESD. RESULTS: The SLC-ESD and C-ESD groups comprised 40 patients each, and all the enrolled patients underwent the assigned treatment. The median ESD procedure time was significantly shorter in the SLC-ESD group (29.1 minutes) than in the C-ESD group (52.6 minutes; P = .005). SLC had a mean attachment time of 1.82 minutes. En bloc resection was achieved without perforation in all the patients in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that SLC-ESD reduces gastric ESD procedure time without increasing the risk of perforation and that the vertical direction to the gastric wall is the appropriate traction direction for gastric ESD. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN 000034533.).

Internal traction method using a spring-and-loop with clip (S-O clip) allows countertraction in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND: Insufficient countertraction and poor field of vision make endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) difficult. Internal traction method using a spring-and-loop with clip (SLC) allows sufficient traction in any direction and good field of vision. However, the attachment procedure is difficult and interference with the endoscope can occur in the retroflexed endoscopic position. We have developed a new use of SLC that simplifies the attachment procedure, eliminating interference with the endoscope. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of SLC for gastric ESD. METHODS: We retrospectively recruited 140 patients with gastric neoplasms who underwent ESD between November 2015 and October 2018 at our department. Among them, 51 patients treated using SLC-assisted ESD (SLC-ESD) and 89 patients treated using conventional ESD (C-ESD) were compared. Propensity score matching was performed to compensate for the differences in age, sex, lesion location, lesion position, specimen size, and ulcer findings. The primary outcome was ESD procedure time. RESULTS: Propensity score matching generated 51 matched pairs. The procedure time in the SLC-ESD group was significantly shorter than that in the C-ESD group (median [interquartile], 40.0 [27.0-81.5] minutes versus 69.0 [46.5-113.5] minutes, P = 0.008). The mean SLC attachment time was 2.08 min. There were no significant differences in complete en bloc resection rate between SLC-ESD and C-ESD groups (100% versus 96.1%, P = 0.495). There were not perforation cases in either group. CONCLUSIONS: SLC may offer an efficient method for gastric ESD, with a short attachment procedure time.

Usefulness of underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection in saline solution with a monopolar knife for colorectal tumors (with videos).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Generally, colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is performed with a monopolar knife with CO2 supply from an endoscope. There are few case reports about underwater ESD (UESD) in saline solution with a bipolar knife. The usefulness and safety of UESD in saline solution with a monopolar knife are unclear. The present study aimed to investigate the usefulness and safety of UESD in saline solution with a monopolar knife for colorectal tumors. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study on UESD for colorectal tumors included 26 colorectal tumors from 24 patients treated with UESD at our department between October 2015 and February 2017. The characteristics of patients, factors associated with ESD difficulty, treatment results, and variations in blood test data before and after UESD were analyzed. RESULTS: En bloc resection was successful in all lesions without any serious adverse events. The median major diameter of the resected specimens was 30 mm (interquartile range [IQR], 28-35) and of the tumor 22.5 mm (IQR, 17.8-25.3). The median procedure time was 60 minutes (IQR, 45-111) and median speed of dissection 10.4 mm2/min (IQR, 6.4-12.2). No cases of perforation occurred. Post-ESD bleeding occurred in only 1 case, and endoscopic hemostasis was achieved. There was no case of electrolyte imbalance requiring treatment after UESD. CONCLUSIONS: UESD in saline solution with a monopolar knife for colorectal tumors is useful and safe. UESD has potential advantages that should be further assessed.

Relationship of hepatitis B virus infection to the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after direct acting antivirals.

Recently, two conflicting articles about recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after direct acting antivirals (DAA) against hepatitis C virus (HCV) were published. We investigated the relationship between DAA and HCC recurrence. Eligible patients were (1) history of HCC and treated curatively with interventions, and (2) interferon-free DAA therapy was initiated after eradication of HCC. We analyzed contributing factor for HCC recurrence. Ten out of 23 participants (43%) encountered recurrence of HCC. Age, sex, diabetes mellitus, fibrosis score, chemistry, and alpha-fetoprotein did not differ between patients with recurrence and patients without recurrence. The patients with recurrence had significantly higher values of antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) than the patients without recurrence, 6.06±3.75 vs. 0.91±2.43 (p=0.0019). The relative risk of HCC recurrence comparing anti-HBc positive to negative was 5.2 (95% confidence interval 1.40 to 19.32). Odds ratio was 22.0 (95% confidence interval 2.5 to 191.1). We conclude that anti-HBc positivity was a strong contributing factor for HCC recurrence after DAA therapy.

Risk of stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for large rectal neoplasms.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Improvements in the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique have made circumferential ESD in the rectum possible. However, little is known about the clinical course after extensive ESD in the rectum. The aim of this study was to determine the stricture risk in the rectum after total or subtotal circumferential ESD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 69 patients with 69 rectal tumors that required ≥ 75 % circumferential resection were identified at Kobe University Hospital and an affiliated hospital between April 2005 and May 2014. Among the patients, 61 were available for evaluation of stricture development, either by follow-up colonoscopy or by surgical specimens. The rate and possible risk factors of post-ESD strictures were investigated. RESULTS: Post-ESD rectal strictures developed in 12 patients (19.7 %). Patients who underwent total circumferential ESD developed a stricture (5/7, 71.4 %) more frequently than those with subtotal (≥ 90 %) ESD (7/16, 43.8 %). Patients undergoing an ESD procedure that involved < 90 % of the circumference did not develop strictures. The strictures were membranous or < 10 mm long in all cases. Of the patients with stricture, 11 received endoscopic balloon dilation and one received bougie with short-caliber-tip transparent hood; all strictures improved following dilation therapy. Statistical analysis revealed that ≥ 90 % circumferential resection was an independent risk factor for stricture, whereas morphology and size were not. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent total or subtotal circumferential ESD of a rectal tumor had a high risk of stricture formation. Dilation helped to alleviate the stenosis.Study registered at University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN 000016559).

Hemodynamic changes and prognosis in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and abnormal blood pressure responses during exercise.

BACKGROUND: An abnormal blood pressure response (BPR) during exercise has been proposed as a risk factor for sudden cardiac death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Some patients with HCM show systolic dysfunction during exercise. HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to clarify the hemodynamic response during exercise and prognosis in patients with HCM and abnormal BPR. METHODS: Sixty-five patients with HCM underwent radionuclide monitoring of left ventricular function and measurement of blood pressure during supine ergometer exercise. Thereafter, cardiac events were recorded for an average period of 76 months. RESULTS: Seven of 65 patients had abnormal BPR, while the others had normal BPR. Changes of heart rate and systemic vascular resistance during exercise did not differ between the two groups. Stroke volume did not increase in the abnormal BPR group but did in the normal BPR group. During a mean follow-up period of 76 months, three of the seven patients (43%) with abnormal but only one patient (2%) with normal BPR suffered a malignant arrhythmia. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal BPR occurred in about 11% of patients with nonobstructive HCM and was associated with a high prevalence of cardiac events. The predictor of abnormal BPR during exercise may not be an abnormal response of systemic vascular resistance and heart rate, but the lack of an appropriate increase in stroke volume.