Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37467260

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As common as plantar fasciitis is, there's a lack of evidence regarding the true pathophysiologic process causing plantar fasciitis and plantar heel pain in general. This may partially explain the high variability and outcomes with current treatment of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis. Although Lemont reported myxoid degeneration of plantar fascia with histologic analysis of patients with fasciitis, muscle biopsy results were not reported. So far it appears we have not focused on the muscular component that may be present with plantar heel pain in general and in patients we diagnose with plantar fasciitis in particular. METHODS: In this article we performed a retrospective analysis of biopsy results from five patients with the diagnosis of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis to determine whether this diagnosis was correct or whether other component pathologies contribute to the chronicity of symptoms or to the failure of treatment. RESULTS: Three of the five pathology reports included specific mention of inflammation, degeneration and atrophy of the intrinsic musculature consistent with myositis. Two of these showed lymphocytic infiltration in the muscle consistent with inflammation, with no signs of inflammation in the fascia. One showed inflammation of the fascia without signs of inflammation of the muscle. CONCLUSIONS: This small study introduces the idea that intrinsic myositis may contribute to, or be responsible for some cases of plantar heel pain and plantar fasciitis. This may be important in changing the way we deal with plantar heel pain in the future.


Assuntos
Fasciíte Plantar , Miosite , Humanos , Fasciíte Plantar/diagnóstico , Fasciíte Plantar/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inflamação/complicações , Dor/etiologia , Miosite/complicações , Miosite/diagnóstico
2.
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc ; 106(5): 323-327, 2016 Sep 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27762622

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Resection of the medial eminence in hallux valgus surgery is common. True hypertrophy of the medial eminence in hallux valgus is debated. No studies have compared metatarsal head width in patients with hallux valgus and control patients. METHODS: We reviewed 43 radiographs with hallux valgus and 27 without hallux valgus. We measured medial eminence width, first metatarsal head width, and first metatarsal shaft width in patients with and without radiographic hallux valgus. RESULTS: Medial eminence width was 1.12 mm larger in patients with hallux valgus (P < .0001). Metatarsal head width was 2.81 mm larger in patients with hallux valgus (P < .001). Metatarsal shaft width showed no significant difference (P = .63). CONCLUSIONS: Metatarsal head width and medial eminence width are significantly larger on anteroposterior weightbearing radiographs in patients with hallux valgus. However, frontal plane rotation of the first metatarsal likely accounts for this difference.


Assuntos
Hallux Valgus/cirurgia , Hallux/cirurgia , Ossos do Metatarso/cirurgia , Osteotomia/métodos , Amplitude de Movimento Articular/fisiologia , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Hallux/diagnóstico por imagem , Hallux Valgus/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Ossos do Metatarso/diagnóstico por imagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Radiografia/métodos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Valores de Referência , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Suporte de Carga
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA