Differences in retinopathy prevalence and associated risk factors across 11 countries in three continents: A cross-sectional study of 156,090 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence, time trends, and risk factors of diabetic retinopathy (DR) among youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) from 11 countries (Australia, Austria, Denmark, England, Germany, Italy, Luxemburg, Netherlands, Slovenia, United States, and Wales). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Data on individuals aged 10-21 years with T1D for >1 year during the period 2000-2020 were analyzed. We used a cross-sectional design using the most recent year of visit to investigate the time trend. For datasets with longitudinal data, we aggregated the variables per participant and observational year, using data of the most recent year to take the longest observation period into account. DR screening was performed through quality assured national screening programs. Multiple logistic regression models adjusted for the year of the eye examination, age, gender, minority status, and duration of T1D were used to evaluate clinical characteristics and the risk of DR. RESULTS: Data from 156,090 individuals (47.1% female, median age 15.7 years, median duration of diabetes 5.2 years) were included. Overall, the unadjusted prevalence of any DR was 5.8%, varying from 0.0% (0/276) to 16.2% between countries. The probability of DR increased with longer disease duration (aORper-1-year-increase  = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.03-1.04, p < 0.0001), and decreased over time (aORper-1-year-increase  = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98-1.00, p = 0.0093). Evaluating possible modifiable risk factors in the exploratory analysis, the probability of DR increased with higher HbA1c (aORper-1-mmol/mol-increase-in-HbA1c  = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.03-1.03, p < 0.0001) and was higher among individuals with hypertension (aOR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.11-1.38, p < 0.0001) and smokers (aOR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.17-1.44, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of DR in this large cohort of youth with T1D varied among countries, increased with diabetes duration, decreased over time, and was associated with higher HbA1c, hypertension, and smoking.

Lower HbA1c in patients with type 1 diabetes and celiac disease who reached celiac-specific antibody-negativity-A multicenter DPV analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To study celiac-specific antibody status over 3 years in patients with type 1 diabetes and biopsy-proven celiac disease (T1D + CD). Furthermore, to determine clinical differences after diagnosis between patients reaching constant antibody-negativity (Ab-neg) and staying antibody-positive (Ab-pos). METHODS: A total of 608 pediatric T1D + CD patients from the multicenter DPV registry were studied longitudinally regarding their CD specific antibody-status. Differences between Ab-neg (n = 218) and Ab-pos (n = 158) patients 3 years after biopsy were assessed and compared with 26 833 T1D patients without CD by linear and logistic regression adjusted for age, gender, diabetes duration and migration background. RESULTS: Thirty-six percent of T1D + CD patients reached and sustained antibody-negativity 3 years after CD diagnosis. The median time until patients returned to Ab-neg was 0.86 (0.51;1.16) years. Three years after diagnosis, HbA1c was lowest in Ab-neg and highest in Ab-pos patients compared to T1D-only patients (adjusted mean (95%CI): 7.72 (7.51-7.92) % vs 8.44 (8.20-8.68) % vs 8.19 (8.17-8.21) %, adjusted P < 0.001, respectively). Total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and frequency of dyslipidemia were significantly lower in Ab-neg compared to T1D-only patients (167 (161-173) mg/dl vs 179 (178-179) mg/dl, P < .001; 90 (84-96) mg/dl vs 99 (98-99) mg/dl, P = .005; 15.7 (10.5-22.9) % vs 25.9 (25.2-26.6) %, P = .017). In longitudinal analyses over 6 years after diagnosis, a constantly higher HbA1c (P < .001) and a lower height-SDS (P = .044) was observed in Ab-pos compared to Ab-neg patients. CONCLUSION: Only one third of T1D + CD patients reached constant Ab-negativity after CD diagnosis. Achieving Ab-negativity after diagnosis seems to be associated with better metabolic control and growth, supposedly due to a higher adherence to therapy in general.