Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 43
Filtrar
1.
World Neurosurg ; 189: e55-e60, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38821400

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In patients who are candidates for craniotomy, scalp nerve blocks have been shown to be effective in relieving pain intensity as well as postoperative hemodynamic stability after surgery, but the results have been inconsistent. We aimed to assess the effect of scalp block on pain control, intraoperative drug use under Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) monitoring, and postoperative pain in patients who were candidates for elective craniotomy. METHODS: In this randomized, single-blinded clinical trial study, candidates for craniotomy were randomly (using the block randomization method) divided into 2 groups before entering the operating room. The first group received a scalp block with bupivacaine (intervention), and the second group did not receive a scalp block (control) besides the routine anesthetic procedure in these patients. ANI, hemodynamic parameters, and the amounts of received remifentanil were conducted and compared. RESULTS: Patients under scalp block received less dosage of fentanyl than the nonscalp block group (mean = 57.14 ± 15.59 mcg vs. 250.00 ± 65.04 mcg, respectively). Similarly, the dose of remifentanil required in the scalp block group was less (mean = 3.04 ± 1.95 mg and 5.54 ± 2.57 mg, respectively). No difference was observed in hemodynamic parameters such as blood pressure and heart rate (before, during, and after surgery). However, the group receiving scalp block had higher ANI means than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Scalp nerve block has an effective role in pain control (increasing ANI), consequently reducing the need for analgesic drugs such as fentanyl and remifentanil following craniotomy without changing the hemodynamic condition.


Assuntos
Bupivacaína , Craniotomia , Bloqueio Nervoso , Dor Pós-Operatória , Couro Cabeludo , Humanos , Craniotomia/métodos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Feminino , Masculino , Couro Cabeludo/inervação , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Método Simples-Cego , Adulto , Bupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Nociceptividade/efeitos dos fármacos , Fentanila/uso terapêutico , Fentanila/administração & dosagem , Medição da Dor , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Remifentanil/administração & dosagem
2.
Anesth Pain Med ; 11(4): e115576, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34692435

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Remifentanil is an ultra-short-acting opioid which facilitates hemodynamic management. However, there are concerns about postoperative Remifentanil hyperalgesia because of its potent fast onset and offset. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine visual analog scale (VAS), postoperative pain, and morphine used in two groups after spine surgery. METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial study, 60 patients aged 18 - 60 years old, according to the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I - II, who underwent spinal canal stenosis or scoliosis surgery, were divided into two groups. In the control group, patients received 0.07 - 0.1 µg/kg/h intraoperative Fentanyl infusion, and in the intervention group 0.1 - 0.2 µg/kg/min remifentanil was infused during the surgery. Both groups received 15 mg/kg intravenous Acetaminophen 20 minutes before the end of the surgery. Postoperative pain score and morphine consumption were measured 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). RESULTS: During the first 12 hours, VAS and morphine consumption were significantly higher in remifentanil group (P < 0.001). However, no significant difference was found between the two groups in morphine consumption 12 - 48 hours after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that Remifentanil infusion during surgery may increase postoperative pain. Also, VAS and morphine consumption were higher during the first 12 hours.

3.
J Pharm Health Care Sci ; 7(1): 37, 2021 Oct 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34629112

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Keeping the heart rate within the normal range has improved the survival of septic shock patients. Amiodarone could target the underlying pathophysiology of sepsis-induced tachycardia. This study aimed to determine whether amiodarone is effective in controlling the heart rate in critically ill patients with septic shock and sustained tachycardia who were receiving vasopressor. METHODS: In this prospective, single-arm cohort study, 46 patients with septic shock and tachycardia were enrolled to receive a loading dose of amiodarone 150 mg, then continuous infusion of 1 mg/min. The primary outcome was the ability of amiodarone in rate control lower than 95 beats per minute (BPM) and maintaining it during 24-h study period. We also recorded the effect of amiodarone on hemodynamic indices as the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The results of the present study indicated a significant decrease in HR in septic shock patients for amiodarone, from 121.0 (116.5, 140.0) at baseline to 91.5(89.3, 108.0) at the end of the study period (p < 0.001). During the study period, a total of 26 (56.52%) of patients achieved the target heart rate lower than 95 BPM and maintained it during study period. Amiodarone decreased HR by 22.8 ± 13.7. While receiving amiodarone infusion, the values for heart rate, mean arterial pressure, cardiac index, norepinephrine infusion rate, and stroke volume index changed significantly between amiodarone initiation and 24-h follow-up (P < 0.001). Amiodarone was well tolerated, because this anti-arrhythmic agent did not increase the need for vasopressor and none of the patients experienced episodes of refractory hypotension. CONCLUSION: This study showed that amiodarone infusion successfully reduced the heart rate in sepsis-induced tachycardia. The patients had improved hemodynamic state as indicated by an increase in cardiac index and SVI.

4.
Phytother Res ; 35(8): 4605-4615, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34080237

RESUMO

Experimental studies have suggested the beneficial effects of curcuminoids as natural polyphenols against traumatic brain injury (TBI). The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of supplementation with curcuminoids on inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers, clinical outcomes and nutritional status in critically ill patients with TBI. A total of 62 ICU-admitted adult patients with TBI were randomly allocated to receive either a daily dose of 500 mg curcuminoids or matched placebo via enteral nutrition for 7 consecutive days based on stratified block randomization by age and sex. Inflammatory and oxidative stress as well as clinical outcomes and nutritional status of the patients were measured at baseline and at the end of the study. There were no overall group effects regarding to all dependent variables. Compared with baseline, serum levels of IL-6, TNF-α, MCP-1 and CRP were significantly reduced in patients receiving curcuminoids (p < .05) without any significant changes in placebo group; however, changes in the activities of GPx and SOD in serum were not significant between two groups. Moreover, APACHEII and NUTRIC score were significantly improved following curcuminoids consumption in comparison with placebo (p < .05). The findings of this study suggest that short-term supplementation with curcuminoids may have beneficial effects on inflammation, clinical outcomes and nutritional status of critically ill patients with TBI.


Assuntos
Estado Terminal , Diarileptanoides , Inflamação/tratamento farmacológico , Estresse Oxidativo/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Curcumina/química , Citocinas/sangue , Diarileptanoides/farmacologia , Suplementos Nutricionais , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Estado Nutricional
5.
Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care ; 28(1): 1-9, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36846537

RESUMO

Background: Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) is a new concept to describe the cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume variation to guide intravenous fluid administration during surgery. LiDCOrapid (LiDCO, Cardiac Sensor System, UK Company Regd 2736561, VAT Regd 672475708) is a minimally invasive monitor that estimates the responsiveness of CO versus fluid infusion. We intend to find whether GDFT using the LiDCOrapid system can decrease the volume of intraoperative fluid therapy and facilitate recovery in patients undergoing posterior fusion spine surgeries in comparison to regular fluid therapy. Methods: This study is a randomised clinical trial, and the design was parallel. Inclusion criteria for participants in this study were patients with comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and ischemic heart disease undergoing spine surgery; exclusion criteria were patients with irregular heart rhythm or severe valvular heart disease. Forty patients with a previous history of medical comorbidities undergoing spine surgery were randomly and evenly assigned to receive either LiDCOrapid guided fluid therapy or regular fluid therapy. The volume of infused fluid was the primary outcome. The amount of bleeding, number of patients who needed packed red blood cell transfusion, base deficit, urine output, days of hospital length of stay and intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and time needed to start eating solids were monitored as secondary outcomes. Results: The volume of infused crystalloid and urinary output in the LiDCO group was significantly lower than that of the control group (p = .001). Base deficit at the end of surgery was significantly better in the LiDCO group (p < .001). The duration of hospital length of stay in the LiDCO group was significantly shorter (p = .027), but the duration of ICU admission was not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: Goal-directed fluid therapy using the LiDCOrapid system reduced the volume of intraoperative fluid therapy.

6.
J Diabetes Metab Disord ; 19(2): 1609-1614, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33553039

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Curcuminoids are dietary polyphenols that can improve health indices through different mechanisms such as anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and immunoregulatory properties. Due to the lack of evidences on the efficacy of curcuminoids in critically ill patients, this study was designed to investigate the effects of short-term curcuminoids supplementation on inflammatory, oxidative stress and adipokine indices as well as nutritional and clinical status in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) patients admitted in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). METHODS: The present trial will be performed in the ICU of Sina and Shohadaye Tajrish hospitals of Tehran, Iran. Sixty-two critically ill patients with TBI will be enrolled based on the eligibility criteria. The patients will be randomly assigned into two groups. For 7 days, they will received either 500 mg curcuminoids in combination with 5 mg piperine or matched placebo. A general questionnaire, consent form as well as NUTRIC, SOFA and APACHEII scoring system and anthropometrics will be assessed at baseline. The inflammatory markers including TNF-α, IL-6, MCP-1 and CRP, oxidative stress indices (GPx and SOD) and adipokines (leptin and adiponetctin) will be measured at baseline and at the end of the study. In addition, dietary intake, concomitant drugs and laboratory tests will be recorded daily. DISCUSSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first clinical trial investigating the effect of curcuminoids supplementation in critically ill patient with TBI. The findings of the present study will provide evidence on the efficacy and safety of curcuminoids in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: (http://www.irct.ir, identifier: IRCT20180619040151N1), Registration date:18.09.2018.

7.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 276(8): 2243-2249, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31055640

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of single low dose (75 mg) preoperative pregabalin in reducing post-operative pain of septorhinoplasty. METHODS: A double blind single center Randomized controlled trial based on block randomization. In the pregabalin group (PG) 34 participants received 75 mg pregabalin orally one hour before anesthesia induction while in control group (CG) 34 participants received a placebo. Pain and sedation were repeatedly measured with Visual Analouge Scale (VAS) and Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale (RSAS) respectively, 0.5, 1, 2, 6, 24 hours postextubation. Cumulative doses of fentanyl and ibuprofen received in both groups were compared. RESULTS: Thirty-two of the participants in PG and 33 of the participants in CG completed the study. The Mean VAS pain score was less in PG versus CG 30 min postoperatively (2.30 ± 1.30 vs. 4.85 ± 1.17), one hour (2.28 ± 0.92 vs. 4.27 ± 0.78), two hours (2.11 ± 0.88 vs. 3.60 ± 0.61) and six hours (1.47 0.62 vs. 2.76 ± 0.91) but not 24-hours postoperatively (0.84 ± 0.62 vs. 1.09 ± 0.92). Participants in the PG were less agitated during early post-extubation period (at 10 min: RSAS 3.93 ± 0.43 vs. 4.42 ± 0.50) and more alert during the first hour post-extubation (at 60 min: RSAS 3.90 ± 0.29 vs. 3.36 ± 0.69). The total dose of rescue fentanyl and ibuprofen was lower in the PG compared to the CG. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of 75 mg pregabalin is very effective for pain control after septorhinoplasty procedure when administered one hour before anesthesia induction. Side effects are rare and opioid sparing was noted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial number: IRCT2017043033706N1.


Assuntos
Dor Pós-Operatória , Pregabalina/administração & dosagem , Rinoplastia , Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Fentanila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Ibuprofeno/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Pregabalina/efeitos adversos , Rinoplastia/efeitos adversos , Rinoplastia/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Anesth Analg ; 126(5): 1641-1645, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29401075

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nasotracheal intubation is commonly performed to provide a secure airway for the maintenance of general anesthesia in maxillofacial surgeries. Routine nasotracheal intubation is performed under general anesthesia by direct laryngoscopy, frequently with the aid of Magill forceps. This method can be time-consuming and may cause bleeding in the field of view. A gum elastic bougie (GEB) is a cheap, slender, and flexible device that could expedite nasotracheal intubation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of a GEB during nasotracheal intubation to facilitate the procedure and reduce the rate of complications. METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial study, 110 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II from 15 to 65 years of age were randomized into 2 equal groups. In both groups, a GlideScope and armored tube were used. In the GEB group, GEB was used to facilitate nasal intubation while the nasal intubation was performed without the aid of GEB in the routine group. The difficult intubation (defined as >1 attempt for intubation) was the primary outcome, and the duration of the intubation, the presence of traces of bleeding, the need for a tube replacement, and the usage of Magill forceps were the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The incidence of bleeding in the GEB group was 1.81% vs 43.63% in the routine group (P < .001). In 5.5% of the GEB group, Magill forceps were used to advance the tube versus 67.3% in the routine group (P < .001). The mean time for intubation in GEB group was 48.63 ± 8.53 vs 55.9 ± 10.76 seconds in the routine group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The GEB is a useful aid to nasotracheal intubation, reducing bleeding, the requirement for Magill forceps and, to a small degree, intubation time. A case exists for its routine use for this purpose.


Assuntos
Desenho de Equipamento/métodos , Intubação Intratraqueal/métodos , Intubação/métodos , Cavidade Nasal/diagnóstico por imagem , Cirurgia Bucal/métodos , Adulto , Desenho de Equipamento/instrumentação , Feminino , Hemorragia/etiologia , Hemorragia/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Intubação/efeitos adversos , Intubação/instrumentação , Intubação Intratraqueal/efeitos adversos , Intubação Intratraqueal/instrumentação , Laringoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laringoscopia/instrumentação , Laringoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Cirurgia Bucal/instrumentação , Adulto Jovem
9.
J Cardiovasc Thorac Res ; 9(4): 221-228, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29391936

RESUMO

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of high positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) and low tidal volume (TV) and recruitment maneuver, on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. Methods: This study is a randomized double blind clinical trial on 64 patients who were undergoing CABG surgery, and were randomly divided into two groups of conventional ventilation (C-Vent) with TV of 9 mL/kg and PEEP=0 cm H2O, and lung protective ventilation (P-Vent), with 6 mL/kg TV and PEEP=10 cm H2O with recruitment maneuver every 30 minutes. Measures of PPCs and modified clinical pulmonary infection score (mCPIS), were assessed for the first 24 hours of postoperative time in order to evaluate the pulmonary complications. Results: P-Vent with 31 patients and C-Vent with 30 patients, participated in the stage of data analysis. Demographic, and preoperative laboratory results showed no significant difference between two groups. During surgery, cardiovascular complications were higher in P-Vent group (P = 0.61) but pulmonary complications were higher in C-Vent group (P = 0.26). Extubation time was not significantly different between two groups, and also components of arterial blood gases (ABG) of 24 hours after surgery showed no significant difference between the two groups. Pathologic changes in the chest X-ray (CXR) of 24 hours after surgery, were lower in P-Vent group, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.22). The PPC criteria was less positive in P-Vent (2 patients) vs 9 patients in C-Vent group (P = 0.02) and mCPIS score was significantly lower in P-Vent group (1.2 ± 1.4) than C-Vent group (2 ± 1.6) (P = 0.048). Conclusion: Lung protective strategy during and after cardiac surgery, reduces the postoperative mCPIS in patients undergoing open heart surgery for CABG.

10.
Nephrourol Mon ; 8(6): e40409, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27896241

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: One of the issues in prostatectomy surgery is bleeding. Although tranexamic acid (TRA) is an antifibrinolytic agent for reducing bleeding, controversies surround its use. OBJECTIVES: In this study, the effect of local administration of TRA on reducing bleeding during prostatectomy surgery was evaluated. METHODS: A total of 186 patients who underwent prostatectomy surgery were assessed in this clinical trial study. Patients were divided randomly into two groups. After prostate removal, TRA (500 mg TRA with 5 mL total volume) to the intervention group and normal saline to the control group were sprayed with the same volume. At the end of surgery, the prescribed blood bags were measured and recorded. Hemoglobin and platelet levels were recorded 6 hours after the test. Moreover, the amounts of blood inside the blood bags in the first 24 hours, the second 24 hours, and the total length of hospital stay were recorded and compared in each group. RESULTS: By comparing the measured values before and after surgery, we found that the amounts of hemoglobin, hematocrit, and platelet decreased. The mean blood loss in the intervention group was recorded at 340 mL and that in the control group was 515 mL. The maximum bleeding in the control group was almost twice as much as that in the intervention group. Blood loss in the intervention group with the administration of TRA was significantly lesser than that in the control group (P = 0.01). The decrease in platelet level in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that local administration of TRA significantly reduces bleeding after prostatectomy surgery and is effective in preventing postoperative hemoglobin decrease.

11.
Nephrourol Mon ; 8(4): e36491, 2016 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27703954

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Opioids are generally the preferred analgesic agents during the early postoperative period. OBJECTIVES: The present study was designed to assess and compare the multimodal analgesic effects of ketamine and tramadol in combination with intravenous acetaminophen after renal surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial was conducted on 80 consecutive patients undergoing various types of kidney surgeries in Sina hospital in Tehran in 2014 - 2016. After extubation, the patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous paracetamol (1 gr) plus tramadol (0.7 mg/kg) (PT group) or paracetamol (1 gr) plus ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) (PK group) within ten minutes. Pain severity was assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS), and the level of agitation was assessed by the Ramsey sedation scale (RSS). Morphine consumption was assessed within the first six hours after drug injection, and hemodynamic parameters were assessed at 5, 10, and 20 minutes after infusion, at the time of transfer from recovery to the ward, and also at one and six hours after transfer to the ward. RESULTS: Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the PK group than in the PT group during all study time points. The mean dose of morphine needed at recovery in the PK group was lower compared with the PT group (0.47 ± 0.94 mg versus 1.50 ± 1.35 mg/P = 0.001). The level of agitation based on the RSS score was significantly lower in the PK group than in the PT group at 10 and 20 minutes after drug administration. The total postoperative complication rate in the PK group was lower than in the PT group (20% versus 53.3%, P = 0.007). In this regard, catheter bladder discomfort was more frequent in the PT group than in the PK group (43.3% versus 3.3%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of intravenous paracetamol 1 gr and ketamine 0.5 mg/kg resulted in an overall reduction in pain scores, decreased postoperative analgesic requirements, and lower agitation score compared with intravenous paracetamol 1 gr and tramadol 0.7 mg/kg for patients undergoing renal surgery.

12.
Iran J Pharm Res ; 15(2): 619-26, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27642334

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recently, the use of ketamine as a systemic and local analgesic drug in reducing post-operative pain is studied more frequently. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to assess the analgesic efficacy of IV ketamine injection inaddition to nephrostomy tract infiltration of ketamine-bupivacaine on postoperative pain relief after tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 100), with renal stone who were candidates for PCNL were randomized to five groups with 20 cases in each: Group C, 10 mL of saline solution was infiltrated into the nephrostomy tract; Group B, 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was infiltrated into the nephrostomy tract; Group BK1, 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine plus 0.5 mg/kg ketamine was infiltrated into the nephrostomy tract; Group BK2, 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine plus 1.5 mg/kg ketamine was infiltrated into the nephrostomy tract; Group K, 10 mL of saline solution containing 0.5 mg/kg ketamine was intravenously administered. Post-operative pain scores were compared between groups as the primary objective. Comparison of Sedation Scores, rescue analgesic consumption, time to the first rescue analgesics administration, hemodynamic and SpO2 values were regarded as the secondary objective. RESULTS: Mean VAS scores in the first 30 min and total analgesic consumption in the first 24 h of post-operative period were significantly lower in groups BK1 and BK2 in comparison with the other groups (P < 0.05). Also, time to first rescue analgesics administration was longer in the same groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Infiltration of ketamine plus bupivacaine provides superior analgesic effects in PCNL surgery compared with other methods.

13.
Iran J Pharm Res ; 15(4): 951-956, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28243294

RESUMO

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is widely considered as the disease of elderly white men. Inflammation is one of the most well-known mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of AAA. Magnesium is one of the most important minerals in the body with established anti-inflammatory effects. In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of Mg loading following AAA surgery on two inflammation markers, IL-6 and CRP, as well as patient's outcome. This study was conducted as a randomized clinical trial on 18 patients (divided into two groups) after surgical correction of Acute Aortic Aneurysm (AAA). All the patients admitted in ICU ward of Sina Hospital. In intervention group, 10 g of MgSO4 has been infused through 12 h. The control group has not received the intervention. IL-6 and CRP were measured and compared at times 0, 12, 24 and 36 h. The patients were monitored for 36 h. After intervention, the differences of heart rate and APACHE II score were not statistically significant between intervention and control groups (P = 0.097 and P = 0.472, respectively). IL-6 levels decreased consistently in both groups after inclusion in the study. However, IL-6 level was significantly less in intervention group early after the end of MgSO4 infusion comparing with control group (P = 0.01). Likewise, the CRP level decreased significantly after inclusion in the study (P = 0.005). However, these changes were not significant between intervention and control groups (P = 0.297). According to the results of this study, continuous infusion of MgSO4 after AAA surgery may provide IL-6 suppression.

15.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 13 Suppl 1: 127-32, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25894141

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Hepatitis B immunoglobulin prophylaxis in combination with antiviral drugs is recommended for prevention of hepatitis B virus reinfection after liver transplant. However, there is no consensus on a standard prophylactic method, and controversy exists over the duration, dose, and route of administration. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of intramuscular hepatitis B immunoglobulin in combination with lamivudine and/or tenofovir and discontinuation of hepatitis B immunoglobulin after 1 year for prevention of hepatitis B virus reinfection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with hepatitis Brelated liver cirrhosis who had undergone primary liver transplants were enrolled. The prophylactic protocol involved intraoperative intramuscular hepatitis B immunoglobulin at 10 000 IU, tapering to 5000 IU daily for the first 6 days, weekly for a month, every 2 weeks for the next month, and monthly for a year after liver transplant, in combination with antiviral drugs. RESULTS: From January 2002 until March 2014, two hundred sixty-eight liver transplants were performed. Forty-four patients (16.4%) who underwent liver transplants due to hepatitis B-related liver failure were enrolled. Five patients had hepatocellular carcinoma; 20 had both hepatitis D and hepatitis B virus infection. The median age was 47 years (range, 26-59 y) with a median model for end stage liver disease score of 20. Thirty-three patients were men (76%). Sixty-one percent of patients were negative for hepatitis B virus DNA at the time of transplant. The median follow-up was 13.6 months (range, 0-142 mo). Only 1 patient (2.3%) experienced hepatitis B virus reinfection (at 44.7 months posttransplant), which was successfully treated with tenofovir. Five patients died (11.4%) during the follow-up from nonhepatitis B causes. CONCLUSIONS: Intramuscular hepatitis B immunoglobulin in combination with lamivudine or tenofovir and discontinuation of hepatitis B immunoglobulin after 1 year posttransplant may provide safe and cost-effective protection against posttransplant hepatitis B reinfection.


Assuntos
Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Vírus da Hepatite B/efeitos dos fármacos , Hepatite B/tratamento farmacológico , Imunoglobulinas/administração & dosagem , Lamivudina/administração & dosagem , Falência Hepática/cirurgia , Transplante de Fígado , Tenofovir/administração & dosagem , Ativação Viral/efeitos dos fármacos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Criança , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Hepatite B/complicações , Hepatite B/diagnóstico , Vírus da Hepatite B/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Humanos , Imunoglobulinas/efeitos adversos , Injeções Intramusculares , Lamivudina/efeitos adversos , Falência Hepática/diagnóstico , Falência Hepática/virologia , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Tenofovir/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
16.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 39(1): 141-6, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25552328

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Anesthetic agents are often combined to enhance their therapeutic effects while minimizing adverse events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of two different sedation regimens of ketamine and propofol combination via infusion on perioperative variables in patients who underwent plastic and reconstructive surgery. METHODS: This randomized double-blind clinical trial was done on 80 patients who were randomized to two groups; group 1 (n = 40) received a 2:1 mixture of 9 mg/ml propofol and 4.5 mg/ml ketamine, and group 2 (n = 40) received a 4:1 mixture of 9 mg/ml propofol and 2.25 mg/ml ketamine. After premedication and before local anesthetic injection, the infusion of mixtures was adjusted to attain the Ramsay sedation scores of 5 in both groups. We recorded induction time, sedation efficacy, cardiovascular and respiratory events, recovery time, and incidence of adverse events during and after the procedure. RESULTS: The mean of volume infusion of mixtures in the beginning of the procedure was higher in group 2 (3.2 ± 1. 2 ml) than in group 1 (2.4 ± 0.8 ml) (p < 0.001). The induction time for sedation was 2.8 ± 0.8 min and 2.6 ± 0.4 min in group 1 and group 2, respectively (p = 0. 92). The number of oversedated patients was greater in group 2 compared to group 1 but not statistically significant (p = 0. 80). The sedation efficacy was similar between the two groups. The hemodynamic changes during the procedure were greater in group 2 compared to group 1 (p = 0. 001). The recovery time was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.43). The mean pain score in the recovery room was lower in group 1 than group 2 (1.2 ± 0.8 vs 2.8 ± 1.8, p = 0. 01). Moreover, 4 (10 %) patients in group 1 and 10 (25 %) patients in group 2 needed opioid administration (p = 0. 02). Other postoperative adverse events were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: We recommend the use of a 2:1 combination of propofol-ketamine, because it reduced the rescue propofol requirement and consequently produced lower cardiovascular and respiratory depression effects and also less postoperative pain.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Dissociativos/administração & dosagem , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Masculino
17.
Acta Med Iran ; 52(11): 804-10, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25415811

RESUMO

According to limitations in blood product resources and to prevent unnecessary transfusions and afterwards complications in perioperative period of total hip arthroplasty, authors administered fibrinogen concentrate in a pilot randomized clinical trial to evaluate bleeding and need to blood transfusion in preoperative period. Thirty patients (3-75 years old) with ASA physical status class I or II and candidate for total hip arthroplasty consequently enrolled in this study and randomly assigned into two groups: taking fibrinogen concentrate and control. Two groups were similar in serum concentration of fibrinogen, hemoglobin, and platelet preoperatively. After induction of general anesthesia 30 mg/kg fibrinogen concentrate was administered in the fibrinogen group. Blood loss, need to blood transfusion and probable complications were compared between two groups. The mean operation time was 3.3 ± 0.8 hours in the fibrinogen group and 2.8 ± 0.6 hours in the placebo group, and this difference was statistically significant (P=0.04). There was a significant correlation between operation time and blood loss during surgery (P=0.002). The mean transfused blood products in the fibrinogen and control group was 0.8 ± 1.01 units and 1.06 ± 1.2 units respectively (P=0.53). The mean of perioperative blood loss was 976 ± 553 ml in the fibrinogen group and 1100 ± 350 ml in the control group, but this difference was not significant between two groups. By adjusting time factor for two groups, we identified that the patients in fibrinogen group had lower perioperative bleeding after adjusting time factor for two groups (P=0.046). None of the patients had complications related to fibrinogen concentrate administration. The prophylactic administration of fibrinogen concentrate was safe and effective in reducing bleeding in the perioperative period of total hip arthroplasty.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Fibrinogênio/administração & dosagem , Hemostáticos/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Transfusão de Sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Perioperatório
18.
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan ; 52(3): 95-100, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25199696

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the common complications of spinal anesthesia; it is observed in 1-40% of cases involving spinal anesthesia. It can cause considerable morbidity and 40% of cases may require invasive treatments such as epidural blood patch. With the exception of invasive treatments such as an epidural blood patch, current standard treatment modalities have not proved efficacious. There had been some research done that indicated successful prophylaxis and/or treatment of PDPH by administration of intravenous steroids. Based on those findings, we hypothesize that a direct injection of corticosteroids to the anesthesia puncture site could increase the amount of corticosteroid that accumulates in the puncture site, and will be more effective in decreasing dural inflammation and incidence of PDPH than that of parenteral steroids. We formulated our study to evaluate the effect of dexamethasone directly injected into spinal anesthesia puncture sites. METHODS: A total of 268 patients undergoing spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups; one group received a prophylactic epidural injection of dexamethasone (2 mL, 8 mg) and the other group received 2 mL of normal saline. The incidence and intensity of PDPH and puncture site backache were each measured at 24 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days after spinal anesthesia. The intensity of the headache was graded according to the meningeal headache index. RESULTS: The overall incidence of headache during the 7-day period was 5 patients (3.7%) in the control group and 11 patients (8.2%) in the study group, which is not statistically significant (X(2) = 2.393 and p = 0.122. The severity of headache also shows no statistical significance (2.2% in cases versus 6% in controls; z = 1.53, p = 0.126). The intensity of headache reported at the 24 hours (z = 0.698; p = 0.485), 72 hours (z = 0.849; p = 0.396), and 7 days (z = 0.008; p = 0.994) was not different. There also was no difference in the incidence of backache in the two groups. CONCLUSION: In contrast to other studies that showed the efficacy of intravenous dexamethasone in the prevention and treatment of PDPH, our study did not show any significant effect of prophylactic epidural injection of dexamethasone in prevention of PDPH. However regarding the low number of PDPH in routine cases, evaluation of this intervention in groups with a high incidence of PDPH by using of particulate steroids is recommended to confirm these preliminary findings.


Assuntos
Raquianestesia/efeitos adversos , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Cefaleia Pós-Punção Dural/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Espaço Epidural , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
19.
ARYA Atheroscler ; 10(2): 94-9, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25161677

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Subarachnoid block with local anesthetics and opioids enable efficacious spinal anesthesia because of their synergistic effect and permit the use of low-dose local anesthetics, which results in a stable hemodynamic state. The purpose of this study was to describe the cardiovascular effects of spinal anesthesia with low-dose bupivacaine and sufentanil on patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: This study was a double-blind randomized clinical trial. A total of 18 patients who had known coronary artery disease were enrolled. Our subjects underwent spinal block for lower limb surgery with 7.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% and 5 µg sufentanil. Complications related to anesthesia such as hypotension, bradycardia, vasopressor need, and blood or volume use were recorded. RESULTS: The average mean arterial pressure decreased 15% in the first 15 min of spinal block in our cases. No patients presented with hypotension and the subjects were without complaints during the spinal anesthesia. All patients remained alert, and no ST segment changes were observed intraoperatively and until 6 h after the operation. Baseline ejection fraction (EF) 40% or less was observed in 10 patients and these subjects were compared with other patients. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate decreased during the first 15 min in response to spinal anesthesia in both groups of patients, but decreased more significantly in patients with EF > 40%. CONCLUSION: We recommend spinal block with low-dose bupivacaine and sufentanil in patients with coronary artery disease and especially in patients with low EF.

20.
Daru ; 22: 57, 2014 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25027749

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sepsis complication is a major cause of death in multiple trauma critically ill patients. Defensin (cysteine rich anti-microbial peptides), as an important component of immune system, might play an important role in this process. There is also rising data on immunological effects of N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC), a commonly used anti-oxidant in oxidative stress conditions and glutathione (GSH) deficiencies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the potential beneficial effects of NAC administration on multiple trauma patients with sepsis. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized controlled study, 44 multiple trauma critically ill patients who were mechanically ventilated and met the criteria of sepsis and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) were randomized into two groups . Control group received all standard ICU therapies and NAC group received intravenous NAC 3 gr every 6 hours for 72 hours in addition to standard therapies. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, length of ICU stay, ICU mortality were recorded. Levels of serum Immunoglobulin M (IgM), Human ß-Defensin 2 (HßD2) and GSH were assessed at baseline and 24, 72, 120 hours after intervention. RESULTS: During a period of 13-month screening, 44 patients underwent randomization but 5 patients had to be excluded. 21 patients in NAC group and 18 patients in control group completed the study. For both groups the length of ICU stay, SOFA score and systemic oxygenation were similar. Mortality rate (40% vs. 22% respectively, p = 0.209) and ventilator days (Mean ± SD 19.82 ± 19.55 days vs. 13.82 ± 11.89 days respectively, p = 0.266) were slightly higher for NAC group. IgM and GSH levels were similar between two groups (p = 0.325, 0.125 respectively), HßD2 levels were higher for NAC group (at day 3). CONCLUSION: High dose of NAC administration not only did not improve patients' outcome, but also raised the risk of inflammation and was associated with increased serum creatinine.


Assuntos
Acetilcisteína/administração & dosagem , Traumatismo Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , APACHE , Adulto , Antioxidantes/administração & dosagem , Creatinina/sangue , Estado Terminal , Feminino , Glutationa/sangue , Humanos , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Contagem de Leucócitos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Traumatismo Múltiplo/sangue , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Respiração Artificial , Sepse/sangue , Adulto Jovem , beta-Defensinas/sangue
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA