The endoscopic-assisted or endoscopic mini- or less-open preperitoneal (E/MILOP) approach for primary and incisional ventral hernia repair.

INTRODUCTION: The endoscopic-assisted or endoscopic mini- or less-open sublay (E/MILOS) concept describes a contemporary approach of trans-hernial repair of ventral hernia via sublay mesh placement. The term sublay often causes confusion, and preperitoneal placement of mesh should be considered as a distinctive approach. We hereby present our experience of a novel approach, the E/MILOP approach, for the repair of primary and incisional ventral hernias. METHODS: All patients who underwent E/MILOP between January 2020 and December 2022 were identified and their preoperative and perioperative characteristics, as well as postoperative outcomes, were retrospectively analyzed. The surgical procedure entailed an incision over the hernia defect and careful entrance into, and development of, the preperitoneal space trans-hernially. A synthetic mesh was placed in the preperitoneal space and the defect was closed with sutures. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients with primary and/or incisional ventral hernias who underwent E/MILOP were identified. Three patients (11.5%) presented with two coexistent types of hernias, and out of a total of 29 hernias, there were 21 (72.4%) umbilical, four epigastric (13.8%) and four incisional (13.8%) hernias. The mean defect width was 2.7 ± 0.9 cm. All cases utilized a mesh with a mean mesh-to-defect ratio of 12.9. The mean postoperative stay was 1.9 days. Surgical site occurrence was observed in eight (30.1%) patients, but none required intervention. No recurrence was observed during a mean follow-up period of 286.7 days. CONCLUSION: The E/MILOP approach is a novel alternative for primary and incisional ventral hernia repair.

Arteriovenous malformation of the spermatic cord mimicking reducible inguinal hernia.

Arteriovenous malformations are a vascular anomaly most often found in the central nervous system; however, they can present ubiquitously in any organs or tissues. We present the case of a 55-year-old man who developed a tender, reducible inguinal bulge and underwent laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair under the clinical diagnosis of an inguinal hernia. Intraoperative observation revealed no hernia sac, but a poorly defined spermatic cord mass, appearing to be responsible for the patient's symptoms, was found and removed. The pathology of the mass was consistent with the diagnosis of an arteriovenous malformation of the spermatic cord. Surgeons should keep in mind the small possibility of arteriovenous malformations in patients with clinical presentation of an inguinal hernia, as they may cause massive bleeding during and after the operation unless handled appropriately.

The first case of robotic-assisted transabdominal retrorectus repair for incisional hernia in Japan.

Extraperitoneal mesh repair for ventral hernia has garnered attention and its rate has been increasing due to concerns for the potential complications of intraperitoneal mesh repair. Recently, robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair is highlighted as a solution to the technically demanding nature of laparoscopic transabdominal or enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal retrorectus ventral hernia repair. A 78-year-old man, who had undergone robot-assisted radical prostatectomy 10 months earlier, presented with an incisional hernia of European Hernia Society Classification M3W2, length 4 cm, width 5 cm with rectus diastasis. A right single-docking robotic-assisted transabdominal retrorectus repair was performed using a 21 by 14 cm self-gripping mesh and anterior wall reconstruction was done by 0 barbed nonabsorbable running suture. There were no complications and recurrence observed during a 7 months postoperative period. Single-docking robotic-assisted transabdominal retrorectus repair was considered a good option for midline moderate-size incisional hernias from the point of view of the ease of suturing, adequateness of dissection and prevention of bowel injury.