Effect of Middle Hepatic Vein Tributaries Preserving Technique Until Just Before Graft Retrieval on Donors' Surgical Outcomes in Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The technique of preserving the major tributaries of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) (V5 and V8) until just before graft retrieval is beneficial to minimize congestion time of the graft. However, it remains unclear whether this technique exerts a burden on donors in terms of operative time, blood loss, and postoperative hepatic dysfunction. In this study we investigated adverse effects of the MHV tributaries preserving technique until immediately before graft retrieval on donors' surgical outcomes. METHODS: Data from 71 donors who underwent right hepatectomy without MHV for a liver transplantation at our hospital from January 2002 to August 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Donors were divided into 3 groups as follows: group 1 (n = 12), no MHV tributary reconstruction; group 2 (n = 33), single MHV tributary reconstruction; group 3 (n = 26), 2 or 3 MHV tributaries reconstruction. Donor operation time, blood loss, proportion of the remnant liver, maximum postoperative total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine transaminase, minimum platelets, prothrombin time, albumin level, number of days in hospital from surgery to discharge, and surgical complications were compared. RESULTS: Compared with groups 2 and 3, group 1 exhibited shorter average operational time and less average blood loss, but the difference was not significant. Comparisons of all other factors indicated no significant differences. CONCLUSION: The technique of preserving the major tributaries of the MHV until just immediately before graft retrieval does not appear to impose an apparent burden on donors.

Edaravone, a free radical scavenger, improves the graft viability on liver transplantation from non-heart-beating donors in pigs.

BACKGROUND: Although liver transplantation from non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs) is an effective way to overcome shortage of donors, primary graft nonfunction is often noted in these grafts. We have previously reported that edaravone, a free radical scavenger, has a cytoprotective effect on warm ischemia-reperfusion injury and improves the function of liver grafts from NHBDs in a rat model of ischemia-reperfusion. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of edaravone on liver transplantations from NHBDs. METHODS: Pigs were divided into three groups: (1) a heart-beating (HB) group (n = 5), in which liver grafts were retrieved from HB donors; (2) a non-heart-beating (NHB) group (n = 4), in which liver grafts were retrieved under apnea-induced NHB conditions; and (3) an edaravone-treated (ED) group (n = 5), in which liver grafts were retrieved in the same manner as the NHB group and treated with edaravone at the time of perfusion (3 mg/L in University of Wisconsin [UW] solution), cold preservation (1 mg/L in UW solution), and after surgery (1 mg/kg/d). The grafts from all groups were transplanted after 4 hours of cold preservation. RESULTS: In the ED group, the 7-day survival rate was significantly higher than that in the NHB group (80% versus 0%, P = .0042, Kaplan-Meier log-rank test). Furthermore, on histologic examination, the structure of sinusoids in the ED group was well preserved and similar to that in the HB group. CONCLUSIONS: Edaravone may improve the viability of liver grafts from NHBDs.

Risk factors for hepatic artery thrombosis after microsurgical vascular reconstruction in liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: In liver transplantation, microsurgical reconstruction of a hepatic artery is essential but requires challenging techniques. Especially in living-donor liver transplantation, the recipient artery is short and located deep in the abdominal cavity. Furthermore, hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) can be a lethal complication. This study sought to uncover the risk factors for HAT after microsurgical vascular reconstruction. METHODS: From 1991 to 2011, we performed 151 microsurgical vascular reconstructions, including 3 deceased-donor liver transplantations. We retrospectively investigated the cases, performing univariate and multivariate analyses to identify independent risk factors for HAT. The patients had undergone ultrasonographic examinations for HAT over the first 14 days after transplantation. RESULTS: Upon univariate analysis, the risk factors identified to be associated with P < .20 were young age (P = .0484), low body weight (P = .0466), short height (P = .0128), high graft-to-recipient weight ratio (P = .0031), small liver graft volume (P = .0416), small amounts of gabexate mesilate infusion (P = .0516), and the conventional technique (without a back-wall support suture; P = .1326). A multiple logistic regression analysis identified low body weight to be the only independent risk factor for HAT. CONCLUSION: On the univariate analysis, we found that using the back-wall support suture technique contributed to the reduction of HAT, whereas on multivariate analysis, the only independent risk factor for HAT was low body weight.

Expression of receptors for anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a on rat islet preparations.

BACKGROUND: Complement activation has been implicated in the development of the instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction (IBMIR). In particular, anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a elicit a broad range of proinflammatory effects, including chemotaxis of inflammatory cells and cytokine release. We have previously shown that 2 types of receptors for C5a are expressed on isolated islets. In the present study, we investigated this component in detail. METHODS: C3aR, C5aR, and C5L2, together with CD11b and CD31, on freshly isolated islets (fresh group) and islets cultured with (cytokine group) or without (culture group) TNF-α, IL-1ß, and IFN-γ for ∼12 hours were analyzed by flow cytometry. In addition, these 3 kinds of receptors were analyzed on nonendocrine cells. RESULTS: C5aR and C5L2 were expressed on the isolated islets (C5aR: 7.91 ± 2.83%; C5L2: 2.45 ± 1.34%) and the expression of both C5a receptors was markedly attenuated by culture for 12 hours (C5aR: P < .005; C5L2: P < .05). Compared with the culture group, the expression was significantly up-regulated in the cytokine group (C5aR: P < .05; C5L2: P = .05). C5aR-positive cells expressed CD11b but not CD31. In contrast to islets, nonendocrine cells expressed C5L2 predominantly. C3aR was scarcely expressed on isolated islets or nonendocrine cells. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that C5aR and C5L2 are expressed on CD11b-positive leukocytes in islet preparations. Depletion of C5a receptors by culturing appropriately could be an attractive therapeutic strategy in clinical islet transplantation.

A precise analysis of C5a inhibitory peptide on inflammatory mediators induced after islet transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: We recently reported that C5a inhibitory peptide (C5aIP) prevents the instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction by attenuating cross talk between complement and coagulation cascades. C5aIP has also been shown to possess a broad range of anti-inflammatory effects. Due to methodological limitations, it is difficult to perform detailed analyses on wide range of inflammatory mediators in rat model. Therefore, we examined whether C5aIP suppressed various inflammatory cytokines induced after islet transplantation using a mouse model. METHODS: Six islet equivalents per gram of syngeneic mouse islet grafts were transplanted intraportally into two groups of streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice: control group (n = 8) and C5aIP group (n = 6). The C5aIP group was treated with a bolus of 4 mg/kg just after islet infusion and a continuous infusion of 0.4 mg/kg/h, whereas the control group was injected with equivalent amounts of saline. Serum samples were collected at 0, 6, and 24 hours after transplantation. We analyzed 23 types of cytokines: interleukins-1a, -1b, -3, -4, -5, -6, -9, -10, -12, -13, and -17; eotaxin; G-CSF; GM-CSF; interferon (INF) gamma; KC; MCP-1; MIP-1 and -1b, RANTES and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Leukocytes in the recipient liver were isolated at 6 hours after transplantation to examine IFN gamma production by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS). RESULTS: No significant difference was detected in terms of the major inflammatory cytokines between the two groups. INF gamma production on CD11b(+)Gr-1(+) cells in the liver was not significantly inhibited by C5aIP (control 30.0% vs C5aIP 24.1%). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggested that beneficial effects of C5aIP on islet engraftment are mainly due to blockade of cross talk between complement and coagulation cascades, rather than the suppression of inflammatory mediators.