Optimal Timing for Initiation of Thromboprophylaxis After Hepatic Angioembolization.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the optimal timing of thromboprophylaxis (TPX) initiation after hepatic angioembolization in trauma patients. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: TPX after hepatic trauma is complicated by the risk of bleeding, but the relative risk after hepatic angioembolization is unknown. METHODS: Patients who underwent hepatic angioembolization within 24 hours were retrospectively identified from the 2017-19 ACS TQIP datasets. Cases with <24-hour length of stay and other serious injuries were excluded. VTE included DVT and PE. Bleeding complications included hepatic surgery, additional angioembolization, or blood transfusion after TPX initiation. Differences were tested with univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Of 1,550 patients, 1,370 had initial angioembolization. Bleeding complications were higher in those with TPX initiation within 24 hours (20.0% vs 8.9%, P<0.001) and 48 hours (13.2% vs 8.4%, P=0.013). However, VTE was higher in those with TPX initiation after 48 hours (6.3%vs 3.3%, P=0.025). In the 180 patients with hepatic surgery prior to angioembolization, bleeding complications were higher in those with TPX initiation within 24 hours (72% vs 20%, P <0.001), 48 hours (50% vs 17%, P<0.001), and 72 hours (37% vs 14%, P=0.001). Moreover, DVT was higher in those with TPX initiation after 96 hours (14.3% vs 3.1%, P =0.023). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to address timing of TPX after hepatic angioembolization in a national sample of trauma patients. For these patients, initiation of TPX at 48- 72 hours achieves the safest balance in minimizing bleeding while reducing the risk of VTE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III - Retrospective Cohort Study.

Initial Hemorrhage Control Procedure for Splenic Injuries May Affect Risk of Venous Thromboembolism.

INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) continues to be a major cause of morbidity in trauma. It is unclear whether the type of hemorrhage control procedure (i.e., splenectomy versus angioembolization) is associated with an increased risk of VTE. We hypothesize that hemodynamically stable patients undergoing angioembolization for blunt high-grade splenic injuries have lower rates of VTE compared to those undergoing splenectomy. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Program dataset from 2017 to 2019 was queried to identify all patients with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade 3-5 blunt splenic injuries. Outcomes including VTE rates were compared between those who were managed with splenectomy versus angioembolization. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed adjusting for age, sex, initial vital signs, Injury Severity Score, and splenic injury grade. RESULTS: The analysis included 4698 matched patients (splenectomy [n = 2349] and angioembolization [n = 2349]). The median (interquartile range) age was 41 (27-58) years and 69% were male. Patients were well matched between groups. Angioembolization was associated with significantly lower VTE than splenectomy (2.2% versus 3.4%, P = 0.010) despite less use of VTE chemoprophylaxis (70% versus 80%, P < 0.001), as well as a relative delay in initiation of chemoprophylaxis (44 h versus 33 h, P < 0.001). Hospital and intensive care unit length of stay and mortality were also significantly lower in the angioembolization group. CONCLUSIONS: Angioembolization is associated with a significantly lower incidence of VTE than splenectomy. Thus, angioembolization should be considered for initial management of hemodynamically stable patients with high-grade blunt splenic injuries in whom laparotomy is not otherwise indicated.

A 20-year retrospective analysis of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism among combat casualties requiring damage control laparotomy at US Military Role 2 surgical units.

BACKGROUND: Combat casualties receiving damage control laparotomy at forward deployed, resource-constrained US Military Role 2 surgical units (R2) require multiple evacuations, but the added risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in this population has not been defined. To fill this gap, we retrospectively analyzed 20 years of Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR) data to define the VTE rate in this population. METHODS: DoDTR from 2002 to 2023 was queried for US Military combat casualties requiring damage control laparotomy at R2. All deaths were excluded in subsequent analysis. Rates of VTE were assessed, and subgroup analysis was performed on patients requiring massive transfusion. RESULTS: DoDTR (n = 288) patients were young (mean age 25 years), predominantly male (98%) with severe (mean ISS 26), mostly penetrating injury (76%), and high mortality. VTE rate was high: 15.8% (DVT: 10.3% and PE 7.1%). In the massively transfused population, the VTE rate was even higher (26.7% vs 10.2%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report that combat casualties requiring damage control laparotomy at R2 have such high VTE rates. Therefore, for military casualties, we propose screening ultrasound upon arrival to each subsequent capable echelon of care and low threshold for initiating thromboprophylaxis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological, Level IV.

When is it safe to start thromboprophylaxis after splenic angioembolization?

BACKGROUND: Thromboprophylaxis after blunt splenic trauma is complicated by the risk of bleeding, but the risk after angioembolization is unknown. We hypothesized that earlier thromboprophylaxis initiation was associated with increased bleeding complications without mitigating venous thromboembolism events. METHODS: All blunt trauma patients who underwent splenic angioembolization within 24 hours of arrival were identified from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program datasets from 2017 to 2019. Cases with <24-hour length of stay, other serious injuries, and surgery before angioembolization were excluded. Venous thromboembolism was defined as deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Bleeding complications were defined as splenic surgery, additional embolization, or blood transfusion after thromboprophylaxis initiation. Data were compared with χ2 analysis and multivariate logistic regression at P < .05. RESULTS: In 1,102 patients, 84% had American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade III to V splenic injuries, and 73% received thromboprophylaxis. Splenic surgery after angioembolization was more common in those with thromboprophylaxis initiation within the first 24 hours (5.7% vs 1.7%, P = .007), whereas those with the initiation of thromboprophylaxis after 72 hours were more likely to have a pulmonary embolism (2.3% vs 0.2%, P = .001). Overall, venous thromboembolism increased considerably when thromboprophylaxis was initiated after day 3. In multivariate analysis, time to thromboprophylaxis initiation was associated with bleeding (odds ratio 0.74 [95% confidence interval 0.58-0.94]) and venous thromboembolism complications (odds ratio 1.5 [95% confidence interval 1.20-1.81]). CONCLUSION: This national study evaluates bleeding and thromboembolic risk to elucidate the specific timing of thromboprophylaxis after splenic angioembolization. Initiation of thromboprophylaxis between 24 and 72 hours achieves the safest balance in minimizing bleeding and venous thromboembolism risk, with 48 hours particularly serving as the ideal time for protocolized administration.

Management of lower extremity vascular injuries in pediatric trauma patients: 20-year experience at a level 1 trauma center.

Introduction: Pediatric lower extremity vascular injuries (LEVI) are rare but can result in significant morbidity. We aimed to describe our experience with these injuries, including associated injury patterns, diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, and outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective review at a single level 1 trauma center from January 2000 to December 2019. Patients less than 18 years of age with LEVI were included. Demographics, injury patterns, clinical status at presentation, and intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS) were collected. Surgical data were extracted from patient charts. Results: 4,929 pediatric trauma patients presented during the 20-year period, of which 53 patients (1.1%) sustained LEVI. The mean age of patients was 15 years (range 1-17 years), the majority were Black (68%), male (96%), and most injuries were from a gunshot wound (62%). The median Glasgow Coma Scale score was 15, and the median Injury Severity Score was 12. The most commonly injured arteries were the superficial femoral artery (28%) and popliteal artery (28%). Hard signs of vascular injury were observed in 72% of patients and 87% required operative exploration. There were 36 arterial injuries, 36% of which were repaired with a reverse saphenous vein graft and 36% were repaired with polytetrafluoroethylene graft. One patient required amputation. Median ICU LOS was three days and median hospital LOS was 15 days. There were four mortalities. Conclusion: Pediatric LEVIs are rare and can result in significant morbidity. Surgical principles for pediatric vascular injuries are similar to those applied to adults, and this subset of patients can be safely managed in a tertiary specialized center. Level of evidence: Level IV, retrospective study.

Admission to a Verified Pediatric Trauma Center is Associated With Improved Outcomes in Severely Injured Children.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown improved survival for severely injured adult patients treated at American College of Surgeons verified level I/II trauma centers compared to level III and undesignated centers. However, this relationship has not been well established in pediatric trauma centers (PTCs). We hypothesize that severely injured children will have lower mortality at verified level I/II PTCs compared to centers without PTC verification. METHODS: All patients 1-15 years of age with ISS >15 in the 2017-2019 American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Programs (ACS TQP) dataset were reviewed. Patients with pre-hospital cardiac arrest, burns, and those transferred out for ongoing inpatient care were excluded. Logistic regression models were used to assess the effects of pediatric trauma center verification on mortality. RESULTS: 16,301 patients were identified (64 % male, median ISS 21 [17-27]), and 60 % were admitted to verified PTCs. Overall mortality was 6.0 %. Mortality at centers with PTC verification was 5.1 % versus 7.3 % at centers without PTC verification (p < 0.001). After controlling for injury mechanism, sex, age, pediatric-adjusted shock index (SIPA), ISS, arrival via interhospital transfer, and adult trauma center verification, pediatric level I/II trauma center designation was independently associated with decreased mortality (OR 0.72, 95 % CI 0.61-0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment at ACS-verified pediatric trauma centers is associated with improved survival in critically injured children. These findings highlight the importance of PTC verification in optimizing outcomes for severely injured pediatric patients and should influence trauma center apportionment and prehospital triage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV - Retrospective review of national database.

Open Versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Post Hoc Analysis of the EAST Appendicitis MUSTANG Study.

Background: We sought to understand which factors are associated with open appendectomy as final operative approach. We hypothesize that higher American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Emergency General Surgery (EGS) grade is associated with open appendectomy. Patients and Methods: Post hoc analysis of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) Multicenter Study of the Treatment of Appendicitis in America: Acute, Perforated and Gangrenous (MUSTANG) prospective appendicitis database was performed. All adults (age >18) undergoing appendectomy were stratified by final operative approach: laparoscopic or open appendectomy (including conversion from laparoscopic). Univariable analysis was performed to compare group characteristics and outcomes, and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify demographic, clinical, or radiologic factors associated with open appendectomy. Results: A total of 3,019 cases were analyzed. One hundred seventy-five (5.8%) patients underwent open appendectomy, including 127 converted from laparoscopic to open. The median age was 37 (25) years and 53% were male. Compared with the laparoscopic group, open appendectomy patients had more comorbidities, higher proportion of symptoms greater than 96 hours, and higher AAST EGS grade. Moreover, on intraoperative findings, the open appendectomy group had a higher incidence of perforated and gangrenous appendicitis with purulent contamination, abscess/phlegmon, and purulent abdominal/pelvic fluid. On multivariable analysis controlling for comorbidities, clinical and imaging AAST grade, duration of symptoms, and intra-operative findings, only AAST Clinical Grade 5 appendicitis was independently associated with open appendectomy (odds ratio [OR], 5.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-25.55; p = 0.025). Conclusions: In the setting of appendicitis, generalized peritonitis (AAST Clinical Grade 5) is independently associated with greater odds of open appendectomy.

Optimizing Transitions of Care and Enhancing Surgical Education on Acute Care Surgery: A Multi-Institutional Survey Study.

OBJECTIVE: Critically ill and injured patients are routinely managed on the Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (ACS) service and receive care from numerous residents during hospital admission. The Clinical Learning Environment Review (CLER) program established by the ACGME identified variability in resident transitions of care (TC) while observing quality care and patient safety concerns. The aim of our multi-institutional study was to review surgical trainees' impressions of a specialty-specific handoff format in order to optimize patient care and enhance surgical education on the ACS service. DESIGN: A survey study was conducted with a voluntary electronic 20-item questionnaire that utilized a 5 point Likert scale regarding TC among resident peers, supervised handoffs by trauma attendings, and surgical education. It also allowed for open-ended responses regarding perceived advantages and disadvantages of handoffs. SETTING: Ten American College of Surgeons-verified Level 1 adult trauma centers. PARTICIPANTS: All general surgery residents and trauma/acute/surgical critical care fellows were surveyed. RESULTS: The study task was completed by 147 postgraduate trainees (125 residents, 14 ACS fellows, and 8 surgical critical care fellows) with a response rate of 61%. Institutional responses included: university hospital (67%), community hospital-university affiliate (16%), and private hospital-university affiliate (17%). A majority of respondents were satisfied with morning TC (62.6%) while approximately half were satisfied with evening TC (52.4%). Respondees believe supervised handoffs improved TC and prevented patient care delays (80.9% and 74.8%, respectively). A total of 35% of trainees utilized the open-ended response field to highlight specific best practices of their home institutions. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical trainees view ACS morning handoff as an effective standard to provide the highest level of clinical care and an opportunity to enhance surgical knowledge. As TC continue to be a focus of certifying bodies, identifying best practices and opportunities for improvement are critical to optimizing quality patient care and surgical education.

Association Between Fecal Contamination and Outcomes After Emergent General Surgery Colorectal Resection: A Post Hoc Analysis of an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) Multicenter Study.

Background: The impact of fecal contamination on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing emergent colorectal resection is unclear. We hypothesized that fecal contamination is associated with worse clinical outcomes regardless of operative technique. Patients and Methods: This is a post hoc analysis for an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma-sponsored multicenter study that prospectively enrolled emergency general surgery patients undergoing urgent/emergent colorectal resection. Subjects were categorized according to presence versus absence of intra-operative fecal contamination. Propensity score matching (1:1) by age, weight, Charlson comorbidity index, pre-operative vasopressor use, and method of colonic management (primary anastomosis [ANST] vs. ostomy [STM]) was performed. χ2 analysis was then performed to compare the composite outcome (surgical site infection and fascial dehiscence). Results: A total of 428 subjects were included, of whom 147 (34%) had fecal contamination. Propensity score matching (1:1) resulted in a total of 147 pairs. After controlling for operative technique, fecal contamination was still associated with higher odds of the composite outcome (odds ratio [OR], 2.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-4.2; p = 0.001). Conclusions: In patients undergoing urgent/emergent colorectal resection, fecal contamination, regardless of operative technique, is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Selection bias is possible, thus randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm or refute a causal relation.

Statistical Power of Randomized Controlled Trials in Trauma Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to conduct a bibliometric study investigating the prevalence of underpowered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in trauma surgery. STUDY DESIGN: A medical librarian conducted a search of RCTs in trauma published from 2000 to 2021. Data extracted included study type, sample size calculation, and power analyses. Post hoc calculations were performed using a power of 80% and an alpha level of 0.05. A CONSORT checklist was then tabulated from each study as well as a fragility index for studies with statistical significance. RESULTS: In total 187 RCTs from multiple continents and 60 journals were examined. A total of 133 (71%) were found to have "positive" findings consistent with their hypothesis. When evaluating their methods, 51.3% of articles did not report how they calculated their intended sample size. Of those that did, 25 (27%) did not meet their target enrollment. When examining post hoc power, 46%, 57%, and 65% were adequately powered to detect small, medium, and large effect sizes, respectively. Only 11% of RCTs had complete adherence with CONSORT reporting guidelines and the average CONSORT score was 19 out of 25. For positive superiority trials with binary outcomes, the fragility index median (interquartile range) was 2 (2 to 8). CONCLUSIONS: A concerningly large proportion of recently published RCTs in trauma surgery do not report a priori sample size calculations, do not meet enrollment targets, and are not adequately powered to detect even large effect sizes. There exists opportunity for improvement of trauma surgery study design, conduct, and reporting.

Prehospital and emergency department pediatric readiness for injured children: A statement from the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma Emergency Medical Services Committee.

ABSTRACT: Injury is the leading cause of death in children older than 1 year, and children make up 22% of the population. Pediatric readiness (PR) of the nation's emergency departments and state trauma and emergency medical services (EMS) systems is conceptually important and vital to mitigate mortality and morbidity in this population. The extension of PR to the trauma community has become a focused area for training, staffing, education, and equipment at all levels of trauma center designation, and there is evidence that a higher level of emergency department PR is independently associated with long-term survival among injured children. Although less well studied, there is an associated need for EMS PR, which is relevant to the injured child who needs assessment, treatment, triage, and transport to a trauma center. We outline a blueprint along with recommendations for incorporating PR into trauma system development in this opinion from the EMS Committee of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. These recommendations are particularly pertinent in the rural and underserved areas of the United States but are directed toward all levels of professionals who care for an injured child along the trauma continuum of care.

Short Versus Long Antibiotic Duration for Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are rapidly spreading, life-threatening infections that require emergent surgical intervention with immediate antibiotic initiation. However, there is no consensus regarding duration of antibiotic therapy after source control. We hypothesized that a short course of antibiotic therapy is as effective as a long course of antibiotic therapy after final debridement for NSTI. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to November 2022. Observational studies comparing short (≤7 days) versus long (>7 days) antibiotic duration for NSTI were included. Primary outcome was mortality and secondary outcomes included limb amputation and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Cumulative analysis was performed with Fisher exact test. Meta-analysis was performed using a fixed effects model and heterogeneity was assessed using Higgins I2. Results: A total of 622 titles were screened and four observational studies evaluating 532 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 52 years, 67% were male, 61% had Fournier gangrene. There was no difference in mortality when comparing short to long duration antibiotic agents on both cumulative analysis (5.6% vs. 4.0%; p = 0.51) and meta-analysis (relative risk, 0.9; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-1.0; I2 0; p = 0.19). There was no significant difference in rates of limb amputation (11% vs. 8.5%; p = 0.50) or CDI (20.8% vs. 13.3%; p = 0.14). Conclusions: Short duration antibiotic therapy may be as effective as longer duration antibiotic therapy for NSTI after source control. Further high-quality data such as randomized clinical trials are required to create evidence-based guidelines.

Burn excision within 48 hours portends better outcomes than standard management: A nationwide analysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have debated the optimal time to perform excision and grafting of second- and third-degree burns. The current consensus is that excision should be performed before the sixth hospital day. We hypothesize that patients who undergo excision within 48 hours have better outcomes. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Programs data set was used to identify all patients with at least 10% total body surface area second- and third-degree burns from years 2017 to 2019. Patients with other serious injuries (any Abbreviated Injury Scale, >3), severe inhalational injury, prehospital cardiac arrest, and interhospital transfers were excluded. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision , procedure codes were used to ascertain time of first excision. Patients who underwent first excision within 48 hours of admission (early excision) were compared with those who underwent surgery 48 to 120 hours from admission (standard therapy). Propensity score matching was performed to control for age and total body surface area burned. RESULTS: A total of 2,270 patients (72% male) were included in the analysis. The median age was 37 (23-55) years. Early excision was associated with shorter hospital length of stay (LOS), and intensive care unit LOS. Complications including deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and catheter-associated urinary tract infection were significantly lower with early excision. There was no significant difference in mortality. CONCLUSION: Performance of excision within 48 hours is associated with shorter hospital LOS and fewer complications than standard therapy. We recommend taking patients for operative debridement and temporary or, when feasible, permanent coverage within 48 hours. Prospective trials should be performed to verify the advantages of this treatment strategy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Power of mentorship for civilian and military acute care surgeons: identifying and leveraging opportunities for longitudinal professional development.

Across disciplines, mentorship has been recognized as a key to success. Acute care surgeons, focused on the care of trauma surgery, emergency general surgery and surgical critical care, practice in a wide variety of settings and have unique mentorship needs across all phases of their career. Recognizing the need for robust mentorship and professional development, the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) convened an expert panel entitled 'The Power of Mentorship' at the 81st annual meeting in September 2022 (Chicago, Illinois). This was a collaboration between the AAST Associate Member Council (consisting of surgical resident, fellow and junior faculty members), the AAST Military Liaison Committee, and the AAST Healthcare Economics Committee. Led by two moderators, the panel consisted of five real-life mentor-mentee pairs. They addressed the following realms of mentorship: clinical, research, executive leadership and career development, mentorship through professional societies, and mentorship for military-trained surgeons. Recommendations, as well as pearls and pitfalls, are summarized below.

Firearm legislation: The association between neighboring states and crude death rates.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the impact of interstate differences in firearm laws on state-level firearm mortality. We aim to study the association between neighboring states' firearm legislation and firearm-related crude death rate (CDR). METHODS: The CDC Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System was queried for adult all-intent (accidental, suicide, and homicide) firearm-related CDR among the 50 states from 2012 to 2020. States were divided into five cohorts based on the Giffords Law Center Annual Gun Law Scorecard, and two groups were constructed: Strict (A, B, C) and Lenient (D, F). We examined the effect of (1) a single incongruent neighbor, defined as "Different" if the state is bordered by ≥1 state with a grade score difference >1, and (2) the average grade of all neighboring states, defined as "Different" if the average of all neighboring states resulted in a grade score difference >1. RESULTS: Strict states with similar average neighbors had significantly lower CDR compared with Strict states with different average neighbors (2.98 [1.91-5.06] vs. 3.87 [2.37-5.94], p = 0.02), while Lenient states with similar average neighbors had significantly higher CDR compared with Lenient states with different average neighbors (6.02 [4.56-8.11] vs. 4.7 [3.95-5.35], p = 0.002). Lenient states surrounded by all similar Lenient states had the highest CDR, which was significantly higher than Lenient states with ≥1 different neighbor (6.52 [5.09-8.96] vs. 5.19 [3.85-6.61], p < 0.001). However, Strict states with ≥1 different neighbor did not have higher CDR compared with Strict states surrounded by all similar Strict states (3.39 [2.17-5.35] vs. 3.14 [1.91-5.38], p = 0.5). CONCLUSION: We report a lopsided neighboring effect whereby Lenient states may benefit from at least one Strict neighbor, while Strict states may be adversely affected only when surrounded by mostly Lenient neighbors. These findings may assist policymakers regarding the efficacy of their own state's legislation in the context of incongruent neighboring states. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Improved survival for severely injured patients receiving massive transfusion at US teaching hospitals: A nationwide analysis.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown improved survival for patients treated at American College of Surgeons (ACS)-verified level I trauma centers compared with level II, level III, and undesignated centers. This mortality difference is more pronounced in severely injured patients. However, a survival benefit for severely injured trauma patients has not been established at teaching institutions compared with nonteaching centers. Because massive transfusion (MT) is associated with high mortality, we hypothesize that patients receiving MT have lower mortality at teaching hospitals than at nonteaching hospitals. METHODS: All adult ACS Trauma Quality Improvement Program-eligible patients who underwent MT, defined as >10 U of packed red blood cells in the first 4 hours after arrival, in the 2019 ACS Trauma Quality Programs participant use file were eligible. Patients with severe head injury (head Abbreviated Injury Scale score, ≥3), prehospital cardiac arrest, and interhospital transfers were excluded. Logistic regression models were used to assess the effects of trauma center hospital teaching status on the adjusted odds of 3-hour, 6-hour, and 24-hour mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1,849 patients received MT (81% male; median Injury Severity Score, 26 [18-35]), 72% were admitted to level I trauma centers, and 28% were admitted to level II centers. Overall hospital mortality was 41%; 17% of patients died in 3 hours, 25% in 6 hours, and 33% in 24 hours. Teaching hospitals were associated with decreased 3-hour (odds ratio [OR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.75), 6-hour (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.24-0.56), 24-hour (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.34-0.75), and overall mortality (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-0.98), compared with nonteaching hospitals, controlling for sex, age, heart rate, injury severity, injury mechanism, and trauma center verification level. CONCLUSION: Severely injured patients requiring MT experience significantly lower mortality at teaching hospitals compared with nonteaching hospitals, independently of trauma center verification level. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Complex And Simple Appendicitis: REstrictive or Liberal postoperative Antibiotic eXposure (CASA RELAX) using Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) and Response Adjusted for Duration of Antibiotic Risk (RADAR): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Objectives: After appendectomy for simple or complicated appendicitis, the optimal duration of postoperative antibiotics (postop abx) is unclear and great practice variability exists. We propose to compare restrictive versus liberal postop abx using a hierarchical composite endpoint which includes patient-centered outcomes and accounts for duration of antibiotic exposure. Methods/Design: Participants with simple or complicated appendicitis undergoing appendectomy are randomly assigned to either restricted or liberal strategy. Eligible subjects declining randomization will be recruited to enroll in an observation only cohort. The primary endpoint is an ordinal scale of mutually exclusive clinical outcomes with within-category rankings determined by duration of antibiotic exposure. Subjects in both randomized and observation only cohorts will be analyzed as intention-to-treat, per-protocol, and as-treated. Exploratory Bayesian analyses will be performed. Conclusion: The complex and simple appendicitis: restrictive or liberal postoperative antibiotic exposure multicenter randomized controlled trial will enroll surgical appendectomy patients and seeks to analyze if a strategy of restricted (compared with liberal) postoperative antibiotics results in similar clinical outcomes with the benefit of reduced antibiotic exposure. Trial registration number: NCT05002829.

Outcomes of Restricted versus Liberal Post-Operative Antibiotic Use in Patients Undergoing Appendectomy: A DOOR/RADAR Post Hoc Analysis of the EAST Appendicitis MUSTANG Study.

Background: There is no consensus on the duration of antibiotic use after appendectomy. We hypothesized that restricted antibiotic use is associated with better clinical outcomes. Patients and Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) Multicenter Study of the Treatment of Appendicitis in America-Acute, Perforated, and Gangrenous (MUSTANG) study using the desirability of outcome ranking/response adjusted for duration of antibiotic risk (DOOR/RADAR) framework. Three separate datasets were analyzed based on restricted versus liberal post-operative antibiotic groups: simple appendicitis (no vs. yes); complicated appendicitis, only four days (≤24 hours vs. 4 days); and complicated appendicitis, four or more days (≤24 hours vs. ≥4 days). Patients were assigned to one of seven mutually exclusive DOOR categories RADAR ranked within each category. DOOR/RADAR score pairwise comparisons were performed between all patients. Each patient was assigned either 1, 0, or -1 if they had better, same, or worse outcomes than the other patient in the pair, respectively. The sum of these numbers (cumulative comparison score) was calculated for each patient and the group medians of individual sums were compared by Wilcoxon rank sum. Results: For simple appendicitis, the restricted group had higher median sums than the liberal group (552 [552,552] vs. -1,353 [-1,353, -1,353], p < 0.001). For both complicated appendicitis analyses, the restricted group had higher median sums than the liberal: only 4 (196 [23,196] vs. -121 [-121, -121], p < 0.02) and 4 or more (660 [484,660] vs -169 [-444,181], p < 0.001). Conclusions: Restricted post-operative antibiotic use in patients after appendectomy is a dominant strategy when considering treatment effectiveness and antibiotic exposure.

Appendectomy versus nonoperative management of simple appendicitis: A post hoc analysis of an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study using a hierarchical ordinal scale.

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists about the preferred initial treatment of appendicitis. We sought to compare the two treatments for initial management of simple appendicitis. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis of the Multicenter Study for the Treatment of Appendicitis in America: Acute, Perforated, and Gangrenous database, subjects were divided into appendectomy or nonoperative management (NOM; antibiotics only or percutaneous drainage) cohorts. A novel topic-specific hierarchical ordinal scale was created with eight mutually exclusive categories: mortality, reoperation, other secondary interventions, readmission, emergency department visit, wound complication, surgical site infection, and no complication. Pairwise comparisons of American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Imaging Severity Grade 1 (simple appendicitis) patients were compared using win-lose-tie scoring and the sums of appendectomy/NOM groups were compared. RESULTS: A total 3,591 subjects were included: 3,262 appendectomy and 329 NOM, with significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups. Across 28 sites, the rate of NOM ranged from 0% to 48%, and the loss to follow-up rate was significantly higher for NOM compared with appendectomy (16.5% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.024). In the simple appendicitis hierarchical ordinal scale analysis, 2,319 subjects resulted in 8,714,304 pairwise comparisons; 75% of comparisons resulted in ties. The median (interquartile range) sums for the two groups are as follows: surgical, 400 (400-400), and NOM, 400 (-2,427 to 400) (p < 0.001). A larger proportion of appendectomy subjects (88.1%) had an outcome that was equivalent (or better) than at least half of the subjects compared with NOM subjects (NOM, 70.5%; OR [95% confidence interval], 0.3 [0.2-0.4]). CONCLUSION: In contemporary American practice, appendectomy (compared with NOM) for simple appendicitis is associated with lower odds of developing clinically important unfavorable outcomes in the first year after illness. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Role of Empiric Antifungal Therapy in Patients with Perforated Peptic Ulcers.

Background: It is unclear if the addition of antifungal therapy for perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) leads to improved outcomes. We hypothesized that empiric antifungal therapy is associated with better clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with PPU. Patients and Methods: The 2001-2012 Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-III) database was searched for patients with PPU and the included subjects were divided into two groups depending on receipt of antifungal therapy. Propensity score matching by surgical intervention, mechanical ventilation (MV), and vasopressor administration was then performed and clinically important outcomes were compared. Multiple logistic regression was performed to calculate the odds of a composite end point (defined as "alive, hospital-free, and infection-free at 30 days"). Results: A total of 89 patients with PPU were included, of whom 52 (58%) received empiric antifungal therapy. Propensity score matching resulted in 37 pairs. On logistic regression controlling for surgery, vasopressors, and MV, receipt of antifungal therapy was not associated with higher odds (odds ratio [OR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-4.7; p = 0.4798) of the composite end point. Conclusions: In critically ill patients with perforated peptic ulcer, receipt of antifungal therapy, regardless of surgical intervention, was not associated with improved clinical outcomes. Selection bias is possible and therefore randomized controlled trials are required to confirm/refute causality.