Impact of atrial fibrillation and the clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction from the K-ACTIVE registry.

BACKGROUND: The clinical incidence and impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) in Japanese acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients is not fully understood. METHODS: To elucidate the clinical incidence and impact of AF on in-hospital mortality in AMI patients, we analyzed a Japanese observational prospective multicenter registry of acute myocardial infarction (K-ACTIVE: Kanagawa ACuTe cardIoVascular rEgistry), which spans 2015 to 2019. A major adverse cardiac event (MACE) was defined as cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and non-fatal stroke. For assessing bleeding events, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 was used. MACE plus BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding were considered as composite events. The clinical outcomes were followed for 1 year. RESULTS: The total of 5059 patients included 531 patients with AF (10.5%) and 4528 patients with sinus rhythm (SR; 89.5%). AF patients were significantly older and tended to have more comorbidities than SR patients. Oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC) was used in 44% of AF patients while single antiplatelet therapy was selected for 52% of patients with OAC. Crude in-hospital mortality was significantly greater in AF patients than in SR patients (10.4%, 5.0%, respectively, p < 0.01). The multivariate analysis was adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, hemodialysis, smoking, previous MI, body mass index, Killip classification, out of hospital cardiac arrest, and OAC. In-hospital mortality was still significantly greater in AF patients than in SR patients in the logistic regression analysis [adjusted odds ratio 2.02 (1.31-3.14)]. AF was an independent risk factor for MACE and composite events in the Cox proportional hazards model [adjusted risk ratio (ARR) 1.91 (1.36-2.69), p < 0.01; ARR 1.72 (1.25-2.36), p < 0.01]. In contrast, AF was not an independent risk factor for bleeding [ARR 1.71 (0.79-3.71), p = 0.18]. CONCLUSION: In Japanese AMI patients, AF was often observed and was associated with worse MACE but not worse bleeding.

Sex-Related Differences in In-Hospital Mortality in Japanese ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Presenting to Hospital in the 24 Hours After Symptom Onset　- Results From K-ACTIVE.

Background: Despite the drastic advances in clinical care for patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), female STEMI patients have higher in-hospital mortality rates than male patients. This study assessed the influence of sex on in-hospital mortality in STEMI patients in Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan. Methods and Results: From October 2015 to June 2018, 2,491 consecutive STEMI patients (23.9% female) who presented to hospital in the 24 h after symptom onset were analyzed. The female patients were 9 years older and less frequently had diabetes, smoking and prior MI than male patients. Pre-hospital managements, including prehospital 12-lead electrocardiography, and symptom-to-door time were similar between the sexes. A door-to-device time ≤90 min was achieved in 61.3% of female cases and in 65.0% of male cases (P=0.13). Reperfusion therapy was provided to 94.6% of female and 97.6% of male patients (P<0.001). In-hospital mortality rate was not significantly different between female and male patients (6.6% vs. 7.8%, P=0.37). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, female sex itself was not associated with in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.52; 95% CI: 0.67-3.47, P=0.32). Conclusions: There was no sex discrepancy in the in-hospital mortality of STEMI patients in this study. Guideline-based treatment, such as advanced pre-hospital management and a high use of reperfusion therapy might have attenuated the sex-related differences in the in-hospital mortality.

Radial Versus Femoral Approach for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: MACE Outcomes at Long-Term Follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the main outcomes of radial versus femoral access at long-term follow-up. BACKGROUND: Little is known about the long-term major cardiovascular events and bleeding complications of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with radial vs femoral approach. METHODS: A total of 1107 patients from the CENTURY II trial were included. To minimize baseline differences between radial and femoral groups, we applied propensity-score matching for this comparison. RESULTS: In this multicenter study, the radial approach was used in 73.4% of patients. After propensity-score matching, baseline and procedural characteristics were comparable between both groups. Procedural success was high and similar in radial and femoral approaches (98.2% vs 97.5%; P=.47) while radial access was associated with a shorter hospital stay (1.69 ± 1.92 days vs 2.08 ± 1.98 days; P<.01). The short-term bleeding and vascular complication rates were significantly lower in the radial group (1.7% vs 6.2% [P<.001 in-hospital] and 2.7% vs 9.6% [P<.001 at 1-month follow-up]). At 3-year follow-up, radial access was associated with lower rates of all-cause mortality (3.9 vs 6.9%; P=.04) and cardiovascular death (2.1 vs 4.9%; P=.02). The composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and revascularization showed no differences between groups (18.2 vs 21.1%; P=.29). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the femoral approach, the radial approach is associated with significantly lower long-term all-cause mortality rate as well as lower in-hospital and short-term bleeding rates. These results suggest additional long-term benefits of radial access for PCI, but should be interpreted within the context of the current study and further verified in future studies.

Long Coronary Lesions Treated With Thin Strut Bioresorbable Polymer Drug Eluting Stent: Experience From Multicentre Randomized CENTURY II Study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess performance of new, bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES), in patients with long coronary lesions (LL) and to compare it to permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent (PP-EES). BACKGROUND: LL have been associated with worse clinical outcomes in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The impact of lesion length on the outcomes of drug eluting stent (DES) implantations is not as clear. METHODS: In the frame of a randomized, multicentre CENTURY II study, out of 1119 patients enrolled, 182 patients had LL (defined as ≥25 mm), and were assigned randomly to treatment with BP-SES (101) or PP-EES (81). Primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF, composite of cardiac death, target vessel related myocardial infarction [MI], and target lesion revascularization [TLR]) at 9 months. All data were 100% monitored and adverse events were adjudicated by an independent clinical event committee. RESULTS: The baseline patient and lesion characteristics were similar in the 2 study arms. At 9-months, the rates of cardiac death (2.0% vs 1.2%; P = 0.70), MI (3.0% vs 4.9%; P = 0.49) and clinically driven TLR (2.0% vs 3.7%; P = 0.48) and TLF (6.9% vs 8.6%; P = 0.67) were similar for BP-SES and PP-EES, respectively. There was no stent thrombosis (ST) in BP-SES group up to 9 months, while 1 case (1.2%) of ST was recorded in PP-EES group (P = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LL showed similar clinical outcomes when treated with Ultimaster BP-SES and Xience PP-EES.