A primer on the restorative therapies for erectile dysfunction: a narrative review.

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common condition that affects millions worldwide. Patients and urologists alike are seeking alternative therapies that can provide long-lasting results in the treatment of ED. This review provides a comprehensive overview of restorative treatments available for ED, such as platelet-rich plasma, stem cell therapy, and shockwave therapy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this narrative review is to provide a primer for urologists and general practitioners on the basics of implementing ED restorative therapies in their practice. METHODS: The PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases were searched for articles in the English language through August 31, 2023, that included key terms such as "erectile dysfunction," "restorative therapy," "shockwave therapy," "platelet-rich plasma," "stem cell therapy," and "stromal vascular fraction." Reference lists of selected studies were manually reviewed to find articles not identified by the initial database search. RESULTS: Shockwave therapy has demonstrated effectiveness in treating ED, with devices like the Medispec ED1000 and Storz Duolith showing statistically significant improvements in patient scores for International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-Erectile Function scores in clinical trials. In reported studies of platelet-rich plasma injections, a substantial percentage of patients reached a minimal clinically important difference in the IIEF-Erectile Function scale after treatment. Studies of ED treatment with stem cell therapy, while limited and with small sample sizes, have demonstrated encouraging improvements in patient scores for the abridged 5-item version of the IIEF after treatment. CONCLUSION: Shockwave, platelet-rich plasma, and stem cell therapies are important, novel, noninvasive restorative treatments for ED that can provide relief for patients wishing to avoid a more invasive approach. While these therapies have shown promising results in clinical trials, more research is required to establish them as standardized and efficacious options in the management of ED.

Return to Play After Hook of Hamate Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

In athletes, a hook of hamate fracture is concerning in terms of time to return to sport and effect on performance upon return. This study aims to analyze the treatment of hook of hamate fractures in athletes to determine their rates of return to play, timelines of recovery, and performance level upon return to play. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to perform this analysis. The PubMed database was queried to perform the literature search. Data were pooled and analyzed. P values <.05 were considered significant. Data were analyzed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software to determine heterogeneity. Twenty studies with 823 patients sustaining hook of hamate fractures that reported any competitive level of play were included in the analysis. Of the 823 patients, 778 (94.5%) were able to return to play with 91.2% (506/555) of patients demonstrating similar or improved performance. The mean time to return to play was 45 days (range: 21-168 days). Treatment included surgical excision for 787 patients (95.6%), open reduction and internal fixation for 18 patients (2.2%), stress reduction/casting for 13 patients (1.6%), and loss to follow-up or surgery refusal for 5 patients (0.6%). A very high number of athletes return to play following a hook of hamate fracture at the same or improved level of performance. In our study, the majority of injuries were treated with surgical excision of the fractured hook of hamate fragment. Most athletes returned to their sport at an average of 45 days.

The influence of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on post-operative outcomes in microsurgery patients.

BACKGROUND: The healthcare industry's efforts to immunize the global community against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been unprecedented. Given the fast-tracking of the novel vaccine, its short- and long-term medical implications remain largely to-be-determined in most patient populations. This study aims to analyze 90-day post-operative outcomes in microsurgical patients, who have received or not received SARS-CoV-2-vaccination, using a continuously updated federated electronic medical record network (TriNetX Inc, Cambridge, MA). METHODS: After screening 70 million de-identified records, 16,799 microsurgery patients aged 18-99 meeting medical coding criteria were allocated into two cohorts. Cohort One received SARS-CoV-2-vaccination prior to undergoing microsurgery whereas Cohort Two did not. Two equally sized cohorts, totaling 818 patients were created after propensity score matching for characteristics including: age, race, ethnicity, smoking, hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and history of SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Postoperative outcomes within 30-, 60-, and 90-days of microsurgery were analyzed. RESULTS: Patients who were SARS-CoV-2-immunized experienced significantly lower (p < .01) surgical site infections (Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR)[95%CI]) = (3.79%-5.36% [0.84-8.54]) ICU admission (9.47%-9.82%[5.45-13.88]), generalized infections (7.68%-9.92%[3.15-14.64]), and hospitalizations (28.48%-32.57%[20.99-40.13]) within 30-, 60-, and 90-days of microsurgery. Additionally, SARS-CoV-2-vaccinated patients also experienced significantly less flap failure (2.49%[0.97-4.02]) and death (2.46%[0.96-3.97]) within 30- and 60-days post-operatively. CONCLUSION: Our analysis examines the potential protective effect of SARS-CoV-2-vaccination in microsurgical patients. Limitations include the retrospective nature of this analysis and the inherent reliance on medical coding. Future prospective studies are warranted to better understand if in fact pre-operative SARS-CoV-2-vaccination has the potential to protect against post-operative microsurgery outcomes.

Current Treatment Modalities Targeting Tumor Microenvironment in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is responsible for significant cancer-related morbidity and mortality following local treatment failure in men. The initial stages of PCa are typically managed with a combination of surgical resection and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Unfortunately, a significant proportion of PCa continues to progress despite being at castrate levels of testosterone (<50 ng/dl), at which point it is coined castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). In recent years, many novel therapeutics and drug combinations have been created for CRPC patients. These include immune checkpoint inhibitors, chemokine receptor antagonists, steroidogenic enzyme inhibition, and novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors as well as combinations of drugs. The selection of the most appropriate therapy depends on several factors like stage of the disease, age of the patient, metastasis, functional status, and response towards previous therapies. Here, we review the current state of the literature regarding treatment modalities, focusing on the treatment recommendations per the American Urological Association (AUA), recent clinical trials, and their limitations. An accurate and reliable overview of the strengths and limitations of PCa therapeutics could also allow personalized therapeutic interventions against PCa.

Laboratory and clinical management of leukocytospermia and hematospermia: a review.

Leukocytospermia and hematospermia are defined as the presence of abnormally high white blood cell and red blood cell concentration in the semen, respectively. Numerous etiologies and various implications on fertility have been identified. In a small proportion of men, the presence of white blood cells or red blood cells can adversely affect sperm quality by the production of reactive oxygen species. Several methods have been used to assess the presence of white blood cells and red blood cells in samples, such as identification of round cells, immunohistochemical staining using monoclonal antibodies, the Endtz test, the peroxidase test, and flow cytometry or microscopy. In addition, techniques have been identified to separate sperm samples from white blood cells and red blood cells for cryopreservation to improve outcomes in assisted reproductive technology. In this review, laboratory and clinical management of leukocytospermia and hematospermia are discussed. Currently available diagnostic methods and treatment options are outlined, and available optimal cryopreservation techniques for samples with white blood cells or red blood cells are summarized.