Characterizing the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Most Important to Patients, Surgeons, and the General Population.

Understanding rhinoplasty characteristics important to patients, physicians, and society is essential for evaluating outcomes and designing optimal treatment plans. The authors aimed to elucidate specific rhinoplasty-related outcomes that are most important to patients, surgeons, and the general population. A cross-sectional survey comprising 11 rhinoplasty-specific characteristics, was distributed to patients, facial plastic surgeons, and the general population. Adult patients presenting for rhinoplasty consideration or follow-up after undergoing rhinoplasty were recruited. Characteristics rankings were compared between the 3 respondent groups using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (ρ). Responses from 150 surgeons, 111 patients, and 102 lay individuals from the general population were included for analysis. When ranking rhinoplasty-specific characteristics in order of importance, patients and the general population ranked "ability to breathe through nose while awake" first and "overall appearance of nose" as second. Surgeons ranked "overall appearance of nose" first and "ability to breathe through nose while awake" second. There were strong correlations between patients' and surgeons' rankings (Spearman's ρ=0.836, P =0.002), between patients' and the general population's rankings (Spearman's ρ=0.773, P =0.007), and between surgeons' and the general population's rankings (Spearman's ρ=0.782, P =0.006). Our results highlight a significant correlation between characteristics of the "ideal" nose as determined by patients, surgeons, and the general population.

Facial Rejuvenation in a Patient With Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis-Treatment Protocol for Compromised Skin Flap.

Facial rejuvenation outcomes have not been well studied in patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GP)-formerly Wegener granulomatosis. This report highlights a case of a 49-year-old female with a history of GP, presenting with facial aging and functional nasal concerns. The patient underwent facial rejuvenation and nasal reconstruction procedures, including primary open functional rhinoplasty, septal perforation repair with Alloderm, deep-plane rhytidectomy, platysmaplasty, nanofat grafting, and fractionated erbium laser to the face (sparing the nose and peri-incisional areas). Despite a routine operation, postoperative course was complicated by wound healing and vascular congestion issues related to her underlying autoimmune disease. This case highlights the risks associated with postsurgical healing in patients with GP undergoing esthetic surgery. To the best of our knowledge, this report is the first to discuss management considerations in a patient with GP undergoing facial rejuvenation surgery.

Rhinoplasty for Thick-Skinned Noses: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review is to critically examine the literature published on rhinoplasties in thick-skinned patients to determine how to maximize outcomes in these patients. METHODS: The PubMEd and Google Scholar databases were searched for clinical studies related to nasal skin thickness as it relates to rhinoplasty surgery and surgical outcomes. RESULTS: We performed a review of the current body of literature and identified twenty-eight articles that met our inclusion criteria for final analysis. Three articles were level of evidence 1 by CEBM guidelines, while the majority were level 4 (39%) and 5 (32%). Most papers were published in the USA (35%), followed by Saudi Arabia (14%). Here, we outline the current body of literature regarding thick-skinned noses in rhinoplasty surgery and identify optimization strategies. CONCLUSION: We highlight a management scheme subdivided into preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative timepoints for the comprehensive management of this patient population. Optimal results rely on an individualized medical and surgical treatment plan and regimen to achieve desired and realistic results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Utilization of Leech Therapy after Rhinoplasty.

BACKGROUND: The use of medicinal leeches in modern reconstructive surgery is well-described. Leech therapy after rhinoplasty has not been previously well-characterized. METHODS: The medical records of all patients who underwent open rhinoplasty by a single surgeon over a 4-year period were reviewed. Patient demographics, including age, sex, medical comorbidities, number of previous rhinoplasty surgeries, time to utilization of leech therapy, adjunct therapies used, resolution of skin changes, and smoking status, were recorded. Operative reports were reviewed for pertinent information, including number of tip grafts used, graft materials used, and placement of septal extension grafts or "unicorn" grafts. RESULTS: Between April of 2016 and March of 2020, 545 patients underwent rhinoplasty performed by the senior author (P.S.N.). Of these patients, 39 (7.2 percent) underwent leech therapy postoperatively. The mean age of included patients was 47.4 years. Of the patients who required leech therapy, 34 (87.2 percent) had undergone revision rhinoplasty. The mean number of previous rhinoplasties was 3.4. The mean number of tip grafts used was 2.6. Thirty-three patients (84.6 percent) had either a traditional septal extension graft or unicorn graft placed. Nine patients (23.1 percent) were former smokers. Complete resolution of skin color changes was seen in 38 patients (97.4 percent). There were no major complications after leech therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Leech therapy is a useful tool for the rhinoplasty surgeon, particularly in the setting of complex revision rhinoplasty, in patients who have undergone multiple previous nasal surgical procedures, or in patients who require significant cartilage grafting to reconstruct the nasal tip or lengthen the nose. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Outcomes of a Treatment Protocol for Compromised Nasal Skin in Primary and Revision Open Rhinoplasty.

Importance: This is the first study to review the incidence of nasal skin compromise after open rhinoplasty surgery and outcomes of treatment. Objectives: To determine whether risk of skin compromise after open rhinoplasty surgery can be predicted and whether our treatment protocol led to acceptable outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a retrospective chart review of the senior author's private patients. In total, 384 rhinoplasty cases were reviewed and all cases with signs of vascular compromise requiring treatment were analyzed. Main Outcomes and Measures: Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate characteristics of patients who developed intra- and postoperative skin compromise, and unpaired two-tailed t-test was used to compare the characteristics of patients with and without compromised nasal skin when possible. Overall satisfaction results and complications in the skin compromise group were reported. Results: A total of 384 open rhinoplasties were performed by the senior author between October 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018. Of them, 109 were primary rhinoplasties and 275 were revision rhinoplasties. Of the 384 rhinoplasties, 27 (7%) had skin compromise leading to unplanned postoperative treatment. Two of the patients in the skin compromise group underwent primary surgeries (7.4%) and 25 underwent revision procedures (92.6%). Advanced age (p < 0.0001), prior or current history of smoking (p = 0.027), and greater number of prior rhinoplasty surgeries (p = 0.0002) were significantly correlated with risk of skin compromise. The average time to last follow-up in the skin compromise group was 392 days (range 15-1057 days). At their last follow-up, 12 patients had complete resolution of all signs of nasal skin compromise with no further treatment required (44.4%). The revision rate for patients experiencing skin compromise was 22.2%. One patient underwent revision surgery directly related to a complication of skin compromise and one is considering revision directly related to skin breakdown. Conclusions and Relevance: The rate of skin compromise after open rhinoplasty is low. Older patients and patients with more prior rhinoplasty surgeries may be at increased risk. Prompt treatment of compromised nasal blood supply after rhinoplasty surgery can salvage skin in most patients.

Treatment Protocol for Compromised Nasal Skin.

As the number of patients seeking surgical and nonsurgical rhinoplasty continues to increase, the risk of nasal skin compromise after surgery also has risen. Vascular insult to the nasal skin envelope can lead to permanent disfigurement that is nearly impossible to correct. Tissue loss often requires major reconstruction that yields suboptimal cosmetic results. This article discusses prevention, early recognition, and effective treatment that aim to mitigate skin necrosis and the resulting soft tissue destruction.

The More the Merrier? Should Antibiotics be Used for Rhinoplasty and Septorhinoplasty?-A Review.

BACKGROUND: With antimicrobial resistance a global threat, optimizing antibiotic usage across the surgical continuum is vital. The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation recently published the first guidelines addressing management in rhinoplasty. The authors reviewed pertinent literature on the role of systemic antibiotics in rhinoplasty and septorhinoplasty. METHODS: The authors performed a MEDLINE search through PubMed using the key terms rhinoplasty, septorhinoplasty, infection, antimicrobials, and antibiotics. RESULTS: Ten studies met criteria. Studies evaluating antibiotics perioperatively showed similar infection and/or bacteremia rates (0-13.3%) in those receiving or not receiving antibiotics. No patients experienced significant local/systemic infections regardless of antibiotic use. In the 3 studies evaluating antibiotics postoperatively, antibiotics decreased the infection rate from 27% to 8% in complex revision cases. In a study evaluating postoperative antibiotics in noncomplex cases, there were no significant differences in infection rates between those receiving only a preoperative dose and those receiving preoperative in addition to 7 days of postoperative antibiotics, with the latter experiencing higher rates of antibiotic-related adverse events and costs. CONCLUSIONS: Peri- and postoperative antibiotics in noncomplex rhinoplasty and septorhinoplasty are not beneficial in decreasing infection risk. Antibiotics, with a first-generation cephalosporin such as cefazolin (non-ß-lactam, such as clindamycin, if ß-lactam allergy), should be considered in patients with comorbidities/undergoing complex surgery. If perioperative antibiotics are used, antibiotics should be administered within 1 hour of incision and discontinued within 24 hours of the operation. Further research is warranted to evaluate the optimal duration of postoperative antibiotics in complex cases.

Correction of the Lower Face and Neck.

Rejuvenation of the lower face and neck strives to reverse signs of aging while optimizing the patient's natural anatomy. Common features of an aesthetically pleasing lower face include a well-defined and appropriately balanced mandible and an acute cervicomental angle. Correction of the aging lower face and neck is accomplished through multiple surgical interventions, performed either alone or in combination. Determination of appropriate procedures is based on individual anatomic pathology. Intimate knowledge of facial anatomy and the complexity of the aging process is paramount to achieve a natural and aesthetic result. Thorough patient evaluation and counseling should precede any intervention. Specifically, the surgeon should be cognizant of the patient's skeletal structure, soft tissue distribution, muscular anatomy, and skin quality. Appropriate postoperative care and management of complications are vital to success.

Use of 5-Fluorouracil for Management of the Thick-Skinned Nose.

Patients with a thick nasal skin and soft tissue envelope can have unpredictable results and irregular scarring after rhinoplasty surgery. These patients typically have sebaceous tissue over the nasal tip and are particularly susceptible to soft tissue polly beak formation and excess scar tissue in the radix, tip, and septum. Targeted injections of 5-fluorouracil alone or mixed with low concentrations of steroid can be useful to prevent and treat excess postoperative scar tissue deposition. Ideally, four to six injections are performed every 1 to 4 weeks beginning 1 week postoperatively. The injections are most beneficial when performed within the first 3 months after surgery. Even a single injection may improve outcomes with minimal side effects.

Rhinoplasty in the African American Patient: Anatomic Considerations and Technical Pearls.

There are several anatomic considerations as well as variations in patients of African heritage. The goal of improvement in aesthetics and functionality must be in balance with racial preservation. Preoperative counseling must discuss patient expectations and surgical limitations based on patients' skin and cartilage. Dorsal augmentation, increased tip projection, and rotation are often needed. Understanding the thick, sebaceous skin often seen in African Americans assists in postoperative management of swelling.

Avoiding and managing complications in the periorbital area and midface.

The eyes play a central role in the perception of facial beauty. The goal of periorbital rejuvenation surgery is to restore youthful proportions and focus attention on the eyes. Blepharoplasty is the third most common cosmetic procedure performed today. Because of the attention placed on the periorbital region, preventing and managing complications is important. Obtaining a thorough preoperative history and physical examination can significantly reduce the incidence of many of the complications. This article focuses on the preoperative evaluation as it relates to preventable complications, followed by common intraoperative and postoperative complications and their management.

Microbiology and antibiotic prophylaxis in rhinoplasty: a review of 363 consecutive cases.

IMPORTANCE: A practical technique for reducing infectious complications from rhinoplasty would represent an important surgical advance. OBJECTIVES: To describe the microbial flora of patients undergoing septorhinoplasty and to evaluate the role of preoperative and postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a retrospective medical record review of 363 consecutive adult patients who underwent preoperative nasal swab testing and rhinoplasty or septorhinoplasty in a single private practice: 279 women (76.9%) and 84 men (23.1%). The average patient age was 35.9 years (age range, 17-70 years). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Identification of endogenous nasal flora and pathogenic bacteria treated with culture-directed antibiotics; evaluation of comorbidities, perioperative infections, and antibiotic treatments. RESULTS: A total of 174 patients (47.9%) underwent primary rhinoplasty, and 189 (52%) underwent revision rhinoplasty. On preoperative nasal culture, 78.2% of patients had normal flora; 10.7% had Staphylococcus aureus; and 0.28% had methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA). In 7.4% of patients, fecal coliforms including Escherichia coli, Enterobacter species, and Citrobacter species were found. Age, sex, smoking, the use of oral contraceptives, or the presence of seasonal allergies did not significantly change the nasal flora or the postoperative infection rate. Patients with adult acne were found to have an increased incidence of colonization with fecal coliforms (43.8%; P < .001). Patients with diabetes were found to have an increased incidence of colonization with S aureus (66.7%; P = .002). The overall infection rate was 3.0% (11 of 363 patients), with 4.0% (7 of 174 patients) seen in primary septorhinoplasties and 2.1% (4 of 189 patients) seen in revision cases. Coliforms accounted for 5 cases (45.5%) of postoperative infections, while S aureus was responsible for 4 cases (36.4%), including 1 case of MRSA. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of this study suggest that risk factors alone may not reliably predict the subset of patients in whom antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated. Knowledge of the endogenous nasal flora and the microbiology of common pathogens in patients undergoing septorhinoplasty will help to further reduce the incidence of infectious complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Rhinoplasty and bony vault complications.

Complications of bony nasal vault surgery can be avoided with a thorough preoperative assessment of the nasal anatomy and meticulous surgical technique. When complications arise, it is imperative to identify the irregularity and undertake the corrective measures. This article highlights possible complications of bony nasal vault surgery and their etiologies, appearances, and management.

Asian rhinoplasty.

Asian rhinoplasty is one of the most challenging ethnic rhinoplasties that plastic surgeons perform because of the thick skin and soft-tissue envelope. There are three goals: pleasing the patient, achieving an aesthetically appealing result, and preserving a natural look. Of these goals, the most arduous is to satisfy the patient, as many patients have unrealistic goals and may desire an extremely narrow Western nose. Furthermore, patients may bring in celebrity or model photographs and expect that outcome, even though it may not be suitable for their face or appear over-resected and pinched. The surgeon's most important task is to attempt to persuade the patient that this result is nonfunctional, esthetically unfit, and difficult to achieve with their skin. For ethnic surgery, a clear and thorough grasp of nasal anatomy, function, and surgical techniques is paramount. An extensive preoperative discussion, including expectations, outcomes, and a detailed list of potential complications with the patient can prevent physician-patient miscommunication. Before surgery, it is essential to review the office examination, previous operative summary, photographs, nasal analysis sheet, problem list, and plan before proceeding with the surgical treatment.

Evolution in techniques for endoscopic brow lift with deep temporal fixation only and lower blepharoplasty-transconjunctival fat repositioning.

As we become more confident with our surgical skills following our fellowship training, some of our approaches and techniques will be modified or changed. My primary evolutionary change involves procedures of the upper third of the face, primarily the brow lift and treatment of lower eyelid fat techniques. Traditional methods of forehead and brow rejuvenation, such as coronal, pretrichal, and direct brow lifts, have provided facial plastic surgeons with effective brow elevation for many years. In the past decade, the endoscopic brow lift has rapidly become accepted as part of the surgical armamentarium and is frequently the technique of choice. In general, the temporal dissection, temporal fixation, forehead subperiosteal or subgaleal dissection with release, and treatment to the brow depressor musculature have been standardized. Methods of bony fixation remain a controversial topic as there are numerous methods. We advocate deep temporal fixation only without bone fixation to achieve effective, long-term brow elevation. Traditionally, lower eyelid herniated fat is removed, which may cause a sunken or hollow lid appearance, especially in patients with a tear trough deformity (nasojugal groove). Lower eyelid transconjunctival fat repositioning, defined as the subperiosteal repositioning of the medial and central lower eyelid herniated orbital fat into the nasojugal fold, may prevent the surgical, hollow lower eyelid appearance while treating the herniated fat. Fat repositioning may be combined with an endoscopic subperiosteal midface-lift, transcutaneous skin pinch, and transconjunctival orbicularis oculi excision. This technique offers a powerful tool in the surgical armamentarium of the facial plastic surgeon.