A comparison of two gutta-percha obturation techniques to replicate canal irregularities in a split-tooth model.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare a modified injectable gutta-percha (MIGP) obturation technique with continuous wave technique (CWT) for the ability to fill the root canal system (RCS) and replicate artificially created intracanal defects at the apical third, using a split-tooth model. STUDY DESIGN: A maxillary canine was use to build a split-tooth model. The root canal was cleaned and shaped using crown-down technique with rotary files to size #40 at the apex. Intracanal defects were created in the dentin of the root canal walls with a half-round bur at the apical third. The canal was obturated 48 times with gutta-percha and sealer. Twenty-four obturations were performed for each technique, MIGP and CWT. After each obturation, the model was separated in 2 halves; buccal and lingual. Each obturation was examined and photographed under operating microscope at ×5 magnification. The images were blindly evaluated by 2 endodontists for the length of gutta-percha fill, ability to fill the RCS, presence of voids, and replication of the canal defects. RESULTS: Results were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test and showed statistical difference between the 2 groups in the quality of the obturation (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The MIGP technique appeared to replicate the canal defects at the apical third better than CWT, with fewer voids in between the canal walls and the gutta-percha mass.

A comparative evaluation of the sealing ability of 2 root-end filling materials: an in vitro leakage study using Enterococcus faecalis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sealing ability of EndoSequence Bioceramic Root-end Repair (BCRR) material when compared with white mineral trioxide aggregate (WMTA). STUDY DESIGN: Forty single-rooted teeth were instrumented, obturated with gutta-percha, root-end resected, and retrofilled with 2 different materials: white ProRoot MTA (WMTA) (n = 15) and BCRR (n = 15). Unfilled specimens (n = 10) received no retrofill and were used as controls. All groups received E. faecalis in a created reservoir coronal to the root filling and the presence of microleakage was evaluated by counting the colony-forming units from each specimen. The results were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in leakage between the 2 experimental groups, but there was a significant difference with the control (P ≤ .05). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that BCRR is equivalent in sealing ability to WMTA when used as root-end filling material in vitro.