Highly cross-linked polyethylene decreases the rate of revision of total hip arthroplasty compared with conventional polyethylene at 13 years' follow-up.

AIMS: The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term results of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young patients using either a conventional (CPE) or a highly cross-linked (HXLPE) polyethylene liner in terms of functional outcome, incidence of osteolysis, radiological wear and rate of revision. METHODS: We included all patients between the ages of 45 and 65 years who, between January 2000 and December 2001, had undergone a primary THA for osteoarthritis at our hospital using a CPE or HXLPE acetabular liner and a 28 mm cobalt-chrome femoral head. From a total of 160 patients, 158 (177 hips) were available for review (CPE 89; XLPE 88). The mean age, body mass index (BMI) and follow-up in each group were: CPE: 56.8 years (46 to 65); 30.7 kg/m(2) (19 to 58); 13.2 years (2.1 to 14.7) and HXLPE: 55.6 years (45 to 65); BMI: 30 kg/m(2) (18 to 51); 13.1 years (5.7 to 14.4). RESULTS: The mean Harris hip score (HHS) at final follow-up was 89.3 for the CPE group and 90.9 for the HXLPE group (p = 0.078). Osteolysis was present around 15 acetabular (17%) and 16 femoral (18%) components in the CPE hips compared with none (0%) in the HXLPE hips. The mean radiological linear wear of the CPE liners was 0.11 mm/year compared with 0.035 mm/year for the HXLPE liners (p = 0.006). The cumulative implant survival, with revision for polyethylene wear as the endpoint, was 86% (95% confidence interval 78 to 94) in the CPE group and 100% in the HXLPE group at 13 years (numbers at risk at 13 years - CPE: 65, XLPE: 61). DISCUSSION: This study shows that HXLPE liners are associated with significantly less osteolysis and a lower rate of revision THA than CPE liners at long-term follow-up. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: The findings of this study highlight the clinical benefits of using HXLPE liners in THA and support the routine use of the material in order to improve implant longevity and to decrease the number of patients needing revision for aseptic osteolysis.

Hip arthroscopy in the setting of hip arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Hip arthroscopy has traditionally been viewed as a hip preservation procedure performed in patients with native joint pathology. However, as the list of indications for arthroscopic hip intervention grows, further advances are expanding its use. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine existing evidence supporting the use of hip arthroscopy in the setting of hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Using predetermined inclusion criteria, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PubMed were searched for articles addressing arthroscopic hip surgery performed in hips containing joint replacement arthroplasties. Inclusion criteria limited our search to human and English language studies addressing articles where clear surgical indications are described. Article screening was conducted in duplicate. RESULTS: Seven-hundred and forty-three studies were retrieved before duplicate screening, and 18 satisfied inclusion criteria. Eleven case series, six case reports and one prospective cohort study are included. In total, 171 patients underwent hip arthroscopy following previous arthroplasty. Indications for arthroscopy included iliopsoas tendinopathy (35.8%), symptomatic hips with no clear diagnosis despite extensive investigation (24.6%), periprosthetic infection (6.4%) and intra-articular loose bodies (3.5%). Almost all patients who underwent hip arthroscopy experienced positive outcomes from the procedure. CONCLUSION: Hip arthroscopy after hip arthroplasty is supported by our systematic review for a variety of indications. Hip arthroscopy can be a safe and effective method of treating hip arthroplasty patients with iliopsoas tendinopathy. Hip arthroscopy also has utility in patients with symptomatic hip arthroplasty despite exhaustion of other diagnostic avenues. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: A systematic review of level IV studies.

Metal ion levels after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a five-year, prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has requested post-market surveillance data, including data on metal ion levels, regarding metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. We performed a prospective, randomized study of metal ion levels in erythrocytes, serum, and whole blood at five years after 28 and 36-mm metal-on-metal and 28-mm metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: One hundred and five enrolled patients were randomized equally to the three bearing surface options and were blinded with regard to their treatment group. Metal ion measurements and clinical evaluations were performed at regular intervals. RESULTS: Cobalt and chromium ion levels in all blood sample types at the five-year time point were significantly lower in the metal-on-polyethylene group than in each of the two metal-on-metal groups (p < 0.001) with the exception of chromium in erythrocytes (p = 0.194). Cobalt in serum (p = 0.029) and erythrocytes (p = 0.002) showed significant increases from two to five years in the 36-mm metal-on-metal group; similar increases were not seen in the 28-mm metal-on-metal group. At five years, five patients in the 36-mm metal-on-metal group and none in the 28-mm metal-on-metal group had cobalt or chromium levels of >7 ppb. Correlations among levels in serum, erythrocyte, and whole blood were stronger for cobalt than for chromium. One patient in the 36-mm metal-on-metal group underwent revision because of an adverse local tissue reaction. CONCLUSIONS: The 36-mm metal-on-metal bearing underperformed the 28-mm metal-on-metal bearing with respect to metal ion levels. The authors are closely following all patients treated with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

Results of the PeRception of femOroaCetabular impingEment by Surgeons Survey (PROCESS).

PURPOSE: Currently, there is a lack of high-level evidence addressing the variety of treatment options available for patients diagnosed with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). The objective was to determine the current state of practice for FAI in Canada. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed and pretested to address the current state of knowledge among orthopaedic surgeons regarding FAI treatment using a focus group of experts, reviewing prior surveys, and reviewing online guidelines addressing surgical interventions for FAI. The membership of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association (COA) was surveyed through email and mail in both French and English. RESULTS: Two hundred and two surveys were obtained (20 % response rate), of which 74.3 % of respondents manage patients under age 40 with hip pain. Most surgeons (62 %) considered failure of non-operative management as the most important indication for the surgical management of FAI, usually by treating both bony and soft tissue damage (54.4 %). The majority of surgeons were unsure of the existence of evidence supporting the best clinical test for FAI, the use of a diagnostic intra-articular injection for diagnosis of FAI, and for non-operative management of FAI. One in four respondents supported a sham surgery (24.8 %) control arm for a trial evaluating the impact of surgical intervention on FAI. CONCLUSIONS: This survey elucidates areas of research for future studies relevant to FAI and highlights controversial areas of treatment. The results suggest that the current management of FAI by members of the COA is limited by a lack of awareness of high-level evidence.

Does morbid obesity affect the outcome of total hip replacement?: an analysis of 3290 THRs.

We evaluated the outcome of primary total hip replacement (THR) in 3290 patients with the primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis at a minimum follow-up of two years. They were stratified into categories of body mass index (BMI) based on the World Health Organisation classification of obesity. Statistical analysis was carried out to determine if there was a difference in the post-operative Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index, the Harris hip score and the Short-Form-12 outcome based on the BMI. While the pre- and post-operative scores were lower for the group classified as morbidly obese, the overall change in outcome scores suggested an equal if not greater improvement compared with the non-morbidly obese patients. The overall survivorship and rate of complications were similar in the BMI groups although there was a slightly higher rate of revision for sepsis in the morbidly obese group. Morbid obesity does not affect the post-operative outcome after THR, with the possible exception of a marginally increased rate of infection. Therefore withholding surgery based on the BMI is not justified.

Randomised controlled trial comparing early migration of two collarless polished cemented stems using radiostereometric analysis.

This was a safety study where the hypothesis was that the newer-design CPCS femoral stem would demonstrate similar early clinical results and micromovement to the well-established Exeter stem. Both are collarless, tapered, polished cemented stems, the only difference being a slight lateral to medial taper with the CPCS stem. A total of 34 patients were enrolled in a single-blinded randomised controlled trial in which 17 patients received a dedicated radiostereometric CPCS stem and 17 a radiostereometric Exeter stem. No difference was found in any of the outcome measures pre-operatively or post-operatively between groups. At two years, the mean subsidence for the CPCS stem was nearly half that seen for the Exeter stem (0.77 mm (-0.943 to 1.77) and 1.25 mm (0.719 to 1.625), respectively; p = 0.032). In contrast, the mean internal rotation of the CPCS stem was approximately twice that of the Exeter (1.61 degrees (-1.07 degrees to 4.33 degrees ) and 0.59 degrees (0.97 degrees to 1.64 degrees ), respectively; p = 0.048). Other migration patterns were not significantly different between the stems. The subtle differences in designs may explain the different patterns of migration. Comparable migration with the Exeter stem suggests that the CPCS design will perform well in the long term.

Complications of limb-lengthening in children who have an underlying bone disorder.

We retrospectively reviewed the results, particularly with regard to complications, of lengthening of long bones in eight children (nine limb segments) who had a limb-length discrepancy secondary to an underlying bone disorder (Group 1). The mean age of these patients was twelve years (range, six to sixteen years), the mean preoperative limb-length discrepancy was 6.0 centimeters (range, 2.7 to 8.8 centimeters), and the mean lengthening of the nine limb segments was 6.2 centimeters (range, 2.7 to 9.0 centimeters). Only two extremities were equalized. We compared the results in Group 1 with those of limb-lengthening in seven children (nine limb segments) who had a discrepancy secondary to post-traumatic growth arrest (Group 2) and seven children (seven limb segments) who had a discrepancy secondary to growth arrest following an infection in the bone (Group 3). All of the procedures were performed at our institution during the same time-period by the same surgeons. There were forty-one complications (twenty-five minor and sixteen major), with a mean of five complications per limb segment, in Group 1; twenty-six complications (twenty minor and six major), with a mean of three complications per limb segment, in Group 2; and twenty-two complications (fourteen minor and eight major), with a mean of three complications per limb segment, in Group 3. The results in Group 1 suggest that the Ilizarov technique for lengthening, although effective in restoring the length of the extremity, is associated with a higher rate of complications in patients who have a discrepancy due to an underlying bone disorder than in those who have a discrepancy due to growth arrest. Therefore, caution should be exercised before a lengthening procedure is recommended for a patient who has an underlying bone disorder.

Management of fibular hemimelia: amputation or limb lengthening.

We reviewed retrospectively 22 patients (23 limb segments) with fibular hemimelia treated by amputation or limb lengthening to evaluate these methods of treatment. There were 12 boys and 10 girls, all with associated anomalies in the lower limbs. Twelve patients (13 limb segments) had early amputation and prosthetic fitting and ten had tibial lengthening using the Ilizarov technique. At the latest follow-up, the twelve patients who had amputation were functioning well and had few complications. The ten patients who had lengthening had suffered numerous complications, and all had needed either further corrective surgery or to wear braces or shoe-raises. Two of the ten lengthened limbs required late amputation for poor function or cosmesis. There were fewer hospital admissions, clinic visits, and periods of absence from school in the amputation group. Our findings suggest that amputation is a more effective method of management than limb-lengthening in severe fibular hemimelia. The Ilizarov method is an attractive alternative for selected patients, but its exact role is not yet established. One problem is that families often have unrealistic expectations of the surgical and prosthetic technology available and may refuse amputation when this has been recommended.