Comparative Effects on Fetal Hematopoiesis and Placental Inflammation From Mesenchymal and Hematopoietic Stem Cells as Agents of Transamniotic Stem Cell Therapy (TRASCET) in a Syngeneic Model of Intrauterine Growth Restriction.

PURPOSE: We compared transamniotic stem cell therapy (TRASCET) using either mesenchymal (MSCs) or hematopoietic (HSCs) stem cells on fetal hematopoiesis in a syngeneic model of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). METHODS: Lewis dams exposed to cycling hypoxia (10.5% O2) in late gestation had their fetuses (n = 83) either receiving no intervention (untreated; n = 9), or intra-amniotic injections of either HSCs (HSC; n = 34), MSCs primed to an enhanced anti-inflammatory phenotype (primed-MSC; n = 28), or saline (sham; n = 12). Normal controls (n = 18) were also studied. Complete peripheral blood counts and placental ELISA for inflammation and angiogenesis markers were performed at term. RESULTS: Overall survival from hypoxia was 41% (34/83). Red blood count (RBC), hematocrit (Hct) and hemoglobin levels (Hb) were all significantly decreased from normal in all hypoxia groups. TRASCET with primed-MSC had significantly higher RBC, Hct, and Hb levels than sham (p = 0.01-0.03, pairwise), though not than untreated (which had no surgical blood loss). The HSC group had only significantly higher Hb levels than sham (p = 0.005). TRASCET with primed-MSC had significantly lower levels of placental TNF-α than sham (p = 0.04), but not untreated. CONCLUSIONS: MCSs seem more effective than HSCs in enhancing hematopoiesis when used as donor cells for TRASCET in a syngeneic model of IUGR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A (animal and laboratory study).

The invisible scars: Unseen financial complications worsen every aspect of long-term health in trauma survivors.

BACKGROUND: Trauma survivors are susceptible to experiencing financial toxicity (FT). Studies have shown the negative impact of FT on chronic illness outcomes. However, there is a notable lack of data on FT in the context of trauma. We aimed to better understand prevalence, risk factors, and impact of FT on trauma long-term outcomes. METHODS: Adult trauma patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥9 treated at Level I trauma centers were interviewed 6 months to 14 months after discharge. Financial toxicity was considered positive if patients reported any of the following due to the injury: income loss, lack of care, newly applied/qualified for governmental assistance, new financial problems, or work loss. The Impact of FT on Patient Reported Outcome Measure Index System (PROMIS) health domains was investigated. RESULTS: Of 577 total patients, 44% (254/567) suffered some form of FT. In the adjusted model, older age (odds ratio [OR], 0.4; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.2-0.81) and stronger social support networks (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.26-0.74) were protective against FT. In contrast, having two or more comorbidities (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.01-3.28), lower education levels (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 95%, 1.26-3.03), and injury mechanisms, including road accidents (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.51-4.77) and intentional injuries (OR, 4.31; 95% CI, 1.44-12.86) were associated with higher toxicity. No significant relationship was found with ISS, sex, or single-family household. Patients with FT had worse outcomes across all domains of health. There was a negative linear relationship between the severity of FT and worse mental and physical health scores. CONCLUSION: Financial toxicity is associated with long-term outcomes. Incorporating FT risk assessment into recovery care planning may help to identify patients most in need of mitigative interventions across the trauma care continuum to improve trauma recovery. Further investigations to better understand, define, and address FT in trauma care are warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

Delivery of essential pediatric congenital surgical care within Brazil's universal health coverage system: a national survey of pediatric surgeons.

Objective: In this study, we assess the delivery of congenital pediatric surgical care under Brazil's system of universal health coverage and evaluate differences in delivery between public and private sectors. Methods: A cross-sectional national survey of pediatric surgeons in Brazil was conducted. Participants were asked which of 23 interventions identified through the Disease Control Priorities 3 (Surgical Interventions for Congenital Anomalies) they perform and to report barriers faced while providing surgical care. Responses were weighted by state and stratified by sector (public vs private). Results: A sample of 352 responses was obtained and weighted to represent 1378 practicing pediatric surgeons registered in Brazil during the survey time. 73% spend the majority of their time working in the public sector ('Sistema Único de Saúde' and Foundation hospitals), and most of them also work in the private sector. Generally, Brazilian pediatric surgeons have the expertise to provide thoracic, abdominal, and urologic procedures. Surgeons working mostly in the public sector were more likely to report a lack of access to essential medications (25% vs 9%, p<0.01) and a lack of access to hospital beds for surgical patients (52% vs 32%, p<0.01). Conclusions: Brazilian pediatric surgeons routinely perform thoracic, abdominal, and urologic surgery. Those working in government-financed hospitals face barriers related to infrastructure, which may impact Brazilians who rely on Brazil's universal health coverage system. Policies that support pediatric surgeons working in the public sector may promote the workforce available to provide congenital pediatric surgical care.