Evinacumab-dgnb (Evkeeza-REGN1500), A Novel Lipid-Lowering Therapy for Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

Chronically elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) has harmful effects on the vasculature including increased vasoconstriction and the formation of plaques which may rupture, causing coronary heart disease and stroke. In patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, adequate reduction of LDL is especially challenging. Although HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are the mainstays for LDL lowering, other treatments such as proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, bempedoic acid, incliseran, lomitapide, and apheresis have been employed in an effort to achieve adequate LDL reduction in these patients. Despite these available therapies, many patients with familial hypercholesterolemia do not meet the LDL targets suggested in current guidelines. Evinacumab is a novel lipid-lowering therapy that exerts its LDL-lowering effect through inhibition of angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3). ANGPTL3 inhibits the breakdown of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, such as very low-density lipoprotein and chylomicrons. By inhibiting ANGPTL3, evinacumab allows these lipoproteins to be degraded, ultimately leading to reductions in LDL, high-density lipoprotein, and triglycerides. Clinical trials have demonstrated evinacumab to be safe and effective in reducing LDL. However, data are lacking regarding its potential to reduce risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Evinacumab is generally well tolerated with the primary adverse effects comprising infusion reactions, nasopharyngitis, influenza-like illness, dizziness, rhinorrhea, and nausea. While evinacumab is an interesting therapy, until it is proven to reduce cardiovascular events, its high cost leaves its anticipated role in therapy somewhat ambiguous. In the meantime, it may be a useful therapy for those with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

Nitrosamine Impurities in Angiotensin Receptor Blockers.

Nitrosamines are known carcinogens which have been recently discovered in several angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). This led to the recall of valsartan in the United States in 2018, and afterward, the recall of other ARBs as well as unrelated medications (e.g., ranitidine). The presence of nitrosamine in ARBs was likely a result of changes in the manufacturing process, although nitrosamine contamination is believed to occur by different mechanisms with other medications. The United States Food and Drug Administration has since taken steps to identify products affected by nitrosamine contamination and mitigate this concern going forward. Despite the contamination of some drug products, studies estimate that the overall risk to patients is low enough to not necessitate changes in prescribing patterns at this time.

Tafamidis: A Novel Treatment for Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy.

Transthyretin (TTR) amyloid cardiomyopathy is a life-threatening condition in which amyloid fibrils accumulate in the heart, eventually leading to cardiac symptomatology and death. To date, treatment of this condition has been directed at symptom relief due to a lack of effective treatment options which target the cause of the disease. The discovery that amyloid deposition was a result of dissociation of the TTR protein structure allowed for the development of tafamidis, which acts by stabilizing the TTR tetramer. Due to the rare nature of the disease, there is limited clinical trial data with tafamidis, with the largest clinical trial enrolling only 441 patients. Nonetheless, that trial demonstrated tafamidis to reduce all-cause mortality as well as cardiovascular hospitalizations compared to placebo with a comparable adverse effect profile, although not all subgroups of patients received benefit. The United States Food and Drug Administration subsequently granted Fast Track review status to tafamidis, leading to its approval in May 2019. Important questions still remain, however, such as which patient groups will receive the most benefit with this drug, how the exceptionally high cost of the drug will be handled by third-party payers, and how the therapeutic role of tafamidis will evolve as competing or perhaps complementary medications complete their ongoing clinical trials and move into the marketplace.

Switching From Ticagrelor or Prasugrel to Clopidogrel.

Ticagrelor and prasugrel are newer antiplatelet drugs which, like clopidogrel, block the P2Y12 platelet receptor to inhibit platelet aggregation. Compared with clopidogrel, both ticagrelor and prasugrel have greater clinical efficacy but also have a higher risk of bleeding and are much more costly. Therefore, some institutions and providers switch patients from ticagrelor or prasugrel to clopidogrel in an effort to lower bleeding risk, stem costs, or otherwise ensure that patients can safely adhere to long-term P2Y12 inhibitor therapy. From a pharmacodynamic perspective, switching patients from ticagrelor or prasugrel to clopidogrel comes at a cost of less antiplatelet efficacy. However, it is unclear if antiplatelet efficacy is diminished enough to affect clinical outcomes. This is because clinical trial data investigating such a switch is scant, leaving the clinician unsure as to the acceptability of this practice. Current clinical trial data have thus far not shown any clinical detriment from switching from ticagrelor or prasugrel to clopidogrel, but there are many limitations to these investigations. So although a large-scale switch of patients from ticagrelor or prasugrel to clopidogrel is not recommended, if the patient is unable to adhere to long-term ticagrelor or prasugrel therapy, switching him/her to clopidogrel seems to be a reasonable practice to maintain chronic suppression of platelet aggregation and minimize the risk of ischemic events.

Cangrelor: A New Route for P2Y12 Inhibition.

Antiplatelet therapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor is a key component of treatment for patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Before the development of cangrelor (Kengreal, The Medicines Company, Parsippany, NJ), only oral P2Y12 inhibitors were available. Cangrelor is a reversible P2Y12 inhibitor that is administered as an intravenous infusion, and its quick onset and offset make it an appealing option for antiplatelet therapy, particularly for patients who are unable to take oral medications. Although cangrelor struggled to show benefit in early trials, the positive results of the CHAMPION PHOENIX trial led to its approval for use as an adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce the risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction, repeat coronary revascularization, and stent thrombosis in patients who have not been treated with another P2Y12 inhibitor and are not being given a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor. Cangrelor has also been evaluated as an option for bridging therapy in patients who must discontinue their oral P2Y12 inhibitor before coronary artery bypass grafting. This review of cangrelor will discuss its mechanism of action, its pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, the clinical trial experience, and its potential place in therapy.

Sacubitril/Valsartan: A Novel Cardiovascular Combination Agent.

Sacubitril/valsartan [LCZ696 (Entresto), Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.] is the first in a new class of drugs that combines neprilysin inhibition with angiotensin II receptor antagonism, the combination of which acts to increase endogenous natriuretic peptides while inhibiting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Sacubitril/valsartan has been studied in the treatment of hypertension, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and has demonstrated clinical efficacy in blood pressure reduction in hypertensive patients with and without HFpEF and a reduction in hospitalizations and mortality for patients with HFrEF. Research to evaluate clinical outcomes in HFpEF is ongoing. Sacubitril/valsartan is approved to reduce hospitalization and risk of cardiovascular death for patients with HFrEF in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II-IV. The product is as well tolerated as an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, with the most common side effect being hypotension. Expectedly, it is much more costly than generic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonists, which will be a factor in determining how widespread the use of this agent will be. In summary, although the number of published studies evaluating its use is limited, sacubitril/valsartan represents a promising new treatment option for patients with HFrEF. Ongoing studies will continue to refine the role of this agent in clinical practice.

Treatment options for patients with poor clopidogrel response.

A significant percentage of patients demonstrate a poor antiplatelet response to clopidogrel. With the emergence of testing for genetic variations in drug-metabolizing enzyme function and testing for platelet function, it is becoming more common to identify patients as poor responders to clopidogrel. This leaves the clinician in a difficult situation when confronted with a patient deemed to be a poor clopidogrel responder as there is no clear therapeutic strategy for treating these patients. In this situation, a number of alternatives to conventional dosing of clopidogrel have been investigated, including increasing the dosage of clopidogrel, switching from clopidogrel to either prasugrel or ticagrelor, or adding cilostazol to clopidogrel therapy. All of these options have demonstrated pharmacologic benefit in terms of greater antiplatelet effects compared with standard clopidogrel dosing in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity or a genetic loss-of-function variant of CYP2C19, the main enzyme responsible for clopidogrel activation. However, the impact of each of these alternative therapies on clinical outcomes is poorly understood. Early studies have not shown a clinical benefit by increasing the clopidogrel dosage or switching to prasugrel although there is still much to be discovered in this area. Of the alternatives to standard dosing of clopidogrel, switching to either prasugrel or ticagrelor has the most potential benefit, but again, there is limited evidence to support this practice in patients who demonstrate high on-treatment platelet reactivity while on clopidogrel although the evidence is somewhat more supportive in patients who have a CYP2C19 loss-of-function variant allele. The evidence for increasing the dosage of clopidogrel or adding cilostazol is the least supportive, making these alternatives difficult to justify. Given the limited evidence to support switching treatments, some providers may simply opt to continue standard dosing of clopidogrel pending the results of ongoing trials. Much research is needed and is currently underway in this area, which will be helpful in establishing future treatment protocols for patients with poor clopidogrel response.

Ticagrelor: a novel reversible oral antiplatelet agent.

The complex mechanism of platelet activation creates an optimal target for pharmacological treatment in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Current antiplatelet medications that are used in addition to aspirin include the thienopyridines, clopidogrel and prasugrel, but there are several limitations to the use of these medications. Clopidogrel and prasugrel irreversibly bind to the P2Y12 receptor, creating a prolonged antiplatelet effect which can be undesirable when surgery is needed. Clopidogrel requires hepatic activation and produces variable platelet inhibition based on genetic polymorphisms. Prasugrel has more consistent platelet inhibition than clopidogrel but carries with it an increased risk of serious bleeds. Ticagrelor is a drug in a new chemical class that reversibly binds the P2Y12 receptor and noncompetitively blocks adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet activation. It was specifically designed to address the limitations of the available antiplatelet agents while maintaining comparable or better antiplatelet effects. It does not require metabolic activation and demonstrates greater platelet inhibition, a faster offset of action and comparable bleeding risk compared to clopidogrel. The pivotal PLATO (The Study of Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial in patients with an acute coronary syndrome demonstrated improved cardiovascular outcomes, including a reduction in myocardial infarctions and vascular events using ticagrelor as compared to clopidogrel with comparable rates of major bleeds. A puzzling finding from that trial was the lack of benefit with ticagrelor in patients enrolled from the United States, which has led to ticagrelor not being approved at this time in this country. The main adverse events with ticagrelor are bleeding and dyspnea, the latter of which is of unclear etiology and of unknown long-term clinical concern. In summary, ticagrelor is an exciting new oral antiplatelet drug that seems to be more efficacious than clopidogrel, with comparable safety. Whether issues of geographic disparities in response and the unusual side effect of dyspnea ultimately prove problematic has yet to be determined. Nonetheless, ticagrelor is a drug that has the potential to change the standard of care of patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Critical appraisal of ticagrelor in the management of acute coronary syndrome.

Ticagrelor is a novel P2Y12 receptor antagonist which, like clopidogrel and prasugrel, functions by blocking adenosine diphosphate-mediated platelet aggregation. However, unlike the aforementioned agents, the binding of ticagrelor to this receptor is reversible. Ticagrelor is also believed to mediate some of its beneficial effects by augmenting the effects of adenosine, which is another unique pharmacologic property of this drug. In terms of antiplatelet effect, ticagrelor is more potent than clopidogrel and produces a faster and stronger inhibition of platelet aggregation. This may also be an advantage of ticagrelor over prasugrel, but this has not been adequately studied. Due to the reversible nature of the binding of ticagrelor to the platelet receptor, ticagrelor has a relatively fast offset of effect, with platelet aggregation approaching pretreatment levels about 3 days after discontinuation of therapy. This has advantages in patients requiring invasive procedures, but also makes medication adherence very important in order to be able to maintain an effective antiplatelet effect. Ticagrelor has been shown to be clinically superior to clopidogrel when given to patients with an acute coronary syndrome, resulting in significantly lower rates of myocardial infarction and vascular death. However, ticagrelor is indicated to be administered with aspirin, and the clinical benefits of ticagrelor may be less when daily dosages of aspirin exceed 100 mg. As expected, bleeding is the most common adverse effect with ticagrelor, although it occurs at rates comparable with those seen for clopidogrel with the exception of noncoronary artery bypass graft-related major bleeding and fatal intracranial bleeds, the latter of which occurs only rarely. Dyspnea is another common adverse effect with ticagrelor, although this is usually not severe and resolves with drug discontinuation. Unlike clopidogrel, there are no known pharmacogenomic concerns with ticagrelor, and emerging data suggest ticagrelor to be effective in patients resistant to clopidogrel, although more study is needed on this topic. While preliminary data suggest ticagrelor to be cost effective when compared with generic clopidogrel, the acquisition cost of ticagrelor is not insignificant and this will likely be an issue for many health care organizations. Currently, ticagrelor is well positioned to assume an active role in the treatment of coronary artery disease due to an impressive efficacy profile and reasonable safety. Its ultimate role in therapy will continue to evolve as studies on this drug continue eg, (Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin, PEGASUS) and more information hopefully becomes available on its use in clopidogrel nonresponders and relative safety and efficacy compared with prasugrel.

Prasugrel: a new antiplatelet drug for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Prasugrel, trade name Effient, is an investigational new antiplatelet drug currently under review for clinical use by the Food and Drug Administration. It is a thienopyridine analog with a structure similar to that of clopidogrel and ticlopidine. Thienopyridine derivatives inhibit platelet aggregation induced by adenosine diphosphate by irreversibly inhibiting the binding of adenosine diphosphate to the purinergic P2Y12 receptor on the platelet surface. Prasugrel has been shown to be a potent antiplatelet agent with a faster, more consistent, and greater inhibition of platelet aggregation compared with clopidogrel. It is debatable, however, how effectively these pharmacologic benefits will translate to clinical benefits. The results of the large TRITON-TIMI 38 trial, which compared prasugrel and clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome who were scheduled to receive coronary stents, demonstrated a significant reduction in ischemic events, including stent thrombosis, with prasugrel, but with an increased risk of major bleeding. The exact role of prasugrel in the management of ischemic heart disease is still being defined, but the risk:benefit ratio will likely play a major role in directing the best place for therapy with this new agent.

Paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease.

PURPOSE: Clinical information regarding paclitaxel-eluting coronary artery stents is reviewed. SUMMARY: Restenosis is a significant complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. Coronary artery stenting has reduced restenosis compared with traditional balloon angioplasty, although restenosis still occurs with bare-metal coronary artery stents. The pathogenesis of in-stent restenosis is believed to involve smooth-muscle-cell proliferation and migration in response to vessel injury. A neointimal layer of extracellular matrix and collagen forms, which may impinge on the vessel lumen. Paclitaxel inhibits vascular smooth-muscle-cell proliferation and reduces neointimal mass. Local delivery of paclitaxel through a coronary stent has been shown to reduce restenosis rates and percent diameter stenosis and to produce other angiographic benefits compared with bare-metal stents. Fewer major adverse coronary events are seen with paclitaxel-eluting stents, predominantly because of a reduction in the need for target-vessel revascularization with minimal impact on rates of mortality and myocardial infarction (MI). The Taxus Express(2) stent, the only approved paclitaxel-eluting stent in the United States, costs about three times as much as a bare-metal stent. Cost-effectiveness analyses are needed to determine if the Taxus stent is cost-effective in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel-eluting stents reduce the rates of restenosis and target-vessel revascularization compared with bare-metal stents and have comparable effects on mortality and MI rates.

Eplerenone: a selective aldosterone receptor antagonist for hypertension and heart failure.

Aldosterone has been implicated for many years as an important substance in the pathogenesis of heart disease. Elevated aldosterone concentrations have been documented in patients with hypertension and heart failure, leading to the use of aldosterone antagonists for the treatment of these conditions. Spironolactone has been used for nearly 2 decades for the treatment of hypertension, and more recently, has become a standard agent for the treatment of systolic heart failure. Spironolactone, however, is a nonselective antagonist of the aldosterone receptor, binding also to other steroid receptors and causing a significant percentage of patients to have sex hormone-related adverse effects such as gynecomastia. Eplerenone is the first of a new class of drugs known as selective aldosterone receptor antagonists, which selectively block the aldosterone receptor with minimal effect at other steroid receptors, thereby minimizing many of the hormonal side effects seen with spironolactone. Eplerenone has been shown to be beneficial both as monotherapy and combination therapy for lowering elevated blood pressure in patients with hypertension. The antihypertensive efficacy of eplerenone is roughly similar to that of other antihypertensive agents, although in 1 study black patients responded better with eplerenone than losartan. In addition, eplerenone has demonstrated some renoprotective effects in diabetic patients with hypertension. Recently, eplerenone was shown to significantly reduce mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in post-myocardial infarction patients with systolic heart failure currently taking standard heart failure medications. Eplerenone is generally well tolerated, although hyperkalemia with this agent is of some concern. Eplerenone is metabolized by CYP3A4 and administration with potent inhibitors of this enzyme is contraindicated because of the risk of hyperkalemia. In summary, eplerenone has proven to be beneficial in treating hypertension and post-myocardial infarction heart failure. Its exact place in therapy will in large part be determined by its cost and whether or not future studies will be able to demonstrate a clinical benefit of this agent over spironolactone or other currently available treatments.

Levosimendan: a unique approach to the treatment of heart failure.

Levosimendan is one of the first agents of a new class of drugs known as calcium sensitizers. These drugs are believed to increase cardiac contractility by sensitizing cardiac myofibrils to calcium, and may therefore be of clinical benefit in the treatment of low-cardiac output states, particularly congestive heart failure. In addition to sensitizing troponin to intracellular calcium, levosimendan has been shown to inhibit phosphodiesterase III, which may contribute to its positive inotropic effect, and open adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-sensitive potassium channels (K(ATP)), which may produce vasodilation. Unlike currently available intravenous inotropes, levosimendan does not increase myocardial oxygen utilization, has not been shown to be proarrhythmic, and has been used effectively in the presence of beta-blocking medications. Levosimendan also has not been shown to impair ventricular relaxation, which was an initial concern with this class of drugs. Clinical studies of levosimendan have demonstrated short-term hemodynamic benefits of levosimendan over both placebo and dobutamine. While large-scale, long-term morbidity and mortality data are scarce, the Levosimendan Infusion versus Dobutamine in severe low-output heart failure (LIDO) study suggested a mortality benefit of levosimendan over dobutamine up to 180 days after treatment. Clinical studies comparing levosimendan with other positive inotropes, namely milrinone, are lacking. Levosimendan treatment appears to be well-tolerated, with the primary adverse events being headache and hypotension. No clinically significant drug-drug interactions have been reported with levosimendan to date. The clinical future of levosimendan will depend on the results of larger, ongoing clinical trials.