Generating a Prioritized List of Operative Procedures for Simulation-based Assessment of General Surgery Trainees Through Consensus.

OBJECTIVE: To develop appropriate content for high-stakes simulation-based assessments of operative competence in general surgery training through consensus. BACKGROUND: Valid methods of summative operative competence assessment are required by competency-based training programs in surgery. METHOD: An online Delphi consensus study was conducted. Procedures were derived from the competency expectations outlined by the Joint Committee on Surgical Training Curriculum 2021, and subsequent brainstorming. Procedures were rated according to their perceived importance, perceived procedural risk, how frequently they are performed, and simualtion feasibility by a purposive sample of 30 surgical trainers and a 5-person steering group. A modified Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation Needs Assessment Formula was applied to the generated data to produce ranked procedural lists, which were returned to participants for re-prioritization. RESULTS: Prioritized lists were generated for simulation-based operative competence assessments at 2 key stages of training; the end of 'phase 2' prior to the development of a sub-specialty interest, and the end of 'phase 3', that is, end-of-training certification. A total of 21 and 16 procedures were deemed suitable for assessments at each of these stages, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes a national needs assessment approach to content generation for simulation-based assessments of operative competence in general surgery using Delphi consensus methodology. The prioritized procedural lists generated by this study can be used to further develop operative skill assessments for use in high-stakes scenarios, such as trainee progression, entrustment, and end-of-training certification, before subsequent validity testing.

Assessment of Technical Competence in Distal Radius Fracture Fixation by a Volar Locking Plate: A Global Delphi Consensus Study.

PURPOSE: Volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures is a common orthopedic procedure and should be mastered by graduating orthopedic residents. Surgical education is transitioning from a traditional time-based approach to competency-based medical education. Valid and objective assessment is essential for successful transition. The purpose of this study was to develop a comprehensive, procedure-specific assessment tool to evaluate technical competence in volar locking plate osteosynthesis of a distal radius fracture. METHODS: International orthopedic/trauma experts involved in resident education participated as panelists in a four-round online Delphi process to reach consensus on the content of the assessment tool. Round 1 was an item-generating round, in which the panelists identified potential assessment parameters. In round 2, the panelists rated the importance of each suggested assessment parameter and reached consensus on which to include in the assessment tool. Round 3 yielded specific assessment score intervals for specific bone and fracture models and is not reported in this study. In round 4, the panelists assigned weights to the assessment parameters on a 1-10 scale to determine how each parameter should have an impact on the overall results. RESULTS: Eighty-seven surgeons, representing 42 countries, participated in the study. Round 1 resulted in 45 assessment parameters, grouped into five procedural steps. After round 2, the number of parameters was reduced to 39. After the final round, an additional parameter was removed and weights were assigned to the remaining parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Using a systematic methodology, a preliminary assessment tool to evaluate technical competence in distal radius fracture fixation was developed. A consensus of international experts supports the content validity of the assessment tool. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This assessment tool represents the first step in the evidence-based assessment essential for competency-based medical education. Before implementation, further studies exploring validity of variations of the assessment tool in different educational contexts are required.

Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of Simulation Based Education in Vascular Surgery in Europe.

OBJECTIVE: This study explored the status and availability of simulation based education (SBE) for learning vascular surgical procedures identified in the 2019 General Needs Assessment in vascular surgery in Europe (GNA-2019) and identified facilitators and barriers to SBE implementation in vascular surgery. METHODS: A three round iterative survey was distributed via the European Society for Vascular Surgery and the Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes. Members from leading committees and organisations within the European vascular surgical community were invited to participate as key opinion leaders (KOLs). Three online survey rounds explored demographics, SBE availability, and facilitators and barriers to SBE implementation. RESULTS: Overall, 147 KOLs (target population 338) accepted invitation to round 1, representing 30 European countries. The dropout rates for rounds 2 and 3 were 29% and 40%, respectively. Most respondents (88%) were senior, consultant level or higher. No mandatory SBE training was required in their department before training on patients, according to 84% of the KOLs. There was high consensus on the need for structured SBE (87%) and mandatory SBE (81%). SBE is available for the top three prioritised procedures in GNA-2019 (basic open skills, basic endovascular skills, and vascular imaging interpretation) in 24, 23, and 20 of the 30 represented European countries, respectively. The highest ranking facilitators were structured SBE programmes, availability of simulation equipment locally and regionally, good quality simulators, and having a dedicated person running the SBE. The highest ranked barriers were lack of structured SBE curriculum, equipment costs, lack of SBE culture, no or limited dedicated time for faculty to teach in SBE, and clinical work overload. CONCLUSION: Based largely on the opinions of KOLs in vascular surgery in Europe, this study revealed that SBE is needed in vascular surgery training and that systematic and structured programmes are required to ensure successful implementation.

Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in thoracic surgery: an international needs assessment.

OBJECTIVES: To identify and prioritize technical procedures for simulation-based training to be integrated into the thoracic surgical curriculum. METHODS: A 3-round Delphi survey was conducted from February 2022 to June 2022 among 34 key opinion leaders in thoracic surgery from 14 countries worldwide. The 1st round was a brainstorming phase to identify technical procedures that a newly qualified thoracic surgeon should be able to perform. All the suggested procedures were categorized, qualitatively analysed and sent to the 2nd round. The second round investigated: the frequency of the identified procedure at each institution, the number of thoracic surgeons that should be able to perform these procedures, the degree of risk to the patient if the procedure is performed by a non-competent thoracic surgeon and the feasibility of simulation-based education. In the 3rd round, elimination and re-ranking of the procedures from the 2nd round were performed. RESULTS: Response rates in the 3 iterative rounds were 80% (28 out of 34), 89% (25 out of 28) and 100% (25 out of 25) in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd round, respectively. Seventeen technical procedures were included for simulation-based training in the final prioritized list. The top 5 procedures were Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) lobectomy, VATS segmentectomy, VATS mediastinal lymph node dissection, diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy and robotic-assisted thoracic surgery port placement, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery docking and undocking. CONCLUSIONS: The prioritized list of procedures represents a consensus of key thoracic surgeons worldwide. These procedures are suitable for simulation-based training and should be integrated in the thoracic surgical curriculum.

A national needs assessment to identify technical procedures in plastic surgery for simulation-based training.

Medical simulation is not developed and integrated into plastic surgery unlike other surgical specialties despite the procedures being complex and require practice. First step in enhancing simulation in plastic surgery is to clarify the need among peers. The objective of the study was to identify and prioritize the technical procedures that should be included in a simulation-based curriculum for residency training in plastic surgery. A panel of participants with key roles in the Danish plastic surgery specialist training program was appointed. Participation was voluntary. A national need assessment study was performed using a three-round Delphi process to collect information from the participants. In round 1, participants reported all the procedures that a newly qualified specialist in plastic surgery should be able to perform. In round 2, participants replied to a survey exploring the frequency of the procedures, the number of surgeons performing the procedure, the risk or discomfort for patients treated by an inexperienced surgeon and the feasibility of training the procedure in simulation, resulting in a preliminary ranking of procedures. In round 3, participants eliminated and reprioritized the identified procedures according to importance. Thirty-five of 37 agreed to enter the expert panel. The response rate was 97%, 86% and 86% for rounds 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Twenty-nine of 136 procedures identified in round 1 reached the final prioritized list of procedures relevant for simulation training in plastic surgery.

A Bi-national Needs Assessment to Identify and Prioritise Procedures in Paediatric Surgery for Simulation-based Training.

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based education (SBE) has led to significant changes in healthcare education. However, SBE has often been based on available resources and local expertise rather than a systematic approach to curriculum development. The aim of this study was to perform a bi-national needs assessment to identify and prioritise procedures in a paediatric surgery curriculum that can be supported using SBE. METHOD: A modified 3-round Delphi technique was used to gather consensus from education leaders and trainees in paediatric surgery in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand (ANZ). Round 1 identified all procedures a newly specialised paediatric surgeon should be able to perform. In Round 2, each procedure was explored for the need for SBE using the Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES) Needs-Assessment Formula (NAF). This pre-prioritised list from Round 2 was sent back to participants for final exclusion and ranking in Round 3. Results 88 participants were identified and invited. From 174 procedures identified in Round 1, 71 procedures were grouped and categorised for Round 2 using the CAMES NAF. In Round 3, 17 procedures were eliminated resulting in 54 procedures. Appendicectomy, inguinal herniotomy, and central venous access were the highest rank procedures after prioritisation in Round 3. There was a strong correlation (r = 0.99) between the NAF score and the prioritised ranking, as well as between consultants and trainees (r = 0.92 in Round 2 and 0.98 in Round 3). CONCLUSION: The prioritised list represents a consensus document decided upon by education leaders and stakeholders in paediatric surgery. These procedures should be an integral part of the SBE of paediatric surgeons in the region. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Developing a simulation-based training curriculum in transesophageal ultrasound with the use of the endobronchial ultrasound-endoscope.

There is an increasing need to focus on how best to train respiratory physicians to perform EUS with bronchoscope-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-B-FNA). At current, training is mostly performed in the clinical environment under expert supervision; however, the advent of simulation-based education now provides a low-risk setting for novice trainees to learn and practice basic endosonography skills from identifying and understanding normal anatomy as well as pathology, maneuvering of endoscope, interpretation of images, and mastering of sampling techniques. In this descriptive educational paper, we used a six-step approach as a framework to describe the development of a structured training program combining EUS-B-FNA with the already well-established certification training program in endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration. This comprehensive training curriculum includes a theoretical course to achieve foundational knowledge, followed by simulation-based training until mastery standards are met, and supervised clinical apprenticeship. All steps should end with an objective assessment to achieve certification. This systematic development will hopefully encourage endosonography leaders and educators to collaborate and implement an evidence-based comprehensive endosonography curriculum that aims to provide the trainee with the essential EUS-B competencies to ensure that lung cancer patients are diagnosed and staged correctly.

Developing a tool to assess competence in resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: An international Delphi consensus study.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an emergency procedure that is potentially lifesaving in major noncompressible torso hemorrhage. It may also improve outcome in nontraumatic cardiac arrest. However, the procedure can be technically challenging and requires the immediate presence of a qualified operator. Thus, evidence-based training and assessment of operator skills are essential for successful implementation and patient safety. A prerequisite for this is a valid and reliable assessment tool specific for the procedure. The aim of this study was to develop a tool for assessing procedural competence in REBOA based on best-available knowledge from international experts in the field. METHODS: We invited international REBOA experts from multiple specialties to participate in an anonymous three-round iterative Delphi study to reach consensus on the design and content of an assessment tool. In round 1, participants suggested items to be included. In rounds 2 and 3, the relevance of each suggested item was evaluated by all participants to reach consensus. Interround data processing was done systematically by a steering group. RESULTS: Forty panelists representing both clinical and educational expertise in REBOA from 16 countries (in Europe, Asia, and North and South America) and seven different specialties participated in the study. After 3 Delphi rounds and 532 initial item suggestions, the panelists reached consensus on a 10-item assessment tool with behaviorally anchored rating scales. It includes assessment of teamwork, procedure time, selection and preparation of equipment, puncture technique, guidewire handling, sheath handling, placement of REBOA catheter, occlusion, and evaluation. CONCLUSION: We present the REBOA-RATE assessment tool developed systematically by international experts in the field to optimize content validity. Following further studies of its validity and reliability, this tool represents an important next step in evidence-based training programs in REBOA, for example, using mastery learning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level V.

Automatic and Objective Assessment of Motor Skills Performance in Flexible Bronchoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Motor skills have been identified as a useful measure to evaluate competency in bronchoscopy. However, no automatic assessment system of motor skills with a clear pass/fail criterion in flexible bronchoscopy exists. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to develop an objective and automatic measure of motor skills in bronchoscopy and set a pass/fail criterion. METHODS: Participants conducted 3 bronchoscopies each in a simulated setting. They were equipped with a Myo Armband that measured lower arm movements through an inertial measurement unit, and hand and finger motions through electromyography sensors. These measures were composed into an objective and automatic composite score of motor skills, the motor bronchoscopy skills score (MoBSS). RESULTS: Twelve novices, eleven intermediates, and ten expert bronchoscopy operators participated, resulting in 99 procedures available for assessment. MoBSS was correlated with a higher diagnostic completeness (Pearson's correlation, r = 0.43, p < 0.001) and a lower procedure time (Pearson's correlation, r = -0.90, p < 0.001). MoBSS was able to differentiate operator performance based on the experience level (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.001). Using the contrasting groups' method, a passing score of -0.08 MoBSS was defined that failed 30/36 (83%) novice, 5/33 (15%) intermediate, and 1/30 (3%) expert procedures. CONCLUSIONS: MoBSS can be used as an automatic and unbiased assessment tool for motor skills performance in flexible bronchoscopy. MoBSS has the potential to generate automatic feedback to help guide trainees toward expert performance.

Learning Curves and Competences of Vascular Trainees Performing Open Aortic Repair in a Simulation-Based Environment.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze learning curves and competency gains of novice vascular trainees when performing open aortic repair in a simulation-based environment. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 16 vascular trainees performing infrarenal open aortic repair on an inanimate abdominal aortic aneurysm simulator with pulsatile pressure and flow. Each participant performed 4 procedures as a primary surgeon while getting structured feedback by a supervising experienced vascular surgeon. All sessions were video recorded and were anonymously and independently assessed by 3 rater-trained experts on an online platform using the newly validated open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair of technical expertise assessment tool. All supervisor interferences and procedure time was noted. RESULTS: Reliability between raters was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.92). Participants' mean scores almost doubled during the course between the first (13.4, 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.8-20) and fourth session (29.8, 95% CI, 26.3-33.3) with a mean difference of 14.6 (P < 0.001). Supervisor interference also decreased significantly from mean 3.0 (95% CI, 1.5-3.6) in the first to 0.7 (95% CI, 0.4-1.0) in the fourth session (P = 0.004). Procedure time decreased with a mean of 24 minutes: from 81 min (95% CI, 71.8-90.3) to 57 min (95% CI, 51.1-63.2, P < 0.001). There was a significant negative correlation between procedure time and the Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair of Technical Expertise score (Pearson's r = -0.72, P < 0.01). Only half of the participants passed the pass/fail score of 27.7 points during the course. CONCLUSIONS: Novice vascular trainees achieve skills and competencies in open aortic repair in a simulated setting with dedicated supervision and feedback and can become ready for supervised surgery on real patients. Learning rates are individual, and it is important to construct training programs with emphasis on proficiency and not merely attending a course.

Learn EVAR sizing from scratch: The results of a one-day intensive course in EVAR sizing and stent graft selection for vascular trainees.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Recognition of structured training in endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for vascular trainees is increasing. Nevertheless, how trainees can achieve sufficient skills in EVAR sizing and graft selection is sparsely described. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of systematic training in basic EVAR sizing and graft selection on vascular surgery trainees using a validated assessment tool. METHODS: Sixteen vascular surgery trainees were included in an intensive 6-h hands-on workshop in aortic sizing and stent graft selection for EVAR with a trainer-to-trainee ratio of 1:2. After 1-h lecture, participants did 5 h of supervised training on increasingly complex cases. Finally, the participants were tested using a validated assessment tool. RESULTS: All participants were able to size the test-case and select a stent graft combination in 24:35 (13:30-48:20) min (median and range). The participants' overall test scores (lower is better) were in median 17.9 (11.9-28.4). This did not differ from the scores of experienced EVAR operators 14.7 (11.7-25.2) (<200 EVAR's) (p = .32) but was inferior to the score of EVAR experts 11.2 (9.8 -18.7) (≥200 EVAR's) (p = .01). The sub-score for anatomical measurements was 10.6 (3.9-18.8) and comparable with the experienced group 9.7 (8.1-12.8) (p = .83) but inferior to the expert operators 6.5 (5.2-10.2) (p = .04). The sub-score for stent graft selection was 7.5 (4.9-14.1) and comparable with experienced operators scoring 4.5 (3.6-12.3) (p = .09) but inferior to the expert operators score of 5.0 (3.6-8.4) (p = .01). CONCLUSION: This study presents the results of a standardised one-day basic EVAR sizing and graft selection workshop. Vascular surgery trainees with no prior EVAR experience learned to size and select stent grafts for a simple infra-renal AAA on par with experienced EVAR operators.

Identifying Technical Procedures in Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology That Should Be Integrated in a Simulation-Based Curriculum: A National General Needs Assessment in Denmark.

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based training is emerging within the orthopaedic field to alleviate the challenges that trainees face such as work-hour restrictions, limited exposure to procedures, and increasing pressures to reduce risk to patients. This training modality has grown increasingly popular over the last 2 decades. However, integration into the curriculum often fails to follow a structured educational plan. The development of simulation-based curricula should follow a structured and stepwise approach that starts with a general needs assessment. This study aimed to identify and prioritize procedures within orthopaedic surgery to be included in a simulation-based curriculum on a national basis. METHODS: A national needs assessment was conducted using the Delphi method. Ninety-five experts who are involved in the training of orthopaedic surgeons from all orthopaedic departments in Denmark were selected to participate in the assessment. Round 1 was a brainstorming phase to identify technical procedures that are relevant for orthopaedic surgeons in training. Round 2 was performed on a departmental basis; it explored the frequency of procedures, the number of surgeons performing each procedure, the risk and/or discomfort to patients, and the feasibility for simulation-based training to prioritize and eliminate some of the procedures that were determined in round 1. During round 3, the experts eliminated and reprioritized procedures from round 2 to produce a final prioritized list. RESULTS: During the first round, 194 procedures were identified. These were reduced to 62 in round 2, and the final list after round 3 consisted of 33 prioritized procedures that are relevant for simulation-based training in orthopaedic surgery. The response rates were 63 of 95 physicians for round 1, 26 of 26 departments for round 2, and 64 of 97 physicians for round 3. The highest prioritized procedures were basic surgical techniques and principles for osteosynthesis, osteosynthesis of proximal femoral fracture, and surgical exposure of the upper and lower extremities. CONCLUSIONS: The prioritized list of technical procedures in orthopaedic surgery that are suitable for simulation-based training can aid in the development of a simulation-based curriculum. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This article offers insights into needs assessment and curriculum development of simulation-based training in orthopaedic surgery and traumatology.

Identifying and prioritizing technical procedures in otorhinolaryngology for simulation-based training: a national needs assessment in Denmark.

PURPOSE: To conduct a national needs assessment using a structured approach to identify and prioritize technical skills and procedures in otorhinolaryngology (ORL) for simulation-based training. METHODS: The study was designed as a national Danish survey of key educational stakeholders in ORL. A Delphi methodology with three rounds was used: the first round constituted a brainstorming phase to identify relevant procedures; the second round was a survey of importance, frequency, number of physicians needed to train, and patient safety/discomfort of the procedures, and feasibility of simulation-based training; and a final third round for prioritization. RESULTS: A total of 62 key opinion leaders were identified and 50 responded in the first round, constituting our panel. Fifty technical skills and procedures were identified in the brainstorming phase and were sent out for assessment, with responses from 56.5% of still eligible panellists. Thirty-six procedures were found important in ORL residency training by the panel. After final prioritization by the panel (response rate 43.4%), there was broad consensus (> 75%) on the need for simulation-based training of 13 technical skills and procedures, with the most highly ranking procedures being emergency cricothyroidotomy, flexible fibre pharyngo-laryngoscopy, and basic surgical skills. CONCLUSIONS: As educational decisions are increasingly required to be evidence-based, this study represents a structured approach to identifying procedures for simulation-based training in ORL. This information can be valuable in the development and implementation of simulation-based training programmes in the ORL residency training curriculum.

Simulation-Based Mastery Learning of Flexible Bronchoscopy: Deciding Factors for Completion.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown the beneficial effects of mastery learning of a simulation-based course, but not all trainees complete it. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to find deciding factors for the completion of a simulation-based mastery learning course with distributive practice in flexible bronchoscopy. METHODS: Seventy-seven trainees who signed up for the course were invited to a survey for deciding factors of completing the course. Sixty-two (81%) trainees answered the survey. RESULTS: Male trainees were more likely to complete the course. The most important factor for completion was clinical relevance, and the most important factor for not completing the course was being "too busy." CONCLUSION: Several deciding factors for completing the course were identified. Successful simulation-based mastery learning courses should be clinically relevant, and the trainees should be provided protected time to complete the training. The instructional design should also be adapted systematically for male and female trainees to achieve the necessary competencies.

Surgical simulation: Current practices and future perspectives for technical skills training.

Simulation-based training (SBT) has become a standard component of modern surgical education, yet successful implementation of evidence-based training programs remains challenging. In this narrative review, we use Kern's framework for curriculum development to describe where we are now and what lies ahead for SBT within surgery with a focus on technical skills in operative procedures. Despite principles for optimal SBT (proficiency-based, distributed, and deliberate practice) having been identified, massed training with fixed time intervals or a fixed number of repetitions is still being extensively used, and simulators are generally underutilized. SBT should be part of surgical training curricula, including theoretical, technical, and non-technical skills, and be based on relevant needs assessments. Furthermore, training should follow evidence-based theoretical principles for optimal training, and the effect of training needs to be evaluated using relevant outcomes. There is a larger, still unrealized potential of surgical SBT, which may be realized in the near future as simulator technologies evolve, more evidence-based training programs are implemented, and cost-effectiveness and impact on patient safety is clearly demonstrated.

Consensus on procedures to include in a simulation-based curriculum in ophthalmology: a national Delphi study.

PURPOSE: The number of available simulation-based models for technical skills training in ophthalmology is rapidly increasing, and development of training programmes around these procedures should follow a structured approach. The aim of this study was to identify all technical procedures that should be integrated in a simulation-based curriculum in ophthalmology. METHODS: Key opinion leaders involved in the education of ophthalmologists in Denmark including heads of departments, heads of clinical education, professors and board members of the society were invited to participate in a three-round Delphi process. Round 1 aimed at identifying technical procedures that physicians should be able to perform competently when completing specialty training; round 2 involved characterization of each procedure including frequency, number of operators, risk and/or discomfort for patients associated with an inexperienced physician, and feasibility of simulation-based training; round 3 included a priority ranking of procedures. RESULTS: The response rate for each round was 71%, 64% and 64%, respectively. Sixty-five procedures were reduced to 25 prioritized procedures during the three rounds. Two-thirds of the procedures that were identified and highly prioritized were therapeutic procedures such as intravitreal injection therapy, yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser iridotomy/capsulotomy, minor ocular surface procedures and retinal argon laser therapy. The diagnostic procedures that were prioritized were ocular ultrasound, superficial keratectomy and optical coherence tomography (OCT). CONCLUSION: The Delphi process identified and prioritized 25 procedures that should be practised in a simulation-based environment to achieve competency before working with patients. The list may be used to guide the development of future training programmes for ophthalmologists.

Determining procedures for simulation-based training in radiology: a nationwide needs assessment.

OBJECTIVES: New training modalities such as simulation are widely accepted in radiology; however, development of effective simulation-based training programs is challenging. They are often unstructured and based on convenience or coincidence. The study objective was to perform a nationwide needs assessment to identify and prioritize technical procedures that should be included in a simulation-based curriculum. METHODS: A needs assessment using the Delphi method was completed among 91 key leaders in radiology. Round 1 identified technical procedures that radiologists should learn. Round 2 explored frequency of procedure, number of radiologists performing the procedure, risk and/or discomfort for patients, and feasibility for simulation. Round 3 was elimination and prioritization of procedures. RESULTS: Response rates were 67 %, 70 % and 66 %, respectively. In Round 1, 22 technical procedures were included. Round 2 resulted in pre-prioritization of procedures. In round 3, 13 procedures were included in the final prioritized list. The three highly prioritized procedures were ultrasound-guided (US) histological biopsy and fine-needle aspiration, US-guided needle puncture and catheter drainage, and basic abdominal ultrasound. CONCLUSION: A needs assessment identified and prioritized 13 technical procedures to include in a simulation-based curriculum. The list may be used as guide for development of training programs. KEY POINTS: • Simulation-based training can supplement training on patients in radiology. • Development of simulation-based training should follow a structured approach. • The CAMES Needs Assessment Formula explores needs for simulation training. • A national Delphi study identified and prioritized procedures suitable for simulation training. • The prioritized list serves as guide for development of courses in radiology.

Training and certification in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) plays a key role in the staging of lung cancer, which is crucial for allocation to surgical treatment. EBUS-TBNA is a complicated procedure and simulation-based training is helpful in the first part of the long learning curve prior to performing the procedure on actual patients. New trainees should follow a structured training programme consisting of training on simulators to proficiency as assessed with a validated test followed by supervised practice on patients. The simulation-based training is superior to the traditional apprenticeship model and is recommended in the newest guidelines. EBUS-TBNA and oesophageal ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA or EUS-B-FNA) are complementary to each other and the combined techniques are superior to either technique alone. It is logical to learn and to perform the two techniques in combination, however, for lung cancer staging solely EBUS-TBNA simulators exist, but hopefully in the future simulation-based training in EUS will be possible.

Identifying content for simulation-based curricula in urology: a national needs assessment.

OBJECTIVE: Simulation-based training is well recognized in the transforming field of urological surgery; however, integration into the curriculum is often unstructured. Development of simulation-based curricula should follow a stepwise approach starting with a needs assessment. This study aimed to identify technical procedures in urology that should be included in a simulation-based curriculum for residency training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A national needs assessment was performed using the Delphi method involving 56 experts with significant roles in the education of urologists. Round 1 identified technical procedures that newly qualified urologists should perform. Round 2 included a survey using an established needs assessment formula to explore: the frequency of procedures; the number of physicians who should be able to perform the procedure; the risk and/or discomfort to patients when a procedure is performed by an inexperienced physician; and the feasibility of simulation training. Round 3 involved elimination and reranking of procedures according to priority. RESULTS: The response rates for the three Delphi rounds were 70%, 55% and 67%, respectively. The 34 procedures identified in Round 1 were reduced to a final prioritized list of 18 technical procedures for simulation-based training. The five procedures that reached the highest prioritization were cystoscopy, transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate, placement of ureteral stent, insertion of urethral and suprapubic catheter, and transurethral resection of the bladder. CONCLUSION: The prioritized list of technical procedures in urology that were identified as highly suitable for simulation can be used as an aid in the planning and development of simulation-based training programs.