Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Neuroimaging Clin N Am ; 32(1): 255-269, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34809842

RESUMO

Pre- and postoperative imaging is increasingly used in plastic and reconstructive surgery for the evaluation of bony and soft tissue anatomy. Imaging plays an important role in preoperative planning. In the postoperative setting, imaging is used for the assessment of surgical positioning, bone healing and fusion, and for the assessment of early or delayed surgical complications. This article will focus on imaging performed for surgical reconstruction of the face, including orthognathic surgery, facial feminization procedures for gender dysphoria, and face transplantation.


Assuntos
Transplante de Face , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Diagnóstico por Imagem , Ossos Faciais/diagnóstico por imagem , Ossos Faciais/cirurgia , Feminização/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino
2.
Clin Imaging ; 68: 71-89, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32574933

RESUMO

The cavernous sinus is a complex structure susceptible to a wide variety of vascular, neoplastic and inflammatory pathologies. Vascular pathologies include ICA aneurysms, carotid-cavernous fistulas, cavernous sinus thrombosis, and cavernous hemangioma. Neoplasms that involve the cavernous sinus include pituitary adenoma, meningioma, schwannoma, lymphoma, perineural tumor spread, metastases, and direct tumor invasion. Infectious and inflammatory diseases include Tolosa-Hunt syndrome, sarcoidosis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, IgG-4 related disease and invasive fungal infections. In this article, we review the clinical and imaging findings of a number of pathologies involving the cavernous sinus, focusing on key features that can narrow the differential diagnosis and, in some cases, support a particular diagnosis.


Assuntos
Seio Cavernoso , Neoplasias Meníngeas , Meningioma , Síndrome de Tolosa-Hunt , Seio Cavernoso/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética
3.
Pediatr Radiol ; 44(10): 1252-7, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24805204

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The upper gastrointestinal (UGI) series is the preferred method for the diagnosis of malrotation. A bedside UGI technique was developed at our institution for use in low birth weight, critically ill neonates to minimize the risks of transportation from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) such as hypothermia and dislodgement of support lines and tubes. OBJECTIVE: To determine the ability of a bedside UGI technique to identify the position of the duodenojejunal junction (DJJ) in low birth weight, critically ill infants in the NICU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed bedside UGI examinations performed in premature infants weighing less than 1,500 g from 2008 to 2013 and correlated the findings with clinical data, imaging studies and surgical findings. RESULTS: Of 27 patients identified (weight range: 633-1,495 g), 21 (78%) bedside UGI series were diagnostic. Twenty of 27 cases (74%) demonstrated normal intestinal rotation. One case demonstrated malrotation with midgut volvulus, which was confirmed at surgery. In six cases (22%), the position of the DJJ could not be accurately determined. No cases of malrotation with midgut volvulus were missed. None of the patients with normal bedside UGI studies was found to have malrotation based on clinical follow-up (mean: 20 months), surgical findings or further imaging. CONCLUSION: The bedside UGI is a useful technique to exclude malrotation in critically ill neonates and minimizes potential risks of transportation to the radiology suite. Pitfalls that may preclude a diagnostic examination include incorrect timing of radiographs, patient rotation, suboptimal enteric tube position and bowel distention. In cases of diagnostic uncertainty, a follow-up study should be performed.


Assuntos
Volvo Intestinal/congênito , Posicionamento do Paciente/métodos , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Intensificação de Imagem Radiográfica/métodos , Trato Gastrointestinal Superior/diagnóstico por imagem , Anormalidades do Sistema Digestório , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido de Baixo Peso , Recém-Nascido , Volvo Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Método Simples-Cego
4.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 200(5): 957-62, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23617475

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Acute appendicitis is the most common condition requiring emergency surgery in children. Differentiation of perforated from nonperforated appendicitis is important because perforated appendicitis may initially be managed conservatively whereas nonperforated appendicitis requires immediate surgical intervention. CT has been proved effective in identifying appendiceal perforation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether perforated and nonperforated appendicitis in children can be similarly differentiated with ultrasound. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 161 consecutively registered children from two centers who had acute appendicitis and had undergone ultra-sound and appendectomy. Ultrasound images were reviewed for appendiceal size, appearance of the appendiceal wall, changes in periappendiceal fat, and presence of free fluid, abscess, or appendicolith. The surgical report served as the reference standard for determining whether perforation was present. The specificity and sensitivity of each ultrasound finding were determined, and binary models were generated. RESULTS: The patients included were 94 boys and 67 girls (age range, 1-20 years; mean, 11 ± 4.4 [SD] years) The appendiceal perforation rate was significantly higher in children younger than 8 years (62.5%) compared with older children (29.5%). Sonographic findings associated with perforation included abscess (sensitivity, 36.2%; specificity, 99%), loss of the echogenic submucosal layer of the appendix in a child younger than 8 years (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 72.7%), and presence of an appendicolith in a child younger than 8 years (sensitivity, 68.4%; specificity, 91.7%). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound is effective for differentiation of perforated from nonperforated appendicitis in children.


Assuntos
Apendicite/diagnóstico por imagem , Apendicite/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Apendicite/cirurgia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , New York/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Ultrassonografia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA