Outcome of intraoperative brachytherapy as a salvage treatment for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced recurrent rectal cancer (RRC) requires a multimodal approach. Intraoperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) may reduce the risk of local recurrence. However, the optimal therapeutic regimen remains unclear. The aim of this retrospective monocentric study was to evaluate the toxicity of HDR-BT after resection of RRC. METHODS: Between 2018 and 2022, 17 patients with RRC received resection and HDR-BT. HDR-BT was delivered alone or as an anticipated boost with a median dose of 13 Gy (range 10-13 Gy) using an 192iridium microSelectron HDR remote afterloader (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). All participants were followed for assessment of acute and late adverse events using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 and the modified Late Effects in Normal Tissues criteria (subjective, objective, management, and analytic; LENT-SOMA) at 3­ to 6­month intervals. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients were treated by HDR-BT with median dose of 13 Gy (range 10-13 Gy). Most patients (47%) had an RRC tumor stage of cT3­4 N0. At the time of RRC diagnosis, 7 patients (41.2%) had visceral metastases (hepatic, pulmonary, or peritoneal) in the sense of oligometastatic disease. The median interval between primary tumor resection and diagnosis of RRC was 17 months (range 1-65 months). In addition to HDR-BT, 2 patients received long-course chemoradiotherapy (CRT; up to 50.4 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions) and 2 patients received short-course CRT up to 36 Gy in 2­Gy fractions. For concomitant CRT, all patients received 5­fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabine. Median follow-up was 13 months (range 1-54). The most common acute grade 1-2 toxicities were pain in 7 patients (41.2%), wound healing disorder in 3 patients (17.6%), and lymphedema in 2 patients (11.8%). Chronic toxicities were similar: grade 1-2 pain in 7 patients (41.2%), wound healing disorder in 3 patients (17.6%), and incontinence in 2 patients (11.8%). No patient experienced a grade ≥3 event. CONCLUSION: Reirradiation using HDR-BT is well tolerated with low toxicity. An individualized multimodality approach using HDR-BT in the oligometastatic setting should be evaluated in prospective multi-institutional studies.

Partial hepatectomy accelerates colorectal metastasis by priming an inflammatory premetastatic niche in the liver.

Background: Resection of colorectal liver metastasis is the standard of care for patients with Stage IV CRC. Despite undoubtedly improving the overall survival of patients, pHx for colorectal liver metastasis frequently leads to disease recurrence. The contribution of this procedure to metastatic colorectal cancer at a molecular level is poorly understood. We designed a mouse model of orthograde metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) to investigate the effect of partial hepatectomy (pHx) on tumor progression. Methods: CRC organoids were implanted into the cecal walls of wild type mice, and animals were screened for liver metastasis. At the time of metastasis, 1/3 partial hepatectomy was performed and the tumor burden was assessed longitudinally using MRI. After euthanasia, different tissues were analyzed for immunological and transcriptional changes using FACS, qPCR, RNA sequencing, and immunohistochemistry. Results: Mice that underwent pHx presented significant liver hypertrophy and an increased overall metastatic load compared with SHAM operated mice in MRI. Elevation in the metastatic volume was defined by an increase in de novo liver metastasis without any effect on the growth of each metastasis. Concordantly, the livers of pHx mice were characterized by neutrophil and bacterial infiltration, inflammatory response, extracellular remodeling, and an increased abundance of tight junctions, resulting in the formation of a premetastatic niche, thus facilitating metastatic seeding. Conclusions: Regenerative pathways following pHx accelerate colorectal metastasis to the liver by priming a premetastatic niche.

Single-cell deconvolution reveals high lineage- and location-dependent heterogeneity in mesenchymal multivisceral stage 4 colorectal cancer.

Metastasized colorectal cancer (CRC) is associated with a poor prognosis and rapid disease progression. Besides hepatic metastasis, peritoneal carcinomatosis is the major cause of death in Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage IV CRC patients. Insights into differential site-specific reconstitution of tumor cells and the corresponding tumor microenvironment are still missing. Here, we analyzed the transcriptome of single cells derived from murine multivisceral CRC and delineated the intermetastatic cellular heterogeneity regarding tumor epithelium, stroma, and immune cells. Interestingly, we found an intercellular site-specific network of cancer-associated fibroblasts and tumor epithelium during peritoneal metastasis as well as an autologous feed-forward loop in cancer stem cells. We furthermore deciphered a metastatic dysfunctional adaptive immunity by a loss of B cell-dependent antigen presentation and consecutive effector T cell exhaustion. Furthermore, we demonstrated major similarities of this murine metastatic CRC model with human disease and - based on the results of our analysis - provided an auspicious site-specific immunomodulatory treatment approach for stage IV CRC by intraperitoneal checkpoint inhibition.

Questions to consider when caring for patients with ulcerative colitis.

Although the management of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) is well defined by national and international guidelines, there are many debates and open questions related to daily care of UC patients. Here, we aimed to review topics with high clinical relevance including therapy algorithms, potential biomarkers for disease prognosis and response to therapy, the role of interventions targeting the gut microbiota, insights from head-to-head trials, novel UC medications, exit strategies, the impact of COVID19 on UC, care of patients with acute severe disease, cancer screening, and the role of surgery.

Endoscopic R1/Rx Resection of T1 Colorectal Cancer-What Next?

ABSTRACT: T1 carcinoma is often not recognized as such, and inappropriate endoscopic resection techniques are selected, resulting in positive (R1) or nonassessable (Rx) resection margins. Full-thickness resection has been proposed as an alternative to completion surgery. Gijsbers et al. compared oncological outcomes of both strategies. The main finding was that colorectal cancer recurrence was significantly higher in the full-thickness excision of the scar compared with the completion surgery group (9.0% vs 2.2%). However, metastasis-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different in both groups. The results of this study favor full-thickness excision of the scar as the first-line approach for Rx/R1-resected margins but otherwise low-risk tumors.

Efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Not Suitable for Transarterial Chemoembolization (HERACLES: HEpatocellular Carcinoma Stereotactic RAdiotherapy CLinical Efficacy Study).

The aim of this prospective observational trial was to evaluate the efficacy, toxicity and quality of life after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to assess the results of this treatment in comparison to trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE). Patients with HCC, treated with TACE or SBRT, over a period of 12 months, enrolled in the study. The primary endpoint was feasibility; secondary endpoints were toxicity, quality of life (QOL), local progression (LP) and overall survival (OS). Between 06/2016 and 06/2017, 19 patients received TACE and 20 SBRT, 2 of whom were excluded due to progression. The median follow-up was 31 months. The QOL remained stable before and after treatment and was comparable in both treatment groups. Five patients developed grade ≥ 3 toxicities in the TACE group and 3 in the SBRT group. The cumulative incidence of LP after 1-, 2- and 3-years was 6, 6, 6% in the SBRT group and 28, 39, and 65% in the TACE group (p = 0.02). The 1- and 2- years OS rates were 84% and 47% in the TACE group and 44% and 39% in the SBRT group (p = 0.20). In conclusion, SBRT is a well-tolerated local treatment with a high local control rates and can be safely delivered, while preserving the QOL of HCC patients.

Comparison of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimens for treatment of peritoneal-metastasized colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in combination with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) improves patient survival in colorectal cancer (CRC) with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Commonly used cytotoxic agents include mitomycin C (MMC) and oxaliplatin. Studies have reported varying results, and the evidence for the choice of the HIPEC agent and uniform procedure protocols is limited. AIM: To evaluate therapeutic benefits and complications of CRS + MMC vs oxaliplatin HIPEC in patients with peritoneal metastasized CRC as well as prognostic factors. METHODS: One hundred and two consecutive patients who had undergone CRS and HIPEC for CRC PC between 2007 and 2019 at the Medical Center of the University Freiburg regarding interdisciplinary cancer conference decision were retrospectively analysed. Oxaliplatin and MMC were used in 68 and 34 patients, respectively. Each patient's demographics and tumour characteristics, operative details, postoperative complications and survival were noted. Complications were stratified and graded using Clavien/Dindo analysis. Prognostic outcome factors were identified using univariate and multivariate analysis of survival. RESULTS: The two groups did not differ significantly regarding baseline characteristics. We found no difference in median overall survival between MMC and oxaliplatin HIPEC. Regarding postoperative complications, patients treated with oxaliplatin HIPEC suffered increased complications (66.2% vs 35.3%; P = 0.003), particularly intestinal atony, intraabdominal infections and urinary tract infection, and had a prolonged intensive care unit stay compared to the MMC group (7.2 d vs 4.4 d; P = 0.035). Regarding univariate analysis of survival, we found primary tumour factors, nodal positivity and resection margins to be of prognostic value as well as peritoneal cancer index (PCI)-score and the completeness of cytoreduction regarding peritoneal carcinomatosis. Multivariate analysis of survival confirmed primary distant metastasis and primary tumour resection status to have a significant impact on survival and likewise peritoneal cancer index-scoring regarding peritoneal carcinomatosis. CONCLUSION: In this single-institution retrospective review of patients undergoing CRS with either oxaliplatin or MMC HIPEC, overall survival was not different, though oxaliplatin was associated with a higher postoperative complication rate, indicating treatment favourably with MMC. Further studies comparing HIPEC regimens would improve evidence-based decision-making.

Simultaneous ipsilateral nephrectomy during kidney transplantation in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a matched pair analysis of 193 consecutive cases.

BACKGROUND: In end-stage renal transplant recipients with autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), the imperative, optimal timing, and technique of native nephrectomy remains under discussion. The Freiburg Transplant Center routinely performs a simultaneous ipsilateral nephrectomy. METHODS: From April 1998 to May 2017, we retrospectively analyzed 193 consecutive ADPKD recipients, receiving per protocol simultaneous ipsilateral nephrectomy and compared morbidity, mortality, and outcome with 193 non-ADPKD recipients of a matched pair control. RESULTS: The incidence of surgical complications was similar with respect to severe medical, surgical, urological, vascular, and wound-related complications as well as reoperation rates and 30-day mortality. Intraoperative blood transfusions were required more often in the ADPKD (22.8%) compared with the control group (6.7%; p < 0.0001). Early postoperative urinary tract infections occurred more frequent (ADPKD 40.4%/control 29.0%; p = 0.0246). Time of surgery was prolonged by 30 min (ADPKD 169 min; 95%CI 159.8-175.6 min/control 139 min; 95%CI 131.4-145.0 min; p < 0.0001). One-year patient (ADPKD 96.4%/control 95.8%; p = 0.6537) and death-censored graft survival (ADPKD 94.8%/control 93.7%; p = 0.5479) were comparable between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: With respect to morbidity and mortality, per protocol, simultaneous native nephrectomy is a safe procedure. Especially in asymptomatic ADPKD KTx recipients, the number of total operations can be reduced and residual diuresis preserved up until transplantation. In living donation, even preemptive transplantation is possible.

Reconstruction of Perineal Defects: A Comparison of the Myocutaneous Gracilis and the Gluteal Fold Flap in Interdisciplinary Anorectal Tumor Resection.

Introduction: Resection of anorectal malignancies may result in extensive perineal/pelvic defects that require an interdisciplinary surgical approach involving reconstructive surgery. The myocutaneous gracilis flap (MGF) and the gluteal fold flap (GFF) are common options for defect coverage in this area. Here we report our experience with the MGF/GFF and compare the outcome regarding clinical key parameters. Methods: In a retrospective chart review, we collected data from the Department of Plastic Surgery of the University of Freiburg from December 2008-18 focusing on epidemiological, oncological, and therapy-related data including comorbidities (ASA Classification) and peri-/postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo-System). Results: Twenty-nine patients were included with a mean follow-up of 17 months. Of the cases, 19 (65.5%) presented with recurrent disease, 21 (72.4%) received radiochemotherapy preoperatively, 2 (6.9%) received chemotherapy alone. Microscopic tumor free margins were achieved in 25 cases (86.2%). 17 patients (7 men, 10 women, rectal adenocarcinoma n = 11; anal squamous cell carcinoma n = 6; mean age 58.5 ± 10.68, mean BMI 23.1, mean ASA score 2.8) received a MGF (unilateral n = 10; bilateral n = 7). Twelve patients (7 men, 5 women, rectal adenocarcinoma n = 7; anal squamous cell carcinoma n = 4, proctodeal gland carcinoma n = 1, mean age 66.2 ± 9.2, mean BMI 23.6, mean ASA score 2.6) received coverage with a GFF (unilateral n = 4; bilateral n = 8). Mean operation time of coverage was 105 ± 9 min for unilateral and 163 ± 11 for bilateral MGFs, 70 ± 13 min for unilateral and 107 ± 14 for bilateral GFFs. Complications affected 62%. There was no significant difference in the complication rate between the MGF- and GFF-group. Complications were mainly wound healing disorders that did not extend the hospital stay. No flap loss and no complication that lead to long-lasting disability was documented (both groups). Pain-free sitting took more time in the GFF-group due to the location of the donor site. Conclusion: MG-flaps and GF-flaps prove to be reliable and robust techniques for perineal/pelvic reconstruction. Though flap elevation is significantly faster for GF-flaps, preoperative planning and intraoperative Doppler confirmation are advisable. With comparable complication rates, we suggest a decision-making based on distribution of adipose tissue for dead space obliteration, intraoperative patient positioning, and perforator vessel quality/distribution.

[Intraoperative radiotherapy in abdominal surgery-Own experiences]. / Intraoperative Strahlentherapie in der Abdominalchirurgie ­ eigene Erfahrungen.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) can be applied for locally advanced tumors and expected or unavoidable R1 situations combined with surgical resection. The aim is to improve local tumor control and long-term survival. The indications are primary and recurrent intra-abdominal and retroperitoneal tumors. This study aimed to evaluate own data and experiences with IORT combined with surgical visceral resection. METHODS: Patients who underwent IORT combined with abdominal tumor resection in the Department of General and Visceral Surgery at the University Medical Center Freiburg between January 2008 and December 2018 were included in this study. The results were retrospectively evaluated regarding short-term and long-term outcomes. RESULTS: The most frequent indications for IORT were sarcoma followed by rectal and anal cancers. The median IORT dose used was 15 Gy (range 8-19 Gy). With a median comprehensive complication index (CCI) of 11.9, complications occurred in 24% of patients (Dindo-Clavien ≥ °III). The 90-day mortality was 0%. Especially in recurrent anal cancer the local control after 1 year was insufficient despite R0 resection. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients IORT could be applied with acceptable morbidity. Nevertheless, the indications and patient selection are critical factors for carrying out the treatment. The effect of IORT to improve local tumor control and long-term survival should be evaluated in further studies.

The minimum distal resection margin in rectal cancer surgery and its impact on local recurrence - A retrospective cohort analysis.

AIM: The distal resection margin (DRM) plays a pivotal role in rectal cancer surgery. Colorectal surgeons are often torn between keeping an oncologically safe margin versus aiming at sphincter preserving surgery. This study was performed to assess the oncological safety of a minimal DRM of <1 cm. METHODS: From a prospectively maintained database for rectal cancer 405 patients were identified. Out of 405 patients 88 patients were eligible for the study characterized by UICC tumor stage of II or III, cancer less than 12 cm from the anal verge and a complete course of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) before undergoing low anterior rectal resection between 2004 and 2012. Preoperative staging included rigid rectoscopy, endo-rectal ultrasound as well as pelvic MRI. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). RESULTS: The incidence of local recurrence was 5.7% (n = 5). In DRM <1 cm (n = 33) local recurrence was seen in two patients (6.1%) and with DRM ≥ 1 cm (n = 55) in three patients (5.5%). The 5-year OS rate was 94.5% (93.2% DRM <1 cm, 95.7% DRM ≥1 cm; P = 0.642). 5-year LRFS was 93.2% in DRM <1 cm and 95.7% in DRM ≥1 cm (P = 0.936). CONCLUSION: R0 resection of stage II and II rectal cancer of the mid and lower third after preoperative CRT yields excellent results even with DRM <1 cm. Minimizing the distal resection margin may allow surgeons to offer sphincter sparing surgery without compromising local recurrence-free and overall survival in individual patients.

Repeated SBRT for in- and out-of-field recurrences in the liver.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and toxicity profile of repeated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for recurrent primary or secondary liver tumors. METHODS: Consecutive patients with primary (hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC] or cholangiocarcinoma [CCC]) or secondary liver cancer (LM), with intrahepatic recurrence or progression after SBRT, underwent re-SBRT in 3 to 12 fractions with a median time of 15 (range 2-66) months between treatments. RESULTS: In all, 24 patients which were previously treated with SBRT (30 lesions) were retreated with SBRT for "in- and out-of-field" recurrences (2nd SBRT: n = 28, 3rd SBRT: n = 2). The median follow-up after re-irradiation was 14 months. The median prescribed dose for the first SBRT was 46.5 (range 33-66 Gy, EQD210 = 70.5) Gy and 48 (range 27-66 Gy, EQD210 = 71) Gy for the re-SBRT. The median mean liver dose (Dmean, liver) was 6 Gy (range 1-25, EQD22 = 7 Gy) for the first SBRT and 10 Gy (range 1-63 Gy, EQD22 = 9 Gy) for the re-SBRT. Of the 30 re-irradiated lesions 6 were re-irradiated in-field resulting in a median EQD22, maximum of 359 (range 120-500) Gy for both treatments, with an α/ß = 2 to account for liver parenchyma. Treatment was well tolerated. Two patients with stent placement before SBRT developed cholangitis 4 and 14 months after re-SBRT. There were no elevations of the serum liver parameters after re-SBRT. One patient developed a grade 3 gastrointestinal bleeding. There was no radiation induced liver disease (RILD) observed. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated liver SBRT is feasible, without excessive liver toxicity, when there is no considerable overlapping with pre-irradiated portions of the stomach or bowel and enough time for the liver to regenerate.

Outcome after hepatic resection for isolated non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastases in 100 patients - the role of the embryologic origin of the primary tumor.

BACKGROUND: The indication for hepatic resection (HR) in patients suffering from liver metastases (LM) other than colorectal and neuroendocrine tumors is one focus of current multidisciplinary, oncologic considerations. This study retrospectively analyzes outcome after HR for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine (NCNNE) LM in the absence of distant or extrahepatic metastases. METHODS: We included 100 consecutive patients undergoing HR for isolated NCNNE LM from a prospective database in our institution, including postoperative follow-up. Primary tumors were of mesodermal origin in 44%, of ectodermal origin in 29% and of entodermal origin in 27%. Survival analysis was performed by univariate and multivariable methods. Mean follow-up after hepatic surgery was 3.6 years (0.25-16). RESULTS: Median age at the time of HR was 59.5 years. Kaplan-Meier-estimated survival after liver resection was 56.8%, 34.3% and 24.5% after 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Univariate analysis after HR revealed residual disease (hepatic or primary; p = 0.02), female gender (p = 0.013), entodermal origin (p = 0.009) and early onset of metastatic disease (≤24 months, p = 0.002), as negative prognostic factors. Multivariable survival analysis confirmed residual disease, female gender, entodermal embryologic origin and early onset of metastatic disease (≤24 months) as independent negative prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Overall outcome after HR of NCNNE LM results in acceptable long-term outcome. Although individual decision-making today mostly relies on clinical experience for this type of disease, risk factors derived from the embryologic origin of the tumor might help in patient selection.

Does the site of primary colorectal cancer influence the outcome after resection of isolated liver metastases?

INTRODUCTION: In unresectable patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), the site of the primary is a strong prognostic factor warranting major adjustments in palliative medical treatment. Initial results suggested that the site of CRC influences prognosis after curative resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). In this study, we evaluated outcome after resection of isolated CLM with regard to the location of the primary. METHODS: 221 patients with macroscopically complete resection of CLM and no known extrahepatic disease were identified. 63 patients had right-sided and 158 had left-sided CRC. Tumors of the transverse colon and rectum were excluded. Survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Characteristics of CLM, primary tumor stage and chemotherapeutic regimens were not significantly different between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier five-year survival was comparable (41%) in patients with right- or left-sided CRC (p = 0.64). Microscopic resection margin, number of liver metastases, age and nodal status but not the site of the primary tumor significantly influenced survival. CONCLUSION: The site of the colorectal primary in this well-defined group of patients after resection of isolated CLM did not prove to be of significant prognostic value. Whether the primary tumor in CLM is located on the left side or the right should not preclude patients from surgery.

The role of albumin-bilirubin grade and inflammation-based index in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the prognostic accuracy of the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade and the inflammation-based index (IBI) in estimating overall survival (OS) and toxicity in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients with 47 HCC lesions with a Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification stage B or C were treated with SBRT in 3-12 fractions. The ALBI grade and the IBI were calculated at different time points (baseline, during, at the end of treatment and at follow-up) and compared with the Child-Pugh (CP) score as well as other patient- and treatment-related parameters, concerning OS and toxicity. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 14.3 months for patients alive. The median OS from SBRT was 10 (95% confidence interval 8.3-11.6) months. The local control at 1 year was 79%. A lower IBI during treatment was associated with better OS (p = 0.034) but not CP and ALBI. Higher C­reactive protein levels as well as higher alpha-fetoprotein concentrations correlated with worse survival (p = 0.001). Both higher ALBI (p = 0.02) and CTP (p = 0.001) at baseline correlated with a higher incidence of acute and late toxicities (CTC ≥2). Neither the mean radiation dose to the liver nor the dose to 700 cc of the liver correlated with the occurrence of toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, a higher ALBI grade as well as a higher CP were predictors of higher incidence of toxicity, whereas a lower IBI during treatment correlated with a better OS. These results should be further evaluated in prospective studies.

Prognostic influence of hepatic margin after resection of colorectal liver metastasis: role of modern preoperative chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Modern chemotherapy (CTX) increases survival in stage IV colorectal cancer. In colorectal liver metastases (CLM), neoadjuvant (neo) CTX may increase resectability and improve survival. Due to widespread use of CTX in CLM, recent studies assessed the role of the hepatic margin after CTX, with conflicting results. We evaluated the outcome after resection of CLM in relation to CTX and hepatic resection status. METHODS: Since 2000, 334 patients with first hepatic resection for isolated CLM were analyzed. Thirty-two percent had neoadjuvant chemotherapy (targeted therapy in 42%). Sixty-eight percent never had CTX before hepatectomy or longer than 6 months before resection. The results were gained by analysis of our prospective database. RESULTS: Positive hepatic margins occurred in 8% (independent of neoCTx). Patients after neoCTX had higher numbers of CLM (p < 0.01) and a longer duration of surgery (p < 0.03). After hepatectomy, 5-year survival was 45% and correlated strongly with the margin status (47% in R-0 and 21% in R-1; p < 0.001). Survival also correlated with margin status in the subgroups with neoCTX (p < 0.01) or without neoCTx (p < 0.01). In multivariate analysis of the entire group, hepatic margin status (RR 3.2; p < 0.001) and age > 65 years (RR 1.6; p < 0.01) were associated with poorer survival. In the subgroup of patients after neoCTX (n = 106), only the resection margin was an independent predictor of survival (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with isolated colorectal liver metastases undergoing resection, the hepatic margin status was the strongest independent prognostic factor. This effect was also present after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for CLM.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for locally advanced intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the role of ablative radiotherapy doses in the treatment of hilar or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCC) using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS: Consecutive patients treated from 2007 to 2016 with CCC were evaluated. Local control and toxicities were assessed every 3 months according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0, respectively. Overall survival (OS), local control (LC) and progression free survival were calculated from SBRT. RESULTS: Thirty seven patients with 43 lesions were retrospectively evaluated. The median dose delivered was 45 Gy (range 25-66 Gy) in 3-12 fractions, corresponding to a median equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD210) of 56 (range 25-85) Gy. The median follow up was 24 months. The OS at 1 year was 56% with a median OS of 14 (95% CI: 7.8-20.2) months from start of SBRT and 22 (95% CI: 17.5-26.5) months from diagnosis. Eight lesions progressed locally. The local control rate (LC) at 1 year was 78%. The median progression free survival was 9 months (95% CI 2.8-15.2) 21 patients progressed in the liver but out of field and 15 progressed distantly. SBRT was well tolerated. Three patients (9%) developed a Grade III bleeding. Seven patients developed a cholangitis, one due to progression and the other because of a stent dysfunction 2-21(median 8) months from SBRT. CONCLUSION: In patients with locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma, SBRT is a local treatment option with an acceptable toxicity profile which warrants further investigation in prospective trials.

Excellent local control and tolerance profile after stereotactic body radiotherapy of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with large HCCs (median diameter 7 cm, IQR 5-10 cm) with a Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score A (60%) or B (40%) and Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification stage B or C were treated with 3 to 12 fractions to allow personalized treatment according to the size of the lesions and the proximity of the lesions to the organs at risk aiming to give high biologically equivalent doses assuming an α/ß ratio of 10 Gy for HCC. Primary end points were in-field local control and toxicity assessment. RESULTS: Forty seven patients with 64 lesions were treated with SBRT (median 45 Gy in 3-12 fractions) with a median follow up for patients alive of 19 months. The median biological effective dose was 76 Gy (IQR 62-86 Gy). Tumor vascular thrombosis was present in 28% and an underlying liver disease in 87% (hepatitis B or C in 21%, alcohol related in 51%, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in 13% of the patients, primary biliary cirrhosis 2%). Eighty three percent received prior and in most cases multiple therapies. Local control at 1 year was 77%. The median overall survival from the start of SBRT was 9 months (95% CI 7.7-10.3). Gastrointestinal toxicities grade ≥ 2 were observed in 3 (6.4%) patients. An increase in CTP score without disease progression was observed in 5 patients, of whom one patient developed a radiation induced liver disease. One patient died due to liver failure 4 months after treatment. CONCLUSION: SBRT is an effective local ablative therapy which leads to high local control rates with moderate toxicity for selected patients with large tumors.