Urology Mythbusters: Does prevalence of vesicoureteral reflux in children vary by race?

In this edition of Mythbusters, we examine the premise that prevalence of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children varies by race. Specifically, we consider whether there is evidence supporting the contention that VUR is more common in White children and less common in Black children. Statements regarding the lower prevalence of VUR in Black children are ubiquitous in both research papers and reviews. Many of the references cited in support of these statements do not actually support the existence of racial variation in VUR, due to uncontrolled single-arm study designs, highly selected samples at risk for bias, or simply not addressing VUR prevalence at all. There is a small group of studies which directly compared VUR prevalence among children undergoing cystography, and these studies have found VUR to be less common among Black children compared to White children. However, the results of such papers can only be considered in the context of a system in which systemic bias and racism may impact access and care delivery in profound ways. Given that race is a social construct that bears little relationship to shared genetic ancestry or underlying biological characteristics, these findings must be approached with extreme caution. The goals of pediatric urological care should be to confer equitable care to all young children regardless of race.

Is cerebral palsy associated with successful ureteral access during the initial attempt at ureteroscopy for urolithiasis in children and young adults?

BACKGROUND: Ureteroscopy is a common treatment for urolithiasis, but initial ureteral access is not always possible, particularly in pediatrics. Clinical experience suggests that neuromuscular conditions such as cerebral palsy (CP) may facilitate access, thus avoiding the need for pre-stenting and staged procedures. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine if probability of successful ureteral access (SUA) during initial attempted ureteroscopy (IAU) is higher in pediatric patients with CP vs. without CP. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed IAU cases for urolithiasis (2010-2021) at our center. Patients with pre-stenting, prior ureteroscopy, or urologic surgical history were excluded. CP was defined using ICD-10 codes. SUA was defined as scope access to urinary tract level sufficient to reach stone. Association of CP and other factors with SUA were evaluated. RESULTS: 230 patients (45.7% male, median age: 16 years [IQR: 12-18 y], 8.7% had CP) underwent IAU, with SUA in 183 (79.6%). SUA occurred in 90.0% of patients with CP vs. 78.6% of those without CP (p = 0.38). SUA was 81.7% in patients >12 years (vs. 73.8% in those <12), and the highest SUA was in those >12 years with CP (93.3%), but these differences were not statistically significant. Renal stone location was significantly associated with lower SUA (p = 0.007). Among patients with renal stone only, SUA in those with CP was 85.7% vs. 68.9% in those without CP (p = 0.33). SUA did not differ significantly by gender or BMI. CONCLUSIONS: CP may facilitate ureteral access during IAU in pediatric patients, but we were unable to show a statistically significant difference. Further study of larger cohorts may demonstrate whether CP or other patient factors are associated with successful initial access. Improved understanding of such factors would help preoperative counseling and surgical planning for children with urolithiasis.

Accuracy of telemedicine for diagnosis and pre-operative assessment of pediatric penile conditions.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with penile conditions comprise a significant proportion of any pediatric urology practice, and physical examination is the mainstay of diagnosis for such conditions. While the rapid adoption of telemedicine (TM) facilitated access to pediatric urology care during the pandemic, the accuracy of TM-based diagnosis for pediatric penile anatomy and pathology has not been studied. Our aim was to characterize the diagnostic accuracy of TM-based evaluation of pediatric penile conditions by comparing diagnosis during the initial virtual visit (VV) with a subsequent in-person visit (IPV). We also sought to assess the agreement between scheduled and actual surgical procedure performed. METHODS: A single-institution prospective database of male patients less than 21 years of age who presented for evaluation of penile conditions between August 2020 and December 2021 was analyzed. Patients were included if they had an IPV with the same pediatric urologist within 12 months of the initial VV. Diagnostic concordance was based on a surgeon-reported survey of specific penile diagnoses, completed at both initial VV and follow-up IPV. Surgical concordance was assessed based on the proposed versus billed CPT code(s). RESULTS: Median age among 158 patients was 10.6 months. The most frequent VV diagnoses were penile adhesions (n = 37), phimosis (n = 26), "other" (n = 24), post-circumcision redundancy (n = 18), and buried penis (n = 14). Initial VV and subsequent IPV diagnoses were concordant in 40.5% (64/158); 40/158 (25%) had partial concordance (at least one diagnosis matched). There was no difference in age, race, ethnicity, median time between visits, or device type between patients with concordant vs. discordant diagnoses. Of 102 patients who underwent surgery, 44 had VV only while 58 had IPV prior to surgery. Concordance of scheduled versus actual penile surgery was 90.9% in those patients who only had a VV prior to surgery. Overall, surgery concordance was lower among those with hypospadias repairs vs. non-hypospadias surgery (79.4% vs. 92.6%, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Among pediatric patients being evaluated by TM for penile conditions, there was poor agreement between VV-based and IPV-based diagnoses. However, besides hypospadias repairs, agreement between planned and actual surgical procedures performed was high, suggesting that TM-based assessment is generally adequate for surgical planning in this population. These findings leave open the possibility that, among patients not scheduled for surgery or IPV, certain conditions might be misdiagnosed or missed entirely.

False-positive urine pregnancy screening tests are uncommon in the hospital setting among patients with bowel-containing urinary tract reconstruction.

PURPOSE: False-positive urine pregnancy screening tests (UPST) have been reported among patients with bowel-containing urinary reconstruction (BCUR). However, the true frequency of such inaccurate results, which have been attributed to urinary mucous or other proteins interfering with or mimicking the binding of beta-HCG in the assay, is unknown in this population. We sought to determine the incidence of false-positive pregnancy screening tests among this patient population at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using existing databases of patients with spina bifida, bladder exstrophy, and genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma, we identified female patients with BCUR who had UPST over a 10-year period as screening prior to procedures or imaging. Patient and test result information was recorded. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients with a history of BCUR were identified: 33 with spina bifida, 73 within the exstrophy-epispadias complex (EEC), and 14 with genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma. Of this group, 46 patients (38%) had at least one UPST during the study period; 15 had 1 UPST, 6 had 2 UPSTs, 4 had 3 UPSTs, and 21 had greater than 3 UPSTs, for a total of 244 UPST in this cohort. UPSTs used at our institution included Sure-Vue brand and Alere brand (HCG sensitivity 20 mIU/ml). Types of BCUR included ileal enterocystoplasty in 25 patients, colon enterocystoplasty in 6, stomach enterocystoplasty in 5, composite enterocystoplasty in 7, and continent catheterizable channel alone (e.g. Yang-Monti, appendicovesicostomy) in 3 patients. Of the 244 UPSTs in patients with BCUR, zero (0%) were positive. CONCLUSIONS: Despite reports in the literature that false-positive UPST are common among patients with bowel-containing urinary diversions, we found no positive UPST among patients with BCUR in the healthcare setting. False-positive UPST in the home setting may be due to variability in sensitivity thresholds, binding agents, technical errors in test technique, kit quality control, or other factors.

Hybrid Clinics: A New Model for Ambulatory Care to Reduce Infection Risk.

Objectives: To assess the viability of a hybrid clinic model combining in-person examination with video-based consultation to minimize viral transmission risk. Methods: Data were collected prospectively in a pediatric urology clinic for in-person visits from January to April 2018 ("classic") and hybrid visits from October to December 2020 of the COVID-19 pandemic ("hybrid"). Variables included provider, diagnosis, patient type, time of day, prior surgery, postoperative status, and decision-making for surgery. The primary outcome was "room time" or time in-person. The secondary outcome was "total time" or visit duration. Proportion of visits involving close contact (room time ≥15 min) was assessed. Univariate analyses were performed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Fisher's exact test. Mixed models were fitted for visit approach and other covariates as fixed effects and provider as random effect. Results: Data were collected for 346 visits (256 classic, 90 hybrid). Hybrid visits were associated with less room time (median 3 min vs. 10 min, p < 0.001) but greater total time (median 13.5 min vs. 10 min, p = 0.001) as compared with classic visits. On multivariate analysis, hybrid visits were associated with 3 min less room time (95% confidence intervals [CIs]: -5.3 to -1.7, p < 0.001) but 3.8 min more total time (95% CI: 1.5-6.1, p = 0.001). Close contact occurred in 6.7% of hybrid visits, as compared with 34.8% of classic visits (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Hybrid clinic visits reduce room time as compared with classic visits. This approach overcomes the examination limitations of telemedicine while minimizing viral transmission, and represents a viable model for ambulatory care whenever close contact carries infection risk.

Comparing Pediatric Ureteroscopy Outcomes with SuperPulsed Thulium Fiber Laser and Low-Power Holmium:YAG Laser.

PURPOSE: The thulium fiber laser is a promising new lithoptripsy technology never before studied in the pediatric population. Our center adopted the first platform in North America, the SuperPulsed thulium fiber laser (SPTF). We aimed to compare outcomes in pediatric ureteroscopy using the SPTF to those using the gold standard, low-power holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, consecutive cohort study of unilateral ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy performed in pediatric patients from 2016 to 2021 as an early adopter of the SPTF. Thirty-day complications and stone-free status, defined as the absence of a stone fragment on followup imaging within 90 days, were analyzed using logistic regression. Operative times were compared using linear regression. Propensity scores for use of SPTF were used in regression analyses to account for potential cohort imbalance. RESULTS: A total of 125 cases were performed in 109 pediatric patients: 93 with Ho:YAG and 32 with SPTF. No significant difference was noted in age (p=0.2), gender (p=0.6), stone burden (p >0.9) or stone location (p=0.1). The overall stone-free rate was 62%; 70% with SPTF and 59% with Ho:YAG. The odds of having a residual stone fragment were significantly lower with SPTF than with Ho:YAG (OR=0.39, 95% CI: 0.19-0.77, p=0.01). There was no significant difference in operative time (p=0.8). Seven (25%) complications were noted with SPTF and 19 (22%) with Ho:YAG (p=0.6). CONCLUSIONS: The SPTF laser was associated with a higher stone-free rate than the low-power Ho:YAG laser without compromising operative time and safety.

Malignancy Yield of Testis Pathology in Older Boys and Adolescents with Cryptorchidism.

PURPOSE: We performed a retrospective, single-institution study to characterize the pathological findings of testis tissue specimens from older boys and adolescents with cryptorchidism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With institutional review board approval, pathology reports were obtained for testicular specimens from patients age 10 years or older at a pediatric hospital from 1994 to 2016. Reports were excluded if they lacked clinical records, lacked testicular parenchyma, were from a descended testis or were from a patient with differences of sexual development. Variables of interest included age, testis location, procedure and pathological findings. Presence of malignancy among intra-abdominal versus extra-abdominal undescended testes was compared using Fisher's Exact Test. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients met inclusion criteria. The median age was 15.3 years (range 10.1-27.7). None had a history of testicular malignancy. Forty-five unilateral orchiectomies, 22 unilateral orchiopexies with biopsy and 4 bilateral procedures were performed. Seventeen testes (22.7%) were intra-abdominal, 42 (56.0%) were in the inguinal canal, 9 (12.0%) were at the external inguinal ring, 3 (4.0%) were in the superficial inguinal pouch and 4 (5.3%) were in the scrotum. Malignancy was detected in 2/71 patients (2.8%). By location, 2/16 patients (12.5%) with intra-abdominal testis and 0/55 patients (0%) with extra-abdominal testis demonstrated malignancy (p=0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Among males with cryptorchidism ages 10 years and older without differences of sexual development, 2/16 patients with intra-abdominal testis and 0/55 patients with extra-abdominal testis demonstrated malignancy. In older boys and adolescents, orchiectomy or biopsy is indicated for intra-abdominal testes but may not be necessary for extra-abdominal undescended testes.

Changes in Clinical Presentation and Renal Outcomes among Children with Febrile Urinary Tract Infection: 2005 vs 2015.

PURPOSE: Recent studies have demonstrated trends of decreasing voiding cystourethrogram utilization rates and delayed vesicoureteral reflux diagnosis in some children. It is possible that such delays could lead to more children sustaining repeated episodes of febrile urinary tract infection, and potential kidney injury, prior to diagnosis and treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using single institutional, cross-sectional cohorts of patients in 2 time periods (2005 and 2015), we compared clinical presentation and renal outcomes among patients 13 years and younger with history of febrile urinary tract infection presenting for initial voiding cystourethrogram. Outcomes included 1) recurrent urinary tract infection, 2) presence of vesicoureteral reflux, 3) grade of vesicoureteral reflux, and 4) renal scarring. Associations between year of presentation and outcomes of recurrent urinary tract infection and vesicoureteral reflux diagnosis were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression models. For the outcome of renal scarring, a logistic regression model was fitted for propensity score matched cohorts. RESULTS: Compared to children presenting in 2005, those in 2015 had 3 times the odds of recurrent urinary tract infection (OR 3.01, 95% CI 2.18-4.16, p <0.0001). Time period was not associated with the odds of vesicoureteral reflux (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.77-1.23, p=0.85). Those in 2015 were more likely to present with vesicoureteral reflux grade >3 (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.13-4.34, p=0.02) but not vesicoureteral reflux grade >2 (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.74-1.67, p=0.60). Renal scarring was more common among children presenting in 2015 (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.03-8.20, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to 2005, children presenting in 2015 for post-urinary tract infection voiding cystourethrogram have increased likelihood of recurrent urinary tract infection and renal scarring, despite similar likelihood of vesicoureteral reflux diagnosis.

Flat Panel Detector c-Arms Are Associated with Dramatically Reduced Radiation Exposure During Ureteroscopy and Produce Superior Images.

Background: We wished to determine whether newly available flat panel detector (FPD) c-arms were (1) associated with lower radiation dose during ureteroscopy (URS) than conventional image intensifier (CII) c-arms and (2) to compare fluoroscopic image quality between the units. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 44 consecutive patients undergoing URS at a pediatric hospital, with c-arms assigned by availability in the operating room. We performed dosimetry experiments using the same c-arms on standard phantoms. Results: Patient and case characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups of patients. The median dose in the FPD group was less than a quarter of the dose in the CII group, 0.48 [0.42, 0.97] mGy vs 2.2 [1.1, 3.8] mGy, p < 0.0001. The FPD dose remained at less than one-third of the CII dose accounting for any difference in fluoroscopy time, and remained significant in a multivariate model including fluoroscopy time and patient weight (ß = 2.4, p = 0.007). Phantom studies showed higher image quality for FPDs at all simulated patient sizes, even at lower radiation doses. Conclusions: This is the first report comparing radiation dose from c-arms of image intensifiers and FPDs in adults or children. Use of an FPD during URS was associated with a substantially decreased absorbed dose for patients while simultaneously improving image quality.

Contemporary Management of Urinary Tract Infection in Children.

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is common in children, and girls are at a significantly higher risk, as compared to boys, except in early infancy. Most cases are caused by Escherichia coli Collection of an uncontaminated urine specimen is essential for accurate diagnosis. Oral antibiotic therapy for 7 to 10 days is adequate for uncomplicated cases that respond well to the treatment. A renal ultrasound examination is advised in all young children with first febrile UTI and in older children with recurrent UTI. Most children with first febrile UTI do not need a voiding cystourethrogram; it may be considered after the first UTI in children with abnormal renal and bladder ultrasound examination or a UTI caused by atypical pathogen, complex clinical course, or known renal scarring. Long-term antibiotic prophylaxis is used selectively in high-risk patients. Few patients diagnosed with vesicoureteral reflux after a UTI need surgical correction. The most consequential long-term complication of acute pyelonephritis is renal scarring, which may increase the risk of hypertension or chronic kidney disease later in life. Treatment of acute pyelonephritis with an appropriate antibiotic within 48 hours of fever onset and prevention of recurrent UTI lowers the risk of renal scarring. Pathogens causing UTI are increasingly becoming resistant to commonly used antibiotics, and their indiscriminate use in doubtful cases of UTI must be discouraged.

Antireflux Surgery at National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric Hospitals.

PURPOSE: This study aims to examine contemporary practice patterns and compare short-term outcomes for vesicoureteral reflux procedures (ureteral reimplant/endoscopic injection) using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Procedure-specific variables for antireflux surgery were developed to capture data not typically collected in National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric (eg vesicoureteral reflux grade, urine cultures, 31-60-day followup). Descriptive statistics were performed, and logistic regression assessed associations between patient/procedural factors and outcomes (urinary tract infection, readmissions, unplanned procedures). RESULTS: In total, 2,842 patients (median age 4 years; 76% female; 68% open reimplant, 6% minimally invasive reimplant, 25% endoscopic injection) had procedure-specific variables collected from July 2016 through June 2018. Among 88 hospitals, a median of 24.5 procedures/study period were performed (range 1-148); 95% performed ≥1 open reimplant, 30% ≥1 minimally invasive reimplant, and 70% ≥1 endoscopic injection, with variability by hospital. Two-thirds of patients had urine cultures sent preoperatively, and 76% were discharged on antibiotics. Outcomes at 30 days included emergency department visits (10%), readmissions (4%), urinary tract infections (3%), and unplanned procedures (2%). Over half of patients (55%) had optional 31-60-day followup, with additional outcomes (particularly urinary tract infections) noted. Patients undergoing reimplant were younger, had higher reflux grades, and more postoperative occurrences than patients undergoing endoscopic injections. CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary data indicate that open reimplant is still the most common antireflux procedure, but procedure distribution varies by hospital. Emergency department visits are common, but unplanned procedures are rare, particularly for endoscopic injection. These data provide basis for comparing short-term complications and developing standardized perioperative pathways for antireflux surgery.

Pharmacological Dilutional Therapy Using the Vasopressin Antagonist Tolvaptan for Young Patients With Cystinuria: A Pilot Investigation.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a pilot study of short-term safety, tolerability, and impact on urinary stone risk parameters of the vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist tolvaptan (which increases urinary excretion of free water) among adolescents and young adults with cystinuria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled cystinuria patients age 12-25 years. Subjects were treated for 4 days at low-dose tolvaptan (0.3 mg/kg/day, maximum 30 mg) and 4 days at high dose (0.6 mg/kg/day, maximum 60 mg). Twenty-four-hour urine collections were done at baseline, day 3-4 of the dosing period, day 7-8 of the dosing period, and 3-6 days after washout. Primary outcome was cystine capacity (mg/L, target capacity > 0). Secondary outcomes included other urinary/serum parameters, tolerability, and thirst response. RESULTS: Two females (17, 23 years) and 2 males (13, 24 years) were enrolled. Cystine capacity respectively went from baseline of -312, -82, -353, and -628 mg/L to 97, 111, 75, and -3 mg/L on high dose (Figure 1). Twenty-four-hour volume went from 1.96, 3.0, 2.1, and 0.91 L to 11.74, 6.5, 9.9, and 2.8 L on high dose (Figure 2). There were no abnormalities in serum electrolytes or liver enzymes. Subjects did experience extreme thirst (9/10 on visual scale), but none discontinued treatment or reduced dose. CONCLUSION: Dilutional therapy with tolvaptan increased both cystine capacity and urinary volumes. This treatment approach has the potential to reduce recurrence of stones in this population. Further investigation should study longer term effects and safety, and determine optimal dosing to improve tolerability.

Accuracy of Ultrasound in Identifying Renal Scarring as Compared to DMSA Scan.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of renal ultrasound (RUS) in detecting renal scarring (RS). METHODS: All initial DMSA scans performed from 2006 to 2009 for history of urinary tract infection (UTI) or vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in patients under 14 years old were identified, and clinical history obtained via chart review. Patients who had RUS within 4 months of DMSA scan and no documented UTI during that interval were included. Decreased uptake of tracer associated with loss of contours or cortical thinning defined a positive DMSA study. Increased echogenicity/dysplasia, cortical thinning, atrophic kidney and/or abnormal corticomedullary differentiation defined a positive RUS. The sensitivity and specificity of RUS in identifying RS were calculated using DMSA scan as the gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients had initial DMSA scans performed for UTI or VUR, with a RUS within 4 months, and no UTI between the 2 studies. Ninety-five of 144 (66%) had RS on DMSA and 49/144 (34%) did not. Patients with or without RS on DMSA were not different in gender (P = .073), age (P = .432), insurance (P = 1.000) or VUR grade (P = .132). Only 39/144 (27.1%) patients had positive RUS. The sensitivity of RUS for RS was 35.8% and the specificity was 89.8%, leading to an accuracy of 54.2% (95%CI; 45.7-62.5%, P = .999). CONCLUSION: RUS demonstrated poor sensitivity for RS visualized on DMSA scan. This suggests that RUS is a poor screening test for RS or indicators of future renal scar. A normal ultrasound does not rule out RS or risk of future renal scar. Specificity of RUS was excellent.

Urology mythbusters: do we need to surgically correct vesicoureteral reflux in older girls to prevent problems in future pregnancy? (revision 1).

In this edition of Mythbusters we critically examine the premise that, because women with history of vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) are at higher risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) and other morbidity during pregnancy, persistent VUR in older girls should be considered an indication for surgical correction. The literature is very limited in that there are essentially no methodologically robust comparisons of pregnancy outcomes among women whose childhood VUR was or was not surgically repaired. Most of the case series and cohorts find relatively high incidence of UTI and pyelonephritis among pregnant women with a history of VUR, but there is very little to suggest that persistent VUR is itself a risk factor for infection during pregnancy. Indeed, some studies suggest that UTI risk is actually higher among women who previously underwent anti-reflux surgery compared to those who did not, although these data are compromised by significant selection bias. In contrast, there is relatively strong evidence that maternal and fetal morbidity is higher when the mother is known to have renal scarring; such women probably merit close surveillance during pregnancy for infection, hypertension and pre-eclampsia, and other problems. Overall, current evidence is insufficient to support routine anti-reflux surgery in girls with the sole purpose of decreasing complications during future pregnancy, particularly for girls with lower-grades of VUR and no renal scarring. The verdict for this urolegend: it contains a a "teeny, tiny nugget of truth."

The Use of Telemedicine for the Postoperative Urological Care of Children: Results of a Pilot Program.

PURPOSE: For postoperative visits, which are often brief interactions between family and clinician, patients may prefer the convenience of receiving postoperative care from home. We evaluated the feasibility of telemedicine for postoperative encounters in pediatric urology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective telemedicine pilot study during an implementation period from November 10, 2017 to March 22, 2018. All postoperative patients deemed eligible by 1 of 4 urologists were offered enrollment in the telemedicine program. Enrollees underwent at least 1 virtual visit within 6 weeks of surgery. Technical difficulties and the number of unscheduled visits and readmissions were noted. After each virtual evaluation the family and clinician were prompted to complete a survey pertaining to perceptions of the telemedicine experience, including how effective the virtual visit was in delivering care. For each virtual visit with a urologist we estimated roundtrip travel cost and time. RESULTS: There was 96% technical success when using the software. A total of 125 postoperative virtual visits were completed in 83 patients. Median age of the children was 3.4 years and 87% were boys. Clinicians found that the virtual visit was "very effective" in 86% of cases, delivering the same care that they would have provided during a visit in person. Families were estimated to have saved a mean $150 travel cost and a median of 113 minutes of travel time per visit. No adverse postoperative outcomes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrates that telemedicine can be successfully implemented in the postoperative care of pediatric urology patients.

Urology Mythbusters: should hydronephrosis grade be used to decide which newborns should undergo voiding cystourethrogram?

In this episode of Mythbusters the premise that among infants with prenatally identified urinary tract dilation (UTD), voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) should be performed in those with higher grade UTD but not in those with lower grade UTD is critically examined. It is concluded that severity of dilation is not strongly associated with risk of vesicoureteral reflux or other anomalies diagnosed by VCUG. Therefore, using hydronephrosis grade to decide which infants with UTD should undergo VCUG is not evidence based.

The effect of surgeon versus technologist control of fluoroscopy on radiation exposure during pediatric ureteroscopy: A randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Fluoroscopy is commonly used during pediatric ureteroscopy (PURS) for urolithiasis, and the most important contributor to overall radiation exposure is fluoroscopy time (FT). One factor that may impact FT is who controls activation of the fluoroscope: the urologist (with a foot pedal) or the radiation technologist (as directed by the urologist). While there are plausible reasons to believe that either approach may lead to reduced FT, there are no systematic investigations of this question. We sought to compare FT with surgeon-control versus technologist control during PURS for urolithiasis. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial (Clinicaltrials.gov ID number: NCT02224287). Institutional Review Board approval was sought and obtained for this study. All subjects (or their legal guardians) provided informed consent. Each patient (age 5-26 years) was randomized to surgeon- or technologist-controlled fluoroscope activation. Block randomization was stratified by the surgeon. For technologist control, the surgeon verbally directed the technologist to activate the fluoroscope. For surgeon control, a foot pedal was used by the surgeon. The technologist controlled c-arm positioning, settings, and movement. The primary outcome was total FT for the procedure. Secondary outcomes included radiation exposure (entrance surface air kerma [ESAK] mGy). We also analyzed clinical and procedural predictors of FT and exposure. Mixed linear models accounting for clustering by surgeon were developed. RESULTS: Seventy-three procedures (5 surgeons) were included. The number of procedures per surgeon ranged from seven to 36. Forty-three percent were pre-stented. Thirty-one procedures were left side, 35 were right side, and seven were bilateral. Stones were treated in 71% of procedures (21% laser, 14% basket, and 65% laser/basket). Stone locations were distal ureter (11.5%), proximal/mid-ureter (8%), renal (69%), and ureteral/renal (11.5%). An access sheath was used in 77%. Median stone size was 8.0 mm (range 2.0-20.0). Median FT in the surgeon control group was 0.5 min (range 0.01-6.10) versus 0.55 min (range 0.10-5.50) in the technologist-control group (p = 0.284). Median ESAK in the surgeon control group was 46.02 mGy (range 5.44-3236.80) versus 46.99 mGy (range: 0.17-1039.31) in the technologist-control group (p = 0.362). Other factors associated with lower FT on univariate analysis included female sex (p = 0.015), no prior urologic surgeries (p = 0.041), shorter surgery (p = 0.011), and no access sheath (p = 0.006). On multivariable analysis only female sex (p = 0.017) and no access sheath (p = 0.049) remained significant. There was significant variation among surgeons (p < 0.0001); individual surgeon median FT ranged from 0.40 to 2.95 min. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure are similar whether the surgeon or technologist controls fluoroscope activation. Other strategies to reduce exposure might focus on surgeon-specific factors, given the significant variation between surgeons.

Has the robot caught up? National trends in utilization, perioperative outcomes, and cost for open, laparoscopic, and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty in the United States from 2003 to 2015.

INTRODUCTION: Since 2010, there have been few new data comparing perioperative outcomes and cost between open (OP) and robotic pyeloplasty (RP). In a post-adoption era, the value of RP may be converging with that of OP. OBJECTIVE: To 1) characterize national trends in pyeloplasty utilization through 2015, 2) compare adjusted outcomes and median costs between OP and RP, and 3) determine the primary cost drivers for each procedure. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the Premier database, which provides a nationally representative sample of U.S. hospitalizations between 2003 and 2015. ICD9 codes and itemized billing were used to abstract our cohorts. Trends in utilization and cost were calculated and then stratified by age. We used propensity scores to weight our cohorts and then applied regression models to measure differences in the probability of prolonged operative time (pOT), prolonged length of stay (pLOS), complications, and cost. RESULTS: During the study period 11,899 pyeloplasties were performed: 75% open, 10% laparoscopic, and 15% robotic. The total number of pyeloplasty cases decreased by 7% annually; OP decreased by a rate of 10% while RP grew by 29% annually. In 2015, RP accounted for 40% of cases. The largest growth in RPs was among children and adolescents. The average annual rate of change in cost for RP and OP was near stagnant: -0.5% for open and -0.2% for robotic. The summary table provides results from our regression analyses. RP conferred an increased likelihood of pOT, but a reduced likelihood of pLOS. The odds of complications were equivalent. RP was associated with a significantly higher median cost, but the absolute difference per case was $1060. DISCUSSION: Despite advantages in room and board costs for RP, we found that the cost of equipment and OR time continue to make it more expensive. Although the absolute difference may be nominal, we likely underestimate the true cost because we did not capture amortization, hidden or down-stream costs. In addition, we did not measure patient satisfaction and pain control, which may provide the non-monetary data needed for comparative value. CONCLUSION: Despite an overall decline in pyeloplasties, RP utilization continues to increase. There has been little change in cost over time, and RP remains more expensive because of equipment and OR costs. The robotic approach confers a reduced likelihood of pLOS, but an increased likelihood of pOT. Complication rates are low and similar in each cohort.

Minor procedure, major impact: Patient-reported outcomes following urethral meatotomy.

INTRODUCTION: Urethral meatotomy as treatment for meatal stenosis is a common pediatric urology procedure; however, little is known about the patient experience following this procedure. OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate clinical factors associated with patient-reported symptom improvement after urethral meatotomy. STUDY DESIGN: The families of boys undergoing urethral meatotomy between 2/2013 and 8/2016 received a survey by mail 6 weeks after surgery. Families were queried on changes in symptoms using a Likert-type scale (5 = much improved, 4 = somewhat improved, 3 = no change, 2 = somewhat worse, and 1 = much worse). Patient and procedure characteristics of the respondents were obtained via chart review. These included surgical indication(s) (abnormal stream, dysuria, or storage symptoms), postoperative complications, reoperation, and unplanned postoperative communications. Patients who had procedures other than simple urethral meatotomy were excluded. Descriptive statistics were compiled, and generalized estimating equations used to determine the associations of patient and procedure characteristics with symptom improvement. RESULTS: We sent 629 surveys and received 194 responses (30.4%). Twelve respondents were excluded for complex procedures or miscoding. The majority of respondents were privately insured (74%) and were between 5 and 12 years old (45%) or 1 and 4 years old (42%). The most frequent surgical indication was abnormal stream (72%) followed by pain (21%) and storage symptoms (15.5%). Nine respondents had minor complications (4.9%). Four patients had restenosis requiring repeat urethral meatotomy. After surgery, a majority (79%) were "much improved," 16% were "somewhat improved," 3% had "no change," and 1% were "somewhat worse." No family reported "much worse." Those patients who had "abnormal stream" as a surgical indication were significantly more likely to report "much improved" (OR 1.83, p = 0.014) than those without. Patient-reported improvement was not associated with suture use, patient age, insurance, surgeon, or location of the procedure (Table). DISCUSSION: Little has been written about patient-reported outcomes following urethral meatotomy. Our study affirms that the majority of boys improve following this procedure. However, improvement is significantly more likely if the child has a preoperative indication of an abnormal stream, such as deflection or spraying. Boys with symptoms of dysuria, frequency, or incontinence may be experiencing sequelae of meatal stenosis that simply take longer to improve. Alternatively, the meatal stenosis may be incidental to the primary symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of families report substantial symptomatic improvement after urethral meatotomy. However, boys undergoing urethral meatotomy for reasons other than a urinary stream abnormality are less likely to experience improvement.