The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma depends on response to neoadjuvant therapy.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of adjuvant therapy (AT) remains unclear in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and surgical resection. METHODS: The 2019 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with non-metastatic PDAC who received NAT followed by pancreaticoduodenectomy. Only patients with data regarding receipt of AT were included. Patients were classified if they had nodal down-staging specifically, or any downstaging (Tumor, Nodal, or overall). Propensity score matching (PSM) adjusted for pretreatment covariate imbalance between groups. The weighted Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to estimate the cumulative survival. RESULTS: After exclusion criteria and PSM, a total of 2784 patients remained; 1689 (60.7%) received AT and 1095 (39.3%) did not receive AT. Among all, those with additional AT had a significantly improved overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001). Upon evaluation of patients without downstaging after NAT, those who received AT had improved OS (no nodal downstaging or any downstaging; p = 0.002; p = 0.001). When evaluating patients with downstaging after NAT, those receiving AT did not have improved OS (nodal downstaging or any downstaging: p = 0.352; p = 0.99). CONCLUSION: Response to NAT appears to correlate with the benefit of AT following pancreaticoduodenectomy; patients who have a favorable response to NAT may not benefit from AT.

Predictors and benefits of multiagent chemotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Timing matters.

INTRODUCTION: Adjuvant (A) multiagent chemotherapy (MC) is the standard of care for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Tolerating MC following a morbid operation may be difficult, thus neoadjuvant (NA) treatment is preferable. This study examined how the timing of chemotherapy was related to the regimen given and ultimately the overall survival (OS). METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried from 2006 to 2017 for nonmetastatic PDAC patients who underwent surgical resection and received MC or single-agent chemotherapy (SC) pre- or postresection. Predictors of receiving MC were determined using multivariable logistic regression. Five-year OS was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 12,440 patients (NA SC, n = 663; NA MC, n = 2313; A SC, n = 6152; A MC, n = 3312) were included. MC utilization increased from 2006-2010 to 2011-2017 (33.1%-49.7%; odds ratio [OR]: 0.59; p < 0.001). Younger age, fewer comorbidities, higher clinical stage, and larger tumor size were all associated with receipt of MC (all p < 0.001), but NA treatment was the greatest predictor (OR 5.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.63-5.80; p < 0.001). MC was associated with increased median 5-year OS (26.0 vs. 23.9 months; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.88-0.96) and NA MC was associated with the highest survival (28.2 months) compared to NA SC (23.3 months), A SC (24.0 months), and A MC (24.6 months; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Use and timing of MC contribute to OS in PDAC with an improved 5-year OS compared to SC. The greatest predictor of receiving MC was being given as NA therapy and the greatest survival benefit was the NA MC subgroup. Randomized studies evaluating the timing of effective MC in PDAC are needed.

SAGES/AHPBA guidelines for the use of microwave and radiofrequency liver ablation for the surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma or colorectal liver metastases less than 5 cm.

BACKGROUND: Primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) represent the liver's two most common malignant neoplasms. Liver-directed therapies such as ablation have become part of multidisciplinary therapies despite a paucity of data. Therefore, an expert panel was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of microwave ablation (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for HCC or CRLM less than 5 cm in diameter in patients ineligible for other therapies. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted for six key questions (KQ) regarding MWA or RFA for solitary liver tumors in patients deemed poor candidates for first-line therapy. Subject experts used the GRADE methodology to formulate evidence-based recommendations and future research recommendations. RESULTS: The panel addressed six KQs pertaining to MWA vs. RFA outcomes and laparoscopic vs. percutaneous MWA. The available evidence was poor quality and individual studies included both HCC and CRLM. Therefore, the six KQs were condensed into two, recognizing that these were two disparate tumor groups and this grouping was somewhat arbitrary. With this significant limitation, the panel suggested that in appropriately selected patients, either MWA or RFA can be safe and feasible. However, this recommendation must be implemented cautiously when simultaneously considering patients with two disparate tumor biologies. The limited data suggested that laparoscopic MWA of anatomically more difficult tumors has a compensatory higher morbidity profile compared to percutaneous MWA, while achieving similar overall 1-year survival. Thus, either approach can be appropriate depending on patient-specific factors (very low certainty of evidence). CONCLUSION: Given the weak evidence, these guidelines provide modest guidance regarding liver ablative therapies for HCC and CRLM. Liver ablation is just one component of a multimodal approach and its use is currently limited to a highly selected population. The quality of the existing data is very low and therefore limits the strength of the guidelines.

Impact of Adherence to Operative Standards and Stage-Specific Guideline-Recommended Therapy in Nonmetastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Achieving optimal surgical outcomes in pancreatic adenocarcinoma requires a combination of both curative-intent resection to oncologic standards and stage-specific neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. This investigation sought to examine factors associated with receipt of standard-adherent surgery (SAS) and guideline-recommended therapy (GRT) and determine the impact of compliance on patient survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From the 2006-2016 National Cancer Database, 21,304 patients underwent resection for nonmetastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. SAS was defined as pancreatic resection with negative margins and ≥ 15 lymph nodes examined. Stage-specific GRT was defined by current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Multivariable models were used to determine predictors of adherence to SAS and GRT and prognostic impact on overall survival. RESULTS: Overall, SAS was achieved in 39% and GRT in 65% of patients, but only 30% received both SAS and GRT. Increasing age, minority race, uninsured status, and greater comorbidities were associated with a decreased odds of receiving both SAS and GRT (all p < 0.05). SAS (HR 0.79; CI 0.76-0.81; p < 0.001) and GRT (HR 0.67; CI 0.65-0.69; p < 0.001) were each independently associated with a survival advantage. Receipt of both SAS and GRT was associated with significant improvement in median OS compared with receiving neither (2.2 years vs 1.1 years; p < 0.001) which was independently associated with a 78% increased risk of death (HR 1.78; CI 1.70-1.86; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite survival benefits associated with adherence to operative standards and receipt of guideline-recommended therapy, compliance remains poor. Future efforts must be directed toward improved education and implementation efforts around both operative standards and therapy guidelines.

Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy: a matched analysis using ACS-NSQIP.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is gaining popularity due to improved perioperative outcomes over open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of MIDP and ODP using patients within a nationwide cohort. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons' National Quality Improvement Program (2014-2018) was used to evaluate incidence of post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) as well as 30-day composite major morbidity for patients undergoing MIDP vs. ODP. Matching was performed with a Mahalanobis-distance model for demographic characteristics, preoperative risk factors, and benign versus malignant pathology. Outcomes were assessed via weighted multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 3940 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy (1978 MIDP, 1962 ODP). After matching, 2985 patients were included (1978 MIDP, 1007 ODP). The rates of major morbidity (8.65% MIDP vs. 9.76% ODP, p = 0.37) were similar between groups. The MIDP group was found to have significantly decreased length of stay (5.6 vs. 7 days, p ≤ 0.001), but greater rates (12.54% MIDP vs. 9.35% ODP, p = 0.02) of post-operative fistula. CONCLUSIONS: When matched for baseline patient characteristics, MIDP was associated with shorter length of hospitalization with similar rates of morbidity compared to ODP. However, MIDP was associated with significantly increased rates of POPF. Further studies are needed to investigate this difference in POPF rate, and determine how to optimize MIDP surgical technique to reduce this risk.

Impact of Mediating and Confounding Variables on the Volume-Outcome Association in the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: High-volume centers (HVC), academic centers (AC), and longer travel distances (TD) have been associated with improved outcomes for patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC). Effects of mediating variables on these associations remain undefined. The purpose of this study is to examine the direct effects of hospital volume, facility type, and travel distance on overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing surgery for PAC and characterize the indirect effects of patient-, disease-, and treatment-related mediating variables. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, patients with non-metastatic PAC who underwent resection were stratified by annual hospital volume (< 11, 11-19, and ≥ 20 cases/year), facility type (AC versus non-AC), and TD (≥ 40 versus < 40 miles). Associations with survival were evaluated using multiple regression models. Effects of mediating variables were assessed using mediation analysis. RESULTS: In total, 19,636 patients were included. Treatment at HVC or AC was associated with lower risk of death [hazard ratio (HR) 0.90, confidence interval (CI) 0.88-0.92; HR 0.89, CI 0.86-0.91, respectively]. TD did not impact OS. Patient-, disease-, and treatment-related variables explained 25.5% and 41.8% of the survival benefit attained from treatment at HVC and AC, reducing the survival benefit directly attributable to each variable to 4.9% and 6.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of PAC at HVC and AC was associated with improved OS, but the magnitude of this benefit was less when mediating variables were considered. From a healthcare utilization and cost-resource perspective, further research is needed to identify patients who would benefit most from selective referral to HVC or AC.

Meeting the New Commission on Cancer Operative Standards: Where Do We Stand Now?

INTRODUCTION: The 2020 Commission on Cancer accreditation standards 5.7 and 5.8 address total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer and lymph node sampling for lung cancer. The purpose of this review was to assess our institution's compliance with these operative standards, which will be required in 2022 and 2023, and provide recommendations to other military training facilities seeking to comply with these standards. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 2018-2020 single institution chart review was performed of operative and pathology reports. Identified deficits were addressed in meetings with colorectal and thoracic surgery leadership, and cases were followed to reassess compliance. RESULTS: A total of 12 rectal and 48 lung cancer cases met the inclusion criteria and were examined. Pre-intervention compliance for standards 5.7 and 5.8 was 58% and 35%, respectively, because of inadequate synoptic reporting and lymph node sampling. After intervention, compliance was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Our institution requires changes to comply with new standards, including in areas of documentation and systematic pulmonary lymph node sampling. We provide lessons learned from our own institutional experience, including practical tips and recommendations to achieve compliance. All military training facilities performing lung and rectal oncologic resections should conduct an internal review of applicable cases in preparation for upcoming American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer site visits.

Downstaging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma With Either Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy Improves Survival.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or chemoradiation (NAC+XRT) is incorporated into the treatment of localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), often with the goal of downstaging before resection. However, the effect of downstaging on overall survival, particularly the differential effects of NAC and NAC+XRT, remains undefined. This study examined the impact of downstaging from NAC and NAC+XRT on overall survival. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried from 2006 to 2015 for patients with non-metastatic PDAC who received NAC or NAC+XRT. Rates of overall and nodal downstaging, and pathologic complete response (pCR) were assessed. Predictors of downstaging were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. Overall survival (OS) was assessed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: The study enrolled 2475 patients (975 NAC and 1500 NAC+XRT patients). Compared with NAC, NAC+XRT was associated with higher rates of overall downstaging (38.3 % vs 23.6 %; p ≤ 0.001), nodal downstaging (16.0 % vs 7.8 %; p ≤ 0.001), and pCR (1.7 % vs 0.7 %; p = 0.041). Receipt of NAC+XRT was independently predictive of overall (odds ratio [OR] 2.28; p < 0.001) and nodal (OR 3.09; p < 0.001) downstaging. Downstaging by either method was associated with improved 5-year OS (30.5 vs 25.2 months; p ≤ 0.001). Downstaging with NAC was associated with an 8-month increase in median OS (33.7 vs 25.6 months; p = 0.005), and downstaging by NAC+XRT was associated with a 5-month increase in median OS (30.0 vs 25.0 months; p = 0.008). Cox regression showed an association of overall downstaging with an 18 % reduction in the risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82; 95 % confidence interval, 0.71-0.95; p = 0.01) CONCLUSION: Downstaging after neoadjuvant therapies improves survival. The addition of radiation therapy may increase the rate of downstaging without affecting overall oncologic outcomes.

Prognostic Role of Lymph Node Sampling in Adolescent and Young Adults With Fibrolamellar Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is rare among adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients, and resection or transplant remains the only curative therapy. The role of lymph node (LN) sampling is not well-defined. The aim of this study was to describe practice patterns, as well as investigate the impact of LN sampling on survival outcomes in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using the 2004-2018 National Cancer Database (NCDB) was performed. Patients ≤21 y old with nonmetastatic HCC who underwent liver resection or transplant were evaluated. Clinical features of patients who underwent LN sampling were compared to those who did not, and univariable and multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate independent predictive factors of node positivity. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox Proportional Hazard Survival Regression. RESULTS: A total of 262 AYA patients with HCC were identified, of whom 137 (52%) underwent LN sampling, 44 patients had positive nodes, 40 (95%) of them had tumors >5 cm; 87 (64%) of patients with sampled nodes had fibrolamellar carcinoma (FLC), which was an independent risk factor for predicting positive nodes (P = 0.001). There was no difference in overall survival between patients who underwent LN sampling and those who did not; however, 5-y overall survival for node-positive patients was 40% versus 79% for node-negative patients (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In AYA patients with HCC, LN sampling was not associated with an independent survival benefit. However, FLC was an independent risk factor for LN positivity, suggesting a role for routine LN sampling in these patients.

Surgical Society Podcasts: A Novel Way to Engage and Educate the Community.

BACKGROUND: Podcasts are increasingly being utilized in the surgical field as an asynchronous educational resource. This article discusses podcasts devoted to the field of surgery and their growing contribution to surgical education. METHODS: We provide examples of current podcasts and their varied structures, including those that distribute clinical and educational content, discuss recent literature and advancements, interview leaders in the field, and/or showcase unique perspectives on topics such as career development, diversity, and wellness. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Podcasts generated from surgical societies stand on unique ground to educate and engage the surgical community.

A Multicenter, 10-Year Experience With Hepatocellular Adenoma: Risk Factors and Disease Course.

BACKGROUND: Management of hepatocellular adenoma (HA) is marked by a paucity of recent studies. Long-term follow-up data from an equal access health care system may facilitate our understanding of the natural disease course of HA and identify modifiable risk factors. METHODS: A multi-institutional, retrospective review of patients with HA from 2008-2017 was performed. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 124 patients identified, 94% were women with a mean age at diagnosis of 39.5 years (range 20-82). Median follow-up was 22.5 months (range 0-114) with thirty-four (27.4%) patients eventually undergoing hepatectomy. Mean BMI of the study population was 30.5 kg/m2 (range 16-72). Stratified by size, average BMI for adenomas ≥5 cm was 34 kg/m2 compared to 28 kg/m2 for those <5 cm (P < .05). The predominant symptom at presentation was abdominal pain (41.1%), while just 4% presented with acute rupture. Overall incidence of the malignancy was 2.5%. Among all patients, oral contraceptive use was documented in 74 (59.7%) patients, of whom 36 (29.0%) discontinued OC for at least six months. Regression after OC cessation occurred in seven patients (19.4%) while the majority (77.8%) remained stable. DISCUSSION: This decade-long review analyzing the impact of modifiable risk factors identifies a direct correlation between BMI and hepatocellular adenoma size. Rupture and malignant transformation are rare entities. Cessation of OC appears to be an effective strategy in the management of hepatic adenoma. Further investigations are warranted to determine if addressing modifiable risk factors such as BMI might induce further HA regression.

Impact of Hepatic Metastasectomy in the Multimodal Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of hepatic metastases in patients with stage IV breast cancer remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of hepatic metastasectomy on long-term outcomes. METHODS: The 2004-2015 National Cancer Database was queried for all patients diagnosed with stage IV breast cancer with metastases isolated to the liver. Patient demographics, disease-, treatment- and outcome-related data were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 2,895 patients, only 90 (3.1%) underwent hepatic resection. Compared to patients who did not undergo metastasectomy, patients treated with metastasectomy tended to be younger (52 ± 12.7 versus 59.2 ± 14.6; P < 0.001) and have private insurance (74.4% versus 45.3%; P < 0.001). Independent predictors of metastasectomy included younger age (OR 0.98; CI 0.96-0.99; P = 0.01), lobular carcinoma (OR 2.26; CI 1.06-4.82; P = 0.03), and prior surgery of the primary site (partial mastectomy (OR 6.96; CI 3.47-13.95; P < 0.001) or total mastectomy (OR 5.74; CI 3.06-10.76; P < 0.001)). Compared to no metastasectomy, hepatic metastasectomy was independently associated with a 37% reduction in the risk of death (HR 0.63; CI 0.44-0.91; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Stage IV breast cancer with metastases to the liver is rare and few patients undergo hepatic resection. However, in this select patient population, hepatic metastasectomy was associated with a significant survival advantage when included in the multimodal treatment of synchronous stage IV breast cancer.

Recurrent pancreatitis due to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm in a young adult.

A young adult male presented with recurrent pancreatitis and a 2.2 cm mixed duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) located in the pancreatic body. Our patient presented at age 21 with his second hospitalization for acute pancreatitis within a year. A mixed duct IPMN with main ductal dilation was identified, which prompted additional workup. Based upon the findings the patient was counseled regarding the risks and benefits of surveillance versus surgery. The patient elected to undergo a robotic-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. Final pathology revealed an IPMN involving branch and main pancreatic ducts with low and focally high-grade dysplasia. IPMNs are increasingly being identified. Consensus guidelines generally propose surveillance, but management in young adults can be complex. Herein we present the second youngest reported case and highlight the continued need for consensus management guidelines.

Rates, Predictors, and Outcomes of Portal Lymphadenectomy for Resectable Gallbladder Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Lymphadenectomy (LND) is recommended following surgical resection of ≥ T1b gallbladder cancer (GBC). However, frequency and stage-specific survival benefits of LND remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB; 2006-15) was queried for resected pathologic stage I-III GBC. LND performance, predictors of receiving LND, and LND association with overall survival (OS) were assessed. RESULTS: Of 2302 total patients, 1343 (58.3%) underwent LND. Patients who underwent LND were younger and more frequently had private health insurance, a negative surgical margin, higher pathologic T stage, and received adjuvant chemotherapy (all p < 0.001). LND rates were highest at academic centers (70.1%) relative to all other facility types (p < 0.001). LND was independently associated with improved OS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.61]. LND was associated with improved OS for pT1b, pT2, and pT3 patients (all p < 0.05) on univariate analysis. LND was independently associated with improved OS in pT2 (HR 0.44, CI 0.35-0.56) and pT3 (HR 0.54, CI 0.43-0.69) patients. CONCLUSIONS: LND is associated with a 48% reduction in risk of death in patients with resectable non-metastatic GBC, with greatest impact in pT2-3 patients. Patients without LND have similar OS to patients with node-positive disease, highlighting the importance of LND. Underutilization of LND likely results in undertreatment of patients with undiagnosed nodal disease, which may contribute to unfavorable oncologic outcomes.