Diagnostic Accuracy of Unenhanced Computed Tomography for Evaluation of Acute Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department.

Importance: Intravenous (IV) contrast medium is sometimes withheld due to risk of complication or lack of availability in patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) for abdominal pain. The risk from withholding contrast medium is understudied. Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced abdominopelvic CT using contemporaneous contrast-enhanced CT as the reference standard in emergency department (ED) patients with acute abdominal pain. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was an institutional review board-approved, multicenter retrospective diagnostic accuracy study of 201 consecutive adult ED patients who underwent dual-energy contrast-enhanced CT for the evaluation of acute abdominal pain from April 1, 2017, through April 22, 2017. Three blinded radiologists interpreted these scans to establish the reference standard by majority rule. IV and oral contrast media were then digitally subtracted using dual-energy techniques. Six different blinded radiologists from 3 institutions (3 specialist faculty and 3 residents) interpreted the resulting unenhanced CT examinations. Participants included a consecutive sample of ED patients with abdominal pain who underwent dual-energy CT. Exposure: Contrast-enhanced and virtual unenhanced CT derived from dual-energy CT. Main outcome: Diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced CT for primary (ie, principal cause[s] of pain) and actionable secondary (ie, incidental findings requiring management) diagnoses. The Gwet interrater agreement coefficient was calculated. Results: There were 201 included patients (female, 108; male, 93) with a mean age of 50.1 (SD, 20.9) years and mean BMI of 25.5 (SD, 5.4). Overall accuracy of unenhanced CT was 70% (faculty, 68% to 74%; residents, 69% to 70%). Faculty had higher accuracy than residents for primary diagnoses (82% vs 76%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.83; 95% CI, 1.26-2.67; P = .002) but lower accuracy for actionable secondary diagnoses (87% vs 90%; OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35-0.93; P < .001). This was because faculty made fewer false-negative primary diagnoses (38% vs 62%; OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.13-0.41; P < .001) but more false-positive actionable secondary diagnoses (63% vs 37%; OR, 2.11, 95% CI, 1.26-3.54; P = .01). False-negative (19%) and false-positive (14%) results were common. Interrater agreement for overall accuracy was moderate (Gwet agreement coefficient, 0.58). Conclusion: Unenhanced CT was approximately 30% less accurate than contrast-enhanced CT for evaluating abdominal pain in the ED. This should be balanced with the risk of administering contrast material to patients with risk factors for kidney injury or hypersensitivity reaction.

Relationship of Seminal Megavesicles, Prostate Median Cysts, and Genotype in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) can involve prostate and seminal vesicles but the potential interrelationship of these findings and associations with PKD gene mutation locus and type is unknown. PURPOSE: To determine the interrelationship of seminal megavesicles (seminal vesicles with lumen diameter > 10mm) and prostatic cysts in ADPKD and to determine whether there are associations with PKD gene mutations. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective, case control. POPULATION: Male ADPKD subjects (n = 92) with mutations in PKD1 (n = 71; 77%) or PKD2 (n = 21; 23%), and age/gender-matched controls without ADPKD (n = 92). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5T, axial/coronal T2 -weighted MR images. ASSESSMENT: Reviewers blinded to genotype independently measured seminal vesicle lumen diameter and prevalence of cysts in prostate, kidney, and liver. STATISTICAL TESTS: Nonparametric tests for group comparisons and univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify associations of megavesicles and prostate median cysts with mutations and renal/hepatic cyst burden. RESULTS: Seminal megavesicles were found in 23 of 92 ADPKD (25%) subjects with PKD1 (22/71, 31%) or PKD2 (n = 1/21, 5%) mutations, but in only two control subjects (P < 0.0001). Prostate median cysts were found in 17/92 (18%) ADPKD subjects, compared with only 6/92 (7%) controls (P = 0.01), and were correlated with seminal vesicle diameters (ρ = 0.24, P = 0.02). Nonmedian prostate cyst prevalence was identical between ADPKD and controls (7/92, 8%). After adjusting for age, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and height-adjusted total kidney volume, ADPKD subjects with megavesicles were 10 times more likely to have a PKD1 than a PKD2 mutation. Among PKD1 subjects, seminal megavesicles occurred more frequently with nontruncating mutations with less severe kidney involvement. DATA CONCLUSION: ADPKD is associated with prostate median cysts near ejaculatory ducts. These cysts correlate with seminal megavesicles (dilated to >10 mm) which predict a 10-fold greater likelihood of PKD1 vs. PKD2 mutation. Cysts elsewhere in the prostate are not related to ADPKD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:894-903.

The Role of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Gynecologic Oncology.

This article discusses the role of Computed tomography (CT) and MR imaging in gynecologic malignancies by reviewing epidemiology, histologic subtypes, and staging systems. Imaging findings specific to different gynecologic malignancies on CT and MR imaging are reviewed and the advantages of each imaging modality discussed. Imaging of endometrial, cervical, and ovarian cancer is reviewed in depth, with a brief discussion of rare gynecologic cancers.

Intravenous Contrast-Induced Nephropathy-The Rise and Fall of a Threatening Idea.

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) has been considered to be a cause of renal failure for over 50 years, but careful review of past and recent studies reveals the risks of CIN to be overestimated. Older studies frequently cited the use of high-osmolality contrast media, which have since been replaced by low-osmolality contrast media, which have lower risks for nephropathy. In addition, literature regarding CIN typically describes the incidence following cardiac angiography, whereas the risk of CIN from intravenous injection is much lower. Most of the early published literature also lacked appropriate control groups to compare to those that received iodinated contrast, and thus attributed rises in creatinine to intravenous contrast without considering normal creatinine fluctuations (frequent in patients with kidney disease) and other acute pathologic states such as hypotension or nephrotoxic drug administration. The aim of this paper is to review the literature detailing CIN risk, discuss why CIN risk is often overestimated and how withholding contrast can lead to misdiagnosis and delay in appropriate patient management.

Split-bolus CT urogram: Is less more?

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of split-bolus CT urogram (SB-CTU) without special maneuvers for ureteral distention in diagnosing upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UCA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A hospital database was searched from 1/1/10, to 9/1/15, for SB-CTU exams without special maneuvers for ureteral distention. Accuracy of SB-CTU for detecting upper and lower urinary tract UCA was computed by comparing the prospective radiology report with cystoscopy, ureteroscopy, and/or urologic clinical follow-up. Patients with less than 12 months of clinical follow-up were excluded. RESULTS: 339 studies were identified in 334 patients (60% male 40% female, avg. age 64). 119 studies were performed for microhematuria, 150 for gross hematuria, 13 for hematuria not otherwise specified, 57 for history of UCA, and one for a collecting system mass on a prior CT. There were five upper tract and 33 bladder tumors with overall prevalence of 1.5% and 9.7%, respectively. The prevalence varied significantly with patient age and clinical indication for SB-CTU. There were one false negative and four false positives for upper urinary tract UCA. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for detecting upper tract and bladder tumors were 80%, 99%, 44%, and 100%, respectively, and 55%, 98%, 78%, and 95%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on this study, SB-CTU without special maneuvers for ureteral distention is highly sensitive for detecting upper tract UCA, although with a low positive predictive value, false positives do occur. The clinical utility of increasing accuracy in diagnosing this low-prevalence disease through other more complex CT urogram protocols should be weighed against the added cost and radiation dose associated with these protocols.

Live Donor Renal Anatomic Asymmetry and Posttransplant Renal Function.

BACKGROUND: Relationship between live donor renal anatomic asymmetry and posttransplant recipient function has not been studied extensively. METHODS: We analyzed 96 live kidney donors, who had anatomical asymmetry (>10% renal length and/or volume difference calculated from computerized tomography angiograms) and their matching recipients. Split function differences (SFD) were quantified with technetium-dimercaptosuccinic acid renography. Implantation biopsies at time 0 were semiquantitatively scored. A comprehensive model using donor renal volume adjusted to recipient weight (Vol/Wgt), SFD, and biopsy score was used to predict recipient estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1 year. Primary analysis consisted of a logistic regression model of outcome (odds of developing eGFR>60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 1 year), a linear regression model of outcome (predicting recipient eGFR at one-year, using the chronic kidney disease-epidemiology collaboration formula), and a Monte Carlo simulation based on the linear regression model (N=10,000 iterations). RESULTS: In the study cohort, the mean Vol/Wgt and eGFR at 1 year were 2.04 mL/kg and 60.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. Volume and split ratios between 2 donor kidneys were strongly correlated (r = 0.79, P < 0.001). The biopsy scores among SFD categories (<5%, 5%-10%, >10%) were not different (P = 0.190). On multivariate models, only Vol/Wgt was significantly associated with higher odds of having eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m (odds ratio, 8.94, 95% CI 2.47-32.25, P = 0.001) and had a strong discriminatory power in predicting the risk of eGFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 1 year [receiver operating curve (ROC curve), 0.78, 95% CI, 0.68-0.89]. CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of donor renal anatomic asymmetry, Vol/Wgt appears to be a major determinant of recipient renal function at 1 year after transplantation. Renography can be replaced with CT volume calculation in estimating split renal function.

Comparison of Renal Parenchymal Volume Preservation Between Partial Nephrectomy, Cryoablation, and Radiofrequency Ablation Using 3D Volume Measurements.

PURPOSE: Small renal masses (SRM) can be managed via a variety of nephron-sparing procedures (NSPs), but the association between choice of NSP and renal parenchymal volume (RPV) preservation is not well understood. We sought to examine RPV preservation after partial nephrectomy (PN) performed via open, robotic, or laparoscopic approaches and thermal ablation (TA) performed via cryoablation (CA) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was a retrospective review of three institutional databases of patients with a SRM <4 cm treated via one of the five NSPs (open PN, laparoscopic PN, robotic PN, percutaneous CA, or percutaneous RFA). The 30 most recent consecutive cases treated via each NSP were selected to obtain a total of 150 cases for analysis. Patient characteristics were obtained via manual chart review, and tumor characteristics were assessed via the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score. Using three-dimensional rendering software, preoperative and postoperative RPV was calculated for the tumor-bearing kidney, excluding the tumor itself (for preoperative images) or the postsurgical/ablative defect (for postoperative images). The percent change in RPV was compared between the procedure types. RESULTS: One hundred fifty cases were included in the final analysis, with 30 cases from each NSP category. While preoperative tumors were larger in the PN group, there was no difference in the mean nephrometry score between groups. The TA group was found to have a lower mean RPV loss (-8.1% vs -16.5%, p<0.005). There was no difference in the RPV loss between modalities of TA (CA vs RFA) or between approaches to PN (open, laparoscopic, robotic). Matched-pair analysis based on the tumor size and multivariate analysis indicated TA vs PN was independently associated with less RPV loss. CONCLUSIONS: TA is associated with less RPV loss than PN in the management of SRM, but there is no difference between modalities of TA (CA vs RFA) or between approaches to PN.

Multimodality imaging of the postpartum or posttermination uterus: evaluation using ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Postpartum and posttermination complications are common causes of morbidity and mortality in women of reproductive age. These complications can be broadly categorized into vascular, infectious, surgical, and neoplastic etiologies, or are due to ectopic implantation of placental or endometrial tissue. Causes of postpartum vascular complications include retained products of conception, arteriovenous malformation, and pseudoaneurysm. Infectious entities include endometritis, abscess, wound cellulitis, and pelvic septic thrombophlebitis. Postsurgical complications include uterine scar dehiscence, bladder flap hematoma, and subfascial hematoma. Neoplastic complications include the spectrum of gestational trophoblastic neoplasms. Ectopic tissue implantation complications include abnormal placentation and uterine scar endometriosis. Imaging is essential for diagnosis, and radiologists must be familiar with and aware of these entities so that accurate treatment and management can be obtained. In this review, we illustrate the imaging findings of common postpartum and posttermination complications on ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Routine intraoperative hepatic sonography does not affect staging or postsurgical hepatic recurrence in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of intraoperative sonography of the liver in the staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and its impact on the rate of postoperative tumor recurrence in the liver. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the rate in which intraoperative sonography of the liver changed surgical management in 470 surgical candidates with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In postsurgical patients, we performed a χ(2) analysis to examine whether the patients who underwent hepatic intraoperative sonography had a lower rate of recurrent disease in the liver within the first 6 months of surgery compared to patients who did not undergo the procedure. RESULTS: Hepatic intraoperative sonography affected management in less than 1% of cases, detecting 1 unsuspected liver metastasis in 470 surgical patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Of 3 patients with equivocal liver lesions identified on preoperative computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, hepatic intraoperative sonography excluded metastasis and cleared all the patients for surgical resection. There was no significant difference in postoperative liver recurrence between the group of patients who received intraoperative sonography before resection and patients who did not have the procedure done (P > .99). CONCLUSIONS: Routine intraoperative sonography of the liver does not affect staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. It may be useful for evaluating equivocal lesions.

Localization of neurovascular bundles on pelvic CT and evaluation of radiation dose to structures putatively involved in erectile dysfunction after prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To (a) locate neurovascular bundles (NVB) on pelvic CT and (b) retrospectively evaluate relationships between radiation dose to structures putatively involved in prostate brachytherapy-induced erectile dysfunction (ED) and incidence of postbrachytherapy ED. METHODS AND MATERIALS: (a) Right/left NVB were identified on nine prostate MRIs. Structures visible on MRI and CT were cross-referenced. Cross-sectional area of each NVB was measured. (b) All patients treated with implant alone and whose treatment was planned on Variseed (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA), with follow-up of >12 months were included; n = 41. Median follow-up was 20 months. All patients were potent (+/- sildenafil) before implant (erection sufficient for intercourse). The right/left NVB (using results from part "a"), penile bulb, and right/left crus were outlined on postimplant CT. Volumes and doses to these structures were calculated. RESULTS: (a) On prostate MRI, NVB was consistently located where the prostate border bends away from the levator ani, at the gland's smallest radius of curvature. Average area of the circle best encompassing the NVB = 0.27 cm(2); diameter was 0.58 cm. (b) 11 of 41 (27%) patients had ED; 30 of 41 were potent (15 with sildenafil). There was no significant difference between potent/impotent patients in isotope, age, diabetes, hypertension, follow-up, or volume of prostate, bulb, right/left NVB, or right/left crus. There was a relationship between smoking and ED (p = 0.05). There was a relationship between bulb %D90 and ED: >10% 67% (4 of 6) vs. <10% 20% (7 of 35) (p = 0.03), which remained when controlling for smoking. There was no relationship between dose to left NVB and potency. There was paradoxical decreased risk of ED with right NVB %V100 >60% (p = 0.019), and right NVB %D60 >100% (p = 0.003). There was no relationship between dose to right/left crus and ED. CONCLUSIONS: A reliable method for localizing NVB on CT is demonstrated. There is no increased risk of prostate brachytherapy-induced ED with increasing dose to crus or NVB at the doses given in this study. There is a possible dose-response relationship between dose to the bulb and risk of ED.

Castleman's disease.

We present a case of retroperitoneal Castleman's disease of the hyaline vascular type, with unusual MR imaging findings, differing form reports to date, along with a review of the imaging findings in Castleman's disease.

Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.

PURPOSE: To (a) determine the performance of screening mammography, ultrasonography (US), and physical examination (PE); (b) analyze the influence of age, hormonal status, and breast density; (c) compare the size and stage of tumors detected with each modality; and (d) determine which modality or combination of modalities optimize cancer detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 11,130 asymptomatic women underwent 27,825 screening sessions, (mammography and subsequent PE). Women with dense breasts subsequently underwent screening US. Abnormalities were deemed positive if biopsy findings revealed malignancy and negative if findings from biopsy or all screening examinations were negative. RESULTS: In 221 women, 246 cancers were found. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, and accuracy of mammography were 77.6%, 98.8%, 99.8%, 35.8%, and 98.6%, respectively; those of PE, 27.6%, 99.4%, 99.4%, 28.9%, and 98.8%, respectively; and those of US, 75.3%, 96.8%, 99.7%, 20.5%, and 96.6%, respectively. Screening breast US increased the number of women diagnosed with nonpalpable invasive cancers by 42% (30 of 71). Mammographic sensitivity declined significantly with increasing breast density (P <.01) (48% for the densest breasts) and in younger women with dense breasts (P =.02); the effects were independent. Mammography and US together had significantly higher sensitivity (97%) than did mammography and PE together (74%) (P <.001). Tumors detected at mammography and/or US were significantly smaller (P =.01) and of lower stage (P =.01) than those detected at PE. CONCLUSION: Mammographic sensitivity for breast cancer declines significantly with increasing breast density and is independently higher in older women with dense breasts. Addition of screening US significantly increases detection of small cancers and depicts significantly more cancers and at smaller size and lower stage than does PE, which detects independently extremely few cancers. Hormonal status has no significant effect on effectiveness of screening independent of breast density.