[Anhedonia in mood disorders and somatic diseases: results of exploratory Mendelian randomization analysis]. / Angedoniya pri rasstroistvakh nastroeniya i somaticheskikh zabolevaniyakh: rezul'taty razvedochnogo Mendelevskogo randomizatsionnogo analiza.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct an exploratory Mendelian randomization analysis of the causal relationships of anhedonia with a wide range of psychiatric and somatic phenotypes based on the genetic data of participants in a population study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 4520 participants, of which 50.4% (n=2280) were female. The mean age was 36.8 (S.D.=9.8) years. Participants were pheno-nailed based on the DSM-5 criteria for anhedonia in the framework of depression. An episode of anhedonia exceeding 2 weeks during life was reported by 57.6% (n=2604) of participants. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) of the anhedonia phenotype was performed, as well as a Mendelian randomization analysis using summary statistics of large-scale GWASs on psychiatric and somatic phenotypes. RESULTS: The GWAS on anhedonia did not reveal the variants with genome-wide significant association (p<10-8). The most significant (p=9.71×10-7) was the variant rs296009 (chr5:168513184) in an intron of the slit guidance ligand 3 (SLIT3) gene. Using Mendelian randomization, nominally significant (p<0.05) causal associations of anhedonia with 24 phenotypes were identified, which can be divided into 5 main groups: psychiatric/neurological diseases, inflammatory diseases of the digestive system, respiratory diseases, oncological diseases and metabolic disorders. The most significant causal effects of anhedonia were found for breast cancer (p=0.0004, OR=0.9986, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.9978-0.999)), minimal depression phenotype (p=0.009, OR=1.004, 95% CI (1.001-1.007)), as well as for apolipoprotein A (p=0.01, OR=0.973, 95% CI (0.952-0.993)) and respiratory diseases (p=0.01, OR=0.9988, 95% CI (0.9980-0.9997)). CONCLUSION: The polygenic nature of anhedonia may cause the risks of comorbidity of this phenotype with a wide range of somatic diseases, as well as may be associated with mood disorders.

[Association of depression and anxiety with somatic diseases: negative lifestyle factors impact]. / Svyaz' depressii i trevogi s somaticheskimi zabolevaniyami: rol' negativnykh vneshnikh faktorov.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the associations of various depression and anxiety phenotypes with manifestations of different somatic disorders and negative lifestyle factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study involved 5116 people. In the online questionnaire, participants provided information about age, sex, height and weight, as well as a history of smoking, alcohol use, physical activity and diagnoses/symptoms of various physical diseases. Self-questions based on the DSM-5 criteria and the online version of the HADS were used to screen for phenotypes of affective and anxiety disorders in a population sample. RESULTS: An association of both subclinical and clinical depressive symptoms on HADS-D was noted for respondents with weight gain (OR 1.43; CI: 1.29-1.58, p<0.05 and OR 1,CI: 1.05-1.52, p<0.05, respectively), increased BMI (OR 1.36; CI: 1.24-1.48, p<0.05 OR 1.27; CI: 1.09-1.47, p<0.05 respectively), and decreased physical activity (OR 1.67; CI: 1.35-2.07, p<0.05 and OR 2.35; CI: 1.59-3.57, p<0.05, respectively) at the time of testing. The phenotypes of depression, anxiety disorders, and bipolar disorder by DSM criteria were associated with a history of smoking. (OR 1.37; CI: 1.18-1.62, p<0.001; OR 1.36; CI: 1.24-1.48, p<0.05 and OR 1.59; CI: 1.26-2.01, p<0.001, respectively). For higher BMI the association was reported only for the bipolar depression phenotype (OR 1.16; CI: 1.04-1.29, p<0.05), and with a decrease in physical activity - for the phenotypes of major depression and anxiety disorders (OR 1.27; CI: 1.07-1.52, p<0.05 and OR 1.61; CI: 1.31-1.99, p<0.001, respectively). A significant association with various somatic disorders was noted for all phenotype variants, but to the greatest extent for those based on DSM criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirmed the association of negative external factors and various somatic disorders with depression. These associations were noted for various phenotypes of anxiety and depression, both in severity and structure, and may be due to complex mechanisms that have shared biological and environmental mechanisms.

[Validation of a DSM-5-based screening test using digital phenotyping in the Russian population]. / Validatsiya skriningovogo testa, osnovannogo na kriteriyakh DSM-5, metodom tsifrovogo fenotipirovaniya na rossiiskoi populyatsii.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of a depression and anxiety screening test based on DSM-5 diagnostic criteria to identify cases of these conditions simultaneously assessed with the validated Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in a population sample by digital phenotyping. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-validation study included 5.116 respondents (mean age 36.9 (9.8)), of which 49.4% (2526) were women. The depression and anxiety screening test was done in electronic form and based on the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. The validated HADS scale was used as a standard test. The categories of depression (HADS-D) and anxiety (HADS-A) phenotypes were formed with a cutoff of ≥8 points and ≥11 points. The main parameters of the validity of the screening test were calculated, including accuracy (Ac), sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp) with their 95% confidence intervals [CI]. RESULTS: The prevalence of current depression and anxiety according to the screening test was 7.8% (400) and 12.5% (639), respectively. The prevalence of lifetime depression was 25.9% (1327). For the HADS-D depression subscale with cut-offs of ≥11 and ≥8 points, the prevalence of depression was 3.4% (174) and 15% (766), respectively. For the HADS-A anxiety subscale with cut-offs of ≥11 and ≥8 points, the prevalence of anxiety was 8.9% (456) and 31.8% (1628), respectively. For HADS-D and HADS-A with a cutoff of ≥11 points, the parameters of current depression were Ac=92%, Sn=47% (CI 95% [39-54]), Sp=94% (CI 95% [93-94]), lifetime depression - Ac=75%, Sn=63% (CI 95% [56-70]), Sp=75% (CI 95% [74-77]) and current anxiety - Ac=88%, Sn=54% (CI 95% [50-59]) and Sp=92% (CI 95% [90-92]). For HADS-D and HADS-A with a cutoff of ≥8 points, the parameters of current depression were Ac=86%, Sn=30% (CI 95% [27-33]), Sp=96% (CI 95% [95-97]), lifetime depression - Ac=74%, Sn=51% (CI 95% [48-55]), Sp=75% 79% (CI 95% [77-80]) and current anxiety - Ac=75%, Sn=31% (CI 95% [29-33]), Sp=96% (95% CI [95-97]). CONCLUSION: The high Ac and Sp of this test allows it to be used for screening purposes to identify (but not exclude) cases of depression and anxiety in the population. However, further studies are needed to validate the screening test using a diagnostic interview with a physician.

[Allogeneic umbilical cord blood cell therapy for children with autism: safety and efficacy of the method]. / Primenenie kontsentrata yadrosoderzhashchikh kletok pupovinnoi krovi u detei s autizmom: bezopasnost' i effektivnost' metoda.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effectiveness and safety of umbilical cord blood cells (UCBC) in children with ASD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study comprised 13 boys and 2 girls, mean age 7.0±0.5 years (test group), and 9 boys and 1 girl, mean age 6.0±1.3 years (control group) diagnosed with autism or autistic syndrome. UCBC were infused intravenously in a single dose of 250±20 million cells, four times at 14±3-day intervals. Dynamics of cognitive functions were assessed with WISC subscales, questionnaire Skvortsov Developmental Profile Survey and brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) conducted before therapy and six months after the first injection. The dynamic of autistic symptoms was explored with CASD and ATEC questionnaires, fulfilled at the start of the study, 3 and 6 months later (test group) or at the start of the study, and 6 months later (control group). RESULTS: UCBC was well tolerated and caused no appreciable adverse effects. Observation revealed improvement in cognitive functioning and alleviation of autistic symptoms in patients of the test group six months after the first UCBC injection. Positive dynamics were more noticeable in the test group than in the control group receiving standard therapy. CONCLUSION: The use of UCBC is safe and might be effective in the complex therapy of autism.

The prognostic role of depression as a predictor of chronic somatic diseases manifestation.

The negative impact of depression on the course and outcome of somatic disorders is well-known and has a solid theoretical basis. The analyses of prospective studies confirm the role of depression as an independent and significant risk factor for widespread chronic somatic disorders including such severe and life-threatening conditions as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and oncological pathology. The majority of somatic disorders and depression are the part of the big class of hereditary diseases with multifactorial character and polygenic nature. It is likely, that the genetic risk diversity of these diseases in population is close. There is also a high probability of genetic risks levels overlap (or of common «cluster¼) of two or more diseases in one individual, with one disorder being major depression. In that case such diseases could be considered «genetically comorbid¼ and manifestation of one disease could alter the risks of other. Precise and informative diagnostic tools could detect subsyndromal depression that could be the prognostic sign of the high risk and rapid manifestation of somatic diseases. Thus, patients with depressive disorder could be considered as a group with high risks of diverse range of somatic pathology. The coalescence of fundamental biomedical scientists and internists (psychiatrists and other physicians) could lead to the elaboration of specific complex preventative measures including social ones.

[Naltrexone and fluoxetine for maintenance of remission in patients with heroin addiction: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial].

Two hundreds and eighty patients with heroin addiction were randomized into 4 equal groups. Patients of the group 1 received naltrexone (N) in dosage 50 mg/day and fluoxetine (F) in dosage 20 mg/day during 6 months. Group 2 received N/F-placebo (FN), group 3--N-placebo (NP)/F and group 4--NP/FP. All patients underwent a session of individual psychotherapy for the maintenance of remission. Express urine drugs tests were used for remission control. Compliance was controlled by a riboflavin marker. Clinical state, psychiatric status and social functioning were assessed using quantified international scales and tests. To the end of the 6 month course, 43% of patients of group 1, 36% of group 2, 21% of group 3 and 10% of group 4 were in remission. Therefore, N/F was more effective than F/NP (p < 0.01) and FP/NP (p < 0.001); N/FP was more effective than F/NP (p < 0.05) and NP/FP (p < 0.001); F/NP did not differ significantly from NP/FP (p = 0.1); N/F did not differ from N/FP (p = 0.2). However N/F was more effective compared to N/FP only in women, probably, due to the higher baseline levels of depression, anxiety and anhedonia. Naltrexone was superior to placebo and fluoxetine in the efficacy of maintenance of remission and preventing relapse in patients with heroin addiction. The combination of naltrexone and fluoxetine was more effective compared to the monotherapy with naltrexone in women only.