Challenges in Diagnosing and Managing the Spectrum of Primary Aldosteronism.

Primary aldosteronism, characterized by the dysregulated production of aldosterone from 1 or both adrenal glands, is the most common endocrine cause of hypertension. It confers a high risk of cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic complications that can be ameliorated with targeted medical therapy or surgery. Diagnosis can be achieved with a positive screening test (elevated aldosterone to renin ratio) followed by confirmatory testing (saline, captopril, fludrocortisone, or oral salt challenges) and subtyping (adrenal imaging and adrenal vein sampling). However, the diagnostic pathway may be complicated by interfering medications, intraindividual variations, and concurrent autonomous cortisol secretion. Furthermore, once diagnosed, careful follow-up is needed to ensure that treatment targets are reached and adverse effects, or even recurrence, are promptly addressed. These challenges will be illustrated in a series of case studies drawn from our endocrine hypertension clinic. We will offer guidance on strategies to facilitate an accurate and timely diagnosis of primary aldosteronism together with a discussion of treatment targets which should be achieved for optimal patient outcomes.

The where, who and how of adrenal vein sampling in Australia and New Zealand.

INTRODUCTION: Primary aldosteronism (PA) causes 10-15% of cases of hypertension, and it is increasingly recognised as being under-diagnosed. An interventional radiology procedure, adrenal vein sampling (AVS), is a necessary and important diagnostic procedure for complete workup of PA. There is an anticipated increase in demand for AVS as detection of PA improves. This study aims to describe the current landscape of AVS in Australia and New Zealand (NZ). METHODS: Two surveys exploring AVS methodology and performance were conducted of (i) Endocrinology Unit Heads and (ii) interventional radiologists who perform AVS, at public hospitals with Endocrinology Units across Australia and NZ. RESULTS: Responses were received from 48/53 Endocrinology Unit Heads (91%) and 35 radiologists from 26 sites (87% of AVS sites). AVS was provided at 28/48 Endocrinology sites (58%) across Australia and NZ. In Australia, sites were concentrated in Victoria, New South Wales and Queensland with none in the Northern Territory; in NZ, sites were more evenly distributed across the North and South Islands. AVS was performed by 1-2 dedicated radiologists at 24 sites, 2-3 radiologists at two sites and a rotating roster of radiologists at two sites. Responses to both surveys revealed significant variation in AVS methodology and interpretation of AVS results. CONCLUSION: There is significant heterogeneity in the availability of AVS, the procedural details and the interpretation of results across Australia and NZ, which potentially impacts the quality of patient care and ability to scale up AVS capacity to meet increasing demand.

A low serum alkaline phosphatase may signal hypophosphatasia in osteoporosis clinic patients.

Low serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was found in 9% of patients attending an osteoporosis clinic, 0.6% of hospital patients, and 2/22 with an atypical femoral fracture. Hypophosphatasia was diagnosed in 3% of osteoporosis clinic patients with low ALP. Low ALP is a screening tool for hypophosphatasia, a condition potentially aggravated by antiresorptive therapy. INTRODUCTION: Hypophosphatasia (HPP) is an inherited disorder associated with impaired primary mineralisation of osteoid (osteomalacia). HPP may be misdiagnosed as osteoporosis, a reduction in the volume of normally mineralized bone. Both illnesses may result in fragility fractures, although stress and atypical fractures are more common in HPP. Antiresorptive therapy, first-line treatment for osteoporosis, is relatively contraindicated in HPP. Misdiagnosis and mistreatment can be avoided by recognising a low serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP). Our aim was to determine the prevalence of a low ALP (< 30 IU/L) in patients attending an osteoporosis clinic, in a hospital-wide setting, and in a group of patients with atypical femoral fractures (AFF). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients attending an osteoporosis clinic at a tertiary hospital during 8 years (2012-2020). Patients were categorised into those with a transiently low ALP, those with low ALP on ≥ 2 occasions but not the majority of measurements, and those with a persistently low ALP. ALP levels were also assessed in hospital-wide records and a group of patients with AFF. RESULTS: Of 1839 patients attending an osteoporosis clinic, 168 (9%) had ≥ 1 low ALP, 50 (2.7%) had low ALP for ≥ 2 months, and seven (0.4%) had persistently low ALP levels. HPP was diagnosed in five patients, four of whom had persistently low ALP levels. The prevalence of HPP was 0.3% in the osteoporosis clinic and 3% in patients with ≥ 1 low ALP. Low ALP occurred in 0.6% of all hospital patients and 2/22 with AFF. CONCLUSION: Persistently low ALP in osteoporosis clinic attendees is easy to identify and signals the possibility of hypophosphatasia, a condition that may be mistaken for osteoporosis and incorrectly treated with antiresorptive therapy.

Development and validation of model for sparing adrenal venous sampling in diagnosing unilateral primary aldosteronism.

CONTEXT: Current guidelines recommend adrenal venous sampling (AVS) to identify unilateral primary aldosteronism (UPA) before offering adrenalectomy. However, AVS is costly and technically challenging, limiting its use to expert centres. OBJECTIVE: To establish a model to predict UPA, and therefore, bypass the need for AVS prior to surgery. DESIGN AND SETTING: The model was developed in a Chinese cohort and validated in an Australian cohort. Previously published prediction models of UPA were also tested. PARTICIPANTS: primary aldosteronism patients with a definite subtyping diagnosis based on AVS and/or surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Diagnostic value of the model. RESULTS: In the development cohort (268 UPA and 88 bilateral primary aldosteronism), combinations of different levels of low serum potassium (≤3.0 or 3.5 mmol/l), high PAC (≥15-30 ng/dl), low PRC (≤2.5-10 µIU/ml) and presence of unilateral nodule on adrenal CT (>8-15 mm in diameter) showed specificity of 1.00 and sensitivity of 0.16-0.52. The model of serum potassium 3.5 mmol/l or less, PAC at least 20 ng/dl, PRC 5 µIU/ml or less plus a unilateral nodule at least 10 mm had the highest sensitivity of 0.52 (0.45-0.58) and specificity of 1.00 (0.96-1.00). In the validation cohort (84 UPA and 117 bilateral primary aldosteronism), the sensitivity and specificity of the model were 0.13 (0.07-0.22) and 1.00 (0.97-1.00), respectively. Ten previous models were tested, and only one had a specificity of 1.00 in our cohorts but with a very low sensitivity [0.07 (0.04-0.10) and 0.01 (0.00-0.06) in our development and validation cohorts, respectively]. CONCLUSION: A combination of high PAC, low PRC, low serum potassium and unilateral adrenal nodule could accurately determine primary aldosteronism subtype in 13-52% of patients with UPA and obviate the need for AVS before surgery.

Thrombus risk versus bleeding risk: a clinical conundrum.

A 62-year-old man presented to the Emergency Department with dyspnoea and central pleuritic chest pain radiating posteriorly to between the scapulae. His medical history included hypertension, osteoporosis and chronic kidney disease secondary to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis with relapsing nephrotic syndrome. Significant examination findings included a loud palpable P2 and a displaced apex beat. An ECG revealed sinus tachycardia with a right-bundle branch block and p-pulmonale. A CT pulmonary angiogram and aortogram demonstrated extensive bilateral pulmonary emboli and a descending thoracic aortic dissection. Subsequent ultrasound of the lower limbs confirmed an extensive, non-occlusive deep vein thrombosis in the right calf. Management of this patient involved therapeutic anticoagulation and tight blood pressure control, with plans for surgical repair delayed due to worsening renal impairment and subsequent supratherapeutic anticoagulation. Co-existence of an aortic dissection and PE has been rarely described and optimal management remains unclear.

Menstrual cycle characteristics in women with persistent schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: Oestradiol has been implicated in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Women with schizophrenia often suffer with menstrual dysfunction, usually associated with low oestradiol levels, but whether menstrual dysfunction has an effect on their psychiatric symptoms is not well researched. The aim of this study is to document the menstrual characteristics of women with chronic schizophrenia with focus upon menstrual regularity, menstrual cycle length and menstrual symptoms. To determine which patient characteristics are associated with irregular menses and whether irregular menses are associated with the severity of psychotic symptoms, menstrual symptoms or depressive symptoms. METHOD: Cross-sectional analyses using baseline data of women enrolled in a clinical trial. Inclusion criteria include Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition, Text Revision diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective or schizophreniform disorder; aged between 18 and 51 years; residual symptoms of psychosis despite treatment with a stable dose of antipsychotic medication for at least 4 weeks. Menstrual cycle characteristics including regularity, cycle length and menstrual associated symptoms were documented. Symptoms of schizophrenia were measured using Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, cognition was measured using Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status and depression was assessed using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. Blood samples were collected at baseline for hormone assays. RESULTS: Of the 139 women, 77 (55.4%) had regular menses, 57 (41%) had irregular menses and 5 (3.6%) women had missing data on their menstrual cycle. Use of atypical antipsychotics associated with hyperprolactinaemia was positively associated with irregular menses (odds ratio = 4.4, 95% confidence interval = [1.8, 10.9], p = 0.001), while age more than 30 years was negatively associated (odds ratio = 0.3, 95% confidence interval = [0.1, 0.6], p = 0.004). Women with irregular cycles had significantly lower oestradiol levels than women with regular cycles (213.2 ± 25.0 vs 299.0 ± 27.3, p = 0.03), but there was no difference in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale or Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status between those with regular and irregular cycles. The most common menstrual associated symptoms were decrease in mood with the menstrual cycle (64.8%), bloating (64.8%), cramps (59.7%), back pain (37.6%) and worsening of psychosis symptoms (32.4%). CONCLUSION: Regular menses are associated with higher oestradiol levels and higher rates of cyclical mood symptoms but are not associated with Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores. Understanding the effect the menstrual cycle can have on psychiatric illness, such as premenstrual exacerbations, is important for the holistic care of women with schizophrenia.