Neurological Surgery Residency Programs in the United States: A National Cross-Sectional Survey.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has approved 117 neurological surgery residency programs which develop and educate neurosurgical trainees. We present the current landscape of neurosurgical training in the United States by examining multiple aspects of neurological surgery residencies in the 2022-2023 academic year and investigate the impact of program structure on resident academic productivity. METHODS: Demographic data were collected from publicly available websites and reports from the National Resident Match Program. A 34-question survey was circulated by e-mail to program directors to assess multiple features of neurological surgery residency programs, including curricular structure, fellowship availability, recent program changes, graduation requirements, and resources supporting career development. Mean resident productivity by program was collected from the literature. RESULTS: Across all 117 programs, there was a median of 2.0 (range 1.0-4.0) resident positions per year and 1.0 (range 0.0-2.0) research/elective years. Programs offered a median of 1.0 (range 0.0-7.0) Committee on Advanced Subspecialty Training-accredited fellowships, with endovascular fellowships being most frequently offered (53.8%). The survey response rate was 75/117 (64.1%). Of survey respondents, the median number of clinical sites was 3.0 (range 1.0-6.0). Almost half of programs surveyed (46.7%) reported funding mechanisms for residents, including R25, T32, and other in-house grants. Residents received a median academic stipend of $1000 (range $0-$10 000) per year. Nearly all programs (93.3%) supported wellness activities for residents, which most frequently occurred quarterly (46.7%). Annual academic stipend size was the only significant predictor of resident academic productivity (R 2 = 0.17, P = .002). CONCLUSION: Neurological surgery residency programs successfully train the next generation of neurosurgeons focusing on education, clinical training, case numbers, and milestones. These programs offer trainees the chance to tailor their career trajectories within residency, creating a rewarding and personalized experience that aligns with their career aspirations.

Cavernous venous malformations in and around the central nervous system. Part 1: Dural and extradural.

Cavernous-type malformations are venous lesions that occur in multiple locations throughout the body, and when present in the CNS, they have canonically been referred to as cavernomas, cavernous angiomas, and cerebral cavernous malformations. Herein all these lesions are referred to as "cavernous venous malformations" (CavVMs), which is congruent with the current International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies classification system. Even though histologically similar, depending on their location relative to the dura mater, these malformations can have different features. In Part 1 of this review, the authors discuss and review pertinent clinical knowledge with regard to CavVMs as influenced by anatomical location, starting with the dural and extradural malformations. They particularly emphasize dural CavVMs (including those in the cavernous sinus), orbital CavVMs, and spinal CavVMs. The genetic and histopathological features of CavVMs in these locations are reviewed, and commonalities in their presumed mechanisms of pathogenesis support the authors' conceptualization of a spectrum of a single disease entity. Illustrative cases for each subtype are presented, and the pathophysiological and genetic features linking dural and extradural to intradural CavVMs are examined. A new classification is proposed to segregate CavVMs based on the location from which they arise, which guides their natural history and treatment.

Price Transparency for Cervical Spinal Fusion Among High-Performing Spine Centers in the United States.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: As of January 1, 2021, all US hospitals are required by the Hospital Price Transparency Final Rule (HPTFR) to publish standard charges for all items and services, yet the state of price transparency for cervical spinal fusion is unknown. Here, we assess the nationwide price transparency landscape for cervical spinal fusion among high-performing spine centers in the United States. METHODS: In this cross-sectional economic evaluation, we queried publicly available price transparency websites of 332 "high-performing" spine centers, as defined by the US News and World Report. We extracted variables including gross charges for cervical spinal fusion, payor options, price reporting methodology, and prices relevant to consumers including listed cash prices and minimum and maximum negotiated charges. RESULTS: While nearly all 332 high-performing spine surgery centers (99.4%) had an online cost estimation tool, the HPTFR compliance rate was only 8.4%. Gross charges for cervical spinal fusion were accessible for 68.1% of hospitals, discounted cash prices for 46.4% of hospitals, and minimum and maximum charges for 10.8% of hospitals. There were large IQRs for gross charges ($48 491.98-$99 293.37), discounted cash prices ($26 952.25-$66 806.63), minimum charges ($10 766.11-$21 248.36), and maximum charges ($39 280.49-$89 035.35). There was geographic variability in the gross charges of cervical spinal fusion among high-performing spine centers within and between states. There was a significant association between "excellent" discharge to home status and lower mean gross charges. CONCLUSION: Although online cost reporting has drastically increased since implementation of the HPTFR, data reported for cervical spinal fusion remain inadequate and difficult to interpret by both providers and patients.

Surgical advances in the management of brain metastases.

As the epidemiological and clinical burden of brain metastases continues to grow, advances in neurosurgical care are imperative. From standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences to functional neuroimaging, preoperative workups for metastatic disease allow high-resolution detection of lesions and at-risk structures, facilitating safe and effective surgical planning. Minimally invasive neurosurgical approaches, including keyhole craniotomies and tubular retractors, optimize the preservation of normal parenchyma without compromising extent of resection. Supramarginal surgery has pushed the boundaries of achieving complete removal of metastases without recurrence, especially in eloquent regions when paired with intraoperative neuromonitoring. Brachytherapy has highlighted the potential of locally delivering therapeutic agents to the resection cavity with high rates of local control. Neuronavigation has become a cornerstone of operative workflow, while intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) and intraoperative brain mapping generate real-time renderings of the brain unaffected by brain shift. Endoscopes, exoscopes, and fluorescent-guided surgery enable increasingly high-definition visualizations of metastatic lesions that were previously difficult to achieve. Pushed forward by these multidisciplinary innovations, neurosurgery has never been a safer, more effective treatment for patients with brain metastases.