Case-Control Study of Tumor Stage-Dependent Outcomes for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Immunosuppressed and Immunocompetent Patients.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressed patients have worse outcomes from cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCCs), although unclear whether it is due to the development of more high-stage tumors or worse outcomes for a given stage. OBJECTIVE: Analyze the impact of immunosuppression on the development of cSCCs and tumor stage-dependent outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-institution 1:2 case-control study of primary invasive cSCCs from 2005 to 2015 in 106 mixed-cause immunosuppressed patients and 212 control subjects matched to age, gender, and race. RESULTS: Four hundred twelve cSCCs from 106 immunosuppressed patients and 291 tumors from 212 matched immunocompetent patients were included. Both cohorts had similar T-stage distribution, with <5% high-stage tumors, that is, AJCC-7 T2, AJCC-8 T3, and BWH T2b/T3. Immunosuppression significantly increased the likelihood of poor outcomes (POs) (aggregate of local recurrence (LR), nodal and distant metastasis, and squamous cell carcinoma-related deaths) for low-stage tumors, that is, AJCC-7 T1 (odds ratio [OR], 4.29), AJCC-8 T1 (OR, 3.45), AJCC-8 T2 (OR, 3.75), BWH T1 (OR, 3.53), and BWH T2a (OR, 3.41) tumors. There was no significant difference in the treatment: most tumors were treated with Mohs (71% vs 75%) or excision (21% vs 20%) in both cohorts. CONCLUSION: Immunosuppressed patients have an increased risk of POs, specifically LRs, from low-stage cSCCs. Definitive treatment of cSCCs is recommended.

A quantitative systematic review of the efficacy of imiquimod monotherapy for lentigo maligna and an analysis of factors that affect tumor clearance.

BACKGROUND: The reported efficacy of imiquimod for lentigo maligna varies widely, without consensus on tumor or treatment factors that can impact tumor clearance. OBJECTIVE: We sought to provide a more precise estimate of clearance rates in patients with lentigo maligna who are treated with imiquimod and to analyze factors that can impact tumor clearance. METHODS: We performed a literature search for biopsy-proven lentigo maligna treated with imiquimod monotherapy, linked treatment and outcome data to individual tumors, calculated histologic and clinical clearance rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and analyzed the impact of tumor and treatment factors on tumor clearance using logistic regression. RESULTS: Based on 347 tumors from 45 studies, histologic and clinical clearance rates were 76.2% (95% CI, 71.4-81.0%) and 78.3% (95% CI, 73.6-82.9%), respectively. The incidence of clinical recurrence was 2.3% (95% CI, 0.5-4.2%), with a mean follow-up of 34.2 ± 11.8 months. Treatment with >60 total applications, or with >5 applications per week was associated with a higher likelihood of histologic clearance (odds ratio, 8.4 [95% CI, 2.9-24.1] and odds ratio, 6.0 [95% CI, 2.4-14.7], respectively). LIMITATIONS: Our limitations included the accuracy and scope of published data, variable follow-up times, potential patient selection, and publication bias related to case series/cohort designs of previous studies. CONCLUSION: Imiquimod offers a 76% histologic and 78% clinical clearance rate for lentigo maligna. Both cumulative dose and treatment intensity affect tumor clearance.